Corticospinal function in conversion disorder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
M Ridding
Publications and source records attributed to M Ridding.
Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on the excitability of human motor cortex.
There have been conflicting reports over whether it is possible to stimulate the human cerebellum through the intact scalp using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Here we attempt to clarify the situation in normal subjects by comparing the various methods which have been used. EMG responses evoked by magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex could be suppressed by a prior magnetic stimulus over the cerebellum but the onset latency of the effect varied according to the type of magnetic coil used. Inhibition began at a latency which ranged from 5 to 9 msec in different subjects if conditioning stimuli were given through a flat figure-of-eight coil held horizontally over the basal occiput. The effect lasted a further 6-10 msec. With a larger double cone coil, held vertically over the basal occiput, inhibition began earlier and at a more constant latency of 5 msec. It lasted only 3 msec. Stimulation of the C6/7 nerve roots in the brachial plexus with either an electrical or magnetic stimulus also could suppress EMG responses evoked by cortical stimulation. This began at a conditioning-test interval of 7 or 8 msec and lasted for some 5 msec. We suggest that two types of motor cortical suppression may be elicited from stimulation over the posterior neck/skull: a cerebellar effect starting at 5 msec, and a peripheral nerve effect starting later at 7/8 msec. Stimulation with a horizontal large figure-of-eight coil may produce a mixture of effects because the lower wing of the coil overlaps the posterior neck and can activate peripheral nerve fibres in the brachial plexus.
Adult↗
Comparison of cervical magnetic stimulation and bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves in normal subjects.
Cervical magnetic stimulation is a new technique for stimulating the phrenic nerves, and may offer an alternative to percutaneous electrical stimulation for assessing diaphragmatic strength in normal subjects and patients in whom electrical stimulation is technically difficult or poorly tolerated. We compared cervical magnetic stimulation with conventional supramaximal bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation in nine normal subjects. We measured oesophageal pressure (Poes), gastric pressure (Pgas) and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). The maximal relaxation rate (MRR) was also measured. The mean magnetic twitch Pdi was 36.5 cmH2O (range 27-48 cmH2O), significantly larger than electrical twitch Pdi, mean 29.7 cmH2O (range 22-40 cmH2O). The difference in twitch Pdi was explained entirely by twitch Poes, and it is possible that the magnetic technique stimulates some of the nerves to the upper chest wall muscles as well as the phrenic nerves. We compared bilateral, rectified, integrated, diaphragm surface electromyographic (EMG) responses in three subjects and found results within 10% in each subject, indicating similar diaphragmatic activation. The within occasion coefficient of variation, i.e. same subject/same session, was 6.7% both for magnetic and electrical twitch Pdi. The between occasion coefficient of variation, i.e. same subject/different days, was 6.6% for magnetic stimulation and 8.8% for electrical. There was no difference between relaxation rates measured with either technique. We conclude that magnetic stimulation is a reproducible and acceptable technique for stimulating the phrenic nerves, and that it provides a potentially useful alternative to conventional electrical stimulation as a nonvolitional test of diaphragm strength.
Action Potentials↗