Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Schnarr

Publications and source records attributed to M Schnarr.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Spacing requirements between LexA operator half-sites can be relaxed by fusing the LexA DNA binding domain with some alternative dimerization domains.

The dimerization domain of the LexA repressor has been replaced by two heterologous dimerization motifs: the "leucine zipper" from the jun oncogene product and the carboxy-terminal oligomerization domain of Escherichia coli lac repressor. The corresponding hybrid proteins LexA1-87-Jun zipper and LexA1-87-lac repressor have been purified and their DNA binding properties have been studied using gel mobility shift assays. Both fusion proteins form stable specific complexes with a short DNA duplex harboring the CTGT(at)4ACAG consensus sequence of the LexA repressor. This conserved DNA binding capacity distinguishes these two fusion proteins from many others containing a LexA DNA binding domain fused to different heterologous transactivation and/or dimerization domains. However the fusion proteins LexA1-87-Jun zipper and LexA1-87-lac repressor behave differently from native LexA repressor in that these fusion proteins tolerate the insertion of additional base-pairs between the two invertedly repeated CTGT motifs. LexA1-87-Jun zipper requires two CTGT motifs and tolerates the insertion of at least two additional base-pairs between these motifs, whereas LexA1-87-lac repressor requires in fact only a single CTGT motif for the formation of a specific complex detectable in gel mobility shift assays. The inability of the normal LexA repressor to form well-defined complexes with operators containing additional base-pairs in the center suggests that the LexA "hinge region" between the amino-terminal DNA binding and the carboxy-terminal dimerization domain might not be entirely flexible. In an attempt to remove a hypothetical interaction between the LexA cleavage site (which is situated within the hinge region) and the catalytic cleavage center (situated within the carboxy-terminal domain) a LexA mutant repressor containing five simultaneous mutations in the hinge region has been constructed and purified. Surprisingly this mutant repressor failed to form stable complexes detectable by the gel mobility shift assay even with the normal consensus sequence, suggesting that the LexA hinge region is more than a simple connector between the two structural domains and that its chemical nature is important not only for LexA cleavage, but also for the formation of stable LexA-DNA complexes.

Avian Proteins↗

Activation of recA protein. The open helix model for LexA cleavage.

RecA protein is induced by the binding of DNA and ATP to become active in the hydrolysis of ATP and the cleavage of repressors. These reactions appear to depend on the structural state of the protein polymerized along the DNA, i.e. a helical coat of six RecA per turn of 95 to 100 A pitch. In support of this model of the active conformation, it was shown that high concentrations of salt also induce this helical polymerized state as well as the enzymatic activities. Here, we describe that, in vitro and with the non-hydrolyzable analogue ATP gamma S, RNA and heparin can also induce both the structural transition and the enzymatic activation of RecA to LexA cleavage in accordance with the model. RNA and heparin do not support the reaction in the presence of ATP, and they do not induce the hydrolysis of ATP either, suggesting that, in contrast to ATP gamma S, the nucleotide is not bound stably enough, and that the combined affinities of polynucleotide and ATP actually modulate the discrimination of RecA for the various possible inducers in vivo.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Isolation and characterization of LexA mutant repressors with enhanced DNA binding affinity.

The LexA repressor from Escherichia coli is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein that shows no pronounced sequence homology with any of the known structural motifs involved in DNA binding. Since little is known about how this protein interacts with DNA, we have selected and characterized a great number of intragenic, second-site mutations which restored at least partially the activity of LexA mutant repressors deficient in DNA binding. In 47 cases, the suppressor effect of these mutations was due to an Ind- phenotype leading presumably to a stabilization of the mutant protein. With one exception, these second-site mutations are all found in a small cluster (amino acid residues 80 to 85) including the LexA cleavage site between amino acid residues 84 and 85 and include both already known Ind- mutations as well as new variants like GN80, GS80, VL82 and AV84. The remaining 26 independently isolated second-site suppressor mutations all mapped within the amino-terminal DNA binding domain of LexA, at positions 22 (situated in the turn between helix 1 and helix 2) and positions 57, 59, 62, 71 and 73. These latter amino acid residues are all found beyond helix 3, in a region where we have previously identified a cluster of LexA (Def) mutant repressors. In several cases the parental LexA (Def) mutation has been removed by subcloning or site-directed mutagenesis. With one exception, these LexA variants show tighter in vivo repression than the LexA wild-type repressor. The most strongly improved variant (LexA EK71, i.e. Glu71----Lys) that shows an about threefold increased repression rate in vivo, was purified and its binding to a short consensus operator DNA fragment studied using a modified nitrocellulose filter binding assay. As expected from the in vivo data, LexA EK71 interacts more tightly with both operator and (more dramatically) with non-operator DNA. A determination of the equilibrium association constants of LexA EK71 and LexA wild-type as a function of monovalent salt concentration suggests that LexA EK71 might form an additional ionic interaction with operator DNA as compared to the LexA wild-type repressor. A comparison of the binding of LexA to a non-operator DNA fragment further shows that LexA interacts with the consensus operator very selectively with a specificity factor of Ks/Kns of 1.4 x 10(6) under near-physiological salt conditions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Transformation and transactivation suppressor activity of the c-Jun leucine zipper fused to a bacterial repressor.

Transcription factor c-Jun appears to be a nuclear target of the Ras-induced signal transduction pathway. In fact, some experiments show that transforming forms of the Ras protein cooperate with Jun in transcriptional activation mediated by an AP-1 site and others indicate that the two oncoproteins cooperate in cellular transformation. Although it is likely that intracellular signaling systems activated by Ras might act directly on c-Jun by inducing specific phosphorylation, it is unclear how c-Jun participates in the transformation process. Here, we present results obtained with a LexA-Jun zipper fusion that lacks both the transcriptional activation domains and the basic region of the DNA-binding domain of c-Jun and contains only the intact leucine-zipper domain. This fusion product has a dominant negative effect on the transcriptional activation elicited by phorbol esters, c-Jun, c-Fos, Ras and E1A on an AP-1-responsive site. An analogous LexA-Fos zipper fusion has similar effects on transcriptional induction. The LexA-Jun zipper fusion acts further as a transformation suppressor, since it causes the generation of nontransformed revertants of ras-transformed cells. This effect is likely to be elicited by the dimerization potential of the Jun leucine zipper trapping cellular Jun and/or Fos in a protein complex unable to bind to DNA. These data implicate further that Ras-mediated transformation involves functional transcription factor AP-1 and that it is possible to interfere with cell transformation by interfering simply with the dimerization of transcription factors involved in the transformation process.

3T3 Cells↗

Construction, purification, and characterization of a hybrid protein comprising the DNA binding domain of the LexA repressor and the Jun leucine zipper: a circular dichroism and mutagenesis study.

An increasing number of eukaryotic transcription factors interacting specifically with DNA comprise a dimerization motif called the "leucine zipper". These leucine zipper proteins form homodimers and/or heterodimers with another protein containing a leucine zipper motif. The leucine zipper of the oncoprotein Jun is particular in that Jun may form homodimers as well as heterodimers with the oncoprotein Fos, which are however more stable than the Jun-Jun homodimers. Leucine zipper dimerization is thought to occur through a coiled-coil arrangement of parallel alpha-helices, but the rules governing the specificity of homo- and/or heterodimerization are still largely unknown. To address this question in the case of the Jun leucine zipper, we constructed a fusion protein containing the amino-terminal DNA binding domain of the LexA repressor from Escherichia coli fused to the Jun leucine zipper. This hybrid protein (LexA-JunZip) is stable in E. coli and confers much tighter repression in vivo than the DNA binding domain of LexA alone. DNA binding competition experiments with synthetic Jun and Fos leucine zipper peptides in vitro showed that the leucine zipper mediated dimerization of LexA-JunZip is essential for DNA binding of the fusion protein. The purified LexA-JunZip protein dimerizes in vitro with a dimerization constant of 2 x 10(7) M-1 at 5 degrees C. Dimerization is very sensitive to temperature, since the dimerization constant drops at 20 degrees C to 2 x 10(6) M-1 and at 30 degrees C to only 3 x 10(5) M-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Interaction of a regulatory protein with a DNA target containing two overlapping binding sites.

The LexA repressor from Escherichia coli regulates the transcription of about 20 different genes upon binding to single or multiple operators. In this work we study the interaction of LexA with the control region of the caa gene (coding for the bacterial toxin colicin A) that contains two operators (O1 and O2) which overlap by at least 2 base pairs relevant for sequence specific DNA recognition. This arrangement raises the question of how the LexA molecules which bind to the central overlapping part of the two operators avoid steric clashes and further, of whether the interaction of LexA with the two operators is cooperative or not. To address these questions we have constructed two mutant operators (O1+O2- and O1-O2+) for which the two most strongly conserved base pairs in each of the external operator half-sites have been mutated. Using methylation interference with the complex formation of LexA with the wild-type and these two mutant operators we could show: 1) that the two mutant operators behave symmetrically in that the methylation of one crucial guanine base in both operator half-sites interferes strongly with complex formation, 2) but that in the wild-type operator (containing four functional operator half-sites) only the two external half-operators give rise to interference if this crucial guanine base is methylated, whereas methylation of the two equivalent guanine bases within the two central (overlapping) operator half-sites does not lead to interference with the formation of a complex where both operators are occupied simultaneously. These data suggest that the centrally bound LexA molecules adopt a somewhat different binding mode than those bound to the external half-operators in order to avoid steric clashes and/or to optimize protein-protein contacts which are likely to be at the origin of the binding cooperativity that we could demonstrate by quantitative DNase I footprinting and gel retardation experiments. While the methylation interference experiments revealed a non-equivalence for the binding of externally and centrally bound LexA molecules, both methylation protection and hydroxyl radical footprinting were unable to reveal this difference, suggesting that the difference between the two binding modes should be fairly subtle.

Bacterial Proteins↗

DNA binding properties of the LexA repressor.

The LexA repressor from Escherichia coli negatively regulates the transcription of about 20 different genes upon binding with variable affinity to single-, double- or even triple-operators as in the case of the recN gene. Binding of LexA to multiple operators is cooperative if the spacing between these operators is favorable. LexA recognizes DNA via its amino-terminal domain. The three-dimensional structure of this domain has been determined by NMR measurements. It contains three alpha-helices spanning residues 8-20, 28-35 and 41-54. In view of this structure, but also according to homology considerations and the unusual contact pattern with the DNA backbone, the LexA repressor is not a normal helix-turn-helix DNA binding protein like for example phage lambda repressor. LexA is at best a distant relative of this class of transcription factors and should probably be considered as a protein that contains a new DNA binding motif. A cluster of LexA mutant repressors deficient in DNA binding falling into the third helix (residues 41-54 bp) suggests that this helix is involved in DNA recognition.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

1H-NMR investigation of the interaction of the amino terminal domain of the LexA repressor with a synthetic half-operator.

A synthetic half-operator DNA-duplex, d(GCTACTGTATGT), containing a portion of the proposed recognition sequence (CTGT) of several "SOS" genes, has been synthesized. The dodecamer has been characterized through 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Complete assignment of exchangeable hydrogen bonded imino protons has been achieved by applying 1D NOE techniques and an analysis of the temperature dependence of the chemical shifts. In order to determine the specific role of the CTGT consensus sequence in the overall recognition process, the oligonucleotide duplex has been titrated with the amino terminal DNA binding domain of the LexA repressor. The observation of substantial changes of 1H-NMR chemical shifts in the imino proton region upon interaction with the protein strongly suggests that the protein binds specifically to the operator DNA. The largest deviations of 1H-NMR chemical shifts upon protein binding have been observed for protons assigned to the CTGT segment, thus strongly suggesting a direct involvement of this sequence in the binding process. At high potassium chloride concentrations the 1H-NMR chemical shift deviations are reverted which is consistent with the known drop in the affinity constant of LexA for operator DNA at high salt concentrations.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Complexes of RecA protein in solution. A study by small angle neutron scattering.

RecA complexes on DNA and self-polymers were analysed by small-angle neutron scattering in solution. By Guinier analysis at small angles and by model analysis of a subsidiary peak at wider angles, we find that the filaments fall into two groups: the DNA complex in the presence of ATP gamma S, an open helix with pitch 95 A, a cross-sectional radius of gyration of 33 A and a mass per length of about six RecA units per turn, which corresponds to the state of active enzyme; and the compact form (bound to single-stranded DNA in the absence of ATP, or binding ATP gamma S in the absence of DNA, or just the protein on its own), a helical structure with pitch 70 A, cross-sectional radius of gyration 40 A and mass per length about five RecA units per turn, which corresponds to the conditions of inactive enzyme. The results are discussed in the perspective of unifying previous conflicting structural results obtained by electron microscopy.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

The LexA repressor and its isolated amino-terminal domain interact cooperatively with poly[d(A-T)], a contiguous pseudo-operator, but not with random DNA: a circular dichroism study.

The interaction of the entire LexA repressor and its amino-terminal DNA binding domain with poly[d(A-T)] and random DNA has been studied by circular dichroism. Binding of both protein species induces an about 2-fold increase of the positive circular dichroism band at about 270 nm of both polynucleotides, allowing a precise determination of the principal parameters as a function of mono- and divalent salt concentration and pH. Both proteins interact much more strongly (about 2000-fold) with poly[d(A-T)] than with random DNA as expected from the homology with the specific consensus binding site of LexA (CTGTATATATATACAG). For both LexA and its DNA binding domain we find that the interaction with poly[d(A-T)] is cooperative with a cooperativity factor omega of about 50-70 for both proteins over a wide range of solvent conditions, suggesting that the carboxy-terminal domain of LexA is not involved in this type of cooperativity. On the contrary, no cooperativity could be detected for the interaction of the LexA DNA binding domain with a random DNA fragment. The overall binding constant K omega (or simply K in the case of random DNA) depends strongly on the salt concentration as observed for most protein-DNA interactions, but the behavior of LexA is unusual in that the steepness of this salt dependence (delta log K omega/delta log [NaCl]) is much more pronounced at slightly acidic pH values as compared to that at neutral or slightly alkaline pH. The behavior is not easily understood in terms of the current theories on the electrostatic contribution to protein-DNA interactions on the basis of polyelectrolyte theory. A comparison of the overall binding constant K omega of the entire LexA repressor and its DNA binding domain reveals that LexA binds only 20-50-fold stronger under a wide variety of salt and pH conditions. This result tends to demonstrate further that the additional energy due to the dimerization of LexA via the carboxy-terminal domain should be rather weak as expected from the small dimerization constant of LexA (2 X 10(-4) M-1).

Bacterial Proteins↗

Genetic analysis of the LexA repressor: isolation and characterization of LexA(Def) mutant proteins.

We report the isolation of LexA mutant proteins with impaired repressor function. These mutant proteins were obtained by transforming a LexA-deficient recA-lacZ indicator strain with a randomly mutagenized plasmid harbouring the lexA gene and subsequent selection on MacConkey-lactose indicator plates. A total of 24 different lexA(Def) missense mutations were identified. All except three mutant proteins are produced in near-normal amounts suggesting that they are fairly resistant to intracellular proteases. All lexA(Def) missense mutations are situated within the first 67 amino acids of the amino-terminal DNA binding domain. The properties of an intragenic deletion mutant suggest that the part of the amino-terminal domain important for DNA recognition or domain folding should extent at least to amino acids 69 or 70. A recent 2D-NMR study (Lamerichs et al. 1989) has identified three alpha helices in the DNA binding domain of LexA. The relative orientation of two of them (helices 2 and 3) is reminiscent of, but not identical to, the canonical helix-turn-helix motif suggesting nevertheless that helix 3 might be involved in DNA recognition. The distribution of the lexA(Def) missense mutations along the first 67 amino-terminal amino acids indeed shows some clustering within helix 3, since 8 out of the 24 different missense mutations are found in this helix. However one mutation in front of helix 1 and five mutations between amino acids 61 and 67 suggest that elements other than helices 2 and 3 may be important for DNA binding.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Investigation of RecA--polynucleotide interactions from the measurement of LexA repressor cleavage kinetics. Presence of different types of complex.

The proteolysis of the LexA repressor in the presence of RecA and various polynucleotides was studied by measuring the fluorescence decrease of LexA upon cleavage. The results were compared with the DNA binding of RecA to investigate the presence of multiple DNA-RecA complexes. All single-stranded polydeoxyribonucleotides (DNA) efficiently stimulated the proteolysis and the maximum activation was reached in the presence of three or four nucleotides of polynucleotide per monomer of RecA. The stimulative effect was decreased in the presence of larger amounts of poly(dA), poly(dT) or heat-denatured DNA, whereas the excess of single-stranded DNAs chemically modified with chloroacetaldehyde did not present such an inhibitory effect, despite the fact that a second DNA molecule is likely to interact with RecA as monitored by the intrinsic fluorescence of these DNA species. The complicated cleavage promotion and inhibition pattern is tentatively explained by a three-state model assuming that RecA may interact with three single-stranded DNA molecules. According to this model, occupation of the first site would be necessary and sufficient for cleavage promotion, the second site would be neutral with respect to cleavage and the occupation of the third site would inhibit LexA cleavage at least partially. Double-stranded natural DNA did not stimulate cleavage, even under conditions where RecA binds quantitatively to the DNA. No polyribonucleotides (RNA) examined showed a significant stimulative effect either, nor did they appear to interact with RecA.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The location of DNA in complexes of recA protein with double-stranded DNA. A neutron scattering study.

Purified recA protein is found as rodlike homopolymers, and it forms filamentous complexes with double-stranded DNA that are stable in the presence of ATP gamma S, a nonhydrolyzable analogue of ATP. The structure of these filaments has been described in some detail by electron microscopy. Here we confirm the mass per length of 6.5 recA/100 A in solution by small-angle neutron scattering and extend the analysis to homopolymers of recA protein, finding a mass per length of about 7 recA/100 A and a radial mass distribution (cross-sectional radius of gyration) significantly different for the two filaments. The models proposed so far for the structure of the complex have placed the DNA in the center of the filament. Here we verify this assumption using small-angle neutron scattering to locate the DNA in the complexes, exploiting the contrast variation method in D2O/H2O mixtures. Model calculations show that the natural contrast difference between DNA and protein is not sufficient to locate the DNA (which accounts for only 4.7% of the mass in the complex). When deuterated DNA is used, the contrast difference is enhanced, and model calculations and experiment then converge, indicating that the DNA is indeed near the axis of the complex.

Binding Sites↗

Effect of induction of SOS response on expression of pBR322 genes and on plasmid copy number.

Several lines of evidence are presented that indicate that the level of tetracycline resistance of Esherichia coli strains harboring plasmid pBR322 varies according to whether the SOS system of the host bacteria has been induced. These include use of strains in which the SOS system is expressed constitutively (lexA def.), is thermoinducible (recA441) or noninducible (lexA ind-), or is highly repressed (multiple copies of lexA+). Similar induction was observed with the product of another plasmid gene, beta-lactamase. The amounts of extractable plasmid DNA were also increased by SOS induction, and we propose that the SOS-induced increases in levels of tetracycline resistance and beta-lactamase activity are due to an increased plasmid copy number.

Alleles↗

The amino-terminal domain of LexA repressor is alpha-helical but differs from canonical helix-turn-helix proteins: a two-dimensional 1H NMR study.

The amino-terminal DNA binding domain of LexA repressor consisting of 84 amino acid residues has been studied by two-dimensional 1H NMR. Sequence-specific 1H resonance assignments were made for the first 60 amino acid residues. The secondary structure of this part of the protein contains three alpha-helices in the peptide segments 8-20, 28-35, and 41-54. The last helix has a distortion around residues 47-48. The peptide segment 28-47 shows weak homology with other helix-turn-helix proteins. To investigate the spatial structure of this region of the molecule distance-geometry calculations were performed based on proton-proton distance constraints from nuclear Overhauser effects. The resulting structure shows that the segment 28-47 contains two helices with a loop region between them. The relative orientation of the two helices is similar to that found in helix-turn-helix proteins, but the helices are further apart, with the phenyl ring of Phe-37 located between them. The Brookhaven Protein Data Bank was searched for structurally homologous peptide segments in other proteins. The result of this search was that the two-helical structure of LexA is not more closely related to the canonical helix-turn-helix motif than it is to similar substructures found in other classes of proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

LexA repressor induces operator-dependent DNA bending.

LexA, the repressor of the SOS system in Escherichia coli induces a substantial DNA bending upon interaction with the operator of the caa gene, which codes for the bacterial toxin colicin A. Analysis by gel electrophoresis of a family of DNA fragments of identical length, but bearing the caa operator at different positions, shows that DNA bending occurs close to or within the operator sequence upon LexA binding. In contrast, the interaction of LexA with the recA operator induces no detectable bending on 5% polyacrylamide gels. This difference between the two operators is likely to be due to an intrinsic bendability of the caa operator related to thymine tracts located on both sides of the operator. Such tracts do not exist in the recA operator. The free DNA fragments harbouring the caa operator show a slight tendency to bend even in the absence of the LexA repressor. The centre of this intrinsic bend is located close to or within the caa operator.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor oligomerises essentially as the entire protein.

The ability of the isolated carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli to form dimers and tetramers has been investigated by equilibrium ultracentrifugation. This domain, that comprises the amino acids 85-202, is readily purified after self-cleavage of the LexA repressor at alkaline pH. It turns out that the carboxy-terminal domain forms dimers and tetramers essentially as the entire LexA repressor. The corresponding association constants were determined after non-linear least squares fitting of the experimental concentration distribution. A dimer association constant of K2 = 3 X 10(4) M-1 and a tetramer association constant of K4 = 2 X 10(4) M-1 have been determined. Similar measurements on the entire LexA repressor [(1985) Biochemistry 24, 2812-2818] gave values of K2 = 2.1 X 10(4) M-1 and K4 = 7.7 X 10(4) M-1. Within experimental error the dimer formation constant of the carboxy-terminal domain may be considered to be the same as that of the entire repressor whereas the isolated domain forms tetramers slightly less efficiently. It should be stressed that the potential error in K4 is higher than that in K2. The overall conclusion is that the two structural domains of LexA have also well-defined functional roles: the amino-terminal domain interacts with DNA and the carboxy-terminal domain is involved in dimerisation reinforcing in this way the binding of the LexA repressor to operator DNA.

Bacterial Proteins↗

A mutant LexA repressor harboring a cleavage motif cysteine-glycine remains inducible.

Using site-directed mutagenesis of the lexA gene we have changed the amino acid Ala-84 of the LexA repressor for a cysteine. The reason for this change was the striking homology between LexA and UmuD and the comparable size of the two amino acid side chains. Using an in vivo repression/induction assay it is shown that the LexA-Cys-84 mutant remains inducible by mitomycin C and UV irradiation essentially in the same way as the wild-type repressor.

Bacterial Proteins↗