Biomedical subjects

Mark D Nichols

Publications and source records attributed to Mark D Nichols.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Cervical preparation using laminaria with adjunctive buccal misoprostol before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether buccal misoprostol improves cervical preparation achieved with laminaria before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative cervical preparation with overnight laminaria and either buccal placebo or 400 microg buccal misoprostol approximately 90 minutes before second-trimester surgical abortion. Block randomization was used to provide balanced enrollment into 2 separate gestational age study groups: early (13-15(6/7)) and mid (16-20(6/7)) second trimester. Surgeons tested maximal cervical dilation by inserting the largest dilator that could be passed through the cervical os without force. Subject demographics and preprocedure symptoms were tracked. RESULTS: Groups were similar in regard to age, gravity, parity, delivery type, and gestational age. Data were analyzed from 125 women in the 13 to 15(6/7) (30 misoprostol, 32 placebo) and 16 to 20(6/7) (31 misoprostol, 32 placebo) gestational age groups. Overall, misoprostol treatment did not improve the initial mean dilation achieved with laminaria alone in either the 13 to 15(6/7) (46.0 fr +/- 5.0; placebo 45.0 fr +/- 6.2, P = .68) or 16 to 20(6/7) (50.9 fr +/- 5.6, placebo 48.9 fr +/- 5.2, P = .16) groups. However, a subanalysis of gestations 19 weeks or more demonstrated significantly greater dilation in the misoprostol group (53.6 fr fr +/- 5.3, placebo 48.5 fr +/- 5.0, P = .01). Subjects receiving misoprostol reported significantly more cramping than those receiving placebo (13-15(6/7) weeks misoprostol 25/30, 83%; placebo 17/32, 53%, P = .02; 16-20(6/7) week misoprostol 25/31, 81%, placebo 16/32, 50%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Cervical dilation with laminaria is augmented by 400 microg buccal misoprostol in gestations 19 weeks or more, but not in earlier gestations. Misoprostol causes more abdominal cramping.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗

PubMed2006

Four percent intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of a 4% intrauterine lidocaine infusion on perceived patient pain in first-trimester abortions. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 80 women receiving either a 5-mL 4% lidocaine (n = 40) or saline (n = 40) intrauterine infusion and a standard paracervical block before first-trimester abortion. Women completed a series of 100-mm visual analog scales (anchors: 0 = none, 100 mm = worst imaginable) to measure their perceived pain (anticipated pain, after speculum insertion, after intrauterine infusion, after cervical dilation, after suction aspiration, and 30 minutes postprocedure). Eight women volunteered for serum lidocaine levels after the lidocaine infusion. RESULTS: Groups were similar in respect to age, parity, prior abortion, ethnicity, gestational age, and level of dysmenorrhea. Pain scores demonstrated a significant difference between groups during cervical dilation (saline 55 mm +/- 26, lidocaine 35 mm +/- 30, P < .01) and during aspiration (saline 71 mm +/- 20, lidocaine 43 mm +/- 30, P < .01). The lidocaine group reported significantly more symptoms (ie, oral numbness and tingling) than the saline group (saline 0/39, lidocaine 16/38, 42%, P < .01). The highest serum lidocaine level recorded was 4.0 microg/mL (lidocaine group). There was no difference in overall satisfaction between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with paracervical block alone, the addition of a 4% intrauterine lidocaine infusion resulted in a significant reduction in patient perception of pain during first-trimester abortion. Although subjective symptoms of systemic lidocaine effect were common, no subjects demonstrated serum levels consistent with lidocaine toxicity. However, further studies to determine safety are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Abortion, Induced↗

PubMed2006

Continuous oral contraceptives: are bleeding patterns dependent on the hormones given?

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether progestin type or estrogen dose influences bleeding patterns, adverse effects, or satisfaction with combined oral contraceptives dosed continuously. METHODS: This was a randomized, double blind, 4-arm active treatment study. Subjects received either 100 microg levonorgestrel/20 microg ethinyl estradiol (E2) (20LNG group), 100 microg levonorgestrel/30 microg ethinyl E2 (30LNG group), 1,000 microg norethindrone acetate/20 microg ethinyl E2 (20NETA group), or 1,000 microg norethindrone acetate/30 microg ethinyl E2 (30NETA group) for 180 days. Subjects logged bleeding events and adverse effects on a daily menstrual calendar. An exit survey measured satisfaction with bleeding patterns. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine women were enrolled. Patients in the 20NETA and 30NETA arms had significantly more days of amenorrhea than the 30LNG arm in the second 90 days (P < .008). The 30LNG group reported more spotting days than the 20NETA group over the entire study period (P < .008) and the 30NETA group for the second 90 days (P < .008). Only a small number of bleeding days were reported with no differences between groups. No differences in adverse effects between groups were found. Women in the 30LNG arm reported lower levels of satisfaction with their bleeding patterns than the other groups (30LNG compared with 20NETA, P = .01; 30LNG compared with 30NETA, P = .001). CONCLUSION: The addition of 10 microg of ethinyl E2 to a 20 microg ethinyl E2 pill containing levonorgestrel or norethindrone acetate did not improve bleeding patterns. During continuous dosing, the use of oral contraceptives containing 1,000 microg norethindrone acetate resulted in more days of amenorrhea and fewer days of spotting than preparations containing 100 microg levonorgestrel. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Development and evaluation of the abortion attributes questionnaire.

This paper describes the development and evaluation of the Abortion Attributes Questionnaire (AAQ), an instrument designed to assess the perceived importance of specific characteristics of abortion methods. Women receiving medical abortions (n=186) and women who chose surgical procedures (n=118) completed the AAQ. Participants were asked to rate how important each of 21 characteristics would be "when choosing between surgical and medical abortion." Factor analyses revealed that the AAQ consists of four factors and, as subscales, the factors have good internal reliability. The validity of the AAQ was established through discriminant function and analysis and results indicated that three of the four factors predicted choice. Taken together, these findings provide empirical support for the constructs measured by the AAQ.

Abortifacient Agents↗

PubMed2004

Teaching contraception: an interactive presentation using managing contraception.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether an interactive medical student contraceptive teaching session results in improved knowledge gain or satisfaction when compared with a standard, didactic lecture. STUDY DESIGN: An interactive lecture was compared with a standard lecture among third-year medical students at Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine and Medical College of Georgia. Knowledge gain was assessed by comparing correct responses to a posttest with the students' own responses to the same questions given as a pretest before the lecture. Satisfaction with the lecture was assessed on a visual analog scale. Scores and satisfaction ratings were compared within and between lecture groups. RESULTS: A total of 150 students participated. There was a significant increase in test scores within both the interactive and standard groups ( P < .0001 for both groups). The change in scores did not differ significantly between the groups ( P = .087). Although overall satisfaction was significantly greater with the standard lecture ( P = .004), it was high with both lectures. CONCLUSION: Knowledge gain with the interactive lecture was equivalent to that with the standard lecture. Satisfaction with both learning formats was high.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of an intrauterine lidocaine infusion on perceived patient pain in first-trimester abortions and to measure serum lidocaine levels. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo control trial of 80 women receiving either a 10-mL 1% lidocaine (n = 40) or saline (n = 40) intrauterine infusion and a standard paracervical block before first-trimester abortion was undertaken. Women completed a series of 100-mm visual analogue scales to measure their perceived pain (anticipated pain, after speculum insertion, after intrauterine infusion, after cervical dilation, after suction aspiration, and 30 minutes after procedure). Twenty women (10 in each group) volunteered for serum lidocaine levels at 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the lidocaine infusion. RESULTS: Groups were similar in respect to age, parity, prior abortion, ethnicity, gestational age, level of dysmenorrhea, and complications. Pain scores by visual analogue scale demonstrated no significant difference between groups at any time point during the procedure; in particular, pain during aspiration (saline infusion 51 +/- 26 mm, lidocaine infusion 47 +/- 28 mm; P =.51). Peak serum levels occurred at approximately 10 minutes after lidocaine infusion. The highest level recorded (lidocaine group) was 2.5 microg/mL (toxicity more than 5 microg/mL). CONCLUSION: Compared with paracervical block alone, the addition of a 1% intrauterine lidocaine infusion resulted in no improvement in patient perception of pain during first-trimester abortion. No subjects demonstrated symptoms or serum levels of lidocaine toxicity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

Abortion, Induced↗

PubMed2003

Bleeding patterns and patient acceptability of standard or continuous dosing regimens of a low-dose oral contraceptive: a randomized trial.

The purpose of this study is to compare bleeding patterns and acceptability of a contraceptive regimen of combined 20 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel taken with and without a hormone-free interval. Thirty-two women desiring oral contraception were randomized to six 28-day cycles (standard group) or 168 days without a pill-free interval (continuous group). Participants kept a daily bleeding calendar documenting bleeding events (none, spotting or required sanitary protection) and side effects (headache, nausea, breast tenderness, depression, premenstrual syndrome and bloating). Primary outcome was number of bleeding days. Secondary outcomes included bleeding days requiring sanitary protection, amenorrhea, patient acceptability of bleeding patterns, method satisfaction and affective side effects. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Although total bleeding days were fewer in the continuous group (mean = 25.9 vs. 34.9 days), this result did not reach statistical significance. However, women in the continuous group reported significantly fewer bleeding days that required protection (18.4 vs. 33.8 days, p < 0.01), and were more likely to have amenorrhea. Although both groups reported a high level of satisfaction with bleeding patterns and side effect profiles, women in the continuous group reported significantly fewer days of bloating (0.7 vs. 11.1 days, p = 0.04), and menstrual pain (1.9 vs. 13.3 days, p < 0.01). Continuous use of 20 microg ethinyl estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel is associated with less bleeding requiring protection, and more amenorrhea than standard administration. Taken with or without a hormone-free interval, this oral contraceptive formulation is highly acceptable with regard to bleeding patterns and side effect profile. The continuous group had fewer light and moderate bleeding days, less bloating and menstrual pain. For patients who are seeking these results, this method may be more desirable.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Similarities in women's perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion.

This paper examines women's acceptability of and experiences with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) as compared with electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) for first trimester abortion. Women requesting pregnancy terminations were randomly assigned to either MVA (n = 64) or EVA (n = 63). Participants completed questionnaires before and after their abortions and approximately 2-4 weeks later. We observed some differences by group in participants' ratings of the importance of method characteristics and in their perceptions of their abortion methods after their abortions. The two groups did not, however, differ in their reports of pain, anxiety or bleeding or in the acceptability of their method.

Abortion, Induced↗

PubMed2003

Successful medical abortion of a pregnancy within a noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn.

In asymptomatic patients with an early gestation located in a noncommunicating rudimentary horn, methotrexate may provide another treatment option or act as a useful adjunct to surgical intervention. We present a case of a successful pregnancy termination of a gestation located in a noncommunicating rudimentary horn with subsequent elective laparoscopic resection.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗

PubMed2002

Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the effect on pain and patient satisfaction of waiting between paracervical block and dilation during first-trimester abortions. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred ninety-nine women seeking pregnancy termination were randomly assigned to a no-wait group (group 1) and a 3- to 5-minute wait between injection and dilation group (group 2). Subjects rated their pain on a visual analog scale at four times: prior to procedure, with dilation, with aspiration, and 30 to 45 minutes after procedure. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in pain or satisfaction ratings reported by group 1 (n = 93) and group 2 (n = 101). A significant decrease in pain with dilation (1.21 cm decrease, P =.009) and aspiration (1.15 cm decrease, P =.0015) was observed among patients who received fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Delay between paracervical injection and dilation during first-trimester abortion does not have an impact on patient pain or satisfaction. Fentanyl decreased pain scores by 20% to 25% during the procedure.

Abortion, Induced↗