Biomedical subjects

Mariana C Stern

Publications and source records attributed to Mariana C Stern.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Multi-population GWAS meta-analysis identifies bladder cancer susceptibility loci and highlights genetic regulation of smoking-related risk.

Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, caused by genetic and environmental risk factors. Here, we report the findings of a multi-population meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies, including 32,470 individuals with and 1,753,462 without bladder cancer. We identify 70 independent risk loci, of which 43 are novel. Using a 70-marker polygenic risk score (HR = 1.63 per standard deviation), we increase the area under the curve from 0.71 (baseline risk model) to 0.75. Integrative analyses reveal the enrichment of the associated variants within accessible chromatin regions, and of the prioritized genes within pathways for xenobiotic metabolism and smoking behavior. Specifically, we show that the 15q25.1 variant rs71581744-ACCCC/A co-localizes with tissue-specific CHRNA3 expression, modulates mRNA stability, and associates with risk of muscle-invasive bladder cancer among current smokers. Together, these findings substantially expand the known genetic architecture of bladder cancer risk and highlight the germline regulation of smoking behavior as a mechanism driving bladder cancer susceptibility.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Genetic risk factors modulate the association between physical activity and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is an established protective factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), but it is unclear if genetic variants modify this effect. To investigate this possibility, we conducted a genome-wide gene-PA interaction analysis. METHODS: Using logistic regression and two-step and joint tests, we analyzed interactions between common genetic variants across the genome and PA in relation to CRC risk. Self-reported PA levels were categorized as active (≥ 8.75 MET-h/wk) vs. inactive (< 8.75 MET-h/wk) and as study- and sex-specific quartiles of activity. RESULTS: PA had an overall protective effect on CRC (OR [active vs. inactive] = 0.85; 95%CI = 0.81-0.90). The two-step GxE method identified an interaction between rs4779584, an intergenic variant near the GREM1 and SCG5 genes, and PA for CRC risk (p-interaction = 2.6×10- 8). Stratification by genotype at this locus showed a significant reduction in CRC risk by 20% in active vs. inactive participants with the CC genotype (OR = 0.80; 95%CI = 0.75-0.85), but no significant PA-CRC association among CT or TT carriers. When PA was modeled as quartiles, the 1-d.f. GxE test identified that rs56906466, an intergenic variant near the KCNG1 gene, modified the association between PA and CRC (p-interaction = 3.5×10- 8). Stratification at this locus showed that increase in PA (highest vs. lowest quartile) was associated with a lower CRC risk solely among TT carriers (OR = 0.77; 95%CI = 0.72-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified two genetic variants that modified the association between PA and CRC risk. One of them, related to GREM1 and SCG5, suggests that the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-related, inflammatory, and/or insulin signaling pathways may be associated with the protective influence of PA on colorectal carcinogenesis.

GWAS↗

PubMed2025

Optimizing participant and community engagement in cancer genomic sequencing research.

PURPOSE: We describe strategies implemented across research centers of the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network to optimize engagement of participants and communities in cancer genomics research. We also present consensus definitions of engagement and engagement optimization, informed by our shared experiences in the Network. METHODS: Key informant interviews and a document review identified engagement and optimization strategies across PE-CGS research centers. Findings were synthesized using qualitative content analysis. Consensus on definitions of engagement and optimization were developed through iterative review by PE-CGS members. RESULTS: PE-CGS research centers adopted tailored strategies based on community needs and scientific gaps. Engagement strategies included community-based efforts (eg, advisory boards and newsletters) and participant-focused approaches (eg, enhanced informed consent and decision support tools). Optimization strategies leveraged scientific methods (eg, randomized controlled trials and surveys) to evaluate engagement. Engagement was described as the sustained and meaningful interactions between researchers, participants, and communities. Optimization was described as the application of scientific methods to refine and improve engagement and research processes and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Engagement and optimization strategies have informed research planning, conduct, and dissemination across PE-CGS. These approaches and definitions provide a foundation for developing evidence-based practices to strengthen participant and community involvement in cancer genomics research.

Humans↗