Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Tonato

Publications and source records attributed to M Tonato.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Pharmacokinetics of vincristine in cancer patients treated with nifedipine.

The pharmacokinetics of vincristine (VCR) after an intravenous bolus dose of 2 mg were studied in patients with cancer with and without a concomitant treatment with the calcium-entry blocker nifedipine (NIF). VCR concentrations were determined by a sensitive radioimmunoassay. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by a nonlinear weighted least-square regression program (SAS-NLIN). A tri-exponential model fitted the raw data better than a bi-exponential model in five of 14 (35%) patients treated with VCR alone and in seven of 12 (58%) patients treated with VCR plus NIF (P = NS). The T1/2 alpha was shorter in NIF-treated patients, whereas the T1/2 gamma was longer in the NIF-treated group. The NIF-treated group showed an increase in the AUC O-infinity and AUC 1 to 96 hours, and a decrease in the AUC 0 to 1 hour. Total plasma clearance of VCR and 7-day urinary excretion of VCR was reduced in the NIF-treated patients. These data suggest that, when VCR is administered to NIF-treated patients with cancer, there is a decrease in VCR clearance from the body. Theoretically, a greater cytotoxicity may be anticipated.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Antiemetic activity of high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in dacarbazine-treated cancer patients. A randomized double-blind study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

In a double-blind randomized trial, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose (2 mg/kg X 4) intravenous metoclopramide (MTC) versus metoclopramide plus high-dose (250 mg X 2) intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) administered for the first 2 days in untreated patients submitted to dacarbazine chemotherapy for 5 days. Thirty-four patients entered the study. Complete protection from nausea and vomiting was achieved in the majority of patients all through the study period with both antiemetic treatments, with slightly greater efficacy at day 2 for the combination. However, after suspension of the antiemetic therapy, there was a relapse of vomiting in patients. Side effects were not different between the two treatments, but extrapyramidal reactions were significantly increased on the second day of antiemetic therapy. In conclusion, high-dose MTC with or without MP can give good antiemetic protection and the combination seems to be slightly more efficacious. However, the relapse of vomiting after discontinuing antiemetic treatment and the high incidence of extrapyramidal reactions justify further studies to find a better antiemetic treatment.

Dacarbazine↗
PubMed1989

Ceftriaxone versus imipenem/cilastatin as empirical monotherapy for infections in cancer patients.

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with ceftriaxone (active ingredient of Rocephin) (CRO) versus imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) in febrile cancer patients with or without neutropenia. 120 febrile episodes were randomized and 89 (75%) were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The overall response rates to both regimens were good (86 and 79% improved in response to CRO and I/C, respectively). Overall mortality was low and similar in the two groups. Both regimens were well tolerated. Our preliminary data corroborate the efficacy of CRO or I/C as empirical monotherapy for febrile episodes in cancer patients. It will be up to future investigations to show whether one of these regimens is superior to the other.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Despite treatment, emesis remains a major problem with cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy. Reasons for variability in antiemetic response among patients and in subsequent cycles are largely unknown and toxicity is sometimes severe. We have, therefore, carried out a multicenter, double-blind randomized trial comparing a combination of high-dose metoclopramide (MTC) (1 mg/kg x 4) and methylprednisolone (P) (treatment A) with a shorter but higher single-dose schedule of metoclopramide (3 mg/kg x 2) combined with dexamethasone (DEX) and diphenhydramine (DIP) to prevent extrapyramidal reactions (treatment B). Three hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients treated with various chemotherapy combinations containing CDDP were studied. Complete protection from vomiting/nausea was, at first cycle, 72.5%/79.5% with treatment B and 55.8%/65.1% with treatment A, a statistically significant difference (P less than .002/P less than .005). In subsequent cycles, protection from emesis significantly decreased with no difference between the two treatments. Multifactorial analysis shows that women, younger patients, outpatients, and patients who experienced emesis in previous cycles were at higher risk of suffering nausea and/or vomiting. Both regimens were well tolerated, but patients treated with treatment B had significantly less extrapyramidal reactions (1.7%/6.1%, P = .053). Treatment B is preferred due to its greater efficacy and lower incidence of extrapyramidal reactions. Trials on antiemetic therapy should take into account the important variables able to influence the efficacy of treatment. There is still a need for improving prevention of emesis in CDDP-treated patients.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1988

5-Fluorouracil and isoprinosine in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. A limited phase I, II evaluation.

We studied the effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and isoprinosine (ISO) on 15 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The patients were treated in a limited Phase I, II protocol. All patients received a fixed ISO dose of 4 g orally on days 1 through 5 of each cycle. Each cycle was repeated every 35 days. The first seven patients were treated with an initial 5-FU dose of 7.5 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on days 1 through 5, which was escalated to 11.5 mg/kg IV after the first course and to 13 mg/kg IV after the second course. The next eight patients were treated with an initial 5-FU dose of 11.5 mg/kg IV on days 1 through 5, which was escalated to 13 mg/kg IV on days 1 through 5. No major responses (complete or partial) were documented. Median survival for all evaluable patients was 33 weeks. Toxicity was predominantly gastrointestinal and hematologic and was considered moderate. Our data suggest that 5-FU and ISO, at the doses used, were ineffectual in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Low-dose mitomycin and weekly low-dose doxorubicin combination chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma previously treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil.

Forty-four evaluable patients with breast carcinoma previously treated with combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) were treated with a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of doxorubicin (A) (20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, repeated every 28 days) and mitomycin (MIT) (10 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 28 days). Five patients (11%) achieved a complete remission (CR) and 14 patients (32%) had a partial response (PR). The median duration of survival was 11.5 months and the median duration of response was 8 months for responders (CR and PR). Toxicity was moderate and consisted of neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (25%), pneumonitis (11%), and cardiomyopathy (2%). The combination chemotherapy regimen A and MIT is an effective regimen for treating previously treated with CMF.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1988

A double-blind trial comparing antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of metoclopramide versus methylprednisolone versus domperidone in patients receiving doxorubicin chemotherapy alone or in combination with other antiblastic agents.

Nausea and vomiting are reported in approximately 60% of neoplastic patients treated with doxorubicin used alone at doses greater than or equal to 50 mg/m2 or in combination with other noncisplatin antiblastic agents. In a double-blind study we compared the efficacy and tolerability of metoclopramide (MTC) versus Domperidone (DMP) versus methylprednisolone (MP) administered intravenously (i.v.) to inpatients. Forty-four patients entered the trial. The three antiemetic regimens were found equally effective. A complete protection from vomiting/nausea was obtained in 14/11 (93.3%/73.3%) of patients treated with MTC, in 15/14 (100%/93%) of those treated with MP and in 11/11 (78.6%/78.6%) of those treated with DMP. Side effects were slight and not significantly different among the three regimens. In conclusion, i.v. MTC and MP (DMP is no longer available in i.v. formulation) as single agents are an adequate treatment for prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by doxorubicin alone or in combination with other noncisplatin antiblastic agents.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1988

Methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide for prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide methotrexate 5-fluorouracil: a double-blind randomized study.

The antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP) and metoclopramide (MTC) in prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide methotrexate 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy has been evaluated in a double-blind trial. The two antiemetic drugs (MP vs. MTC) offered the majority of patients a similar complete protection from vomiting (76.5 vs. 66.7%) and nausea (82.4 vs. 81.8%), but in older patients MTC seems more efficacious than MP. Sedation was found more frequently (p = 0.02) in patients treated with MTC. In conclusion, in patients treated with CMF the use of MP as preventive therapy of nausea and vomiting is to be preferred to MTC due to its better tolerability, but in older patients MTC should be considered if MP fails.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Phase III randomized study of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide v fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer: an Italian multicentre trial.

From February 1983 to January 1985, 497 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either epirubicin or doxorubicin in the following combination chemotherapy regimen: fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) on days 1 and 8; epirubicin or doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1; cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (FEC or FAC). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression or to cumulative doses of 700 mg/m2 for epirubicin and 550 mg/m2 for doxorubicin. Dose reductions were applied according to the standard criteria. Activity was evaluated in 443 patients (222 in the FEC arm and 221 in the FAC arm). The two experimental groups were comparable in age, performance status, menopausal status, histology, previous treatments, and site of the disease. The overall response rate (complete response and partial response [CR + PR]) was not significantly different: 53.6% for FEC and 56.5% for FAC. The median time to progression was 273 days for FEC and 314 days for FAC; the median survival time was 591 and 613 days, respectively. Leukopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting were significantly lower in patients treated with FEC. As for cardiotoxicity, four cases of congestive heart failure (CHF) were recorded among patients treated with FAC while only one was observed in the FEC group. These results indicate that epirubicin in a combination chemotherapy regimen is as active as doxorubicin and is significantly less toxic.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

A prospective randomized double-blind crossover study comparing the antiemetic activity of alizapride and metoclopramide in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy.

We designed a double-blind randomized crossover study to compare the antiemetic activity and toxicity of high-dose intravenous alizapride (3.5 mg/kg) versus high-dose intravenous metoclopramide (1 mg/kg) both combined with intravenous methylprednisolone in 40 untreated cancer patients submitted to cisplatin chemotherapy alone. The mean number of vomiting episodes (3.6 vs. 1.0), length of vomiting (209.8 vs. 80.9 min), and rate of complete prevention of vomiting (25% vs. 68.4%) at first cycle were in favor of metoclopramide, with a statistically significant difference. This difference was not statistically significant in the second cycle after crossover. Toxicity of both treatments was mild and diarrhea was more frequent in the alizapride-treated patients. Preference expressed by the patients was also in favor of metoclopramide. We conclude that alizapride offers less antiemetic protection than metoclopramide in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. Further use of alizapride in such patients is not recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Viridans streptococci septicemia in cancer patients: a clinical study.

Viridans streptococci septicemia was documented in ten cancer patients, 7 of whom were neutropenic (less than 1000/mmc). Pneumonia was presumed to be the source of bacteremia in six patients. Viridans streptococci isolated from sputum culture in an immunocompromised host must be regarded as the potential etiological agent, then further characterized and checked for antibiotic sensitivity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Double-blind controlled trial of the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP), metoclopramide (MTC) and domperidone (DMP) in breast cancer patients treated with i.v. CMF.

Sixty-two patients treated for the first time with i.v. CMF were included in a double-blind comparative study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of 3 different drugs (methylprednisolone (MP), metoclopramide (MTC), and domperidone (DMP) in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Complete protection from vomiting/nausea was obtained in 85%/80% in the group treated with MP; in 60%/65% in the group treated with MTC and in 38%/42% in the group treated with DMP. Average number of vomiting episodes was 2.4 with MP, and 1.7 with MTC and 6.2 with DMP. Older patients seem to be a prognostically unfavorable subgroup. Side-effects were mild and infrequent. We conclude that MP and MTC are probably equally efficacious antiemetic treatments in patients undergoing i.v. CMF chemotherapy, but due to the risk of extrapyramidal reactions with MTC, MP probably should be the treatment of choice in these patients.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1987

Antiemetic activity of high doses of metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: a randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

We designed a multicenter, double-blind randomized study to determine the safety and antiemetic effectiveness of intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (P) combined with high-dose IV metoclopramide (MTC) v MTC alone in 200 untreated cancer patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. One hundred eighty-five patients were evaluable for treatment efficacy. MTC plus P was significantly superior to MTC alone in reducing the number and length of vomiting episodes (P = .001 and P = .0008, respectively) and the maximal intensity of nausea (P = .0124 with a score system; P = .0155 with a linear analogue scale) and length of nausea (P = .0056). The subgroup with a major incidence of nausea and vomiting was women, especially young women, outpatients, and those treated with higher doses of cisplatin. Side effects were low and equally distributed between the two treatment groups. We conclude that MTC plus P has greater antiemetic activity than MTC alone in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

[Combined chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic treatment of limited pulmonary microcytoma].

Between 1978 and 1983, 34 patients (32 evaluable) suffering from limited small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC-L) were treated following the protocol polychemotherapy (CAV) plus thoracic cobalt teletherapy and "precautionary" cranial irradiation (30 Gy in 2 weeks). Minimum follow-up was 30 months. After induction chemotherapy there was complete remission (CR) in 20% of cases whereas at the end of induction chemo-radiotherapy there was complete remission (CR) in 44% (p less than 0.05) of cases. Median duration of the responds was 12 months. Total median survival is 15 months, median NED survival 32 months (6-90 months). Seven out of 14 CR patients received consolidated thoracic radiotherapy (Rt); 6 of these survived disease-free for over 2 years. No salvage therapy carried out has proved useful. Only in one patient (3%) brain metastasis occurred. Iatrogenic toxicity was also kept within limits of brain level. The role Rt plays in increasing the CR percentage, in drastically diminishing the incidence of brain metastasis, in improving the quality of life by increasing the disease-free interval must be emphasized. Finally it should be noted that only CR patients have the possibility to become "long survivors".

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin in the treatment of non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. A pilot study.

A total of 39 patients with non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCL) were treated with cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin. A major response rate (complete response + partial response) was seen in 15 patients (39%). Median survival for all patients was 340 days; median survival of the responding group was 514 days. Toxic effects included moderate hematologic toxicity, nausea, and vomiting. There were no treatment-related deaths. This regimen clearly is effective in treating NSCL.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1986

Vindesine and mitomycin C in chemotherapy: refractory advanced breast cancer.

Thirty-five unselected postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma, refractory to hormonal manipulation and/or chemotherapy, were treated with vindesine (3 mg/m2 day 1, then weekly for 6 weeks, then every other week) and mitomycin (12 mg/m2 day 1, then every 6 weeks). Thirty-one patients were evaluable for response. Two patients obtained a complete response (CR), three patients a partial response. Duration of the response in the two patients with CR was 24 and 16 months, respectively. Toxicity was mild, consisting of leukopenia and neurologic toxicity. Thrombocytopenia was not a significant clinical problem. Vindesine with mitomycin C, as administered in this study, is a safe, but marginally effective regimen for previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Adult↗