Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Sun

Publications and source records attributed to M Sun.

434 records · Page 25Linked to original sources

A hydrostatic method assessing accuracy and reliability while revealing asymmetry in blood pressure measurements.

This study describes a method for noninvasive hydrostatic validation of blood pressure devices. It is based on the hydrostatic pressure exerted by a column of blood. The mid-position of an upward-held wrist blood-pressure cuff marks the top of the column, and a cuff on the opposite wrist pointed downward similarly determines the bottom of the column. Twenty-one healthy subjects comprising 12 right-handed and nine left-handed men and women entered this study. Each repeatedly alternated the arm positions ten times. Linear regression analysis yielded correlation coefficients for comparison of the Dinamap devices against the hydrostatic differences of 0.57, 0.70, and 0.70 for systolic pressure (SP), diastolic pressure (DP), and mean pressure (MP), respectively. These coefficients combined with the results of the graphic method of Altman and Bland demonstrated the best results for DP and matched least for SP. Overall results presented mean errors (ME: Dinamap-hydrostatic) +/- standard deviations (SD) of 9.3 +/- 10.1, -1.0 +/- 5.6, and 6.3 +/- 6.7 mmHg for SP, DP, and MP, respectively. These results are numerically comparable to some of the prior reports of ME +/- SD analysis of Dinamap devices by conventional validation studies. Numerically, DP is within and MP is close to the AAMI standards. The results of ME +/- SD, however, revealed a remarkable asymmetry for SP. The results of all the left-arm-up/right-arm-down position had ME +/- SD 12.3 +/- 11.1, -0.6 +/- 5.8, and 7.2 +/- 7.1 mmHg for SP, DP, and MP, respectively. The results of the opposite positioning were 6.3 +/- 7.9, -1.3 +/- 5.5, and 5.4 +/- 6.2 mmHg, respectively. This asymmetry of the SP differences seems independent of handedness (left or right) and gender, and may be related to the reflectance caused by intrathoracic vasculature asymmetry, which suggests that for validation purposes, the left-arm-down/right-arm-up position should be used. The alternative position may be used to detect and/or study this asymmetry. Such detection should have important clinical consequences for patient blood pressure monitoring. During surgery, if both arms must be placed shoulder-high, for instance, the right arm should provide more accurate and reliable blood pressure measurement.

Adult↗

A new approach to reproducibility assessment: clinical evaluation of SpaceLabs Medical oscillometric blood pressure monitor.

The SpaceLabs Medical oscillometric blood pressure monitor was evaluated in both neonatal and adult populations according to the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standard for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. For the neonatal study, the umbilical artery pressure was used as a reference. Fifteen newborn ICU patients were enrolled in the study, yielding a total of 150 pairs of comparison readings. For the adult study, the first and fifth phases of the Korotkoff sounds were used as a reference. One hundred twelve adults were enrolled in the study, yielding a total of 336 pairs of comparison readings. Accuracy was analyzed by the AAMI SP-10 standard. For systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively, the mean differences +/- standard deviations of oscillometric accuracy were 0.1 +/- 4.3 and 2.7 +/- 4.8 mmHg for the neonatal study and -0.6 +/- 5.9 and 0.9 +/- 6.4 mmHg for the adult study, which are within the AAMI SP-10 accuracy standard. Reproducibility was analyzed by a new approach developed from the sequential technique of the 1990 British Hypertension Society protocol. For systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively, the mean differences +/- standard deviations of the oscillometric reproducibility were estimated to be -0.1 +/- 3.3 and 0.1 +/- 3.4 mmHg for the neonatal study and -0.3 +/- 3.2 and 0.1 +/- 3.5 mmHg for the adult study.

Adult↗