Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mark Nicolich

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Nicolich.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Relationship between silicosis and lung function.

In an examination of the relationship between silicosis and lung function, relevant studies of silica-exposed workers were reviewed. Smoking, dust exposure, and emphysema are three important factors that can confound the association between silicosis and lung function. Despite the importance of smoking in relation to lung function, some studies did not control for smoking, or smoking was controlled inadequately. The data suggest a weak association between lung function (mainly obstruction) and dust exposure, although some studies had crude measures of exposure. In general, the lung function of those with radiographic silicosis in category 1 was indistinguishable from those in category 0. Those in category 2 had small reductions in lung function relative to those with category 0 and little difference in the prevalence of emphysema. There were slightly greater decrements in lung function with category 3 and more significant reductions with progressive massive fibrosis. Emphysema was related to higher categories of silicosis, as well as to smoking. Silica exposure was often inadequately controlled in studies examining silicosis and lung function. A few studies suggested that emphysema is an independent risk factor associated with significant reductions in lung function.

Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic↗

Relationship between silicosis and smoking.

An evaluation of the relationship between silicosis and smoking is important in exploring the etiology of silicosis, and the relationship could have an impact on studies dealing with silicosis and lung cancer. Data addressing this relationship were found in studies designed explicitly to evaluate this association and studies that explored other questions. Studies based on compensation registers were excluded. Smoking data and methods varied across the studies considered. Of the 13 studies, 3 supported the hypothesis that smoking was positively associated with silicosis, 8 provided limited support (most included subpopulations showing positive associations), and 1 did not support the hypothesis. The only autopsy study suggested an inverse association. It is unclear whether the generally positive results indicate that smoking predisposes to silicosis or that nonspecific radiographic appearances from smoking were interpreted as silicosis in some studies. A positive association between radiographic silicosis and smoking would bias studies of silicosis and lung cancer, especially those lacking smoking data.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗