Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M S Litwin

Publications and source records attributed to M S Litwin.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an increasingly important endpoint in prostate cancer care. However, pivotal issues that are not fully assessed in existing HRQOL instruments include irritative urinary symptoms, hormonal symptoms, and multi-item scores quantifying bother between urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal domains. We sought to develop a novel instrument to facilitate more comprehensive assessment of prostate cancer-related HRQOL. METHODS: Instrument development was based on advice from an expert panel and prostate cancer patients, which led to expanding the 20-item University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) to the 50-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC). Summary and subscale scores were derived by content and factor analyses. Reliability and validity were assessed by test-retest correlation, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, interscale correlation, and EPIC correlation with other validated instruments. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were high for EPIC urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domain summary scores (each r >/=0.80 and Cronbach's alpha >/=0.82) and for most domain-specific subscales. Correlations between function and bother subscales within domains were high (r >0.60). Correlations between different primary domains were consistently lower, indicating that these domains assess distinct HRQOL components. EPIC domains had weak to modest correlations with the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), indicating rationale for their concurrent use. Moderate agreement was observed between EPIC domains relevant to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate module (FACT-P) and the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI), providing criterion validity without excessive overlap. CONCLUSIONS: EPIC is a robust prostate cancer HRQOL instrument that complements prior instruments by measuring a broad spectrum of urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms, thereby providing a unique tool for comprehensive assessment of HRQOL issues important in contemporary prostate cancer management.

Aged↗

A nationwide charge comparison of the principal treatments for early stage prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and treatment of men with early stage prostate carcinoma is expensive and controversial, yet the similarities in reported survival rates has underscored the importance of ascertaining the relative charges of different forms of therapy. METHODS: Patient specific data on demographic characteristics, hospital and physician resource use, and charges were obtained from the Health Care Financing Administration for 1993 through 1996. The inpatient, outpatient, and part B claims from men with a new diagnosis of prostate carcinoma were captured from the quarter of the year in which biopsy was performed through the two quarters after treatment. Charges are reported in inflation-unadjusted dollars. RESULTS: Of 10,107 men treated for early stage prostate carcinoma, 58% received external beam radiation therapy (XRT), 35% had radical prostatectomy, and 7% underwent brachytherapy. Over the 4 years, use of XRT decreased 19% whereas use of brachytherapy increased 21%. Men aged 65-69 years were more likely to have radical prostatectomy, but after age 70 years, XRT predominated. The most expensive treatments were radical prostatectomy with adjuvant XRT ($31,329) and brachytherapy with pretreatment XRT ($24,407). Cost of radical prostatectomy alone was more than XRT alone ($19,019 vs. 15,937; P < 0.05) or brachytherapy alone ($15,301; P < 0.05). Treatment utilization varied with age, race, and geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: The mean charges for the workup, treatment, and 6 month follow-up of patients treated for early stage prostate carcinoma ranged between $15,301 and $31,329, with significant treatment group differences. Without a clear survival advantage from one form of treatment, issues such as costs, quality of life, and patient preferences take on paramount importance.

Age Factors↗

Urinary function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: a longitudinal, multivariate quality of life analysis from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor.

PURPOSE: We measure the effect of time on urinary function and bother during the first 2 years following treatment for early stage prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied urinary function and bother in 564 men recently diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer and treated with radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index, which is a validated, health related quality of life instrument that includes these 2 domains. To minimize the influence of other factors we adjusted for age, co-morbidity, general health, pad use, anticholinergics or procedures for urethral stricture. All subjects were drawn from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), which is a national longitudinal database. RESULTS: Urinary function improved with time during the first year after surgery but remained fairly constant during year 2. Urinary function remained stable throughout the 2 years after radiation. Urinary bother was worse after radiation throughout the 2 years, although it improved markedly by the end of year 1. Age, ethnicity and co-morbidity did not impact urinary function or bother but being married did have an advantage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing surgery or radiation showed different longitudinal profiles of urinary function and bother during the first 2 years after treatment.

Aged↗

Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We compare general and disease specific health related quality of life in men undergoing brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer to those undergoing radical prostatectomy and age matched healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cohorts consisted of 48 men treated with brachytherapy with and without pretreatment external beam radiation therapy (brachytherapy group), 74 who underwent radical prostatectomy (prostatectomy group) and age matched healthy controls from the literature. The RAND 36-item general health survey, University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, American Urological Association symptom index, validated Cancer Interference with Life and Family Scales, and sociodemographic and co-morbidity questionnaires were completed 3 to 17 months after treatment. RESULTS: General health related quality of life did not differ greatly among the 3 groups. Urinary function (leakage) was worse in the brachytherapy group than in controls but better than in the prostatectomy group. Brachytherapy group patients had more irritative urinary symptoms and worse bowel function than controls. Sexual function and bother were worse in prostatectomy and brachytherapy groups than in healthy controls. Physical function, bodily pain, urinary function, and bother and American Urological Association symptom index scores improved with time after brachytherapy. Patients who underwent brachytherapy after external beam radiation performed worse in all general and disease specific health related quality of life domains compared to those who did not undergo pretreatment radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: At an average of 7.5 months after treatment the general health related quality of life of patients undergoing brachytherapy with and without pretreatment external beam radiation was similar to age matched controls, although urinary, bowel and sexual problems were reported. These problems appeared to improve during the first year after treatment. Much of the impairment in disease specific health related quality of life among patients undergoing brachytherapy may be attributed to pretreatment radiation.

Aged↗

An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a satisfaction measure for use in longitudinal, prospective studies of patient care. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer (n = 228) who were enrolled in CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) completed a self-administered questionnaire that included a health-related quality-of-life and satisfaction measure. A subset of patients completed the questionnaire again within 30 days. METHODS: The satisfaction measure contained 6 individual subscales: overall satisfaction with care, contact with providers, confidence in providers, communication skills, humaneness, and a summary scale. Six items surveyed patients' willingness to participate in decision making (participatory style), and these were averaged into a single score. Variability, reliability, stability, and validity were evaluated. RESULTS: Responses to the items varied substantially. The overall satisfaction scale demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.82) and moderate test-retest reliability (0.62), and it could discriminate between groups of individuals expected to differ with regard to satisfaction (by age and disease stage). Subscale internal consistency reliability (0.37-0.54) and stability (0.38-0.63) were weaker, suggesting that only a single scale should be reported. The participatory scale performed poorly and could not be recommended for future use. CONCLUSION: The overall satisfaction measure developed for this study demonstrated good reliability and validity and should be useful in other population-based studies in conjunction with other outcome measures.

Aged↗

Defining an international research agenda for quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: While the traditional goal in the management of patients with prostate cancer has been to maximize survival, the recent advent of the medical outcomes movement has underscored the importance of patient-centered issues, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: In this paper we present a comprehensive approach to the study of HRQOL in men with prostate cancer. We begin by defining HRQOL in general, discussing its measurement, and placing it in the context of prostate cancer. We then describe the primary goals of HRQOL research and present examples of validated instruments. We finish by proposing a quality of life research agenda for the next two decades. RESULTS: Contemporary perspectives on HRQOL are based on the World Health Organization's definition of health as not merely the absence of disease, but as a state of physical, emotional, and social well-being. HRQOL measurement must adhere to the strict methodological principles of survey psychometrics and is best accomplished with any of several validated instruments. Once collected, HRQOL information is useful for prostate cancer patients facing difficult treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: A solid foundation for HRQOL research has been built in early- and late-stage prostate cancer. It includes the development of new instruments and the establishment of descriptive data. This groundwork will allow investigators to address more complex research issues, such as interpreting interactions among HRQOL domains, presenting HRQOL data to future patients, optimally timing HRQOL data collection, uncovering innate and alterable factors that influence HRQOL, and exploring the intercultural nuances of HRQOL assessment.

Health↗

Urology.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Circumcision, Male↗

The National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index: development and validation of a new outcome measure. Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network.

PURPOSE: Chronic abacterial prostatitis is a syndrome characterized by pelvic pain and voiding symptoms, which is poorly defined, poorly understood, poorly treated and bothersome. Research and clinical efforts to help men with this syndrome have been hampered by the absence of a widely accepted, reliable and valid instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life impact. We developed a psychometrically valid index of symptoms and quality of life impact for men with chronic prostatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a structured literature review of previous work to provide a foundation for the new instrument. We then conducted a series of focus groups comprising chronic prostatitis patients at 4 centers in North America, in which we identified the most important symptoms and effects of the condition. The results were used to create an initial draft of 55 questions that were used for formal cognitive testing on chronic prostatitis patients at the same centers. After expert panel review formal validation testing of a revised 21-item draft was performed in a diverse group of chronic prostatitis patients and 2 control groups of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients and healthy men. Based on this validation study, the index was finalized. RESULTS: Analysis yielded an index of 9 items that address 3 different aspects of the chronic prostatitis experience. The primary component was pain, which we captured in 4 items focused on location, severity and frequency. Urinary function, another important component of symptoms, was captured in 2 items (1 irritative and 1 obstructive). Quality of life impact was captured with 3 items about the effect of symptoms on daily activities. The 9 items had high test-retest reliability (r = 0.83 to 0.93) and internal consistency (alpha = 0.86 to 0.91). All but the urinary items discriminated well between men with and without chronic prostatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index provides a valid outcome measure for men with chronic prostatitis. The index is psychometrically robust, easily self-administered and highly discriminative. It was formally developed and psychometrically validated, and may be useful in clinical practice as well as research protocols.

Chronic Disease↗

Changes in health-related quality of life in the first year after treatment for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for prostate cancer has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We examined HRQOL immediately after diagnosis and treatment and 1 and 2 years after treatment for a cohort of men with early and late-stage prostate cancer. METHODS: We studied 692 men enrolled in CaPSURE, a large national observational data base of patients with prostate cancer. General and disease-specific HRQOL were measured with validated instruments at study entry and quarterly thereafter. Individuals were grouped by initial treatment: radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and observation (ie, no treatment in first year). Trends in HRQOL scores were evaluated immediately after treatment through 2 years, adjusting for age and length of follow-up. RESULTS: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy demonstrated statistically significant increases in functioning in general and in disease-specific components during the year after treatment when compared with scores immediately after treatment. Patients receiving radiotherapy and hormonal therapy had significant improvements in patient reports of health change during the year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy have low HRQOL scores just after treatment in almost all general and disease-specific areas, but at 1 year there is a sharp improvement. Patients undergoing observation, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy remain stable over time. All treatment groups continue to have decrements in sexual function.

Aged↗

Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of treatment choice (pelvic irradiation [XRT] versus radical prostatectomy [RP] with or without nerve sparing) on sexual function and sexual bother during the first 2 years after treatment. METHODS: We studied sexual function and sexual bother in 438 men recently diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer and treated with XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated health-related quality-of-life instrument that includes these two domains. To minimize the influence of other factors, we adjusted for age, comorbidity, general health, and previous treatment for erectile dysfunction. All subjects were drawn from CaPSURE, a national, longitudinal data base. RESULTS: Sexual function improved over time during the first year in all treatment groups; however, during the second year, sexual function began to decline in the XRT group. Older patients who received XRT showed substantial declines in sexual function throughout the 2 years, and older patients who underwent RP experienced a return of very low baseline sexual function. Sexual function was improved by the use of nerve-sparing procedures or erectile aids. Alterations in sexual bother were ameliorated by many factors, including age, general health perceptions, and sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing all showed comparable rates of improvement in sexual function during the first year after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. However, in the second year after treatment, patients treated with XRT began to show declining sexual function; patients treated with RP did not.

Aged↗

Can hospital structural and financial characteristics explain variations in mortality caused by acute myocardial infarction?

Each year 1 in 160 people in the United States suffers from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Of these more than 1.5 million cases annually, 500,000 end in fatalities. This study's purpose was to describe and evaluate the role hospital characteristics play in rates of mortality caused by AMI in acute-care California hospitals. Characteristics evaluated include structural characteristics--i.e., teaching status, percentage of board-certified physicians, registered nurse hours per patient day (RN hours/patient day), volume of cases, technological resource availability, and urban density; and financial characteristics--profit status and total operating expenses per patient day. Although part of a larger investigation correlating mortality and length of stay, this article reports only the results for significant influences on mortality.

California↗

Academic medicine and managed care: seeking common ground.

The authors report the highlights of a one-day symposium, "Academic Medicine and Managed Care: Seeking Common Ground," sponsored in early 1997 by Tulane University Medical Center. The meeting was held to foster better understanding of the gap between managed care organizations (MCOs) and academic health centers (AHCs) and to define their common ground. There were 62 participants, mainly executives froin AHCs and MCOs, plus government officials and policy researchers interested in the interface of academic medicine and managed care. The participants agreed that there are indeed some common areas in which the two types of organizations can develop programs and interests that serve the missions of both. These include (1) a commitment to high-quality health care, objectively measured by outcomes; (2) issues of "customer service"; (3) certain areas of research (e.g., examining outcomes of medical interventions; measuring cost and cost-effectiveness; measuring quality of care); and (4) preventive medicine, an area in which both AHCs and MCOs are still relatively weak. On the other hand, large elements of AHCs' basic missions of education and research are not seen by MCOs as areas for developing a common agenda. Participants agreed that AHCs must do their best to improve and demonstrate the quality of their care, address the challenges of the market (i.e., take "customer service" seriously), address the issue of how many specialists and how many generalists should be trained, and define the cost of each of their missions. On the other hand, managed care must acknowledge that the missions of AHCs greatly benefit patients and society. Participants agreed that all approaches to AHC-MCO interfaces must be flexible and local, that common ground does exist, and that understanding can grow between these two kinds of organizations if acrimonious exchanges are avoided and serious efforts are made to work together for solutions.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We describe the clinical and pathological outcomes of intraoperative frozen sections performed on the posterolateral prostate margins during nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a technique of bilateral nerve sparing, inking the posterolateral prostate margins and obtaining frozen sections. When tumor was seen on frozen section, the fascia and neurovascular bundle were widely excised before completing the vesicourethral anastomosis. We reviewed 142 radical retropubic prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon between 1992 and 1997. Patients were divided into group 1--nerve sparing procedure using our technique (48 patients), 2--planned unilateral nerve sparing without frozen sections (46) and 3--planned bilateral nerve sparing without frozen sections (48). Potency was measured implicitly by physician assessment and explicitly with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. Group comparisons were made for positive margins, biochemical recurrence and potency. Mean followup was 24.5, 43.8 and 39.4 months for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 48 group 1 patients 9 (18%) had adenocarcinoma in the frozen section specimen, prompting wide excision of the bundles. None of these patients had biochemical recurrence during a mean followup of 20.5 months. Both bundles were spared in the remaining 39 patients (82%). There was no difference in survival or time to biochemical recurrence between groups 1 and 2. Potency was significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (36 versus 13%, p = 0.001), even after age adjustment (p = 0.05). In contrast, potency did not differ between groups 1 and 3 (38 versus 40%). Preoperative stage, grade and prostate specific antigen level were similar among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant difference in potency rates adjusted for age between patients with and without frozen sections. Our results indicate that this technique can enhance the ability of the surgeon to monitor the nerve sparing procedure without compromising cancer control.

Adult↗

Accuracy of recall in health-related quality-of-life assessment among men treated for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of patient recall of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled onto a longitudinal, observational cohort study of HRQOL after radical prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer were asked to assess their baseline HRQOL before surgery. They were later asked to recall their baseline HRQOL at intervals of 7 to 37 months after surgery. The two views of baseline HRQOL (actual and recall) were compared. HRQOL was measured with established instruments (the RAND 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey and a validated short form of the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index) that addressed impairment in the physical, mental, urinary, bowel, and sexual domains. RESULTS: Overall, recall was poor. Patients tended to remember their baseline HRQOL as being better than it actually was. This effect was particularly striking for urinary and sexual function. Greater education and younger age diminished this effect in some domains. The effect did not vary with time since surgery. CONCLUSION: Men undergoing radical prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer do not accurately recall their pretreatment HRQOL when asked several months or years later. This recall bias is constant throughout a period of 6 months to 3 years after surgery. By collecting data before treatment and observing subjects longitudinally, investigators can ensure that HRQOL changes are analyzed in the context of any impairment that may have been present at baseline. If a longitudinal study is not feasible, then great caution must be used if patients are asked to recall their pretreatment HRQOL.

Aged↗