[Olfactory esthesioneuroepithelioma].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Tedeschi.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Medical courses in Australia currently are encouraging students to observe general practice by way of short periods of attachment. The figures indicate that a significant proportion of the patients in the practice are going to be concerned about this, even though the exposure is very necessary. This article deals with the way that the 'three man consultation' can be fashioned in order to minimize discomfort of the patient, or unnecessary inhibition of the learning process for the student.
PURPOSE: Many studies have addressed the quantification of visual acuity, and the conventional method of measuring it has so far demonstrated serious limitations. Vision testing requires new methods that can more precisely express the quality of vision as perceived by the patient. METHODS: This study employed the Delphi method of consensus building. Concepts associated with quality of vision (QoV) were identified by a board of experts and proposed to participating specialists in two subsequent questionnaires. Upon receipt of the completed questionnaires, the replies were classified to determine the building blocks of a consensus. RESULTS: By analyzing the replies to the two questionnaires, the authors determined the key elements of QoV on which a consensus was found among the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus was reached on the opinion that the quantification of visual acuity by traditional means is inadequate for investigating QoV. Although visual acuity is still a basic element for testing, the experts believe that contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and microperimetry are additional parameters necessary for quantifying QoV. The use of a psychometric questionnaire on visual function could allow a better interpretation of visual impairment.
Glutathione (GSH) is a sulfur-containing nucleophile that protects against cisplatin-induced renal toxicity without reducing the antitumor activity of the cytotoxic agent. To document further the clinical role of GSH in improving the outcome of cisplatin-containing regimens, the feasibility of the GSH/cisplatin combination using a low-volume hydration protocol was evaluated in untreated ovarian cancer patients. Twelve patients at stage III (minimal residual disease) and 23 with localized disease at high risk for recurrence were treated with cisplatin (90 mg/m2, i.v. in 250 ml of normal saline over 30 min) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 i.v.) every 3 weeks. GSH (5 g in 200 ml of normal saline) was administered by a short-term infusion (15 min) prior to cisplatin. The hydration protocol consisted of 1 liter of fluids without diuretics. The treatment was well tolerated; no nephrotoxic or neurotoxic manifestations were observed. The renal excretion of cisplatin (23%) at 24 hours following infusion was lower than expected using a standard i.v. hydration protocol. No reduction of renal elimination of cisplatin could be detected in subsequent courses, thus suggesting a minimal degree of impairment in renal function. In the series of evaluable patients (11) with stage III disease, 9 had complete pathological response. In the series of patients with no clinically detectable disease initially, all were disease-free at treatment completion. Taken together with previous observations, these results support the view that the use of GSH is a successful approach in the attempt to optimize cisplatin treatment, providing a new modality of drug administration for out-patient treatment.
Cisplatin (CDDP) is one among the most effective and widely used anticancer drugs. Its use is, however, often limited by its peripheral neurotoxicity, which may be severely disabling and sometimes not reversible. To prevent or reduce CDDP peripheral neurotoxicity several "neuroprotective" drugs have been proposed. This goal is of extreme importance in the treatment of cancer patients, especially in view of the better results obtained by anticancer chemotherapy in terms of longer disease-free survival which has made even more crucial than in the past the point of the quality of life of the long-surviving patients. The data of pre-clinical and clinical studies with neuroprotectant agents are often conflicting, in some cases because of inadequate methods of evaluation and/or study design used to examine their effectiveness. The aims of this review will be 1) to discuss and describe the most appropriate methods of evaluation of CDDP and neuro-protectant drugs in experimental in vitro and in vivo pre-clinical studies 2) to evaluate critically the results of the clinical trials reported so far with the combined treatment and 3) to explore the possible future strategies to achieve neuroprotection during high-dose CDDP treatment in humans.