Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M V Graham

Publications and source records attributed to M V Graham.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Prospective phase I/II studies of definitive irradiation and chemotherapy for advanced gynecologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: This is a prospective study to evaluate toxicity and efficacy of concurrent irradiation and three cycles of chemotherapy bolus cisplatin and infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 I.V. rapid infusion, and 5-day continuous infusion of 5FU (750 mg/m2 per day (schedule A); or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. rapid infusion, and 4-day continuous infusion of 5FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day (schedule B). Schedule A was given to 25 patients in the first 36 months of the study and was changed to schedule B in an additional 42 patients. All patients received irradiation, which usually consisted of 20 Gy whole pelvis, 30-40 Gy split field, and two intracavitary insertions for a total of 80-90 Gy to point A. Primary cervical cancer occurred in 40 patients with 3 having stage IB bulky, 2 with stage IIA, 5 with stage IIB, 2 with stage IIIA, 23 with stage IIIB, 4 with stage IV, and 1 with stage IVB. Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy occurred in 18 patients. The remainder of the patients consisted of two each with stages III and IV endometrial carcinoma, two with stage III vaginal carcinoma, two with stage III vulvar carcinoma, and one with recurrent vulvar carcinoma. Patients were treated from 1985 through 1992. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survivals for patients with stages IB (bulky)-IIB cervical cancer was 70%, 25% for stages IIIA-IVA, and 39% for patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma. All four patients with endometrial carcinoma have recurred and died. Two patients with vulvar carcinoma are alive and free of disease, and one is dead of intercurrent disease. One patient with stage III vaginal carcinoma is alive and free of disease, while the other recurred and died. No significant differences were observed in the toxicity of the two chemotherapy schedules. There were 9/39 (23%) grade 4 and one fatal complication in those with primary cervical carcinoma. The overall fistulae rate was 11% (4/39) with three patients developing rectovaginal fistulae and one having vesicovaginal fistula. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemotherapy and irradiation for advanced gynecologic malignancies as administered in this study is highly toxic and fails to demonstrate an obvious survival improvement.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1995

Preliminary results of a prospective trial using three dimensional radiotherapy for lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the preliminary results of a prospective trial using three-dimensional (3D) treatment for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy patients with inoperable Stage I through IIIB lung cancer were treated with three-dimensional thoracic irradiation with or without chemotherapy (35% received chemotherapy). Total prescribed dose to the tumor ranged from 60-74 Gy (uncorrected for lung density). All patients were evaluated for local control, survival, and development of pneumonitis. These parameters were evaluated in respect to and compared with three-dimensional parameters used in their treatment planning. RESULTS: With a minimum follow-up of 6 to 30 months, the 2-year cause-specific survival rate for Stages I and II was 90% and 53% for Stage III (no difference between Stages IIIA and IIIB). Patients with local tumor control had a better 2-year overall survival rate (47%) than those with local failure (31%). Volumetrically heterogeneously calculated doses were important to the accurate delineation of dose-volume coverage as there was a wide range of discrepancies between a homogeneously prescribed point dose calculation and the heterogeneously calculated volume coverage of that prescription. High-grade pneumonitis was correlated with the location of the tumor with lower lobe tumors having a much higher risk than those with upper lobe tumors. A critical volume effect and threshold dose were apparent in the development of high-grade pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional therapy for lung cancer has been practically implemented at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and shows promising results in our preliminary analysis. The incidence of high-grade pneumonitis, however, warrants careful selection of patients for future dose escalation. Future dose escalation trials in lung cancer should be directed to volumes that limit the amount of elective nodal irradiation. However, the volume of necessary elective nodal irradiation remains unknown and should be studied prospectively. Dose escalation trials are indicated and may be facilitated by smaller target volumes.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

Phase I/II study of treatment of locally advanced (T3/T4) non-oat cell lung cancer with concomitant boost radiotherapy by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 83-12): long-term results.

PURPOSE: This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of high dose-per-fraction radiotherapy given to the tumor primary concurrently with conventional fractionated radiotherapy to the electively irradiated regional lymph nodes (concomitant boost). This article reports the late results of toxicity and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-nine patients with histologically proven clinical Stage T3-T4, N1-3 nonsmall cell lung cancer were prospectively enrolled in this study. Fifty-six were evaluable for late effects. The treatment delivered 2.68 Gy daily to the primary tumor, 5 days a week, to a total dose of 75 Gy in 28 fractions in 5.5 weeks. At the same treatment sessions, the electively irradiated nodal areas received 1.8 Gy daily, 5 days per week, to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. All doses were calculated with heterogeneity corrections for lung density. RESULTS: Presently, one patient remains alive at 7.7 years. Median survival was 10.0 months with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 41%, 25%, 18%, and 4%, respectively. Three patients developed severe late complications, including pulmonary fibrosis and osteonecrosis. The remainder of the patients, however, developed only grade 1 or 2 pulmonary fibrosis and/or pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: We conclude that concomitant boost radiotherapy in the manner reported resulted in acceptable late toxicity. The 2- and 3-year survivals compared favorably with the best-reported results in the literature with either hyperfractionated or chemoradiotherapy treatment. Studies that deliver higher radiotherapy doses to the gross tumor combined with chemotherapy are in order.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The Electronic View Box: a software tool for radiation therapy treatment verification.

PURPOSE: We have developed a software tool for interactively verifying treatment plan implementation. The Electronic View Box (EVB) tool copies the paradigm of current practice but does so electronically. A portal image (online portal image or digitized port film) is displayed side by side with a prescription image (digitized simulator film or digitally reconstructed radiograph). The user can measure distances between features in prescription and portal images and "write" on the display, either to approve the image or to indicate required corrective actions. The EVB tool also provides several features not available in conventional verification practice using a light box. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The EVB tool has been written in ANSI C using the X window system. The tool makes use of the Virtual Machine Platform and Foundation Library specifications of the NCI-sponsored Radiation Therapy Planning Tools Collaborative Working Group for portability into an arbitrary treatment planning system that conforms to these specifications. The present EVB tool is based on an earlier Verification Image Review tool, but with a substantial redesign of the user interface. A graphical user interface prototyping system was used in iteratively refining the tool layout to allow rapid modifications of the interface in response to user comments. RESULTS: Features of the EVB tool include 1) hierarchical selection of digital portal images based on physician name, patient name, and field identifier; 2) side-by-side presentation of prescription and portal images at equal magnification and orientation, and with independent grayscale controls; 3) "trace" facility for outlining anatomical structures; 4) "ruler" facility for measuring distances; 5) zoomed display of corresponding regions in both images; 6) image contrast enhancement; and 7) communication of portal image evaluation results (approval, block modification, repeat image acquisition, etc.). CONCLUSION: The EVB tool facilitates the rapid comparison of prescription and portal images and permits electronic communication of corrections in port shape and positioning.

Hospital Records↗
PubMed1995

Three-dimensional treatment planning and conformal radiation therapy: preliminary evaluation.

Preliminary clinical results are presented for 209 patients with cancer who had treatment planned on our three-dimensional radiation treatment planning (3-D RTP) system and were treated with external beam conformal radiation therapy. Average times (min) for CT volumetric simulation were: 74 without or 84 with contrast material; 36 for contouring of tumor/target volume and 44 for normal anatomy; 78 for treatment planning; 53 for plan evaluation/optimization; and 58 for verification simulation. Average time of daily treatment sessions with 3-D conformal therapy or standard techniques was comparable for brain, head and neck, thoracic, and hepatobiliary tumors (11.8-14 min and 11.5-12.1, respectively). For prostate cancer patients treated with 3-D conformal technique and Cerrobend blocks, mean treatment time was 19 min; with multileaf collimation it was 14 min and with bilateral arc rotation, 9.8 min. Acute toxicity was comparable to or lower than with standard techniques. Sophisticated 3-D RTP and conformal irradiation can be performed in a significant number of patients at a reasonable cost. Further efforts, including dose-escalation studies, are necessary to develop more versatile and efficient 3-D RTP systems and to enhance the cost benefit of this technology in treatment of patients with cancer.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

A day-to-day decision support tool.

An easy-to-use decision support tool for staffing is explained. By combining information from a hospital's patient classification system with the hospital's usual staffing policies, a graph can be developed that shows immediately whether a unit is economically justified in using overtime or contract nurses, or if nurses are available from other units.

Decision Support Techniques↗
PubMed1994

Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to use daily electronic portal imaging to evaluate weekly port filming in detecting patient set-up position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computer-based portal alignment method was used to quantify the field displacements on 191 digitized weekly port films and 848 daily electronic portal images in 21 radiation therapy patients. An electronic portal image data set as a control for actual daily treatment position was used to evaluate weekly port films with respect to same-day field displacement, rate of field placement error detection, and prediction of subsequent daily field displacements. RESULTS: The field displacements measured on a port film frequently deviated from the corresponding field displacements on the electronic portal image obtained in the same treatment set-up. A linear regression analysis showed that the curves fitted to the same-day field displacements had slopes that differed significantly from unity (p < 0.001). Overall, the respective frequencies of field placement error, beyond clinical tolerance limits of 5, 7, and 10 mm (corresponding to head and neck, thoracic, and pelvic sites) for port filming and electronic portal imaging were 11% and 14% (p = 0.4) in the X-direction (lateral or anteroposterior) and 24% and 13% (p = .0001) in the Y-direction (caphalad-caudad). When the data were broken down by anatomical region, this discrepancy was found to be mainly due to the differences in the thorax, and head and neck image data sets. For thoracic fields, error in Y-shifts was 28% by port filming, but only 9% by portal imaging (p = 0.01). In the head and neck region, 18% of the port films exceeded tolerance, whereas only 6% of the electronic portal images did (p = 0.0001). Field displacements on the treatment set-ups between the acquisition of port films were not predicted by those films. CONCLUSION: There are discrepancies between the field displacements and field placement errors detected by weekly port films and daily electronic portal images. This study suggests that improved methods of treatment verification may be necessary in modern radiation therapy.

Diagnostic Imaging↗
PubMed1994

Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning study for patients with carcinoma of the lung.

PURPOSE: Several reports in the literature suggest that local-regional control and possibly survival could be improved for inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer if the radiation dose to the target volume could be increased. Higher doses, however, bring with them the potential for increased side effects and complications of normal tissues. Three-dimensional treatment planning has shown significant potential for improving radiation treatment planning in several sites, both for tumor coverage and for sparing of normal tissue from high doses of radiation and, thus, has the potential of developing radiation therapy techniques that result in uncomplicated local-regional control of lung cancer. We have studied the feasibility of large-scale implementation of true three-dimensional technologies in the treatment of patients with cancers of the thorax. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CT scans were performed on 10 patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer to obtain full volumetric image data, and therapy was planned on our three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning system. Target volumes were determined using the new ICRU nomenclature--Gross Tumor Volume, Clinical Target Volume, and Planning Target Volume. Plans were performed according to our standard treatment policies based on traditional two-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning methodologies and replanned using noncoplanar three-dimensional beam techniques. The results were quantitatively compared using dose-volume histograms, dose-surface displays, and dose statistics. RESULTS: Target volume delineation remains a difficult problem for lung cancer. Defining Gross Tumor Volume and Clinical Target Volume may depend on window and level settings of the three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning system, suggesting that target volume delineation on hard copy film is inadequate. Our study shows that better tumor coverage is possible with three-dimensional plans. Dose to critical structures (e.g., the heart) could often be reduced (or at least remain acceptable) using noncoplanar beams even with dose escalation to 75 to 80 Gy for the planning volume surrounding the Gross Target Volume. CONCLUSION: Commonly used beam arrangements for treatment of lung cancer appear to be inadequate to safely deliver tumor doses of higher than 70 Gy. Although conventional treatment techniques may be adequate for tumor coverage, they are inadequate for sparing of normal tissues when the prescription dose is escalated. The ability to use noncoplanar fields for such patients is a major advantage of three-dimensional planning. This capability led to better tumor coverage and reduced dose to critical normal tissues. However, this advantage was achieved at the expense of a greater time commitment by the treatment planning staff (particularly the radiation oncologist) and a greater complexity of treatment delivery. In summary, three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning appears to provide the radiation oncologist with the necessary tools to increase tumor dose, which may lead to increased local-regional control in patients with lung cancer while maintaining normal tissue doses at acceptable tolerance levels.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1994

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in bronchogenic carcinoma: considerations for implementation.

Lung cancer continues to be a major health problem worldwide. In spite of significant technological and scientific medical progress, the final outcome of this disease is still dismal. Except for a small percentage of patients with early stage who undergo complete surgical resection, local control continues to be disappointingly low. In a recent report by Arriagada et al. (Arriagada R, Le Chevalier T, Quoix E, Rufie P, de Cremoux H, Douillard J-Y, Tarayre M, Pignon, J-P, LaPlanche, A. Effect of chemotherapy on locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a randomized study of 353 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 20:1183-1190), biopsy proven local control by RT alone was only 17%. This team also found that the addition of combination chemotherapy, although it has decreased distant metastasis, has not had any impact on local control. There are some indications in the literature to suggest that higher doses of radiation to the target volume (tumor) may result in improved local control in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. This temptation for increasing dose to target volume, however, should not result in inappropriate normal tissue side-effects and complications. Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy has shown a significant potential for improving radiation treatment planning in several sites, both for tumor coverage and sparing normal tissue. Using this technology, progress in uncomplicated locoregional control of lung cancer may become a reality. The following is a review of literature and analysis of the currently available information on this subject.

Carcinoma, Bronchogenic↗
PubMed1993

An evaluation of two methods of anatomical alignment of radiotherapy portal images.

PURPOSE: Two techniques have been developed at our institution to allow anatomical registration of digitized portal images to a simulation film. Accuracy of the portal image alignment methods is tested and single intrauser and multiple interuser variation is examined using each technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Method one requires the identification of anatomical fiducial points on a simulation image and its corresponding portal image. The parameters required to align the corresponding points are calculated by a least squares fit algorithm. Method two uses an anatomical template generated from the simulation image and superimposing it upon a portal image. The template is then adjusted by a computer mouse to obtain the best subjective anatomical fit on the portal image. Megavoltage portal images of a skull phantom with various known shifts and eight clinical image files were aligned by each method. Each data set was aligned several times by both a single user and multiple users. RESULTS: Alignment of the anatomical phantom portal images demonstrates an accuracy of less than 0.8 +/- 0.9 mm and 0.7 +/- 1.0 degrees with either method. As out of plane rotation increased from 0 to 5 degrees, simulating out of plane malpositioning, alignment orthogonal to the plane of rotation worsened to 1.5 +/- 1.1 mm with the point method and 2.4 +/- 1.6 mm with the template method. Alignment parallel to the axis of the gantry rotation was insensitive to this change and remained constant as did the rotational alignment parameters. For the clinical image files the magnitude of variation for a single user is typically less than +/- 1 mm or +/- 1 degree. The magnitude of variation of alignment increased when multiple users aligned the same image files. The variation was dependent upon anatomical site and to a lesser degree the method of alignment used. The root mean square deviation of translational shifts range from +/- 0.68 mm when using the template method in the pelvis to as high as +/- 2.94 mm with the template method to align abdominal portal images. In the thorax and pelvis translational alignments along the horizontal axis were more precise than along the vertical axis. Multiple user variability was in part due to poor image quality, user experience, non rigidity of the anatomical features, and the difficulty in locating an exact point on a continuous anatomical structure. CONCLUSION: In well controlled phantom studies both the fiducial point and template method provide similar and adequate results. The phantom studies show that alignment error and variance increase with distortion in anatomical features secondary to out of plane rotations. In clinical situations intrauser variation is small, however, multiple interuser variation is larger. The magnitude of variation is dependent upon the anatomical site aligned.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed1993

Radiation therapy alone for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This paper is a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical Stage I non-small cell carcinoma of the lung treated with definitive radiation therapy alone. The results of therapy, patterns of failure and the relationship of technical aspects of the delivery of radiotherapy to outcome are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1980 through 1990, 53 patients with Stage I non-small cell lung cancer were treated with definitive radiation therapy alone at the Radiation Oncology Center of the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and its affiliated hospitals. All patients had a pathologic diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer and were not candidates for surgical resection because of either patient refusal (10 patients), poor performance status (5 patients), or premorbid medical problems (38 patients). The median age was 73 years. Histologic cell type included squamous (32), adenocarcinoma (11), large cell (4), and unclassified non-small cell (6). Initial tumor size was < or = 3 cm in 23 patients, between 3 and 5 cm in 13 patients and > or = 5 cm in 17 patients. Diagnostic staging varied during the study period. All patients had chest X-rays and computed tomography scans of the chest. A majority had liver and bone scans, but only four underwent mediastinoscopy. The radiation therapy was of megavoltage energy in all patients, with a median primary prescription tumor dose of 63.2 Gy. Survival was measured from the date radiation therapy was initiated. RESULTS: The actuarial overall survival rate for the entire group was 19% at 3 years and 6% at 5 years, with a median survival time of 20.9 months. Of the 49 deaths, 35 died of lung cancer; 13 died of intercurrent illness, and one died of pancreatic cancer, which made the actuarial cause-specific survival 33% at 3 years and 13% at 5 years. The actuarial 3-year disease-free survival was 33%. Local primary tumor progression occurred in 22 patients, resulting in a 51% 3-year actuarial freedom from local progression. An additional four patients failed in regional lymph nodes that were included in the original treatment portals. Multivariate analysis found only T stage to be associated with overall survival (p = .02). However multivariate analysis showed age as a prognostic factor to be approaching statistical significance (p = .07). Patients under 70 years of age showed an increased survival rate compared to patients over 70 years. Radiation therapy doses > or = 65 Gy appeared to result in a decreased proportion of patients dying of lung cancer with no apparent increase in either acute or long-term complication rates. CONCLUSION: Results of definitive radiation therapy for inoperable Stage I non-small cell lung remain inferior to surgical therapy. Potential methods to improve local control with radiotherapy are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

The use of on-line image verification to estimate the variation in radiation therapy dose delivery.

PURPOSE: On-line radiotherapy imaging systems provide data that allow us to study the geometric nature of treatment variation. It is more clinically relevant to examine the resultant dosimetric variation. In this work, daily beam position as recorded by the on-line images is used to recalculate the treatment plan to show the effect geometric variation has on dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily 6 MV or 18 MV x-ray portal images were acquired using a fiberoptic on-line imaging system for 12 patients with cancers in the head and neck, thoracic, and pelvic regions. Each daily on-line portal image was aligned with the prescription simulation image using a template of anatomical structures defined on the latter. The outline of the actual block position was then superimposed on the prescription image. Daily block positions were cumulated to give a summary image represented by the block overlap isofrequency distribution. The summary data were used to analyze the amount of genometric variation relative to the prescription boundary on a histogram distribution plot. Treatment plans were recalculated by considering each aligned portal image as an individual beam. RESULTS: On-Line Image Verification (OLIV) data can differentiate between systematic and random errors in a course of daily radiation therapy. The data emphasize that the type and magnitude of patient set-up errors are unique for individual patients and different clinical situations. Head and neck sites had the least random variation (average 0-100% block overlap isofrequency distribution width = 7 mm) compared to thoracic (average 0-100% block overlap isofrequency distribution width = 12 mm) or pelvic sites (average 0-100% block overlap isofrequency distribution width = 14 mm). When treatment delivery is analyzed case by case, systematic as well as random errors are represented. When the data are pooled by anatomical site, individuality of variations is lost and variation appears random. Recalculated plans demonstrated dosimetric deviations from the original plans. The differences between the two dosimetric distributions were emphasized using a technique of plan subtraction. This allowed quick identification of relative "hot and cold spots" in the recalculated plans. The magnitude and clinical significance of dosimetric variation was unique for each patient. CONCLUSIONS: OLIV data are used to study geometric uncertainties because of the unique nature for individual patients. Dose recalculation is helpful to illustrate the dosimetric consequences of set-up errors.

Humans↗
PubMed1993

Parental sensitivity to infant cues: similarities and differences between mothers and fathers.

This study investigated the relationship of parent and infant characteristics to parental sensitivity to infant cues. Thirty-two families with firstborn infants were observed in a play situation. Capacity for empathy was the best predictor of sensitivity to infant cues for both mothers and fathers. Attitudes toward infant care also predicted sensitivity in mothers but not fathers, whereas nonverbal decoding ability, marital adjustment, baby temperament, and gender were unrelated to sensitivity to cues. Significant differences were found between parents in terms of their capacity for empathy and attitudes toward infants. Compared with fathers, mothers were both more empathic and had more positive attitudes than fathers.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of prognostic factors and survival among black patients and white patients treated with irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported differences in cancer incidence and survival between populations of Blacks and Whites. A 45% higher death rate from lung cancer for Black men and a survival duration for Black patients with lung cancer that is generally shorter than that for White patients have also been reported. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether race affects known prognostic factors for non-small-cell lung cancer in Black versus White patients. This analysis attempts to determine which prognostic factors may contribute to the reported differences in disease outcome. METHODS: We used data from 1565 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated in four randomized prospective trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The data were pooled for a retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors by race. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences between Blacks and Whites with regard to sex, weight loss, histology, and RTOG T stage (P < .05), but the only clinically significant difference (P < or = .01) was weight loss. Despite these findings, overall survival for Blacks and Whites did not differ significantly (P = .67). Median survival for Blacks and Whites with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90 or more was 12.1 and 11.3 months, respectively (P = .45). Survival for Blacks and Whites with a KPS of less than 90 was 7.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. Cause of death did not differ between the two races. For both races, KPS, age, sex, weight loss, and RTOG T and N stages were significant prognostic factors for survival (P < .01), but race was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Further studies of the differential in cancer survival for Blacks and Whites may be indicated, but greater impact may be achieved by addressing socioeconomic factors, lifestyle and occupational risk factors, health education, and access to adequate health care.

Black People↗