Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Mark Grosser

Publications and source records attributed to Mark Grosser.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting risk of ischemic stroke: A transformer model using genomic data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Genetic factors contribute to IS susceptibility, yet conventional polygenic risk score approaches are primarily based on additive effects and may not fully capture non-linear relationships or positional context and interactions among genetic variants. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a transformer-based genomic model incorporating position-wise genotype embedding for IS risk prediction. METHODS: We conducted a genome-wide association study using the UK Biobank dataset to identify IS-associated loci. Gene prioritisation was subsequently performed using tissue-specific expression quantitative trait locus-based Mendelian randomisation and colocalization analyses in whole blood and brain cortex. We then developed a transformer-based model that encoded genotype and SNP-position information using a position-wise embedding layer. Model performance was evaluated across three UK Biobank control definitions and externally assessed in the independent All of Us cohort. Performance metrics included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), precision, recall, and F1 score. RESULTS: Across the three UK Biobank control definitions, the proposed method achieved the numerically highest discrimination among the evaluated models, with AUROCs of 0.8109, 0.7843, and 0.7468 using MRF-negative, combined, and MRF-positive controls, respectively. In the external All of Us cohort, the proposed method achieved an AUROC of 0.7251 and retained the highest AUROC among the evaluated models. In a separate incident-stroke survival analysis, medium- and high-score groups had hazard ratios of 1.13 and 1.21, respectively, relative to the low-score group. A total of 18 IS-associated loci were identified. Among the tissue-specific MR results, EDEM2 in the brain cortex remained significant after Bonferroni correction, while DCHS2 showed a nominal association. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed transformer-based framework provides a genomic modelling approach that achieved the highest discrimination among the evaluated models in this study and retained comparative performance in an independent external cohort. In further applications, integrating this genomic framework with conventional clinical, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors may support more comprehensive and personalised IS risk assessment. Prospective, population-representative, and multi-ancestry validation will be important to establish its potential role in future prevention-oriented risk management.

Genomics and bioinformatics

Comprehensive evaluation of ACMG/AMP-based variant classification tools.

MOTIVATION: The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines represent the gold standard for clinical variant interpretation. Despite the widespread adoption of ACMG/AMP guidelines, a comprehensive comparison of the software tools designed to implement them has been lacking. This represents a significant gap, as clinicians require evidence-based guidance on which tools to use in their practice. RESULTS: We benchmarked four ACMG/AMP-based tools (Franklin, InterVar, TAPES, Genebe) selected from 22 tools, and compared their performance with LIRICAL, a top-performing phenotype-driven tool, using 151 expert-curated datasets from Mendelian disorders. Selection criteria included free availability, VCF compatibility, operational reliability, and not being disease-specific. Our evaluation framework assessed top-N accuracy (N = 1, 5, 10, 20, 50), retention rates, precision, recall, F1 scores, and area under the curve (AUC). Statistical validation employed bootstrap confidence intervals (n = 1000) and Friedman tests. LIRICAL (68.21%) and Franklin (61.59%) demonstrated superior top-10 variant prioritization accuracy in Mendelian disorders, significantly outperforming other tools (P = .0000). Results demonstrate that tools with advanced phenotypic integration significantly outperform those relying primarily on genomic features. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data and source code required to reproduce the findings of this study are openly available in the Code Ocean repository at https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.6562438.v1.

Software