Biomedical subjects

Manoj Monga

Publications and source records attributed to Manoj Monga.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Temperature activated deflection of a novel ureteroscopic laser fiber sheath.

PURPOSE: Loss of active deflection with insertion of a holmium laser fiber can significantly decrease the efficacy of intrarenal flexible ureteroscopy. We evaluated the impact of inserting a novel, temperature activated, deflectable laser sheath on active deflection and flow rates. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Active deflection of 5 flexible ureteroscopes was measured with an empty channel and following separate insertions of 2, 272 mum holmium fibers. Insertion of the same fibers was then repeated through a proprietary, temperature activated, coiling nitinol sheath. Active deflection of the sheath following insertion into the working channel was achieved by a rapid flush of 10 cc hot water (60C) through the irrigation side port. Release of active deflection was obtained by repeating this maneuver with cold water (15C). Degrees of deflection were measured in triplicate. Flow rates were measured at 100 cm H2O pressure. RESULTS: Active deflection with an empty working channel decreased significantly with insertion of the 2 laser fibers (12 to 32 degrees). Insertion of the laser fiber through the nitinol sheath followed by temperature activation of the sheath maximized active deflection beyond baseline measures with the laser fibers by up to 60 degrees. Flow rates in all ureteroscopes decreased significantly with the use of the Powerflex sheath (Optical Integrity, Panama City, Florida) but it remained above 12 ml per minute in all ureteroscopes. CONCLUSIONS: A temperature activated, deflectable nitinol sheath facilitates active deflection with a 272 mum holmium laser fiber in the working channel of the flexible ureteroscope, suggesting strong potential for clinical evaluation.

Alloys↗

PubMed2004

Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment, and sexual function.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hypothesis that infertility may result in a decrease in quality of life and an increase in marital discord and sexual dysfunction. The burden of infertility is physical, psychological, emotional, and financial. METHODS: Couples seeking treatment for infertility were asked to complete standardized validated questionnaires assessing quality of life (Quality of Well-Being Scale-Self Administered, version 1.04), marital adjustment (Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test), and sexual function (Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women and International Index of Erectile Function for men). Couples seeking elective sterilization served as the control subjects. RESULTS: Eighteen infertile couples and 12 couples seeking elective sterilization participated in the study. The mean age, years together, and household income were comparable. Infertile couples had made a mean of 14.5 office visits for infertility, and 83% of couples reported feeling societal pressures to conceive. The Marital Adjustment Test scores for the women of the infertile couples were significantly lower than the scores of the controls (P = 0.01); however no difference was noted in the men. A trend toward lower quality-of-life scores was noted in women (P = 0.09) but not in the men of infertile couples. No statistically significant impact on sexual functioning in women was noted; however, the men in the infertile couples had lower total International Index of Erectile Function scores (P = 0.05) and intercourse satisfaction scores (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Women in infertile couples reported poor marital adjustment and quality of life compared with controls. Men may experience less intercourse satisfaction, perhaps because of the psychological pressure to try to conceive or because of the forced timing of intercourse around the woman's ovulatory cycle.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Systematic evaluation of ureteral access sheaths.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the physical characteristics of ureteral access sheaths that affect their ability to resist buckling and kinking in the ureter. METHODS: Eight commercially available ureteral sheaths were tested. The buckling pressure was measured by adding sequential loads to a point 20 cm from the tip of the sheath until the mass that resulted in buckling of the catheter was determined. The kinking pressure was determined by measuring the diameter of the sheath with a digital caliper as sequential loads were applied to the surface of the sheath. The frictional properties of the sheath were measured by testing the force required to push the sheath through a mock tube. RESULTS: The Cook Flexor was more resistant to buckling, requiring 202 g of force before buckling occurred, and both the Cook Flexor and the Applied access sheaths were more lubricious. The kinking measurements demonstrated a linear loss of diameter of the sheath with added loads. The Applied Forte XE and Cook Flexor ureteral access sheaths were more resistant to kinking than were the other sheaths tested. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the physical characteristics of ureteral sheaths may help determine which sheaths will perform well with regard to buckling during insertion and kinking during use.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

Systematic evaluation of stone basket dimensions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 17 commercial stone baskets for characteristics we believe are favorable for stone extraction. METHODS: The ACMI (Sur-Catch 3.0), Bard (Dimension 3.0), Boston Scientific (Zero-tip 2.4/3.0, Segura 2.4/3.0, Gemini 3.0, Parachute 3.1), Cook (N-Circle 2.2/3.0/3.2, N-Force 3.2, Flatwire 2.0), and Sacred Heart (Halo 1.9, Vantage 2.4, Summit 3.0, Hercules 3.0) were tested in triplicate. The maximal basket width was measured with a digital caliper as the basket length was opened in 0.5 to 2-mm increments using a mechanical caliper under optical light microscope visualization. Baskets were rated for the linearity of opening and length at which the target basket width (5 mm) was reached. RESULTS: The only basket to exhibit linear opening was the N-Circle. All other baskets opened in an exponential fashion, with the initial excursion in length corresponding to little change in basket width, followed by a rapid increase in basket width as the basket extended further. The N-Circle 2.2F, 3.0F, and 3.2F baskets reached the target basket width at a basket length of 9.4, 9.7, and 9.6 mm, respectively. As a group, the tipless baskets opened more rapidly to the target basket width (9.4 to 14.8 mm) than did the flat-wire baskets (17.5 to 22.7 mm) or helical baskets (18.6 to 24.8 mm). CONCLUSIONS: A basket that requires a shorter basket excursion to reach a 5-mm width will be easier to maintain in the field of view. Linear basket opening provides the operator with greater control to engage a stone. After closure of a basket on a 5-mm stone, the larger the basket length dimension, the greater the likelihood the calculus may escape.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

Minimally invasive therapy for renal cell carcinoma: is there a new community standard?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate current practice use of laparoscopic and minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of renal cell cancer. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 174 members of the Minnesota Urological Society. The first case scenario described a 6-cm lesion not amenable to nephron-sparing surgery. The second case scenario described a 3-cm lower pole exophytic mass amenable to nephron-sparing surgery. The treatment options included traditional therapy (open partial or radical nephrectomy) and minimally invasive therapy (laparoscopic radical or partial nephrectomy or renal cryoablation). RESULTS: Our survey response rate was 49%. For the first scenario, 86% of respondents would offer open radical nephrectomy; however, 57% would offer laparoscopic surgery. Of those urologists offering laparoscopic surgery, 14% would refer outside their practice and 43% would use a hand-assisted approach. Sixty-four percent of the metropolitan and 56% of the urban respondents would offer a form of minimally invasive therapy; only 29% of rural respondents offered these options. For the second scenario, 90% of respondents would offer open partial nephrectomy and 45% a minimally invasive therapy; however, 24% of these would refer outside their practice. Thirty-eight percent of respondents would offer laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and 22% of respondents would offer renal cryoablation. Urologists completing residency after 1990 were more likely to offer a minimally invasive option (65%) compared with urologists completing residency before 1990 (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive therapy for renal cell cancer is evolving into a community standard of care, with urologists relying heavily on outside referrals to access minimally invasive alternatives. Younger urologists living in metropolitan and urban areas are more likely to offer minimally invasive therapy. Additional emphasis should be placed on increasing the availability of minimally invasive techniques in rural settings.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate irrigant flows and intrapelvic pressures with small-diameter access sheaths. Ureteral access sheaths improve irrigant flow and decrease intrarenal pelvic pressures during flexible ureteroscopy. However, no comparisons of individual sheaths have been conducted. Previous studies have demonstrated more favorable results with the 12F sheath than with the 10F sheath. METHODS: Ureteral access sheaths were tested ex vivo in porcine kidneys. An 18F angiocatheter was placed in the renal pelvis and connected to a Hewlett Packard Gauss Pressure transducer. Irrigant was maintained at 100 mm Hg pressure. Irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures were measured with three flexible ureteroscopes at baseline and using each of four 10F sheaths, with the sheaths positioned in the middle ureter and the ureteroscopes positioned in the renal pelvis. The pressure at which irrigant efflux through the sheath occurred and the rate of irrigant efflux through the access sheath were measured. RESULTS: Intrapelvic pressures measured greater than 40 mm Hg, and irrigant flows remained at less than 15 mL/min when the Olympus URF-P3 and Storz 11274AAU flexible ureteroscopes were tested with all four sheaths. The intrapelvic pressures, irrigant inflow, and irrigant efflux with the Wolf 7325.172 (7.5F) flexible ureteroscope were optimized in combination with the Cook Peelaway 10F and Applied Access 10F sheaths. CONCLUSIONS: Small ureteral access sheaths should be used only with the Wolf 7325.172 flexible ureteroscope. The Cook Peelaway (10F) and Applied Access (10F) sheaths offered the greatest increase in irrigant flow and decrease in intrapelvic pressures.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the rapidity of stone capture and removal by six tipless and four helical baskets in a ureteral model. Expeditious ureteral stone extraction is reliant on the basket size, configuration, and radial dilation force. METHODS: A 5-mm feline calculus was placed in a simulated model of the human ureter at a distance of 7.5 cm from the orifice, and saline irrigant instilled. A 6/7.5F Wolf semirigid ureteroscope was used for access and visualization of the stone. Operators were randomized to start stone extraction with 1 of 10 stone baskets, and three extraction attempts were conducted with each device. Six experienced operators tested each device. The tipless baskets tested were the ACMI Sur-Catch NT 3.0F, Bard Dimension 3.0F, Boston Scientific Zerotip 3.0F, Cook N-Circle 3.0F, Cook Delta 2.4F, and Sacred Heart Halo 1.9F. The helical baskets tested were the Cook N-Force 3.2F, Microvasive Gemini 3.0F, ACMI Sur-Catch Helical 3.0F, and Sacred Heart Hercules 3.0F. The time to extraction in seconds was recorded. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the tipless (14 +/- 7 seconds) or helical (12.8 +/- 6.6 seconds, P = 0.21) basket groups. All baskets were able to retrieve the ureteral stones successfully. The most efficient basket was the Cook N-Circle with an average time of 8.7 seconds to stone extraction compared with the least efficient basket, the ACMI Sur-Catch NT, at 15.8 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: The Cook N-Circle basket provided the most expeditious means to stone extraction in a ureteral model.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

A novel dual-diameter ureteroscope working channel: impact on irrigant flow.

OBJECTIVES: To compare irrigant flow characteristics through standard working channels (3.6F to 4.5F) and a dual-diameter working channel. Irrigant flow is critical for adequate visualization during endoscopic procedures. METHODS: Working channels were created out of 80 cm of light wall polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubing (inner diameter 3.6F, 4.0F, and 4.5F) with a male Luer connector attached to one end by epoxy resin. The dual-diameter working channel was created with a 70-cm segment of PTFE (4.5F inner diameter, 0.059 in.) and a 10-cm segment of PTFE (3.6F inner diameter, 0.047 in.) with a male Luer connector attached to the free end of the 4.5F tubing. Stone basket shafts (100 cm in length, outer diameter 1.9F, 2.4F, and 3.0F) were created out of unmodified polyimide tubing with a 0.018-in.-diameter nitinol mandrel epoxy core for stability. Irrigant flow was measured at 100 mm Hg pressure for 1 minute with an empty channel and with stone basket shafts in the channel. RESULTS: The flow rates were significantly greater with the dual-diameter working channel than with the standard flexible ureteroscope (3.6F) working channel using an empty channel (79.2 versus 44.1 mL/min, P = 0.0001), 1.9F basket (35.9 versus 10.0 mL/min, P = 0.003), 2.4F basket (20.7 versus 4.3 mL/min, P = 0.002), and 3.0F basket (6.0 versus 0.7 mL/min, P = 0.0002) sheath. CONCLUSIONS: A dual-diameter working channel may optimize irrigant flow characteristics for flexible ureteroscopes while maintaining a small distal tip diameter.

Polytetrafluoroethylene↗

PubMed2004

Advanced intrarenal ureteroscopic procedures.

The role of flexible ureteroscopy in the management of intrarenal pathology has undergone a dramatic evolution, powered by improvements in flexible ureteroscope design; deflection and image quality; diversification of small, disposable instrumentation; and the use of holmium laser lithotripsy. This article reviews the application of flexible ureteroscopy for advanced intrarenal procedures.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2004

Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: implications for clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physical characteristics may be important in the performance of a flexible ureteroscope. This study evaluated the strength of the shaft and deflection mechanism of several instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sequential loads were placed along the axis of downward deflection to measure the stiffness of the shaft and strength of deflection. Bending pressure was defined as the force required to deflect the tip of the ureteroscope 15 degrees from baseline. Buckling pressure was defined as the force that resulted in catastrophic bending (>90 degrees) of the shaft of the ureteroscope. Strength of deflection was defined as the force that resulted in loss of 10 degrees of active deflection. RESULTS: Bending pressures were lower for the Olympus URF-P3 (6.4 g) and Wolf 7325.172 (6.0 g) ureteroscopes. Similarly, buckling pressures were lower for these two ureteroscopes (9.0 g and 11.6 g, respectively). The Wolf and Storz flexible ureteroscopes had stronger deflection mechanisms than the Olympus URF-P3 and the ACMI DUR-8. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates significant differences in ureteroscope strength. Higher buckling pressures may facilitate advancement of a ureteroscope over a guidewire but may impede secondary deflection. Lower bending pressures may facilitate passive intrarenal manipulation. Strength of deflection may impact the ability to maintain deflection with an instrument in the working channel.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

Ephedrine- and guaifenesin-induced nephrolithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: Ephedrine and guaifenesin are herbal supplements that have experienced increased use over the past decade. Ephedrine has been used as a stimulant and weight-loss product, guaifenesin as an expectorant and cough suppressant; both are found in combination in many antitussives and expectorants. This paper reviews the reported cases of ephedrine- and guaifenesin-induced nephrolithiasis, as well as the diagnostic techniques and treatments that have been successfully used for these stones. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature pertaining to nephrolithiasis and the compounds ephedrine and guaifenesin was conducted. RESULTS: Ephedrine and guaifenesin use results in over 35% of urinary stones that are related to pharmaceutical metabolites, and collectively are present in 0.1% of all urinary stones. These calculi are radiolucent, requiring the use of computerized tomography (CT scan) for diagnosis. Alkalinization therapy offers an alternative to surgical intervention and may have a role in prevention of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Ephedrine and guaifenesin have been shown to cause nephrolithiasis in cases of abuse when taken individually or in combination. It is important for the clinician to be aware of the potential for these compounds to cause nephrolithiasis.

Antitussive Agents↗

PubMed2004

Progression of nephrolithiasis: long-term outcomes with observation of asymptomatic calculi.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Observation is often recommended for patients presenting with asymptomatic renal calculi. This study evaluated the natural history of asymptomatic calculi and the risk of progression of disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 300 male patients average age 62.8 years who were followed for a mean of 3.26 years for asymptomatic renal calculi in an outpatient urology clinic. At presentation, the mean cumulative stone diameter was 10.8 mm; 56% were lower-pole stones, and 48% of the patients had multiple calculi. Patients underwent annual radiographic imaging and clinic visits with standardized questions regarding the development of symptoms or complications from calculi. Progression of disease was defined as the need for surgical intervention, the development of pain, or stone growth on serial imaging. RESULTS: Overall, 77% of patients experienced disease progression, with 26% requiring surgical intervention. Stone size was positively associated with progression: those with an isolated stone >/=4 mm on presentation were 26% more likely to fail observation than patients with smaller solitary calculi (P = 0.012). Stone growth was less common in those with upper-pole and middle-pole stones (47% v 61%) for lower-pole stones; P = 0.002). Urine uric acid concentration correlated positively with the rate of stone growth (P = 0.05). Likewise, serum uric acid concentration predicted stone growth (odds ratio = 3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Stratification of risk of progression according to presenting stone size, location, and composition may facilitate discussions with the patient regarding the alternatives of observation versus intervention. Specifically, small non-uric acid calculi in the upper pole may be most amenable to observation.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Forearm compression by laparoscopic hand-assist devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic hand-assist devices have facilitated the broad application and acceptance of laparoscopy in urology and other surgical fields. This study evaluated forearm compression by these devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five commercially available hand-assist devices were tested (Gelport, Intromit, PneumoSleeve, Handport, LapDisc). In three surgeons using a porcine model, compressive forces were measured along the paths of the median and ulnar nerves at the point of maximum proximal forearm circumference using FlexiForce A101 sensors. Glove size for all three surgeons was 7 1/2; however, the maximum forearm circumference ranged from 26 to 33 cm. The hand-assist devices were placed in pigs after skin and fascial incision (9 cm), and the insufflation pressure was set at 18 mm Hg. Surgeons subjectively rated the ease of device insertion and hand insertion, degree of forearm compression, and the development of paresthesias. RESULTS: The LapDisc was rated superior with regard to insertion. The Gelport was rated superior for hand insertion and removal; however, moderate to severe forearm compression and paresthesias were reported. The maximum forearm compression forces were highest with the LapDisc (97 mm Hg) and the Gelport (78 mm Hg) and lowest with the Handport (33 mm Hg). CONCLUSION: The choice of hand-assist device is dependent on its ease of use, efficacy at maintaining insufflation, and effect on the surgeon's performance and fatigue. The impact of forearm compression should be considered in the selection of the hand-assist device and in the development of new devices.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Accessory instrumentation for ureteroscopy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of ureteroscopy for diagnostic and therapeutic applications has evolved rapidly over the past 5 years. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in instrumentation for rigid and flexible ureteroscopy. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in accessory instrumentation can be divided into improvements in ureteral access, irrigation, intracorporeal lithotripsy, and stone extraction. By evaluating in-vitro and clinical evaluations of accessory instrumentation, one can identify specific products that may facilitate a positive ureteroscopic outcome. SUMMARY: Preoperative preparation is the best predictor of positive outcome after ureteroscope. The cornerstone to preoperative preparation is the proper selection of accessory instrumentation. There is no greater frustration than to see the target but be unable to address it.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

The fractured flexible ureteroscope with locked deflection.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

Residency training in percutaneous renal access: does it affect urological practice?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of residency training in percutaneous renal access on subsequent urological practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys evaluating practice and training in percutaneous renal access were mailed to residents who graduated between 1981 and 2001. A statistical analysis was performed to determine the effect of percutaneous access training on current practice patterns in percutaneous renal procedures. A subgroup analysis was conducted for graduates with more than 10 years after residency. RESULTS: Responses were received from 37 of 48 surveys mailed (77%) and 35 surveys were eligible for analysis. A total of 92% of urologists trained in percutaneous access currently perform percutaneous surgical procedures compared to only 33% of those untrained (p <0.001). Urologists trained in access perform a mean of 14.0 percutaneous renal procedures annually while those untrained perform 3.3 procedures (p = 0.02). Only 27% of urologists trained in percutaneous access continue to perform percutaneous renal access compared to 11% of those untrained (p = 0.33). A subset analysis of urologists trained more than 10 years ago shows similar results. The primary reasons stated for not performing their own access are that the radiologist has better equipment (61%) or skills (44%), or obtaining access requires extra time (50%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a relationship between training in percutaneous renal access and subsequent use of percutaneous renal procedures in the urologist's practice. Emphasis should be placed on providing continuing education opportunities to maintain competency in this important technique.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2004

Percutaneous renal stone extraction: in vitro study of retrieval devices.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, percutaneous stone extraction has relied on the use of 2-prong and 3-prong graspers, which are prone to causing trauma to the urothelium. We evaluate the efficiency of stone removal with a novel tipless stone basket designed specifically for percutaneous procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3, 5 and 8 mm human calculus were placed in the calix of a percutaneous renal model. A 26Fr Storz nephroscope (27093B, Storz Medical AG, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland) was inserted through a 30Fr Amplatz sheath into the model with camera input from a Storz telecam SL-NTSC feeding to a 20-inch Sony Triniton monitor (Sony Corp of America, New York, New York). Operators were randomized to start stone extraction with a Storz 3-prong grasper (27090RB) or a Cook 12Fr Perc-NCircle (38 cm) (Cook Urological, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana). Subsequent testing alternated between the 2 devices until 10 extraction attempts were conducted with each device. Time to extraction of all 3 calculi and number of inadvertent withdrawals of the sheath were recorded. Three experienced operators tested each device. RESULTS: Stone extraction times were shorter with the Cook Perc-NCircle than the 3-prong grasper for all operators. Mean time for stone extraction was 25.3 +/- 11.2 seconds for the Perc-NCircle compared to 35.1 +/- 18.5 seconds for the 3-prong grasper (p = 0.016). Loss of access by inadvertent removal of the Amplatz sheath occurred in 53% of the attempts with the 3-prong grasper compared to 7% of attempts with the Perc-NCircle. CONCLUSIONS: The Cook Perc-NCircle facilitates a more expeditious approach to percutaneous stone removal with less risk of sheath withdrawal.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of nitinol tipless stone baskets in an in vitro caliceal model.

PURPOSE: Tipless stone baskets facilitate caliceal calculi extraction during flexible ureteroscopy. We evaluated the stone capture rate of 9 commercially available tipless stone baskets in an in vitro model using novice and expert operators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Microvasive Zerotip (2.4Fr, 3.0Fr), Cook N-Circle (2.2Fr, 3.0Fr, 3.2Fr), Bard Dimension (3.0Fr, Sacred Heart Medical Halo (1.9Fr), Vantage (1.9Fr) and Circon-ACMI Sur-Catch-NT (3.0Fr) were tested by 3 novice and 3 experienced basket operators. Each operator performed stone extraction of 2, 5 and 8 mm calculi (size determined by digital caliper with 3 repetitions of each basket. The time to extraction of the calculus from a convex based test tube caliceal model was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Fisher's pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: After a learning curve of 27 basket retrievals, there was no significant difference in stone capture times between novice (38 +/- 54 seconds) and expert operators (32 +/- 49 seconds, p = 0.174). For total stone capture (all sizes) the Sacred Heart Halo resulted in the most rapid stone extraction (17 +/- 14 seconds) by novices and experts, while the Sur-Catch NT resulted in the slowest stone extraction (78 +/- 90, seconds, p = 0.001). The Halo (14 +/- 9 seconds) and Vantage (19 +/- 12 seconds) baskets were significantly faster for 2 mm calculi than the N-Circle (73 +/- 60 seconds, p = 0.006), Sur-Catch (169 +/- 85 seconds, p = 0.0005) and Dimension (73 +/- 70 seconds, p = 0.017). The Zerotip functioned well for 2 mm calculi in the hands of expert operators (15 +/- 9 seconds) but not novice operators (94 +/- 95 seconds). The Sur-Catch NT was significantly slower for 2 mm calculi than the N-Circle (p = 0.01), Dimension (p =.03), Halo (p =.0005), Vantage (p =.001) and Zerotip (p =.002). For 5 mm calculi the Halo was superior (12 +/- 8 seconds), while the Zerotip were superior for 8 mm calculi (8 +/- 3 seconds) compared to the N-Circle (23 +/- 28 seconds, p = 0.026), Halo (26 +/- 18 seconds, p = 0.021) and Vantage (23 +/- 15 seconds, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The Sacred Heart Halo and Vantage baskets resulted in the most expeditious stone extraction, especially for 2 to 5 mm calculi while the Microvasive Zerotip was optimal for 8 mm calculi. The Sur-Catch NT had the slowest stone capture rate for all stone sizes. Caliceal models of stone basketing may be useful to train novice urology residents and nursing assistants.

Alloys↗