Biomedical subjects

M S Banks

Publications and source records attributed to M S Banks.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Visual self-motion perception during head turns.

Extra-retinal information is critical in the interpretation of visual input during self-motion. Turning our eyes and head to track objects displaces the retinal image but does not affect our ability to navigate because we use extra-retinal information to compensate for these displacements. We showed observers animated displays depicting their forward motion through a scene. They perceived the simulated self-motion accurately while smoothly shifting the gaze by turning the head, but not when the same gaze shift was simulated in the display; this indicates that the visual system also uses extra-retinal information during head turns. Additional experiments compared self-motion judgments during active and passive head turns, passive rotations of the body and rotations of the body with head fixed in space. We found that accurate perception during active head turns is mediated by contributions from three extra-retinal cues: vestibular canal stimulation, neck proprioception and an efference copy of the motor command to turn the head.

Cues↗

PubMed1997

The computation of binocular visual direction: a re-examination of Mansfield and Legge (1996)

Mansfield and Legge (1996) reported recently that a target's perceived binocular direction is dependent on the ratio of contrasts presented to the two eyes. Although their main conclusion concerned the dependence of perceived direction on interocular contrast, they also argued that the change in perceived direction is due to a shift in the position of the cyclopean eye and that the relative directions of binocular targets are unaffected by eye position. We take issue with both of these arguments. With regard to the former, their task was an alignment task, not an egocenter task, so it did not provide information relevant to the position of the cyclopean eye. Indeed, their data can be explained by the conventional theory of binocular visual directions with a fixed cyclopean eye (e.g., Hering, 1879; Ono, 1981) once a simple, but important modification is added. With regard to their conclusion concerning eye position, we show that the vergence of the eyes has a clear and systematic effect on perceived relative directions in the setup used by Mansfield and Legge.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed1996

Mechanisms of heading perception in primate visual cortex.

When we move forward while walking or driving, what we see appears to expand. The center or focus of this expansion tells us our direction of self-motion, or heading, as long as our eyes are still. However, if our eyes move, as when tracking a nearby object on the ground, the retinal image is disrupted and the focus is shifted away from the heading. Neurons in primate dorso-medial superior temporal area responded selectively to an expansion focus in a certain part of the visual field, and this selective region shifted during tracking eye movements in a way that compensated for the retinal focus shift. Therefore, these neurons account for the effect of eye movements on what we see as we travel forward through the world.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Retinal illuminance and contrast sensitivity in human infants.

Several investigators have related infants' low contrast sensitivity to immaturities in the optics and receptor lattice of the immature eye. A critical element in the modeling is how much the lower photon catch of the immature retina reduces sensitivity; the assumptions vary from square-root to Weber's law and lead to very different modeling outcomes. We measured the relationship between retinal illuminance and contrast sensitivity at different spatial frequencies. The sweep visual-evoked potential was used to measure thresholds in 2- and 3-month olds and adults over a 2.5-log-unit range of illuminances. The contrast threshold vs illuminance functions were fit by power functions. The best-fitting exponents for adults were about -0.5 at higher spatial frequencies (consistent with square-root law) and lower at lower frequencies. The best-fitting exponents for 2- and 3-month olds were -0.2 to -0.35 which indicates that threshold is less affected by changes in illuminance than is the case in adults. These results suggest that none of the models relating optical and receptoral immaturities to infants' spatial vision has assumed an appropriate relationship between lower photon catch and contrast sensitivity. Once the models are modified to incorporate the relationship obtained in the present experiment, the predictions fall well short of explaining 2-month olds' low contrast sensitivity.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Ideal observer for heading judgments.

Several aspects of the viewing situation affect the ability to determine heading from optical flow. These include the amount of depth variation and number of texture elements in the scene, the location and amount of the visual field stimulated, and the position of the focus of expansion within the stimulus. Without a quantification of the discrimination information provided by the stimuli presented to the observer, it is impossible to determine how much of an observed change in performance reflects the properties of neural mechanisms and strategies employed by the observer. To enable a better quantification, we developed an ideal observer for the discrimination of heading from random-dot flow fields. Internal noises of the ideal observer were set by the results of single-dot velocity discrimination experiments. We compared human and ideal observer performance in discriminating headings with different patterns of flow (e.g. radial vs laminar) presented on different parts of the retina. Efficiency--the ratio of ideal and human thresholds--was fairly constant for the various flow patterns and retinal eccentricities. This outcome indicates that most of the variation in human observers' ability to estimate heading from the flow patterns and retinal loci considered here is due to changes in the discrimination information provided by the stimulus after measurement by the visual system. In the discussion, we show how the ideal observer can be used to quantify the spatial distribution of heading discrimination information for any observer translation through any scene represented by dots.

Depth Perception↗

PubMed1996

Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements.

The ability to judge heading during tracking eye movements has recently been examined by several investigators. To assess the use of retinal-image and extra-retinal information in this task, the previous work has compared heading judgments with executed as opposed to simulated eye movements. For eye movement velocities greater than 1 deg/sec, observers seem to require the eye-velocity information provided by extra-retinal signals that accompany tracking eye movements. When those signals are not provided, such as with simulated eye movements, observers perceive their self-motion as curvilinear translation rather than the linear translation plus eye rotation being presented. The interpretation of the previous results is complicated, however, by the fact that the simulated eye movement condition may have created a conflict between two possible estimates of the heading: one based on extra-retinal solutions and the other based on retina-image solutions. In four experiments, we minimized this potential conflict by having observers judge heading in the presence of rotations consisting of mixtures of executed and simulated eye movements. The results showed that the heading is estimated more accurately when rotational flow is created by executed eye movements alone. In addition, the magnitude of errors in heading estimates is essentially proportional to the amount of rotational flow created by a simulated eye rotation (independent of the total magnitude of the rotational flow). The fact that error magnitude is proportional to the amount of simulated rotation suggests that the visual system attributes rotational flow unaccompanied by an eye movement to a displacement of the direction of translation in the direction of the simulated eye rotation.

Cues↗

PubMed1996

Gravitational acceleration as a cue for absolute size and distance?

When an object's motion is influenced by gravity, as in the rise and fall of a thrown ball, the vertical component of acceleration is roughly constant at 9.8 m/sec2. In principle, an observer could use this information to estimate the absolute size and distance of the object (Saxberg, 1987a; Watson, Banks, von Hofsten, & Royden, 1992). In five experiments, we examined people's ability to utilize the size and distance information provided by gravitational acceleration. Observers viewed computer simulations of an object rising and falling on a trajectory aligned with the gravitational vector. The simulated objects were balls of different diameters presented across a wide range of simulated distances. Observers were asked to identify the ball that was presented and to estimate its distance. The results showed that observers were much more sensitive to average velocity than to the gravitational acceleration pattern. Likewise, verticality of the motion and visibility of the trajectory's apex had negligible effects on the accuracy of size and distance judgments.

Acceleration↗

PubMed1994

Estimating heading during eye movements.

In eight experiments, we examined the ability to judge heading during tracking eye movements. To assess the use of retinal-image and extra-retinal information in this task, we compared heading judgments with executed as opposed to simulated eye movements. In general, judgments were much more accurate during executed eye movements. Observers in the simulated eye movement condition misperceived their self-motion as curvilinear translation rather than the linear translation plus eye rotation that was simulated. There were some experimental conditions in which observers could judge heading reasonably accurately during simulated eye movements; these included conditions in which eye movement velocities were 1 deg/sec or less and conditions which made available a horizon cue that exists for locomotion parallel to a ground plane with a visible horizon. Overall, our results imply that extra-retinal, eye-velocity signals are used in determining heading under many, perhaps most, viewing conditions.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1993

Does chromatic sensitivity develop more slowly than luminance sensitivity?

Chromatic sensitivity is very low in humans during the first few months of life. We examined whether low chromatic sensitivity reflects a deficiency among chromatic mechanisms or whether it is simply a manifestation of poor visual sensitivity in general. The sweep VEP was used to measure contrast sensitivity to gratings varying in the mixture of red and green components. For infants from 2 to 8 weeks of age, sensitivity to all mixtures was lower than color-normal adults' sensitivity, but infant and adult ratios of luminance/chromatic sensitivity were similar. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that infants have functional MWS and LWS cones and the requisite post-receptor chromatic mechanisms to compare their signals.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1993

Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow.

We examined the ability to use optic flow to judge heading when different parts of the retina are stimulated and when the specified heading is in different directions relative to the display. To do so, we manipulated retinal eccentricity (the angle between the fovea and the center of the stimulus) and heading eccentricity (the angle between the specified heading and the center of the stimulus) independently. Observers viewed two sequences of moving dots that simulated translation through a random cloud of dots. They reported whether the direction of translation--the heading--in the second sequence was to the left or right of the direction in the first sequence. The results revealed a large and consistent effect of heading eccentricity: Judgments were much more accurate with radial flow fields (small heading eccentricities) than with lamellar fields (large heading eccentricities), regardless of the part of the retina being stimulated. The results also revealed a smaller and less consistent effect of retinal eccentricity: With radial flow (small heading eccentricities), judgments were more accurate when the stimulus was presented near the fovea. The variation of heading thresholds from radial to lamellar flow fields is predicted by a simple model of two-dimensional motion discrimination. The fact that the predictions are accurate implies that the human visual system is equally efficient at processing radial and lamellar flow fields. In addition, efficiency is reasonably constant no matter what part of the retina is being stimulated.

Depth Perception↗

PubMed1992

The perception of heading during eye movements.

When a person walks through a rigid environment while holding eyes and head fixed, the pattern of retinal motion flows radially away from a point, the focus of expansion (Fig. 1a). Under such conditions of translation, heading corresponds to the focus of expansion and people identify it readily. But when making an eye/head movement to track an object off to the side, retinal motion is no longer radial (Fig. 1b). Heading perception in such situations has been modelled in two ways. Extra-retinal models monitor the velocity of rotational movements through proprioceptive or efference information from the extraocular and neck muscles and use that information to discount rotation effects. Retinal-image models determine (and eliminate) rotational components from the retinal image alone. These models have been tested by measuring heading perception under two conditions. First, observers judged heading while tracking a point on a simulated ground plane. Second, they fixated a stationary point and the flow field simulated the effects of a tracking eye movement. Extra-retinal models predict poorer performance in the simulated condition because the eyes do not move. Retinal-image models predict no difference in performance because the two conditions produce identical patterns of retinal motion. Warren and Hannon observed similar performance and concluded that people do not require extra-retinal information to judge heading with eye/head movements present, but they used extremely slow tracking eye movements of 0.2-1.2 deg s-1; a moving observer frequently tracks objects at much higher rates (L. Stark, personal communication). Here we examine heading judgements at higher, more typical eye movement velocities and find that people require extra-retinal information about eye position to perceive heading accurately under many viewing conditions.

Eye Movements↗

PubMed1992

Temporal contrast sensitivity in human infants.

Temporal contrast sensitivity was measured in 1.5- and 3-month-old infants using the FPL procedure. Stimuli were 0.1 c/deg counterphase-flickering sinewave gratings. Temporal rates ranged from 1 to 20 Hz. Because the spatial sinewave underwent phase shifts of 180 degrees, the target could not be seen unless the observer was able to resolve it temporally. Adults were tested with the same temporal stimuli using a 2-alternative forced-choice procedure and a spatial frequency of 0.5 c/deg. Adult temporal CSFs were bandpass with peak sensitivity at 10 Hz. Infant temporal CSFs were lowpass at 1.5 months and bandpass at 3 months. The infants' contrast sensitivity was over a log-unit lower than adults'. Unlike spatial CSFs, infant sensitivity was closest to adult sensitivity at the highest flicker rate.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

The effects of luminance on FPL and VEP acuity in human infants.

Grating acuity was measured in 16-week-old human infants. Three measurement techniques were used: forced-choice preferential-looking (FPL), and two visual-evoked-potential (VEP) techniques. The stimuli were counterphase flickering sinewave gratings with a space-average luminance of -1.0 or 2.0 log cd/m2. Slightly different luminance-dependent changes occur between FPL and VEP acuities, suggesting that some factor influences the two methods differently as stimulus luminance varies. A comparison between FPL acuities and VEP acuities within infants suggests a quantitative relationship between techniques. Infant's acuity for sinewave gratings with a space-average luminance of -2.0, -1.0, 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 log cd/m2 was also measured using a single VEP paradigm. The results are compared to the same measurements in adults and to infant and adult ideal observers. VEP acuity in this group of infants improves by about 0.5 log units between -2.0 and 0.0 log cd/m2 and remains asymptotic between 0.0 and 2.0 log cd/m2. This result suggests that luminance-dependent changes in infant acuity cannot be fully accounted for by immaturities in the optics and photoreceptor spacing and efficiency.

Evoked Potentials, Visual↗

PubMed1992

Scotopic visual efficiency: constraints by optics, receptor properties, and rod pooling.

We studied the influence of optics, photoreceptor properties, and rod pooling on scotopic contrast sensitivity by comparing the performance of an ideal discriminator to that of human observers. Comparisons of human and ideal contrast sensitivities indicated that preretinal factors and summation area were not sufficient to explain the shape of the human CSF. Spatial pooling of rods was explored as a possible explanation of this discrepancy. Our highest efficiency, expressed in terms of a human/ideal contrast sensitivity ratio, was about 1:3 (0.33) for a contrast discrimination task.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Gravity as a monocular cue for perception of absolute distance and/or absolute size.

When the motion of an object is influenced by gravity (eg free fall, pendulum, wave motion), that influence may provide a cue to computing the absolute distance and/or size of the object. Formal analysis supports the claim that the distance and size of moving objects are generally computable with reference to the gravitational component of motion. Informal evidence from judgments of realism in films is consistent with this gravity-cue hypothesis.

Cues↗

PubMed1991

The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination.

We examined the effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation, on phase discrimination thresholds. In expt I, the ratio of thresholds for 180 deg shifts in F + 2F gratings remained invariant across a wide range of fundamental contrasts. Experiment II demonstrated that random fluctuations in overall pattern contrast did not affect discrimination. Experiment III found that foveal, but not peripheral, thresholds were roughly independent of spatial scale; foveal-peripheral differences in phase sensitivity could not be eliminated by scaling stimulus size. Finally, expt IV found that thresholds for some phase shifts varied significantly with orientation in the periphery; in general, peripheral sensitivity was greatest for radially-oriented gratings. The implications of these findings for models of phase discrimination are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling.

We examined the contribution of optical and photoreceptor properties as well as receptor pooling to eccentricity-dependent variations in spatial vision by comparing the performance of ideal observers with that of human observers. We measured contrast sensitivity functions in human observers and calculated such functions in ideal observers for retinal eccentricities of 0-40 deg. Comparisons of human and ideal performance in a variety of tasks reveal that many aspects of the variation in spatial vision with eccentricity can be understood from an analysis of the discrimination information available at the retinal ganglion cells.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed1988

Effect of reinforcement on infants' performance in a preferential looking acuity task.

Two experiments examined the effect of reinforcement on infants' performance in a preferential looking acuity task. In experiment 1, performance of 3- and 5-month-old infants was assessed under three conditions. In one condition, reinforcement was contingent upon performance. In another, no reinforcement was provided. In the last condition, reinforcement was provided, but it was not contingent upon performance. Similar performance was observed in all three conditions. In experiment 2, 7-month-olds were tested in the first and second conditions. No differences in performance were observed between these two groups. Thus, the reinforcement used in preferential looking measurements does not appear to improve performance significantly for 3- to 7-month-old infants. Several interpretations of these results are presented. The most plausible is that performance under nonreinforced conditions is already nearly optimal, so the addition of reinforcement has little impact. General implications for estimates of infant visual sensitivity in the laboratory and clinic are discussed.

Humans↗