Biomedical subjects

M Scaglia

Publications and source records attributed to M Scaglia.

112 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

[Defecography in internal invagination of the rectum].

Rectal invagination has been considered an important cause of defecation difficulties and blockade (obstructed defecation). In the present study defecographies performed on 15 patients, with previous diagnosis of rectal invagination have been reviewed. Six patients had an intra-rectal (IR) invagination, three had an intra-anal (IA) invagination, while two patients did not show a typical rectal invagination. In the present series there is a suspected radiologic recurrence of the invagination. Three patients show a tendency to rectal stenosis. Anorectal angles at rest and under straining appears higher than the ones in normal subjects, after rectopexy, anorectal angles do not appear to be significantly changed and the pelvic floor is not significantly raising post-operatively. 7 out of 10 women had a rectocele preoperatively and 4 out 9 postoperatively. In 8 patients it was possible to compare a pre to a post-operative defecography. All patients but one displayed a reduction in the ability in emptying the rectum. The fact that rectal emptying is impaired may suggest that some autonomic denervation might occur following rectal mobilization.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Occult rectal prolapse: functional results after rectopexy].

In the present work the Authors have studied 19 patients with occult rectal prolapse evaluating symptoms and functional results after posterior abdominal rectopexy. Symptoms of internal rectal procidentia appear as a definite syndrome. In our patients pain upon defecation, this being often localized to the perineal and sacral region, was observed in 14 on 19 cases, while fecal incontinence was present in 5 cases (29%) and rectal bleeding in 8 (44%). These compliances are relieved by the anatomical correction of the rectal intussusception, but the preexisting functional disorders in the mechanism of defecation appear to be unaffected by rectopexy. (Sensation of obstruction 11 cases (58%) preop. e 9 cases (53%) postop.).

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Variations in rectal capacity and compliance after abdominal rectopexy].

The aim of this study was to attempt to gain insight in to the pathophysiologic characteristics of rectal prolapse by evaluating rectal compliance in patients with complete or incomplete rectal prolapse, before and after rectopexy. 21 subjects with complete rectal prolapse and 10 subjects with internal procidentia of rectum were treated with one of two abdominal rectopexies, according to Wells or according to a modified Ripstein's technique. For comparison, measurements were also carried out in 17 age and sex control subjects who had no bowel disturbances or anal symptoms. On distension with 40 cm H2O rectal volume amounted to 218 (175-255) ml for controls, 225 (178-256) ml for complete prolapses and 200 (125-225) ml for invaginations. Compliance amounted respectively to 9.5 (5-11,4), 8.5 (5-12,6), 7.5 (4-10,6) ml/cm H2O in the pressure interval 0-10 cm H2O with a decrease in compliance at higher pressure intervals. There was no correlation between rectal volume and compliance and gas or faecal incontinence, evacuation difficulties, feeling of blockade upon defecation and constipation. The effect of rectopexy has been separately evaluated according to the diagnosis. In complete prolapse significant changes of rectal capacity were observed for lower distending pressures (from 10 to 30), but not for higher (40-50). The compliance was significantly different for even lower distending pressures (0-10 cm H2O). In internal rectal procidentia rectopexy did not significantly changed capacity compliance. This work confirms the observations that the rectal compliance in rectal prolapse, complete and incomplete, do not differ from healthy controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Abdominal rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: how to foresee the functional result].

21 patients (19 women) who underwent rectal prolapse repair were prospectively studied. At the one year follow-up, 6 of the eleven incontinent patients (54 per cent) regained full continence and while three of the remaining 5 patients improved they still referred occasional imperfection of continence. Resting anal pressure and maximal squeeze pressure were both significantly lower in the five patients who remained incontinent, 23 (17-31) mm Hg vs 50 (31-52) mm Hg (p < = 0.02) and 52 (17-75) mm Hg vs 108 (89-110) mm Hg (p < = 0.02), respectively. Moreover the manometric results showed evidence that in patients who remained incontinent, the anal pressure in response to rectal distention, was significantly lower than patients who regained continence (p < = 0.05) both before and after operation. We conclude that incontinent patients with rectal prolapse who exhibit a markedly low minimal residual anal pressure on recto-anal reflex inhibition are less likely to improve after rectopexy and that this preoperative test may be a useful predictor.

Adult↗