Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M S Wilkes

Publications and source records attributed to M S Wilkes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

An innovative approach to educating medical students about pharmaceutical promotion.

Prescription drugs comprise approximately 9% of the total cost of health care in the United States. The manner in which doctors obtain information about new and changing pharmaceuticals obviously has the potential to have a profound impact on health care costs, pharmaceutical companies' profits, and the quality of health care. Patterns learned in medical school undoubtedly influence physicians' future behaviors. The authors describe an educational program, in which university pharmacists portrayed pharmaceutical company representatives to model a promotional presentation, that they designed to generate critical thinking among third-year medical students regarding the influence of pharmaceutical representatives on the prescribing practices of physicians. The authors also provide information suggesting that the program increased the uncertainty many students felt about the accuracy and ethics of standard drug "detailing."

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A comparative study of measures to evaluate medical students' performance.

PURPOSE: To assess how new National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) performance examinations--computerbased case simulations (CBX) and standardized patient exams (SPX)-compare with each other and with traditional internal and external measures of medical students' performances. Secondary objectives examined attitudes of students toward new and traditional evaluation modalities. METHOD: Fourth-year students (n = 155) at the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine (including joint programs at Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science and University of California, Riverside) were assigned two days of performance examinations (eight SPXs, ten CBXs, and a self-administered attitudinal survey). The CBX was scored by the NBME and the SPX by a NBME/Macy consortium. Scores were linked to the survey and correlated with archival student data, including traditional performance indicators (licensing board scores, grade-point averages, etc.). RESULTS: Of the 155 students, 95% completed the testing. The CBX and the SPX had low to moderate statistically significant correlations with each other and with traditional measures of performance. Traditional measures were intercorrelated at higher levels than with the CBX or SPX. Students' perceptions of the various evaluation methods varied based on the assessment. These findings are consistent with the theoretical construct for development of performance examinations. For example, to assess clinical decision making, students rated the CBX best, while they rated multiple-choice examinations best to assess knowledge. CONCLUSION: Examination results and student perception studies provide converging evidence that performance examinations measure different physician competency domains and support using multipronged assessment approaches.

Educational Measurement↗