Biomedical subjects

M Simic

Publications and source records attributed to M Simic.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Growth hormone secretion elicited by GHRH, GHRP-6 or GHRH plus GHRP-6 in patients with microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma before and after bromocriptine therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are potent GH releasers which act at both pituitary and hypothalamic levels through specific G-protein coupled receptors, recently cloned. A synergistic effect from the simultaneous administration of GHRH + GHRP-6 on GH release is observed in normal subjects, while it is absent in patients with hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection. We studied the effects of GHRH, GHRP-6 and both secretagogues on GH release in patients harbouring pituitary tumours that may be reduced in size by medical treatment. DESIGN: Analysis of peak GH response to GHRH, GHRP-6 and GHRH plus GHRP-6 in patients with micro- and macroprolactinomas. Integrated GH response over 2 hours calculated as AUG-GH mU/l x 120 min. Analysis of delta PRL above the basal level in response to the same GH releasers. PATIENTS: Eleven patients with macroprolactinomas aged 41.2 +/- 4.8 years (range 24-75), nine patients with microprolactinomas aged 31.5 +/- 3.4 (range 22-53) and 13 healthy subjects aged 42.1 +/- 4.7 years (range 22-64) were studied. Prolactinoma patients were then treated with bromocriptine (15-20 mg orally) for 6-24 months. Tests were repeated when there was evidence of tumour shrinkage and normalized plasma prolactin concentrations. RESULTS: Peak GH response before treatment in macroprolactinoma patients was 4.9 +/- 0.9 mu/l after GHRH, 8 +/- 4 mU/l after GHRP-6 and 18 +/- 5 mU/l after GHRH + GHRP-6. Synergism was absent. AUC were 390 +/- 90; 500 +/- 100 and 1100 +/- 300 mU/l x 120 min respectively. These values were all significantly different (P < 0.05) from normal subjects and patients with microprolactinomas with peak GH 16.8 +/- 0.9 mU/l after GHRH; 43 +/- 6 mU/l after GHRP-6 and 130 +/- 10 mU/l after GHRH + GHRP-6. AUC-GH was 1200 +/- 400 after GHRH, 2200 +/- 400 after GHRP-6 and 9000 +/- 1000 mU/l x 120 min after GHRH + GHRP-6. As in normal subjects, synergism was preserved in patients with microprolactinoma (P > 0.05). After treatment with bromocriptine peak GH in patients with macroprolactinoma was 8 +/- 4 mU/l after GHRH, 22 +/- 5 mU/l after GHRP-6 and 70 +/- 20 mU/l after GHRH + GHRP-6. AUC-GH was 800 +/- 300, 1100 +/- 300 and 3500 +/- 800 mU/l x 120 min, respectively. The response of GH after GHRP-6 and GHRH + GHRP-6 improved significantly (P < 0.05) in treated patients with macroprolactinoma. There was no significant change in GH response in microprolactinoma patients after treatment with bromocriptine. Peak GH after GHRH was 30 +/- 20 mU/l, after GHRP-6 it was 75 +/- 8 mU/l and after GHRH + GHRP-6 it was 200 +/- 30 mU/l. AUC-GH was 1500 +/- 700 after GHRH, 4500 +/- 500 after GHRP-6 and 15,100 +/- 600 mU/l x 120 min. Delta prolactin after GHRP-6 did not change before and after bromocriptine treatment in patients with macroprolactinoma or microprolactinoma. CONCLUSION: GH release after GHRP-6 or GHRH + GHRP-6 is fully preserved in patients with microprolactinomas and does not differ before and after treatment with bromocriptine. Patients with macroprolactinoma have blunted responses of GH after GHRH and GHRP-6 and synergism is severely compromised. GH responsiveness to and synergistic interaction between GHRH and GHRP-6 recovers after shrinkage of macroprolactinoma with bromocriptine. Prolactin release stimulated by intravenous administration of GHRP-6 in healthy subjects was not seen in patients with micro- or macroprolactinomas.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Increased incidence of neoplasia in patients with pituitary adenomas. The Pituitary Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine the rate of neoplasms in patients with other pituitary adenomas (non-functioning and prolactinomas) in comparison with acromegaly which is known to favour the development of neoplasia. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We reviewed clinical records for 220 patients with acromegaly, 151 patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NF) and 98 patients with prolactinomas. Incidence rates of cancer for patients with pituitary tumours were calculated per person-years of follow-up study. These rates were then compared with sex and age adjusted incidence rates reported by National Tumour Registry. An internal control group of 163 subjects with a non-neoplastic condition, i.e. Graves' disease followed chronically in the same clinic was also studied. The ratios observed to expected were expressed as standardized incidence rates (SIR). The only significant difference between the acromegalic and other pituitary tumours patients was in hypopituitarism, present in 18.2% (acromegaly) 47% (NF) and 18.6% (prolactinomas). RESULTS: Twenty-three malignant tumours were registered in 19 acromegalics (1 Hodgkin disease, 1 myelogenous leukaemia, 1 lymphocytic leukaemia, 3 papillary thyroid carcinomas, 1 ovarian carcinoma, 2 colorectal carcinoma, 1 renal cell carcinoma, 4 cervical carcinoma, 2 skin cancers, 2 pancreatic carcinoma, 4 breast carcinoma, 1 bladder carcinoma). Three acromegalics harboured two malignancies. Patients with acromegaly had a 3.39-fold increased rate of malignant tumours compared with the general population and a 3.21-fold increased rate compared with our internal control group. Eleven malignant tumours were found in patients with NF-pituitary adenomas and 2 in prolactinoma patients (1 lymphoma, 1 multiple myeloma, 1 colonic cancer, 1 renal cell cancer, 1 stomach cancer, 2 lung cancers, 1 cervix carcinoma, 1 breast cancer, 1 testicular carcinoma and 3 melanoma). Patients with NF pituitary adenomas had a 3.91-fold increased rate of malignant tumours compared with the general population and 4.07-fold increase compared with the internal control group. Patients harbouring prolactinomas did not have an increased incidence rate of malignancy compared with the general population or our internal controls. Female patients with acromegaly and male patients with NF-pituitary adenoma had higher incidences of neoplasia. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the overall incidence of malignant tumours in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas and acromegaly is significantly higher than expected for general population and for our internal control group.

Acromegaly↗

PubMed1998

Brain trauma: cause-consequence connection problems.

Despite sophisticated equipment like computerized tomography, in some cases doctors have a problem with the diagnostic procedure in relation to patients with serious injuries of the central nervous system (CNS). There may be no clinical signs of disorders of the CNS, or other evidence of difficulties, but diffuse axonal lesions and demyelinisation processes often exist. This type of lesion is a special pathomorphological entity, known as the syndrome of patient who talks and dies. Macroscopical and microscopical findings are poor and rare, especially in the hours immediately following the injury. The main findings are not evidential and the problem is the explanation of sudden death from unknown causes. The following studies are based on human tissue analyses. They are based on the analyses of the CNS of patients who suffered from brain trauma. The specimens from the brain stem were taken in order to perform histological, microscopic analysis. Percentage value of surface of myelin for the control group was X1 38.62% for HE technique and X1 33.46% for Gomory's method. The value for the test group was X2 16.12% for HE technique and X2 13% for Gomory's technique. Statistical probability for both groups was 95% (P < 0.05; T = 14.9). Application of these procedures helps legal authorities to make trials more objective.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Evaluation of pituitary GH reserve with GHRP-6.

GH releasing peptides (GHRPs) were developed before the isolation and identification of GH releasing hormone (GHRH) in 1982 yet the clinical era of the GHRPs began in 1988. Since then clinical studies have been greatly extended. We studied the effects of GHRPs on GH release as a function of age, metabolic status and in different neuroendocrine pathologies. The different mechanism of action of GHRPs versus GHRH and the site of action have been addressed. There is a large variability in the stimulatory action of GHRH contrasted with the reproducibility of action of GHRPs. In different metabolic states GH response after GHRH is more impaired than after GHRP-6. On the other hand in different neuroendocrine pathologies GH response after GHRP-6 is more impaired than after GHRH. Each secretagogue provides separate information on GH secretion, necessary not only for linear growth but for general metabolism.

Endocrine System Diseases↗

PubMed1991

Evaluation of the epidemiology of hepatitis B virus cross-infection in a maternity hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the hepatitis B infection risk in a university hospital of obstetrics and gynecology. SETTING: The University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Sarajevo, Yugoslavia. DESIGN: Staff members were divided into three groups: 73 doctors, 184 medical technicians working in delivery rooms, and 55 medical technicians working with postnatal care. The patients were 63 women, aged 17 to 39 years (mean = 26.11 years), pregnant for the first time and in the first stage of labor. Participants all had a negative history of hepatitis B and no known contact with the hepatitis B virus. RESULTS: The incidence of hepatitis B infections among physicians, technicians, and postnatal care technicians was 1.36%, 3.8%, and 3.6%, respectively. The incidence among patients was 4.76%. The daily infection risk varied between 1% and 17% of all deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of transmission of the hepatitis B virus to hospital workers in this setting is indeed high enough to make a case for hepatitis B vaccination in susceptible staff members. Even if vaccination of staff members is carried out, hygienic measures to prevent the transmission of bloodborne infection between patients and from patients to staff are of the utmost importance.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1989