Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Marianne Engberg

Publications and source records attributed to Marianne Engberg.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

[It smells! 2].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Denmark↗

The course of low back pain in a general population. Results from a 5-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the course of low back pain (LBP) in a general population over 5 years. DESIGN: Prospective population-based survey by postal questionnaires in 1991, 1992, and 1996. SETTING: The municipal of Ebeltoft, Denmark. SUBJECTS: Two thousand people aged 30 to 50 years, representative of the Danish population. Main outcome measure Number of days with low back pain during the past year. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred seventy were recruited of whom 813 (59%) were followed to 5 years. The responders could be divided into 3 groups with regard to LBP: no pain, short-term pain, and long-lasting/recurring pain. More than one third of people who experienced LBP in the previous year did so for >30 days. Forty percent of people with LBP >30 days at baseline remained in that group 1 and 5 years later, and 9% with LBP >30 days in year 0 were pain free in year 5. People with LBP in year 0 were 4 times more likely to have LBP in year 1, and 2 times more likely to be affected in year 5. CONCLUSIONS: Low back pain should not be considered transient and therefore neglected, since the condition rarely seems to be self-limiting but merely presents with periodic attacks and temporary remissions. On the other hand, chronicity as defined solely by the duration of symptoms should not be considered chronic.

Adult↗

Low prevalence of ischemic electrocardiographic findings in a Danish population.

OBJECTIVE: Mortality and incidence of cardiovascular disease have declined during the past 35-40 years. The dual aim of this study is to investigate whether the prevalence of electrocardiographic findings is low compared with older studies and to describe the prevalence of electrocardiographic findings in the Danish population, which has not been reported since 1981. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study based on electrocardiograms obtained from a random sample of the population in the district of Ebeltoft, Denmark, December 1991-June 1992. RESULTS: The age and sex stratified prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms ranged from 6.8% (95% CI: 4.01-10.7%) in women to 15.0% (95% CI: 10.6-20.4%) in men aged 41-51 years. Men had significantly more electrocardiographic changes than women (p = 0.004). Frequent findings were signs of earlier myocardial infarction (3.1%; 95% CI: 2.1-4.5%), axis deviation (3.1%; 95% CI: 2.1-4.5%) and incomplete right bundle branch block (1.2%; 95% CI: 0.6-2.2%). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of ischemic electrocardiographic findings is low when compared with studies from the past 50 years.

Aging↗

[Can systematic general health screening and patient-physician health discussions improve the cardiovascular profile of the population? A randomized controlled trial in general practice with a 5-year follow-up].

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the impact of general health screenings and discussions with general practitioners on the cardiovascular risk profile of the population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based, randomised, controlled, 5-year follow-up trial conducted in a primary care setting. In total 2000 randomly selected men and women, aged 30-50 years, from family practices in the district of Ebeltoft, Denmark. Of these persons, 1507 (75.4%) agreed to participate, and were randomised into: (1) a control group who did not receive health screenings; (2) an intervention group that received two health screenings; or (3) an intervention group that received both the two screenings and a 45-minute follow-up consultation annually with their general practitioner. All were followed up after 5 years by questionnaires and health screenings. The outcome measures were: cardiovascular risk score (CRS), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, serum cholesterol, carbon monoxide in expiratory air, and use of tobacco. RESULTS: After 5 years, the CRS, BMI, and serum cholesterol levels were lower in the intervention groups, as compared with the control group. The improved outcome was greater in the baseline risk groups. The number of persons with elevated CRS in the intervention groups was about half the number of persons with elevated CRS in the control group. The difference was not a result of medication use. There was no difference between the group that received consultations after the screenings and the group that had health screenings alone. DISCUSSION: Systematic health screenings reduce the cardiovascular risk score in a middle-aged population. After 5 years of follow-up, the number of persons at elevated cardiovascular risk was about half the expected. The impact of intervention is higher in at-risk individuals. Planned consultations about health did not appear to improve the cardiovascular profile of the study population.

Adult↗

[The association between physical workload and low back pain clouded by the "healthy worker" effect].

INTRODUCTION: Both physical and psychosocial workplace factors are considered risk factors for low back pain (LBP). However, today, no consensus has been reached regarding the exact role of these factors in the genesis of LBP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Questionnaire data were collected at baseline for 1,397 (and after five years for 1,163) men and women aged 31-50 years at baseline. LBP (any LBP within the past year; LBP < or = 30 days in total during the past year; LBP > 30 days in total during tha past year) was analysed in relation to physical workload (sedentary, light physical, and heavy physical work) using logistic regression and controlling for age, gender, and social group. The proportions af workers changing between the workload groups over the five-year period were analysed in relation to LBP status. RESULTS: A baseline no statistically significant differences in LBP outcomes were found for workers exposed to sedentary, light physical, or heavy physical work. This was true for both genders and all age and social groups. At follow-up these was a statistically significant dose-response association between any LBP and long-standing LBP during the past year and increasing physical workload at baseline, also after controlling for age, gender and social group. Subjects with a heavy physical workload at baseline changed significantly more often to sedentary work, if they had experienced LBP for more than 30 days out of the past year. DISCUSSION: Having a sedentary job might have a protective or neutral effect in relation to LBP, whereas having a heavy physical job constitutes a significant risk factor. Because og migration between exposure groups (the "healthy worker" effect), longitudinal studies are necessary for investigating the associations between physical workload and LBP.

Adult↗

Cholesterol reduction following health screening in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in plasma cholesterol following health screening and health discussions in general practice. DESIGN: Randomised prospective population-based study conducted over a period of 5 years. SETTING: Primary care, all general practitioners (GPs) in a well-defined area. SUBJECTS: A random sample of inhabitants aged 30-49 years in January 1991, registered with a local GP was invited to participate. The participants (1507 persons, or 75.4% of the 2000 invited) were randomly allocated to two intervention groups and a control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma cholesterol, percentage of subjects with plasma cholesterol higher than 7 mmol/l. RESULTS: After 5 years of intervention, plasma cholesterol in the whole population was significantly lower in the intervention groups compared to the control group. The decrease was most pronounced (0.5 mmol/l) in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. The percentage of high-risk individuals with a cholesterol level higher than 7 mmol/l was significantly lower in the intervention groups compared to the control group (9.8% vs 6.2%, p = 0.04), corresponding to a 37% reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the health checks had a measurable impact on plasma cholesterol levels, the most pronounced effect is seen among individuals at high cardiovascular risk.

Adult↗

General health screenings to improve cardiovascular risk profiles: a randomized controlled trial in general practice with 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of general health screenings and discussions with general practitioners on the cardiovascular risk profile of a random population of patients. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based, randomized, controlled, 5-year follow-up trial conducted in a primary care setting. POPULATION: The study group consisted of 2000 patients, randomly selected middle-aged men and women aged 30 to 50 years from family practices in the district of Ebeltoft, Denmark. Of these patients, 1507 (75.4%) agreed to participate. Patients were randomized into (1) a control group who did not receive health screenings, (2) an intervention group that received 2 health screenings, (3) an intervention group that received both the 2 screenings and a 45-minute follow-up consultation annually with their general practitioner. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Cardiovascular risk score (CRS), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, serum cholesterol, carbon monoxide in expiratory air, and tobacco use. RESULTS: After 5 years, the CRS, BMI, and serum cholesterol levels were lower in the intervention groups compared with the control group. The improved outcome was greater in the baseline risk groups. The number of patients with elevated CRS in the intervention groups was approximately half the number of patients with elevated CRS in the control group. The difference was not a result of medication use. There was no difference between the group that received consultations after the screenings and the group that had health screenings alone. CONCLUSIONS: Health screenings reduced the CRS in the intervention groups. After 5 years of follow-up, the number of persons at elevated cardiovascular risk was about half that expected, based on the prevalence/proportion in a population not receiving the health checks (the control group). The impact of intervention was higher among at-risk individuals. Consultations about health did not appear to improve the cardiovascular profile of the study population.

Adult↗