M W Gill — Page 2 | Search PubMed

PubMedDate not supplied

Isopropanol: acute vapor inhalation neurotoxicity study in rats.

Five groups of 25 Fischer 344 rats of each sex were exposed for 6 h to isopropanol vapor at 0, 500, 1500, 5000 or 10,000 ppm. Behavioral observations for 10 rats of each sex were made prior to and 1, 6, and 24 h after exposure. Motor activity was evaluated for 15 rats of each sex prior to and immediately following exposure. Exposure to isopropanol caused a spectrum of transient effects indicative of narcosis at 10,000 ppm and sedation at 5000 ppm. Prostration or severe ataxia, decreased arousal, slowed or labored respiration, decreased neuromuscular function, hypothermia and loss of reflex function were observed 1 and 6 h after exposure to 10,000 ppm isopropanol vapor. Similar, but less severe, alterations were observed in animals in the 5000 ppm exposure group 1 h after exposure. Exposure concentration-related decreases in motor activity were observed in males and females in the 5000 and 10,000 ppm groups and slight decreases in motor activity were observed in males in the 1500 ppm group. Animals in the 1500 and 5000 ppm exposure groups recovered from these motor activity effects within 5 h. Based on this study, exposure of male and female rats to isopropanol vapor produces transient, concentration-related narcosis and/or sedation at concentrations of 5000 and 10,000 ppm and minor decreases in motor activity in males at a concentration of 1500 ppm. The no-observed-effect level (NOEL) for this was 500 ppm isopropanol.

1-Propanol↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Interlaboratory comparison of motor activity experiments: implications for neurotoxicological assessments.

Motor activity is an important functional measure used in neurotoxicology. The effects of chemicals on motor activity, however, may depend on variables such as type of measurement apparatus, physical and environmental testing conditions, and many other experimental protocol and organismic variables. Due to the increasing use of motor activity in neurotoxicology, a major question concerns the potential for differences in experimental findings due to variations in sensitivity and reliability between different laboratories and devices used to measure motor activity. This study examined historical data from a number of laboratories that employed different devices and experimental protocols to measure motor activity. Four aspects of the motor activity data were compared: 1) within-laboratory control variability across time; 2) within-laboratory replicability of control data; 3) between-laboratory variability in the effects of chemicals; and 4) between-laboratory comparison of the control rates of habituation. The analyses indicated that there was a relatively restricted range of within-laboratory variability and reliability in control values, and that these ranges were comparable across laboratories. Similar profiles of habituation were also seen across the different laboratories. Moreover, in virtually every case, all laboratories were capable of detecting qualitatively similar changes in motor activity following acute exposure to a variety of chemicals. These data indicate a high degree of comparability in the data generated by the different devices and experimental protocols.

Animals↗