Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Tondeur

Publications and source records attributed to M Tondeur.

79 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Malabsorption of liposoluble vitamins in a child with bile acid deficiency.

A male born to first cousins presented at 12 months with hypocalcemic convulsions, rickets, epistaxis due to vitamin K deficiency, and extremely low serum levels of beta-carotene and vitamin A. Liver function was altered moderately (glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, 55 U/L; glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, 37 U/L; lactate dehydrogenase, 255 U/L; alkaline phosphatase, 437 U/L). To correct the deficiencies, 8,000 IU vitamin D/day, 10,000 IU vitamin A/day, and intramuscular administration of vitamin K1 were required. At 9 years, he presented signs of neuromuscular affection, and the serum vitamin E level (measured for the first time) was extremely low. Classic lipid malabsorption syndromes (abetalipoproteinemia, chronic cholestasis, mucoviscidosis, coeliac disease, Whipple's disease) were excluded by appropriate examinations. Composition of duodenal bile acids was characterized by undetectable levels of cholic acid metabolites, and only chenodeoxycholic acid metabolites were present. Serum total bile acid concentration was normal, with an atypical low cholic acid/chenodeoxycholic acid ratio and abnormal presence of 3 beta-OH-delta 5-cholenic acid and 6-OH-bile acids. Urinary bile acid composition was also characterized by elevated 6-OH-bile acids. Known enzymopathies of the bile acid synthetic pathway were excluded (cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, cerebro-hepato-renal syndrome of Zellweger, coprostanic acidemia). Bile acid pool sizes were determined by using stable isotopes: cholic acid pool size [2.90 (N, 32 +/- 16) microM/kg] and chenodeoxycholic acid pool size [10.8 (N, 32.6 +/- 9.9) microM/kg] were extremely low; fractional turnover rates of both bile acids were in a normal range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Transmission of examination results to patients: opinion of referring physicians and patients].

Patients frequently ask the nuclear medicine physician or the radiologist for conclusions at completion of a diagnostic procedure. The present study tried to assess opinions from both patients and referring physicians. Answers from both parties were grossly discordant: most of the referring physicians thought patients should not be given results of a diagnostic procedure by the nuclearist or radiologist an approach most of the patients disagreed with. Deontological guidelines of the official Belgian association do not authorize nuclear medicine physicians nor radiologists to give the patients any result directly; according to our data, this rule should be adapted.

Adult↗