Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Mae Thamer

Publications and source records attributed to Mae Thamer.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Pandemic-Related Disruptions and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Safety-Net Settings.

IMPORTANCE: Pandemic-related disruptions in cirrhosis care resulted in major gaps and delays in surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether these initial declines improved and rebounded to prepandemic levels remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contemporary clinical practice data on HCC surveillance utilization from before the COVID-19 pandemic to 4 years after the onset of the pandemic among safety-net populations with cirrhosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 5 safety-net health systems in the US. Adults with cirrhosis were evaluated longitudinally across 3 time periods: March 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period), March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022 (COVID-19 era), and March 1, 2022, to February 29, 2024 (post-COVID-19 period). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was undergoing HCC surveillance identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, and corresponding International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for indication. Comparisons of HCC surveillance across time periods used paired t tests, and comparisons of HCC surveillance between subgroups within the same time period used χ2 tests. RESULTS: Among 6940 patients with cirrhosis, 4001 (57.7%) were men (median [IQR] age, 58 [52-64] years), 206 (3.0%) were Asian, 1720 (24.8%) were Hispanic, 1672 (24.1%) were non-Hispanic Black or African American, and 3081 (44.4%) were non-Hispanic White. The proportion who underwent HCC surveillance within 6 months after diagnosis was 30.8% (1940 patients) in the pre-COVID-19 era, which declined to 21.1% (1468 patients) in the COVID-19 era, and remained at 22.3% (1405 patients) in the post-COVID-19 era. Consistent trends were observed among men and women and among all age and race groups, except for Asian individuals, for whom there was an observed increase in the post-COVID-19 era. Similar trends of low HCC surveillance post-COVID-19 were observed across insurance types but was particularly concerning among uninsured or indigent care covered patients, among whom only 116 of 997 (11.9%) underwent surveillance in the most recent period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this observational study of US safety-net populations with cirrhosis, rates of HCC surveillance following pandemic-related declines remained persistently low even up to 4 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with fewer than 1 in 4 patients having undergone guideline-concordant HCC surveillance.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Factors influencing route of administration for epoetin treatment among hemodialysis patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Published clinical guidelines advocate subcutaneous (SC) administration for epoetin therapy, although this is practiced among only 7% of all hemodialysis patients. Despite this disparity, few studies have examined factors associated with route of epoetin administration in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services End-Stage Renal Disease Clinical Performance Measures Project were used to identify 13,854 patients receiving hemodialysis in 3,069 dialysis facilities from October to December in 1999 and 2000. Unadjusted associations were examined by using t-test and chi-square test. Adjusted associations were estimated by using generalized estimating equations to control for clustering of patients within the same dialysis facility. RESULTS: In the United States, use of the SC route of epoetin administration varies widely across the country. After adjusting for patient sociodemographics and comorbidities, the greatest rates of SC therapy are found in the Midwest and West, in providers not affiliated with chains, and in hospital-based and not-for-profit freestanding units. Previous exposure to SC administration (as a predialysis or peritoneal dialysis patient) predicted subsequent SC use, for-profit and large chains were significantly less likely to use SC administration, and increased use of injectable drugs overall (to maximize income) was associated with less SC use. CONCLUSION: In addition to regional variation in SC use, study findings indicate that physician decision making for epoetin administration route is influenced primarily by type of ownership and financial incentives. Adherence to published clinical guidelines was not a consistent predictor of SC use. Given the similar effectiveness, but significantly decreased dose associated with SC epoetin, these findings suggest an enormous opportunity for cost savings for the Medicare program.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Hematocrit was not validated as a surrogate end point for survival among epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of hematocrit as a surrogate end point for survival among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with epoetin. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Using United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data, we conducted an observational prospective study to analyze the relationships among epoetin dose, hematocrit, and survival for 31,301 facility-based hemodialysis patients incident to ESRD therapy in 1998. To address our objective, we used criteria developed by Prentice based on results from a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Results indicate that hematocrit is inversely associated with epoetin dose. For the same epoetin treatment-related achieved hematocrit levels, there were widely varying treatment-related survival outcomes, thereby challenging a central criterion required to empirically validate a surrogate end point. CONCLUSION: Our results support earlier clinical trial and epidemiological data suggesting that hematocrit may not be a valid surrogate for survival among the epoetin-treated renal failure population. We hypothesize that hematocrit may not be in the causal pathway or that epoetin may have important mechanisms of action apart from increasing hematocrit. Effective treatment for anemia may therefore not be simply a matter of increasing hematocrit. This study has potential implications for revising the existing treatment guidelines for anemia management and selecting an appropriate treatment regimen.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed2004

Epoetin requirements predict mortality in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a frequent complication of end-stage renal disease. Poor responsiveness to epoetin therapy hampers the management of anemia. Escalating epoetin doses often are used to overcome epoetin resistance. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between epoetin dose requirements and mortality. METHODS: Using United States Renal Data System administrative claims data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 94,569 prevalent hemodialysis patients in 2000 and 2001. A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, adjusted for baseline variables, and a 5-knot cubic regression spline were used to model the dose-response relationship between epoetin and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Significant interpatient variation exists in epoetin dose requirements to attain defined hematocrit levels. For every hematocrit cohort studied, patients administered higher doses of epoetin had significantly lower hematocrit values and greater mortality rates. Using the cubic spline function, a significant nonlinear relationship between increased epoetin dose and mortality was found regardless of hematocrit (P < 0.0001), with the steepest increase in relative risk for death found after the 72.5th dose percentile. CONCLUSION: Epoetin dose requirement is an independent predictor of total mortality in hemodialysis patients after adjustment for hematocrit. Poor responders who continue to have low hematocrit values despite the administration of high epoetin doses may not necessarily benefit from more epoetin, but perhaps should be considered for other adjunctive therapies. In contrast to conventional wisdom, this study suggests that epoetin dosing requirements could provide important prognostic information beyond that predicted by hematocrit alone.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Cost-quality trade-offs in dialysis care: a national survey of dialysis facility administrators.

Dialysis facilities face important trade-offs between cost and quality under constrained capitated reimbursement. How management at dialysis facilities makes decisions affecting cost and quality of care and views opportunities and threats is unknown. We conducted a national survey of dialysis facility administrators. We asked administrators what changes they would make in response to increases or decreases in reimbursement, their views on linking dialysis care payment to quality-of-care measures, and their views on providing patients with treatment options and outcomes information. One hundred fifty-seven of 280 dialysis facility administrators (56%) responded. If dialysis reimbursement were to increase by 20%, the five most common responses were to: improve patient education programs (62% of respondents), improve facility amenities (42%), purchase new equipment (30%), provide more money for staff salaries (28%), and increase number of nursing staff (21%). Conversely, if dialysis reimbursement were to decrease by 20%, the most common responses were to: limit staff salary (45% of respondents), decrease nursing staff (41%), not replace dialysis equipment (43%), increase dialyzer reuse (37%), and return less to investors (36%). Differences in rank order of responses were observed according to professional training of the administrator and profit status of the facility. Administrators uniformly believe that it is very acceptable to provide facility-specific outcomes data to the public, as well as information on modalities of treatment provided by facilities. However, administrators varied in their views regarding whether reimbursement should be based on quality by using a process-of-care measure, such as the average dose of dialysis, or an outcome-of-care measure, such as case-mix-adjusted mortality rates. We conclude that increases in facility reimbursement generally would be used by dialysis facility administrators for the benefit of patients, whereas decreases (or inflation erosion) in payment rates might compromise staffing. US dialysis administrators support sharing treatment options and outcomes information with patients, but appear to be ambivalent with regard to linking reimbursement to adequacy of dialysis or patient outcomes. These results have important implications regarding proposed changes in the US capitated dialysis payment rate and current efforts to empower consumers of dialysis care.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improved survival with higher hematocrits: where is the evidence?

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is reviewing Medicare coverage policy for recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) therapy. CMS officials are concerned that "Medicare spending on EPO may be higher than necessary without resulting in optimal patient benefit." Approximately 190 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients die each day-a mortality rate that has remained essentially unchanged since 1994-despite improvements in the "adequacy of dialysis, vascular access, and anemia management". To date, the evidence cited in support of a survival benefit of epoetin confuses the relationship between treatment response and outcomes with a causal effect of epoetin. A variety of mechanisms may account for a non-causal association between hematocrit and mortality can occur. We conclude that there is no basis for inferring the survival benefits (or detriments) of increasing a patient's hematocrit by adjusting the dosing of epoetin. Furthermore, we note that caution is required in administering large doses of epoetin to unresponsive patients in order to achieve the target hematocrit. A better understanding of the epoetin/survival relationship, well-grounded in science, is needed to provide a basis for CMS to improve its current epoetin policies, and may help to improve patient mortality.

Epoetin Alfa↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Public support for policies that would help people with chronic conditions.

According to a national public opinion survey, Americans strongly support government solutions to help people with chronic conditions and their caregivers. Such solutions include a Medicare prescription drug benefit, a tax credit for caregivers, a tax break for people who purchase private long-term care insurance, and public long-term care insurance. A majority is willing to support several of these initiatives by paying higher taxes, but our survey suggests that other initiatives may not have sufficient support to offset their incremental costs. In addition, support for these proposals varies systematically by individual characteristics, which suggests that there are different constituencies for each proposal.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Translating epoetin research into practice: the role of government and the use of scientific evidence.

Spending for epoetin is Medicare's single largest drug expenditure. We chronicle the evolution of epoetin policy based on a lack of well-designed post-Food and Drug Administration approval studies demonstrating clinical benefit; congressional/federal agency reliance on clinical practice guidelines that might have misinterpreted evidence supporting causality; and the premature translation of research into practice and policy. Were the right choices made? Epoetin showcases the risk and benefit conundrum created when evidentiary standards are relaxed. Our review concludes with broad-based policy recommendations for the newly implemented Medicare Part D program.

Decision Making↗