Biomedical subjects

M Rigge

Publications and source records attributed to M Rigge.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Primary total hip replacement: variations in patient management in Oxford & Anglia, Trent, Yorkshire & Northern 'regions'.

OBJECTIVES: To examine national practice, and variations in practice, concerning total hip replacement; in particular the choice of prosthesis and the involvement of consultants in NHS operations. DESIGN: Pre-operative survey of patients undergoing total hip replacement. SETTING: Five English regions serving combined population of 16.8 million people. SUBJECTS: 13,343 total hip replacement operations in one year commencing September 1996, either in NHS or private sector. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prosthesis used for surgery, status of surgeons involved in operation, use of laminar flow operating theatre. RESULTS: Prostheses without well documented 5-year survival were used in 5504 (58%) of 9417 operations for which information was available. The consultant was the operator in 4810 (64%) of 7499 NHS operations. In 1352 trainee-led operations, the consultant was present for only 637 (47%); this figure was 54% for trainees in years 1-4 of their training. Substantial variation between NHS consultant firms occurred both for use of prostheses with well documented survival data, and supervision of trainees by the consultant. CONCLUSIONS: This large study is the first attempt to describe national practice for primary total hip replacement. Substantial variation among consultant firms was observed for all indices of practice reported.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a patient assessed outcome measure, the Oxford Hip Score, in a national study of primary hip replacement surgery. DESIGN: A survey of patients' health status before undergoing primary hip replacement surgery and three months and one year after surgery. SETTING: 143 hospitals in three NHS English regions. PATIENTS: 7151 patients admitted for primary total hip replacement surgery over a period of 13 months from September 1996. MAIN MEASURES: For patients, Oxford Hip Score and satisfaction with hip replacement and, for surgeons, American Anesthesiologists' Society (ASA) classification of physical status. RESULTS: The response rates to the postal questionnaire at three and 12 months follow up were 85.2% and 80.7%, respectively. Including all three administrations of the questionnaire, all except two items of the Oxford Hip Score were completed by 97% or more respondents and only one item at one administration appeared marginally to reduce the reliability of the score. The effect sizes for changes in the score from baseline to three months was 2.50 and to 12 months was 3.05. Patients rated by surgeons as being healthy preoperatively by the ASA classification were somewhat more likely to return a completed questionnaire at three months (79.4% versus 75.3%) and 12 months (72.4% versus 70.3%) than those rated as having poorer health. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there was little evidence of difficulties for patients in completing the Oxford Hip Score or of unreliable data, except in relation to one questionnaire item. The instrument was very responsive to change over time and score changes for the Oxford Hip Score related well to patients' satisfaction with their surgery. The instrument is an appropriate measure in terms of validity, responsiveness, and feasibility for evaluating total hip replacement from the

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Patient's charter. NHS--keeping the customer satisfied.

Complaints to the College of Health suggest that the Patient's Charter standards on receiving care on the basis of clinical need, response to complaints, and information-giving are not being met in many cases. Patients must be involved in revising the Patient's Charter. A truly patient-focused service demands patient representatives on health authority and trust boards, spot checks and systematic reviews of health services. Acute trusts should be remodelled to mirror the patient's progress through the hospital and back to the community.

Ethics Committees↗

PubMed1997

Consumer information. Dr who?

There is no systematic way to get reliable information about consultants' expertise and experience. A telephone survey of all acute trusts in one region revealed that half provided no information at all on their consultants, either for GPs or patients. The current situation flies in the face of rhetoric about informed patient choice and openness.

Family Practice↗

PubMed1997