Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Weinberger

Publications and source records attributed to M Weinberger.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Mailed reminders for area-wide influenza immunization: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if mailed reminders would increase area-wide influenza immunization for persons aged 65 and older. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Ten counties in Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Using a Medicare database, 10,000 subjects were selected randomly from 10 counties in Indiana and randomized for the study. Using pre-established criteria, 4503 persons in the control group and 4508 in the intervention group were eligible for study. INTERVENTION: Intervention subjects received mailed reminders during the immunization season of 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Data from mailed surveys, Medicare claims, and phone calls were used to determine immunization rates. RESULTS: Of those surveyed who received immunization, only 63.4% filed a Medicare claim. Immunization rates were high in both groups but higher in the intervention group, 69.0% versus 64.2%. Age, presence of lung disease, assignment to the intervention group, presence of heart disease, and an age-sex interaction term were significantly and independently related to immunization. CONCLUSIONS: The Healthy People Year 2000 goal (60% immunization for persons 65 and older) was exceeded in this population. Medicare claims data do not reflect immunization rates accurately. Mailed reminders, an inexpensive intervention, increased immunization rates area-wide and have potential for cost savings.

Age Factors↗

Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical stroke trials are increasingly measuring patient-centered outcomes such as functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). No stroke-specific HRQOL measure is currently available. This study presents the initial development of a valid, reliable, and responsive stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) measure, for use in stroke trials. METHODS: Domains and items for the SS-QOL were developed from patient interviews. The SS-QOL, Short Form 36, Beck Depression Inventory, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index were administered to patients 1 and 3 months after ischemic stroke. Items were eliminated with the use of standard psychometric criteria. Construct validity was assessed by comparing domain scores with similar domains of established measures. Domain responsiveness was assessed with standardized effect sizes. RESULTS: All 12 domains of the SS-QOL were unidimensional. In the final 49-item scale, all domains demonstrated excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha values for each domain >/=0.73). Most domains were moderately correlated with similar domains of established outcome measures (r2 range, 0.3 to 0.5). Most domains were responsive to change (standardized effect sizes >0.4). One- and 3-month SS-QOL scores were associated with patients' self-report of HRQOL compared with before their stroke (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SS-QOL measures HRQOL, its primary underlying construct, in stroke patients. Preliminary results regarding the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SS-QOL are encouraging. Further studies in diverse stroke populations are needed.

Adult↗

Use of automated telephone disease management calls in an ethnically diverse sample of low-income patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether low-income patients with diabetes were able and willing to use automated telephone disease management (ATDM) calls to provide health status information that could improve the quality of their care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 252 adults with diabetes, 30 of whom spoke Spanish as their primary language, were enrolled at the time of clinic visits in a Department of Veterans Affairs health care system (n = 132) or a county health care system (n = 120). Patients received ATDM calls for 12 months and responded to queries using their touch-tone telephones. We examined 1) whether patients completed ATDM assessments consistently over the year and used the calls to report their self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) levels, 2) the characteristics of patients most likely to use the system frequently, 3) whether patients responded consistently within ATDM assessments, and 4) whether ATDM assessments differentiated among groups of patients with different clinical profiles at baseline. RESULTS: Half of all patients completed at least 77% of their attempted assessments, and one-fourth completed at least 91%. Half of all patients reported SMBG levels during at least 86% of their assessments. Patients completed assessments and reported glucose levels consistently over the year. Health status indicators were the most important determinants of assessment completion rates, while socioeconomic factors were more strongly associated with patients' likelihood of reporting SMBG data during assessments. Patients' responses within assessments were consistent, and the information they provided during their initial assessments identified groups with poor glycemic control and other health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Most low-income patients with diabetes can and will use ATDM calls as part of their care. The information they provide is reliable and has clinical significance. ATDM calls could improve the information base for diabetes management while relieving some of the pressures of delivering diabetes care under cost constraints.

Automation↗

Racial disparity in cardiac decision making: results from patient focus groups.

BACKGROUND: While numerous studies suggest that African Americans receive fewer invasive cardiac procedures than whites, the basis for these treatment differences is not understood. METHODS: We conducted focus group sessions with patients who had received treatment in the hospital or the emergency department within the preceding 3 months for ischemic heart disease at 2 urban, university-affiliated hospitals. RESULTS: Discussions with patients identified the following factors that influenced their decision making: clarity, simplicity, and consistency of treatment recommendations; advice from friends and family about whether to accept recommendations; availability to speak with others who accepted similar recommendations; and having honest and caring physicians. African American patients identified the following additional factors that influenced their decision making: perceptions of health care discrimination; perceptions of undesirable physician behavior; faith in God to control one's destiny; and patient-physician camaraderie. CONCLUSIONS: Participants identified common issues influencing health care decision making, regardless of race. However, additional factors were expressed only by African American participants. These factors conveyed racial differences in perceptions of the health care system that may, in part, contribute to differences in health care decision making and treatment.

Black or African American↗

Using focus groups to understand arthritis patients' perceptions about unconventional therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To understand arthritis patients' use of unconventional therapies (UT). METHODS: Thirty-three rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients followed in university clinics participated in 5 focus groups to discuss: their beliefs about arthritis and UT; UT they have used; reasons for using UT; effectiveness of UT; sources of information on UT; and communication about UT with the physician. Two investigators analyzed focus group transcripts to identify common themes. RESULTS: All patients believed arthritis to be incurable by conventional regimens or UT. Over one-half had used UT to relieve pain; cost was unimportant. Patients trusted information about UT from family, friends, and others with arthritis, but not supermarket tabloids or television commercials. Most discussed UT use with their physician, primarily to prevent interactions with prescribed treatments. Physicians' reactions ranged from ridicule to giving permission to continue using UT. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide an understanding of arthritis patients' motives for using UT and for discussing this behavior with their physician.

Adult↗

Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Two patients with rapidly progressive necrotizing fasciitis of a lower extremity due to Staphylococcus aureus as a single pathogen are described. In both patients the portal of entry was attributed to needle puncture (intra-articular injection and intravenous catheter, respectively), followed by bacteremia. Necrotizing fasciitis occurred in a site remote from the needle puncture, suggesting metastatic infection. One patient developed toxic shock syndrome and the other a sunburn-like rash and erythematous mucosae with strawberry tongue. One patient died, and the other required above-knee amputation due to secondary infectious complications. Staphylococcus aureus may mimic the presentation of invasive group A streptococcal infections. A history of needle puncture should alert the physician to the possibility of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Aged↗

Unexpected candidemia complicating ureteroscopy and urinary stenting.

Two elderly patients with obstructive renal calculi who developed Candida albicans bloodstream infection within 12 h following ureteroscopy and ureteral stenting are described. Both patients were treated with prolonged courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics and were found to have urine cultures positive for Candida albicans prior to the urologic procedures. One patient also developed bilateral candidal endophthalmitis. The clinical presentation was indistinguishable from bacteremia complicating manipulation of the urinary tract. The patients were successfully treated with systemic antifungal therapy. Candiduria may present a risk for dissemination during invasive, relatively simple urologic procedures.

Aged↗

Low inguinal approach for correction of recurrent varicocele.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of low inguinal (or subinguinal) approach in the treatment of recurrent or persistent varicocele after surgical treatment. Recurrent varicocele was diagnosed in 23 patients who previously underwent surgical treatment. The technique used consisted of low inguinal incision at the level of the external inguinal ring without opening the external oblique aponeurosis. External spermatic veins (cremasteric veins) were dissected and selectively ligated. Then the spermatic fascia was incised and the internal spermatic veins were identified and ligated individually. Postoperative radioisotope scan, scrotal examination and sperm analysis were used for treatment evaluation. Twenty-one (91.3%) had negative postoperative scan and no signs of varicocele on physical examination. A marked improvement of sperm analysis was noted in 19 patients (p<0.05), while two had only minor improvement. Two patients had positive postoperative scans without improvement of semen analysis. Neither atrophy nor azoospermia were detected on follow-up examination in any of these men, however, one patient developed hydrocele. This study indicates a good surgical outcome and improvement of semen quality without significant complications.

Adolescent↗

Utilities for major stroke: results from a survey of preferences among persons at increased risk for stroke.

BACKGROUND: Patient beliefs, values, and preferences are crucial to decisions involving health care. In a large sample of persons at increased risk for stroke, we examined attitudes toward hypothetical major stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: Respondents were obtained from the Academic Medical Center Consortium (n = 621), the Cardiovascular Health Study (n = 321 ), and United Health Care (n = 319). Preferences were primarily assessed by using the time trade off (TTO). Although major stroke is generally considered an undesirable event (mean TTO = 0.30), responses were varied: although 45% of respondents considered major stroke to be a worse outcome than death, 15% were willing to trade off little or no survival to avoid a major stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should speak directly with patients about beliefs, values, and preferences. Stroke-related interventions, even those with a high price or less than dramatic clinical benefits, are likely to be cost-effective if they prevent an outcome (major stroke) that is so undesirable.

Adult↗

Effect of prednisone on prostate-specific antigen in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of prednisone on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a cohort of patients with "hormone-refractory" prostate cancer. METHODS: Data were collected from 29 consecutive patients with hormone-refractory progressive prostate cancer who were treated with 10 mg of prednisone orally two times a day. Patients were included in this analysis only if other factors known to influence PSA levels (antiandrogen withdrawal, radiation, and/or other concomitant anticancer therapies) were definitively excluded as potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: The mean and median PSA decline after initiating prednisone was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20% to 46%) and 24% (range 0% to 99%), respectively. Ten patients (34%) had a PSA decline of more than 50% and 4 patients (14%) had PSA declines of more than 75%. The average and median time for progression-free survivals were 2.8 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.8) and 2.0 (range 0 to 11) months. Four (14%) patients had PSA declines lasting 6 months or more. Median survival was 12.8 months. Additional analyses indicated that a PSA decline of more than 50%, compared with less than 50%, was associated with a longer survival. Toxicities included steroid myopathy (n = 4), new-onset diabetes (n = 1), and dyspnea (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Prednisone (10 mg orally two times a day) can decrease PSA by more than 50% in approximately one third of patients with hormone-refractory progressive prostate cancer. On the basis of comparisons with other data sets, we hypothesize a dose-response relationship between glucocorticoid dose and PSA decline.

Aged↗

Cooperative studies in health services research in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Department of Veterans Affairs, through its Cooperative Studies Program, has a long history of conducting large-scale, multihospital biomedical clinical trials. The agency's Health Services Research and Development Service, although newer, has a distinguished record of mainly single-site research into the organization, delivery, and financing of health services. In 1990, a joint program was initiated to conduct multicenter studies in health services research. This article describes the studies developed in the new program and the research design issues encountered in planning them. Identification of the patient population, specification and measurement of the intervention, and description of the control group, as well as attention to the unit of randomization and analysis, outcome variables and choice of effect size, data quality, and ethical considerations are among the important issues related to the design of these studies and future studies in health services.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Can raters consistently evaluate the content of focus groups?

Focus groups are increasingly being used to provide insights to researchers and policy makers. These data complement quantitative approaches to understanding the world. Unfortunately, quantitative and qualitative methodologies have often been viewed as antithetical, rather than complementary, strategies. While focus groups can clearly generate rich information that is unobtainable through other quantitative methods, it is important to determine the degree to which different raters can consistently extract information from transcripts. Thus, our goal was to quantify agreement in the interpretation of transcripts from patient and physician focus groups, using decision-making in ischemic heart disease as a model. We used data from focus groups with both patients and physicians that sought to identify factors affecting diagnostic and treatment decisions in ischemic heart disease. Three raters independently reviewed transcribed audiotapes from focus groups of patients with ischemic heart disease, as well as focus groups of physicians who care for these patients. We found that raters could not distinguish between major and minor factors reliably. More troubling, however, is that consistency regarding the apparently straightforward judgment as to the mere presence or absence of a factor was difficult to achieve. In particular, the three raters of each transcript failed to agree on between one third and one half of the factors. This reasonably high level of disagreement occurred despite the raters: (1) having generated the individual factors themselves based upon their reading a random sample of actual transcripts and (2) being trained in the use of rating forms (including standard definitions of themes). These data suggest that if a single rater evaluates focus group transcripts, as is commonly done, judgments may not be reproducible by other raters. Moreover, a single rater may not extract all important information contained in the transcripts.

Female↗

Case management programs in primary care.

To review the impact of case management programs on health care resource use; their impact on patient satisfaction, quality of life, and functional status (patient-centered outcomes); and their cost-effectiveness, we reviewed the English language literature utilizing the following MEDLINE and HealthSTAR headings: case management, patient care planning, patient-centered care, disease management, care management, and managed care programs. Bibliographies of relevant articles were also reviewed. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Data were extracted manually from relevant publications and are presented descriptively because formal, quantitative methods were not applicable. Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the seven studies examining case management's impact on health resource use, only two found a positive effect. Both successful programs targeted patients with specified disease conditions and care was supervised by a medical subspecialist. None of the programs targeting general disease conditions or supervised by generalists reported a positive effect. All six studies examining patient-centered outcomes reported a positive impact. These effects were unrelated to the patient's conditions or the study personnel. Both studies examining clinical parameters found a positive impact. Only three studies examined costs; all reported nonsignificant cost savings. While case management programs offer theoretical benefits, few examples of successful programs were found. Positive effect was related to disease condition and specialty training of study personnel. Patient-centered outcomes were often improved upon but at unknown cost. Further multisite clinical trials are needed to define case management's role in our future health care system.

Case Management↗

Racial differences in cardiac catheterization use and appropriateness.

The authors sought to investigate the role of medical appropriateness as a potential explanatory factor in previously observed interracial cardiac procedure rate differences. A retrospective cohort study using RAND appropriateness criteria was conducted at a Veterans Affairs medical center among a sample of patients who were evaluated for cardiovascular disease during 1993 (n=200). All participants were men and 50% were black (mean age=61.8 years). Blacks were less likely than whites to undergo cardiac catheterizations (CC) (odds ratio [OR]=0.23, P < 0.01). When RAND criteria were applied, blacks were found to have fewer indications that made them appropriate candidates for CC and more indications making them inappropriate candidates for CC (chi-square test, P < 0.05). No CC procedure underuse was found among blacks, whereas 10% of CC overuse was found among whites. Interracial CC procedure use differences were not due to procedure underuse among blacks but were in part due to overuse among whites.

Black or African American↗

Relation between literacy, race, and stage of presentation among low-income patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer is a major health problem, especially among low-income men. Opportunities vary for early detection of prostate cancer for low-income black and white men because of financial, cultural, and social factors. In this study, we evaluated the association of poor literacy skills with higher rates of presentation of advanced stages of prostate cancer among low-income black and white men who received care in equal-access medical systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Literacy and stage at diagnosis of prostate cancer were evaluated in 212 low-income men who received medical care in Shreveport, LA, and Chicago, IL. The patients' literacy was assessed with the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), an individually administered reading screening test designed specifically for use in the medical setting. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of metastatic disease at presentation as a function of patient age, race, literacy, and city. RESULTS: Whereas black men were almost twice as likely to present with stage D prostate cancer (49.5% v 35.9%; P < .05), they were significantly more likely to have literacy levels less than sixth grade (52.3% v 8.7%; P < .001). However, after adjustment for differences in literacy, age, and city, race was not a significant predictor of advanced-stage prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Low literacy may be an overlooked but significant barrier to the diagnosis of early-stage prostate cancer among low-income white and black men. The development of culturally sensitive, low-literacy educational materials may improve patient awareness of prostate cancer and improve the frequency of diagnosis of early-stage cancer.

Adult↗