PubMed1996
Long-term administration of morphine for the treatment of chronic pain produces constipation; this requires the use of laxatives, which impair water absorption and upset the electrolyte balance. Morphine-induced constipation is mainly due to inhibition of the propulsive movement of the gastrointestinal tract combined with spastic contraction of smooth circular muscles as a result of drug binding to opioid receptors in the tract. Since papaverine lacks affinity for opioid receptors but relaxes smooth muscle, it seemed possible that oral papaverine might be capable of diminishing constipation without impairing the analgesia achieved with morphine. For this purpose, experiments were carried out on rats: constipation was checked for by measuring the intestinal transit time, and analgesia was assessed by measuring the latency of the tail-flick response to radiant heat or nociceptive activity in single neurons of the thalamus evoked by supramaximal electrical stimulation of afferent C fibres in the sural nerve. Morphine and papaverine were administered by the oral route. Control animals received saline. To measure the intestinal transit time, India ink solution was given orally. Morphine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg orally) prolonged the transit time from approx. 420 min in the controls to more than 600 min, a dose of 2.5 mg/kg producing the maximum effect. Papaverine (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg) administered orally together with morphine significantly reduced morphine-induced constipation (Tables 1, 2). Papaverine given alone at a dose of 2 mg/kg caused no change in transit time, while 5 mg/kg significantly increased it (Table 2). The latency of the tail-flick response was increased by oral morphine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) at 1, 2, and 3 h after administration. Papaverine (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) given in combination with morphine left the antinociceptive effect of morphine unchanged (Figs. 1-3). A study of the nociceptive activity evoked in thalamus neurons of rats under urethane anaesthesia indicated that intestinal absorption of morphine was blocked. Therefore, metoclopramide (0.15 mg/kg) was injected i. v. 10 min before oral administration of morphine or the combination of morphine plus papaverine. Subsequently, morphine produced a dose-dependent depression of evoked nociceptive activity (Fig. 4), the mean effect amounting to 60 % of the control activity and being produced by 2.5 mg/kg (Fig. 5). Since in former experiments on nociceptive activity evoked in thalamus neurones it has been found that the ED(50) of i. v. morphine is 0.05 mg/kg, it is very likely that the presystemic elimination of orally administered morphine is very high and, in addition, that the efficiency of its active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide, is rather poor. When morphine 2.5 mg/kg was given together with papaverine 0.5 mg/kg, and morphine 5 mg/kg was administered in combination with papaverine 2 mg/kg, there was no significant reduction in the depressant effect of morphine on nociceptive activity evoked in thalamus neurons (Figs. 6, 7). The results suggest that papaverine given by the oral route may reduce morphine-induced constipation without impairment of the analgesic action of morphine in patients suffering from pain.