Biomedical subjects

M Shiffrar

Publications and source records attributed to M Shiffrar.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1995

Motion integration across differing image features.

To interpret the projected image of a moving object, the visual system must integrate motion signals across different image regions. Traditionally, researchers have examined this process by focusing on the integration of equally ambiguous motion signals. However, when the motions of complex, multi-featured images are measured through spatially limited receptive fields, the resulting motion measurements have varying degrees of ambiguity. In a series of experiments, we examine how human observers interpret images containing motion signals of differing degrees of ambiguity. Subjects judged the perceived coherence of images consisting of an ambiguously translating grating and an unambiguously translating random dot pattern. Perceived coherence of the dotted grating depended upon the degree of concurrence between the velocities of the grating terminators and dots. Depth relationships also played a critical role in the motion integration process. When terminators were suppressed with occlusion cues, coherence increased. When dots and gratings were presented at different depth planes, coherence decreased. We use these results to outline the conditions under which the visual system uses unambiguous motion signals to interpret object motion.

Depth Perception↗

PubMed1993

Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance.

In this study, the perceived speed of a tilted line translating horizontally (for a duration of 167 msec) is evaluated with respect to a vertical line undergoing the same translation. Perceived speed of the oblique line is shown to be underestimated when compared to the vertical line. This bias increases: (1) when the line is further tilted, (2) with greater line lengths, (3) with lower contrasts, and finally (4) with a speed of 2.1 deg/sec as compared to a higher speed of 4.2 deg/sec. These results may be accounted for by considering that two velocity signals are used by the visual system to estimate the speed of the line: the translation of this line (this signal does not depend on the line's orientation) and the motion component normal to the line (this signal depends on orientation). We suggest that these two signals are encoded by different types of units and that the translation signal is specifically extracted at the line endings. We further suggest that these signals are integrated by a weighted average process according to their perceptual salience. Other interpretations are considered at the light of current models dealing with the two-dimensional integration of different velocity signals.

Differential Threshold↗

PubMed1993

Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines.

We studied direction discrimination for lines moving obliquely relative to their orientation. Manipulating contrast, length and duration of motion, we found systematic errors in direction discrimination at low contrast, long length and/or short durations. These errors can be accounted for by a competition between ambiguous velocity signals originating from contour motion processing units and signals from line terminator processing units. The dynamic of this competition can be described by a simple model involving two different classes of processing units with different contrast thresholds, different integration time constants and different levels of response saturation.

Computers↗

PubMed1992

The influence of terminators on motion integration across space.

Individual motion measurements are inherently ambiguous since the component of motion parallel to a homogeneous translating edge cannot be measured. Numerous models have proposed that the visual system solves this ambiguity through the integration of motion measurements across disparate contours. To examine this proposal, subjects observed a translating diamond through four stationary apertures. Since the diamond's motion could not be determined from any single contour, motion integration across contours was required to determine the diamond's direction of motion. We demonstrate that observers have difficulty accurately integrating motion information across space. Performance improved when the diamond stimulus was presented at 7 degrees eccentricity, through jagged apertures, or at low contrast. Taken together, these results imply that integration across space is more likely when the motion of contour terminators is less salient or reliable.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed1991

Percepts of rigid motion within and across apertures.

Humans consistently err in their percepts of rotational motion viewed through an aperture. Such errors provide insight into the constraints observers use to interpret retinal images. In the 1st of 2 experiments, Ss consistently perceived the fixed center of rotation for an unmarked line viewed through an aperture as located on the line, regardless of its actual location. Accuracy greatly improved with visible line endings. This finding was extended to explain why a square appears nonrigid when it rotates behind a partial occluder. This illusion may result from observers misperceiving the center of rotation of the unmarked square sides. In this situation, Ss seemed unable to apply an object rigidity constraint across apertures. These findings support a conceptualization of the visual system in which consistent local information must be clearly present before prior knowledge can be used to interpret retinal stimulation.

Attention↗