Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Sambataro

Publications and source records attributed to M Sambataro.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Role of atrial natriuretic peptide in the pathogenesis of sodium retention in IDDM with and without glomerular hyperfiltration.

The pathogenetic determinants of sodium retention in IDDM are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to elucidate the action of ANP in 11 IDDM patients with high GFR (greater than or equal to 135 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2), referred to here as HF patients; in 10 IDDM patients with normal GFR (greater than 90 and less than 135 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2), referred to here as NF patients; and 12 control subjects, here called C subjects, at baseline and during saline infusion administered on the basis of either body weight (2 mmol.kg-1 x 60 min-1; Saline 1) or of ECV (12 mM.ECVL-1 x 90 min-1; Saline 2) during euglycemic insulin-glucose clamp. C subjects and both HF and NF IDDM patients received a second Saline 1 infusion accompanied by ANP infusion (0.02 microgram.kg-1.min-1) at euglycemic levels. HF and NF patients were studied again after 3 mo of treatment with (10 mg/day). Quinapril (CI 906, Malesci, Florence, Italy), an ACE inhibitor without sulfhydryl group. At baseline, both HF and NF IDDM patients had higher plasma ANP concentrations than C subjects (HF, 36 +/- 4, P less than 0.01 and NF, 34 +/- 3, P less than 0.01 vs. C, 19 +/- 3 pg/ml). Plasma ANP and natriuretic response to isotonic volume expansion was impaired both in HF (44 +/- 8 pg/ml, NS vs. base) and NF (40 +/- 7 pg/ml, NS vs. base) compared with C (41 +/- 4 pg/ml, P less than 0.01 vs. base) during Saline 1. On the contrary, plasma ANP response to Saline 2 was similar in HF and NF patients and C subjects, but IDDM patients had still lower urinary sodium excretion rates. The simultaneous administration of ANP and Saline 1 resulted in comparable plasma ANP plateaus in C subjects and HF and NF patients. However, urinary sodium excretion rate was significantly lower in HF and NF patients than in C subjects: HF, 267 +/- 64, P less than 0.01 and NF, 281 +/- 42, P less than 0.01 vs. C, 424 +/- 39 mumol.min-1 x 1.73 m-2. During simultaneous administration of ANP and Saline 1, GFR and FF increased in C subjects, but not in HF and NF patients. HF and NF patients had higher urinary vasodilatory prostanoid excretion rates than C subjects at baseline. Saline infusion did not change urinary excretion rate of prostanoids either in C subjects or IDDM patients (both NF and HF).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Impaired response to angiotensin II in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Role of prostaglandins and sodium-lithium countertransport activity.

The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy remains elusive. A role for renal prostaglandins in antagonizing the hormonal effects of renin-angiotensin II has been postulated as a putative factor leading to hyperfiltration in patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to elucidate the effects of angiotensin II on kidney haemodynamics and on blood pressure in eight normal subjects, in nine normotensive, in nine hypertensive with normal sodium-lithium countertransport activity in erythrocytes, in seven hypertensive without and in eight hypertensive Type 1 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and with high sodium-lithium countertransport activity in erythrocytes. Angiotensin II infusion (4 ng.kg-1.min-1 for 60 min) decreased the glomerular filtration rate to a greater extent in normal subjects (-20%), than in normotensive patients (-5% p less than 0.01), in hypertensive patients with normal sodium-lithium countertransport activity in erythrocytes (-8% p less than 0.01) in hypertensive patients with high sodium-lithium countertransport (-6% p less than 0.01) and in hypertensive microalbuminuric patients (-5% p less than 0.01) with Type 1 diabetes. The urinary excretion rate of vasodilatory prostaglandins was two-three fold higher in all patients than in normal subjects. Acute indomethacin treatment restored a normal response to angiotensin II infusion in normotensive patients, but did not change the renal haemodynamic response in normal subjects. With regard to hypertensive patients with and without microalbuminuria indomethacin treatment restored a normal response to angiotensin II in some but not all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evidence of a threshold value of glycated hemoglobin to improve the course of renal function in type 2 diabetes with typical diabetic glomerulopathy.

We recently observed that the course of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) rapidly declines in a subgroup of Type 2 diabetic patients (D) with abnormalities of albumin excretion rate (AER) and typical diabetic nephropathy, despite tight blood pressure control. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether amelioration of blood glucose control, using insulin, improves the course of GFR. GFR decay was measured by spline modeling analysis of the plasma clearance rate of 51CR-EDTA, assessed every 6 months. We identified two groups of D using morphometric analysis of renal biopsy, who had values of glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and fractional mesangial volume (Vv mes/glom) respectively below (Group A: 38) or above (Group B: 50) the mean+2SD of values found in 27 kidney donors (GBM: 389 nm; Vv mes/glom: 0.25), as previously described in detail. Median AER was similar at base line in the 2 groups (109 microg/min, 29-1950, in Group A, 113 microg/min, 37-1845, in Group B; n.s.). Conventional metabolic therapy (sulphonylureas and/or biguanides) was used both in Group A and B during a 3 year follow-up period (Period 1). Group B was further divided in two subgroups with body mass index below (Group B, a) and above (Group B, b) the value of 30 kg/m2. Mean +/- SD HbA1c was 8.2 +/- 1.6% in Group A, 8.3 +/- 1.7% in Group B (a) (n.s.) and 9.1 +/- 1.7% in Group B (b) (n.s.). Tight blood pressure control was achieved and maintained using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and/or beta blockers and/or calcium antagonists and/or thiazides. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was 92 +/- 3 mmHg in Group A and 91 +/- 4 mmHg in Group B (n.s.). GFR decay was significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (Group A vs B: +1.21 +/- 0.71 vs -5.86 +/- 1.61 ml/min/1.73 m2/year). Median AER significantly rose in Group B (177 microg/min, p<0.05 vs base line) but not in Group A (134 microg/min, n.s.) during the third year of follow-up. Groups A and B were then followed over 4.1 years (range 3.1-4.4) (Period 2) maintaining the above described antihypertensive regimen, resulting in MAP values similar to those described during Period 1. Group A patients were treated with the same conventional glycemic control during Period 2. Group B (a) was conversely treated with intensive insulin therapy to achieve a HbA1c value below 7.5% (3 daily injections of regular and 1 or 2 daily injections of intermediate acting insulin associated with metformin 500 mg twice daily in 64% of the patients). Group B (b) patients were only treated by metformin (850 mg thrice daily) to achieve a HbA1c value below 7.5%. HbA1c decreased below the 7.5% target value in Group B (a) (7.0 +/- 1.6%, p<0.01 vs Period 1), but not in Group B (b) (8.0 +/- 1.6%, p<0.05 vs Period 1) and in Group A (8.3 +/- 1.7%, n.s. vs Period 1). The GFR decay of Group B, a during Period 2 was lower than that during Period 1 (Period 1 vs Period 2: -5.9 +/- 1.8 vs -1.8 +/- 0.7 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, p<0.01). GFR decay during Period 2 was similar to that observed during Period 1 in Group A (Period 1 vs Period 2: +1.21 +/- 0.71 vs +0.7 +/- 0.6 ml/min/1.73 ml/year, n.s.) and in Group B (b) (Period 1 vs Period 2: -4.4 +/- 0.71 vs -4.2 +/- 0.6 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, n.s.). Median AER did not significantly change in the fourth year of Period 2 , either in Group A or B (Group A vs B: 141 vs 152 microg/min, n.s.). In conclusion, our findings seem to suggest that amelioration of blood glucose control is attained both by insulin and metformin intensive treatment, but only insulin decreases and maintains HbA1c levels below 7.5%. These pattens of HbA1c appear to be a threshold value in order to significantly blunt GFR decay in a subgroup of Type 2 diabetic patients with typical diabetic glomerular lesions, who are less responsive to tight blood pressure control alone. Conversely, the cohort of patients with less severe diabetic glomerulopathy steadily show constant GFR patterns, despite similar abnormalities of albumin excretion rate, and HbA1c average values above 7.5%.

Aged↗