Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Yildirim

Publications and source records attributed to M Yildirim.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.

The aim of the present clinical study was to determine, through histologic and histomorphometric investigations of human bone specimens, whether the addition of autogenous bone to the bone substitute material Bio-Oss can produce a high-quality implant site. To improve vertical bone height, 13 sinus floor elevations were carried out in a total of 12 patients. Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor was completed using a mixture of Bio-Oss and bone harvested intraorally from the mandibular symphysis, the retromolar space, or the tuberosity region. Following an average of 7.1 months of healing, 36 Brånemark System implants were placed. During this surgical intervention, 23 cylinder-shaped bone biopsies were taken from the augmented maxillary region using trephine burs. Histologic analysis of the bone biopsies revealed that the Bio-Oss granulate was well-integrated into the newly formed bone; 33.1% (+/- 12.4%) of the substitute material surface was in direct contact with bone. Histomorphometric analysis of the samples revealed an average percentage proportion of bone of 18.9% (+/- 6.4%). The bovine substitute material and soft tissue occupied, respectively, 29.6% (+/- 8.9%) and 51.5% (+/- 9.4%) of the measured surface. When the implants were uncovered after an average healing phase of 6 months, all 36 implants had become osseointegrated. The combination of osteoconductive Bio-Oss and osteoinductive autogenous bone thus proved to be a material suitable for application in sinus floor augmentation.

Adult↗

Healing of bone defects in combination with immediate implants using the membrane technique.

Twenty Brånemark implants were placed with membranes (Gore-Tex Augmentation Material) as immediate or delayed implants in the extraction sockets of 15 patients. Membrane perforations through the mucous membrane occurred in 10 patients after 6 to 24 weeks and once after 2 weeks. Histologic examination of 15 tissue samples taken when the membrane was removed showed genuine bone regeneration in three patients, connective tissue regeneration with intermittent bone regeneration in eight patients, purely fibrous healing in two patients, and inflammatory granulation tissue in two patients. The high proportion of membrane perforations with immediate implants should be taken into account in the assessment and clinical application of this therapy principle.

Alveolar Process↗

Simultaneous hard and soft tissue augmentation for implant-supported single-tooth restorations.

The replication of nature in the rehabilitation of a single missing anterior tooth is primarily a surgical challenge, as hard and soft tissue deficiencies compromise the achievement of functional and aesthetic implant-supported restorations. Bone defects can be treated using guided bone regeneration (GBR), with or without bone graft materials. The successful application of the GBR technique has been documented in several experimental and clinical studies; the primary challenge associated with single tooth replacement is the creation of an adequate soft tissue recipient site. However, the increased morbidity and prolonged healing period involved in performing hard and soft tissue grafting procedures in two consecutive appointments do not achieve patient expectations. The learning objective of this article is to master a single-tooth replacement technique that allows surgical treatment of bony and soft tissue deficiencies in a single procedure, during either an immediate or delayed implant placement.

Adult↗