Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M de Barrio

Publications and source records attributed to M de Barrio.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Allergy to chironomid larvae (red migde larvae) in non professional handlers of fish food.

UNLABELLED: Chironomids are insects which inhabit wetlands. In countries such as Sudan, The United States. Egypt and Japan they are the cause of serious environmental allergy. In Europe, and particularly in Spain, allergy to Chironomids is infrequent and has only been described in patients who handle Chironomid larvae which form part of certain fish foods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a case of hypersensitivity to the Chironomid Midge (Chironomus thummi thummi) in a 23-year-old patient who on two occasions, after being in contact with fishfood, suffered rash, rhinoconjunctivitis, dyspnea and dysphagia. A Prick test was carried out with the habitual pneumoallergens, Chironomid Midge extract (PBS: 1.3 mg/ml), Common Mosquito (Culex pipiens), Squid, Mussel, Prawn and Anisakis. Conjunctival provocation was also carried out with Chironomid Midge extract; detection of specific IgE for Chironomid Midge, Common Mosquito (Aedes comunis), Mussel, Squid, Shrimp, Anisakis, house dust and house mites by means of the CAP technique; detection of IgE by means of ELISA in response to Chironomid Midge, Aedes mosquito, Squid, Prawn, Mussel and Anisakis; ELISA-inhibition and Immunoblott-inhibition. RESULTS: The positive results of the cutaneous tests, the detection of specific IgE and conjunctival provocation confirmed the existence of an IgE-mediated mechanism. In our patient, the in vitro techniques demonstrated cross reactivity with the Common Mosquito. CONCLUSIONS: We report on a patient with a case history of rhinoconjunctivitis, rash, dyspnea, and dysphagia after handling fish food. The etiological agent was the Chironomid larvae. The sensitization of our patient has been demonstrated by means of in vivo and in vitro techniques.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Characterization of allergens secreted by Anisakis simplex parasite: clinical relevance in comparison with somatic allergens.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic methods for the study of allergic reactions to Anisakis simplex (A.s.) based on whole-body extracts of the larva are clearly insufficient. OBJECTIVES: To study the allergenicity of the proteins secreted by the parasite. Comparison with somatic antigens and determination of their clinical importance in allergic patients were also addressed. METHODS: An excretory/secretory (E/S) extract was produced by culturing third-stage A.s. larvae. It was used to perform immediate skin tests and to determine specific IgE in 10 patients diagnosed with allergy to A.s. Both tests were compared with the results obtained with the whole-body extract (somatic (S)). The molecular weight (MW) of their allergens was determined by immunoblotting, and a single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge with E/S proteins was performed. Finally, allergens' resistance to gastric pepsin and acid pH was explored. RESULTS: A.s. larvae secreted allergens more potent than those present in the S extract. The skin prick test wheal area produced by E/S molecules and the absorbance obtained in the determination of specific IgE with these allergens (ELISA) were 5.8 times bigger than those obtained with S extract. MW allergens of 72 and 56 kDa in E/S extracts and those of 56, 48 and 43 kDa in S extract were recognized by more than 50% of the patients. Partial cross-reactivity between them was revealed by immunoblotting inhibition studies. Oral challenge with E/S extract (up to 479 microg) was negative in all the patients. Treatment of E/S proteins with gastric pepsin inhibited the binding of the E/S allergens for specific IgE. The acid pH did not affect the overall binding of IgE to E/S extract. It decreased by 15.23% and 19.96% at pH 4 and 2, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A.s. secretes allergens more potent than somatic antigens and should be used in the diagnostic procedures. These allergens are inactivated by the pepsin, which supports the theory that live larva is necessary to induce an allergic reaction in most of the patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Bezafibrate-induced anaphylactic shock: unusual clinical presentation.

We report a case of a patient who suffered generalized urticaria, chest tightness, wheezing, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and loss of consciousness. Two hours earlier she had taken Eulitop Retard following lunch. She had tolerated all the implicated food after the reaction. Allergy evaluation revealed intense positive responses to intradermal tests with bezafibrate active component and Eulitop Retard (skin tests in control subjects were negative). Specific IgE tests (RAST) to Eulitop Retard were negative. An IgE mechanism is suggested to be responsible for this adverse reaction on the basis of the positive skin tets. The delayed onset (two hours) of this anaphylactic shock is unusual. Although infrequent, it may be caused by the specific pharmacokinetic characteristics of this drug, which is a slow releasing agent, mainly absorbed in the gut. The drug was taken just after lunch, and this concomitant food ingestion could also have produced a delay in gastric drainage and a retarded drug absorption. An IgE-mediated accelerated type reaction could also explain this delay. Apparently the patient reacted after the first contact to the drug, and the absence of a sensitization period is not usual in this type of immune reponse. Finally, we recommend the performance of prick and intradermal skin tests prior to any systemic challenge when allergic reactions to fibric acid derivatives are suspected.

Anaphylaxis↗
PubMed1999

Lupine-induced anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Legumes are one of the most common foods causing allergic reactions in children and adults. Cross-reacting antibodies are frequently demonstrated in this family but the real clinical cross-reactivity is uncommon. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of lupine-induced anaphylaxis and to elucidate in vivo and in vitro cross-reactivity with some legumes. METHODS: Skin prick test (SPT) with some legumes were performed. Cap-IgE, ELISA-IgE, and immunoblotting were carried out. Open oral challenges with some legumes were performed. Cross-reactivity was studied by ELISA and immunoblotting inhibition. RESULTS: The results demonstrated type-I hypersensitivity reactions with lupine and some other legumes. Cap-IgE with peanut was positive but the SPT and ELISA-IgE were negative and the patient tolerated a peanut challenge. ELISA inhibition revealed a partial inhibition (62%) using lupine as the solid phase. Partial inhibition was demonstrated by immunoblotting inhibition. Open oral challenge with peanut and green bean were negative but positive with pea. CONCLUSION: We present a lupine sensitized patient with positive SPT and in vitro cross-reactivity with other legumes. Clinical cross-reactivity progressively developed over a 5-year period. Discrepancies were found between the clinical aspect and in vitro study of peanut allergy. Factors determining the wide variability in cross-reactivity among individuals are still obscure.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Piroxicam-induced photodermatitis. Cross-reactivity among oxicams. A case report.

BACKGROUND: there is a group of patients with contact allergy to thimerosal (thiosalicylic acid and ethylmercuric chloride), thiosalicylic acid sensitized, who develop photodermatitis to piroxicam. We present a case which we have investigated cross-reactivity among different oxicams. METHODS AND RESULTS: a 44-year-old man with contact allergy to thimerosal. A few hours after the intake of Feldene (piroxicam) while running outside, developed a papuloerithematosus exanthema in the neck, knees and forearms, and microvesicles on the finger webs, that became descamative a few days later. Oclusive patch tests with thiosalicylic acid, mercury, piroxicam, tenoxicam, droxicam and meloxicam and photopatch test with the oxicams were performed. Patch tests with thiosalicylic acid and piroxicam were positive and negative with the others. All the oxicams photopatch tests were positive. CONCLUSIONS: we present a case of photodermatitis and dermatitis to piroxicam, in a patient with contact allergy to the thiosalicylic moiety of thimerosal, in which cross-reactivity with the other oxicams have been demonstrated. In cases of oxicams-induced photodermatitis, all oxicams should be avoided, to elude posible cross-reactions.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Anaphylactic shock caused by impurities in orgotein preparations.

Previously reported allergic reactions to orgotein (superoxide dismutase) injections has assigned responsibility to this molecule, which is obtained from bovine liver. We report an anaphylactic shock probably caused by impurities contained in an orgotein preparation. Prick test to Peroxinorm (orgotein), BSA, and cow liver extract were positive but resulted negative with chymotrypsin, milk, meat and cow epithelium extracts. Tryptase levels determined 3, 24 hours and 15 days after the shock measured 6.32, 0.81 and 0.84 U/L respectively. Detection of specific IgE to Peroxinorm, BSA and chymotrypsin by ELISA was negative and positive to cow liver. Specific IgE to milk and cow epithelium by Pharmacia CAP system was negative. Immunoblotting with Peroxinorm revealed IgE specific bands at an apparent M.W of 67, 51, 56 and 16 kDa; immunoblotting with cow liver revealed bands at 72, 56, 50 and 36 kDa; immunoblotting with BSA and chymotypsin were negative. This case emphasises the role that 20 % of impurities of the pharmaceutical preparation may have in immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Allergens↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Recurrent fixed drug eruption caused by citiolone.

Citiolone (N-acetylhomocysteinethiolactone) is a thiolic-derived medication frequently used in Spain and in other countries as a mucolytic agent for the treatment of certain hepatic disorders. Mucolytic drugs have rarely been implicated in the fixed drug eruption etiology. We report on a patient who presented several episodes of fixed exanthema related to citiolone intake. The patch test with citiolone (10% in dimethyl sulfoxide) was negative. The diagnosis was confirmed by a positive controlled oral challenge test. Other mucolytic thiolic-derivatives (N-acetylcysteine) were tolerated by the patient, thus crossreactivity between these drugs seems to be unlikely.

Acetylcysteine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Acute IgE-mediated generalized urticaria-angioedema after topical application of povidone-iodine.

Povidone is a synthetic polymer mainly used as a dispersing or suspending agent for many pharmaceutical products. It is also used as a carrier for iodine. In many countries it is not mandatory its inclusion in drug labels so many adverse effects may be under diagnosed. Povidone-iodine used as a topical antiseptic solution may produce allergic contact dermatitis and irritation. Povidone, when systemically administered may deposit in tissues causing local lesions and pain. Three cases of immediate hypersensitivity to this agent have been reported. We present a patient who developed generalized urticaria and angioedema immediately after the first topical use of Betadine (povidone-iodine) on a right arm wound. The positive skin prick test to Betadine and povidone extract and the demonstration of serum specific IgE to povidone, confirmed an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity.

Acute Disease↗