Biomedical subjects

Mark A Hermsmeier

Publications and source records attributed to Mark A Hermsmeier.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Are target-family-privileged substructures truly privileged?

One of the early and effective approaches to G-coupled protein receptor target family library design was the analysis of a set of ligands for frequently occurring chemical moieties or substructures. Various methods ranging from frameworks analysis to pharmacophores have been employed to find these so-called target-family-privileged substructures. Although the use of these substructures is common practice in combinatorial library design and has produced leads, the methods used for finding them rarely verified their selectivity for the particular target family from which they were derived. The frequency of occurrence among ligands associated with a target receptor family is not a sufficient criterion for those substructures to receive the label of target-family-privileged substructure. This study explores the question of selectivity of ClassPharmer generated fragments for a series of target families: GPCRs, nuclear hormone receptors, serine proteases, protein kinases, and ligand-gated ion channels. In addition, a GPCR focused library and a random set of 10k compounds are examined in terms of their target-family-privileged-substructure composition. The results challenge the combinatorial chemistry concept of target-family-privileged substructures and suggest that many of these fragments may simply be drug-like or attractive for various receptors in accordance with the original definition of privileged substructures.

Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Measuring CAMD technique performance: a virtual screening case study in the design of validation experiments.

The dynamic nature and comparatively young age of computational chemistry is such that novel algorithms continue to be developed at a rapid pace. Such efforts are often wrought at the expense of extensive experimental validations of said techniques, preventing a deeper understanding of their potential utility and limitations. Here we address this issue for ligand-based virtual screening descriptors through design of validation experiments that better reflect the aims of real world application. Applying the newly defined chemotype enrichment approach, a variety of two- and three-dimensional (2D/3D) similarity descriptors have been compared extensively across data sets from four diverse target types. The inhibitors within said data sets contain molecules exhibiting a wide array of substructure functionality, size and flexibility, permitting descriptor comparison in myriad settings. Relative descriptor performance under these conditions is examined, including results obtained using more typical virtual screening validation experiments. Guidelines for optimal application of said descriptors are also discussed in the context of the results obtained, as is the potential utility of fingerprint filtering.

Computer-Aided Design↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Solid-phase synthesis of 5-substituted amino pyrazoles.

An efficient method for the solid-supported synthesis of 5-N-alkylamino and 5-N-arylamino pyrazoles is described. This method is general and mild and utilizes readily accessible resin-immobilized beta-ketoamides 2 as starting materials for the preparation of 1. Resin-immobilized beta-ketoamide, aryl-, or alkylhydazine and Lawesson's reagent are suspended in a mixture of THF/Py and heated at 50-55 degrees C to give a resin-bound 5-aminopyrazole, that is liberated from the solid support by treatment with TFA.

Amines↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Genetic Algorithm guided Selection: variable selection and subset selection.

A novel Genetic Algorithm guided Selection method, GAS, has been described. The method utilizes a simple encoding scheme which can represent both compounds and variables used to construct a QSAR/QSPR model. A genetic algorithm is then utilized to simultaneously optimize the encoded variables that include both descriptors and compound subsets. The GAS method generates multiple models each applying to a subset of the compounds. Typically the subsets represent clusters with different chemotypes. Also a procedure based on molecular similarity is presented to determine which model should be applied to a given test set compound. The variable selection method implemented in GAS has been tested and compared using the Selwood data set (n = 31 compounds; v = 53 descriptors). The results showed that the method is comparable to other published methods. The subset selection method implemented in GAS has been first tested using an artificial data set (n = 100 points; v = 1 descriptor) to examine its ability to subset data points and second applied to analyze the XLOGP data set (n = 1831 compounds; v = 126 descriptors). The method is able to correctly identify artificial data points belonging to various subsets. The analysis of the XLOGP data set shows that the subset selection method can be useful in improving a QSAR/QSPR model when the variable selection method fails.

Algorithms↗