Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M T Ventura

Publications and source records attributed to M T Ventura.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Intestinal permeability in patients with adverse reactions to food.

BACKGROUND: An abnormal intestinal permeability could contribute to establish an altered sensitivity to food-allergen. AIM: To evaluate the intestinal permeability in subjects with adverse reactions to food on allergen-free diet. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one patients with food allergy and 20 with food hypersensitivity on allergen-free diet were enrolled and divided in four groups according to the seriousness of their referred clinical symptoms when they were on a free diet. METHODS: Intestinal permeability was evaluated by Lactulose/Mannitol ratio urinary detection determined by anion-exchange chromatography. RESULTS: Statistically significant different Lactulose/Mannitol ratio was evidenced in subjects with food allergy (p=0.003) or hypersensitivity (p=0.0008) compared to control patients. The correlation between Lactulose/Mannitol ratio and the seriousness of clinical symptoms, by using Spearman test, was statistically significant for food allergy (p=0.0195) and hypersensitivity (p=0.005) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present data demonstrate that impaired intestinal permeability, measured in our conditions, is present in all subjects with adverse reactions to food. In addition, for the first time, we report a statistically significant association between the severity of referred clinical symptoms and the increasing of Intestinal Permeability Index. These data reveal that intestinal permeability is not strictly dependent on IgE-mediated processes but could better be related to other mechanisms involved in early food sensitisation, as breast-feeding, or microbial environment that influence the development of oral tolerance in early infancy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Airway inflammation in subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastro-oesophageal reflux-related asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) are both characterized by airway inflammation. DESIGN: The purposes of this work were (i) to study airway inflammation in patients troubled by gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) and GER associated with asthma, (ii) to ascertain whether GER can aggravate asthma by exacerbating the pre-existing airway inflammation and oxidative stress and (iii) to establish the validity of analysing breath condensate and induced sputum when studying the airways of subjects affected by GER. PATIENT S AND METHODS: We enrolled 14 patients affected by mild asthma associated with GER (40 +/-12 years), nine with mild but persistent asthma (39 +/- 13 years), eight with GER (35 +/- 11 years) and 17 healthy subjects (37 +/- 9 years). Sputum cell counts and concentrations of interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-6 and 8-isoprostane were measured in breath condensate and supernatant. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: GER-related asthma is characterized by an eosinophilic inflammation, as determined by elevated concentrations of IL-4 in breath condensate and sputum supernatant, and by sputum cell analysis. GER alone presents a neutrophilic pattern of inflammation when determined by elevated concentrations of IL-6 in sputum cell analysis. A concomitant increase has been found in 8-isoprostane in GER associated (or not associated) with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that GER is characterized by a neutrophilic airway inflammation and by increased oxidative stress. GER does not however aggravate pre-existing airway inflammation in asthma patients. Determinations of inflammatory and oxidant markers in the breath condensate of subjects with GER reflect these measured in the induced sputum.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Rhinitis and asthma in athletes: an ARIA document in collaboration with GA2LEN.

This consensus document is aimed at reviewing evidence that the rhinitis-asthma links have peculiar features in athletes. Beside a review of epidemological data on the high prevalence of rhinitis and asthma in athletes, the effects on intense physical exercise on the immune system and repiratory functions are discussed, with special reference to the role of allergens and pollutants. In extending the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) recommendations to athletes, the issue is addressed of adapting diagnosis and management to criteria set by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and regulations adopted by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

Asthma↗
PubMed2006

Cross-reactivity in cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to glucocorticoids.

In the last few decades, glucocorticoids have received increasing attention for their capability of provoking systemic hypersensitivity reactions, when administered orally, parenterally, or intralesionally, as well as allergic skin and mucosal symptoms, when applied locally to the skin in patients with contact dermatitis or to the mucosa in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis. However, because of their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties, glucocorticoids are often not suspected of such hypersensitivity reactions. In addition, because glucocorticoids retain their anti-inflammatory potential, even if they act as sensitizers, the signs and symptoms of allergic reactions are not always obvious, particularly when they overlap with those caused by the very diseases glucocorticoids are used to treat. Moreover, interpretation of diagnostic tests, specifically that of patch-test reactions, can be difficult. In this review, particular attention is addressed to the problem of allergenic cross-reactivity among topical and systemic glucocorticoids. We also look at the clinical and practical aspects of both cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to glucocorticoids and their consequences on anti-inflammatory therapeutic choices.

Cross Reactions↗
PubMed2006

Hypersensitivity reactions to ophthalmic products.

Adverse reactions after administration of ophthalmic products have frequently been observed. These reactions can be provoked by both active principles and excipients. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been suggested for such reactions, including immunologic ones. Basophils and mast cells participate in IgE-mediated reactions through the release of mediators like histamine and tryptase, whereas a T-cell-mediated pathogenic mechanism is involved in most delayed reactions, particularly conjunctival ones and eyelid dermatitis. Prick tests and immediate-reading intradermal tests are carried out to diagnose immediate hypersensitivity reactions, while patch tests are usually performed to evaluate delayed reactions. Other diagnostic tests, such as serum-specific IgE assays in immediate reactions, as well as delayed-reading intradermal tests and/or lymphocyte transformation tests in delayed ones, are rarely performed. In this review, particular attention is addressed to the clinical and practical aspects of both cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to ophthalmic products.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2004

Allergy, asthma and markers of infections among Albanian migrants to Southern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Studies of immigrants represent an useful tool to determine the relative relevance of environmental vs genetic factors in causing the reported rapid increase of the prevalence of sensitization and allergic diseases. METHODS: A total of 152 Albanian migrants to Southern Italy responded to a questionnaire based on the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) and 139 of them underwent skin prick test, and 61 serological assays for total IgE and IgG antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii (TG), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), hepatitis A virus (HAV) and Helicobacter pylori (HP). RESULTS: Reported asthma was rare (2/152; 1.3%) and reported nasal allergies rather frequent (24/152; 15.8%). Sensitization to common inhalant allergens occurred in 27/139 (19.4%) subjects. The frequency of skin sensitization to pollen (P = 0.003) and that of hay fever (P = 0.004) increased with the time spent in Apulia. All the 61 sera had antibodies against HAV, 59/61 (96.7%) against HSV-1, 48/61 (78.7%) against HP and 34/61 (55.7%) against TG. The prevalence of skin sensitization and hay fever symptoms were correlated to the duration of residence in Southern Italy. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented indicate that Albanian migrants to Italy, in spite of the low prevalence of allergic diseases and sensitization in their country of origin, manifest with time an increasing prevalence of sensitization to local allergens and nasal symptoms after immigration to Italy. This would suggest a permanent role of allergen exposure and lifestyle factors in influencing the appearance of sensitization and symptoms of allergic diseases.

Albania↗
PubMed2003

Alternative glucocorticoids for use in cases of adverse reaction to systemic glucocorticoids: a study on 10 patients.

BACKGROUND: Reactions to systemically administered corticosteroids are rare, despite their widespread use. OBJECTIVES: To identify alternative glucocorticoids for emergency use in patients with adverse reactions to systemic glucocorticoids. METHODS: Ten patients were identified as having adverse reactions after the use of systemic corticosteroids. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests to hydrocortisone (HC) and methylprednisolone (MP), and intradermal tests to betamethasone and dexamethasone, were performed in all patients, and oral challenge tests to betamethasone (n=10) and deflazacort (n=6). RESULTS: Skin prick tests were negative in all patients, whereas intradermal tests to HC and MP were positive in eight; two patients showed only an isolated cutaneous sensitivity to MP. Intradermal tests to betamethasone and dexamethasone were negative, and oral challenge tests were negative in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the possibility of an IgE-mediated mechanism for allergic reactions to HC and MP, probably due, at least in part, to a steroid-glyoxal. We suggest that betamethasone and deflazacort could be reserved for emergency use in patients with adverse reactions to other corticosteroids.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Eyedrop-induced allergy: clinical evaluation and diagnostic protocol.

BACKGROUND: In the last few years, adverse reactions to mydriatic eyedrops have been investigated. However, is not still available a standardized protocol, capable of identify the pathogenetic mechanism. In the light of these findings we have evaluated the reliability of a protocol with well established concentration of specific allergens. METHODS: The diagnostic method includes the application of patch test series Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali (GIRDCA), medicaments, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, main eyedrops' excipients, pure active principles and extemporaneous preparations with mydriatic eyewashes. At the same time, skin prick test with a solution of atropine sulfate at 1 per thousand and an intradermal test with injection of atropine at 0.01 per thousand were carried out. RESULTS: After patch tests were removed, we detected seven positiveness to the phenylephrine, two to the benzalkonium chloride, one to thiomersal, one to the ethylendiamine and one to the atropine sulfate 1 per thousand. With intradermal tests we obtained three positiveness in patients who reported adverse reactions to atropine. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that phenylephrine is frequently responsible for allergic conjunctivitis (53.8%). In the case of atropine, even though the limited number of patients suggests to perform more extensive studies, it emerges that our diagnostic protocol is safe and might be able to screen allergic reactions in the field of ophthalmopathies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Allergic and pseudoallergic reactions induced by glucocorticoids: a review.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) represent the most effective treatment for autoimmune and allergic diseases, even if collateral effects are not rare, especially endocrine and immunosuppressive manifestations. Moreover, these drugs can develop adverse immunological reactions of I, III or IV type. Though immediate adverse reactions caused by systemic therapy with GCs are not very frequent, the possible beginning of anaphylactic and pseudo-anaphylactic manifestations in patients undergoing therapy with these drugs has to be considered. It has been observed that immediate adverse reactions usually are happened in asthmatic patients and in patients obliged to assume GCs again and again because of their pathology (e.g, kidney transplant). Other risk factors resulted to be female sex and hypersensibility to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Both in the cases of pseudo-allergic and allergic reactions, the pharmacological principle is hardly the responsible agent for the reaction; instead the excipients in drugs are often implicated (succinate salt, sulphites and carboxy-methyl-cellulose). It is possible that the IgE-response is highly specific for a fixed GC molecule as well depending on the way of administration and its salification. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that in patients with a first type allergic reaction to GCs there is a fourth type, sensitization to GCs, which is not usually diagnosed and even comes before IgE sensitization. Third type hypersensibility reactions may occur, too. Since GCs are large-scale drugs, also in emergency medicine and reanimation, allergic sensitization towards them, although infrequent, gives many interventionist problems. In the light of this feature, it seems of crucial importance to verify the tolerance toward other GC molecules. And in particular, it has been noted that patients presenting immediate reactions to hydrocortisone (HC) and methylprednisolone (MP) could tolerate prednisone and prednisolone per os and second-generation GCs, such as desamathazone and betamethazone. Nevertheless, second-generation GCs must not be considered safe; in fact, the beginning of allergic manifestations has been pointed out even towards them.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2001

Retrospective study on fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray efficacy in patients with allergic rhinitis: evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters.

BACKGROUND: In allergic rhinitis, allergenic stimulation causes the release of various mediators that induce symptoms and the development of chronic inflammation, which, in turn, is caused by cells involved in the late phase of inflammation, such as eosinophils. The eosinophils also cause damage at the mucosal level through the secretion of eosinophil cationic protein and other preformed factors contained in their granules. The objective was to verify the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis; in a retrospective study, we have evaluated mediators of inflammation, making correlations with the clinical symptoms score during and outside the pollen season. METHODS: Forty patients with allergic rhinitis and 15 normal controls were included in our study. Eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil chemotactic activity, and blood and nasal lavage eosinophil count were evaluated as laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in nasal lavage levels of eosinophil cationic protein in allergic patients, and this was strictly correlated with the clinical symptoms score. No differences were found in the eosinophil count of allergic patients and in the serum eosinophil cationic protein of patients sensitized to seasonal allergens in comparison with normal subjects. By contrast, an increase in serum eosinophil cationic protein level was found in patients sensitized to perennial allergens. After topical administration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a reduction in nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein secretion was obtained with a reduction of eosinophil chemotactic activity at the local level. This reduction correlated with an improvement of clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical improvement and reduction in nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil chemotactic activity after administration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray further confirms the role of this treatment in allergic rhinitis.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed2001

Contact dermatitis in students practicing sports: incidence of rubber sensitisation.

BACKGROUND: Over the last few years, changes in cutaneous homoeostasis resulting from sports activities have been reported. In particular, alterations in sweating mechanisms, the hydrolipid barrier, and surface bacterial flora, together with exposure to atmospheric conditions and the need to use medicaments, detergents, and other topical substances, predispose subjects to allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis in a group of young people practising sports activities. METHODS: Patch tests were performed to confirm the diagnosis of irritant or allergic dermatitis; in addition, the radioallergoabsorbent test (RAST) to latex was evaluated in the group studied. RESULTS: Allergic contact dermatitis caused by thiourams (23.3%) and mercaptobenzothiazole (20.9%) was prevalent. Other haptens, such as benzocaine and nickel, which are contained in clothing, equipment, topical medicaments, and creams used for massage, were also allergenic. In two cases, RAST positivity to latex was registered. CONCLUSIONS: -The results suggest that close contact with sports equipment may increase the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis. Students practising certain sports may have "professional" allergic contact dermatitis to additives used in the production of rubber.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Retrospective study of adverse reactions to non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): predictive value of controlled challenge with alternative drugs.

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and NSAIDs, which inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme (C-O), are responsible, when administered at therapeutic doses, for adverse reactions mainly involving the skin and respiratory tract. The prevalence of intolerance to ASA and NSAIDs, assessed by the Section of Allergic and Immunological Diseases at the University of Bari on a population of 15,800 patients referred for allergic diseases over a period of 7 years, was found to be 11.4%. The adverse reactions to NSAIDs observed were in most cases skin complaints (88.9%), followed by respiratory symptoms (asthma +/- rhinitis, rhinitis) and general symptoms (shock, hypotension, lipothymia). The most common types of NSAIDs taken were pyrazolones, salicylics, arylpropionics, paracetamol. Controlled oral challenges with alternative NSAIDs (especially nimesulide) confirm the predictive power of this test: in fact, among patients who showed tolerance to the challenge drug, only 10.6% manifested unexpected reactions during the course of one year's follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Modulation of eosinophilic chemotaxis with azelastine and budesonide in allergic patients.

In this paper, the effect of azelastine hydrochloride, a potent inhibitor of leukotrienes (LTs) and H1 receptors for histamine, was assessed as regards modulation of in vitro eosinophilic chemotaxis. In this respect, chemotaxis of eosinophils (EOS), isolated from the peripheral blood of untreated allergic subjects in the acute phase, was significantly diminished after in vitro treatment with azelastine in comparison to values before treatment. When EOS were pre-incubated with serial dilutions of the drug, it was observed that azelastine inhibited chemotaxis in a dose-dependent fashion. Since azelastine acts in vitro as a regulator of the calcium pump, EOS were pre-incubated with different concentrations (0.6 and 3.0 mM) of Ca++. In these experimental conditions azelastine was able to reduce EOS chemotactic activity only in the presence of 0.6 mM Ca++, whereas with higher Ca++ concentrations (3.0 mM) the inhibitory effect of the drug was abrogated. On the other hand, particular attention was paid to inhaled budesonide, a non halogenated glucocorticosteroid derivative, structurally related to 16 alpha-hydroxy prednisolone, which represents a helpful for treatment mild to moderate asthma. Data obtained after in vitro treatment with budesonide of a group of allergic patients demonstrated that EOS chemotactic activity was significantly reduced in these subjects. Conclusively our data show that 1) azelastine acts as a dose-dependent antagonist of chemotaxis; 2) it may exert this action by inhibiting Ca++ flow into cells; 3) inhaled budesonide may induce inhibition of bronchial inflammation by downregulating EOS chemotactic capacity.

Adolescent↗