Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Rhiner

Publications and source records attributed to M Rhiner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Donepezil in the treatment of opioid-induced sedation: report of six cases.

Donepezil, an oral acetylcholinesterase inhibitor approved for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, was given to 6 cancer pain patients having sedation related to the analgesic use of opioids. Each patient was taking more than 200 mg of oral morphine equivalents per day, and several were receiving complex analgesic regimens consisting of multiple adjuvant medications. Sedation improved at least moderately in 5 of the patients and mildly in 1 after they began taking donepezil. Patients reported a decrease in episodes of spontaneous sleeping during the day, fewer myoclonic twitches, improved daily function and greater social interaction. Several also reported improved sleep at night. Analgesia was not compromised by the use of donepezil, and in some cases it appeared improved. Donepezil may be a valuable alternative to psychostimulants in the treatment of opioid-induced sedation. A prospective controlled trial comparing the treatment effects of psychostimulants and donepezil on patients having opioid-induced sedation is underway.

Adult↗

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: a controlled dose titration study.

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a novel opioid formulation in which the potent synthetic mu-agonist fentanyl is embedded in a sweetened matrix that is dissolved in the mouth. It is undergoing investigation as a treatment for cancer-related breakthrough pain, a prevalent phenomenon defined as a transitory flare of moderate to severe pain that interrupts otherwise controlled persistent pain. There have been no controlled trials of other treatments for this condition. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ascending doses of OTFC, a novel controlled dose titration methodology was developed that applied blinding and randomization procedures to the evaluation of recurrent pains in the home environment. The study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind dose titration study in ambulatory cancer patients. The sample comprised adult patients receiving a scheduled oral opioid regimen equivalent to 60-1000 mg oral morphine per day, who were experiencing at least one episode per day of breakthrough pain and had achieved at least partial relief of this pain by use of an oral opioid rescue dose. After collection of 2 days of baseline data concerning the efficacy of the usual rescue drug, patients were randomly treated with either 200 or 400 microg OTFC unit doses in double-blind fashion. Up to two breakthrough pains each day could be treated with up to four OTFC unit doses per pain. OTFC in unit doses containing 200, 400, 600, 800, 1200 or 1600 microg of fentanyl citrate were available for the study. The unit dose was titrated upward in steps until the patient had 2 consecutive days on which breakthrough pain could be treated with the single unit dose, titration was ineffective at a 1600 microg unit dose, or 20 days elapsed. To maintain the double-blind, orders to titrate up were ignored one-third of the time according to a pre-defined randomization schedule accessible only to an unblinded study pharmacist. Main outcome measures included, numeric or categorical measures of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessment of drug performance. Dose response relationships were found suggesting that the methodology was sensitive to opioid effects. Seventy-four percent of patients were successfully titrated. There was no relationship between the total daily dose of the fixed schedule opioid regimen and the dose of OTFC required to manage the breakthrough pain. Although the study was not designed to provide a definitive comparison between OTFC and the usual rescue drug, exploratory analyses found that OTFC provided significantly greater analgesic effect at 15, 30 and 60 min, and a more rapid onset of effect, than the usual rescue drug. Adverse effects of the OTFC were typically opioid-related, specifically somnolence, nausea and dizziness. Very few adverse events were severe or serious. This study demonstrated the feasibility of controlled trial methodology in studies of breakthrough pain. OTFC appears to be a safe and effective therapy for breakthrough pain, and dose titration can usually identify a unit dose capable of providing adequate analgesia. If the lack of a relationship between the effective OTFC dose and fixed schedule opioid regimen is confirmed, dose titration may be needed in the clinical use of this formulation. Further investigation of OTFC as a specific treatment for breakthrough pain is warranted.

Administration, Oral↗

Managing breakthrough cancer pain: a new approach.

Every day, nurses in all clinical settings work closely with patients who are experiencing various types and intensities of pain. Advances in pain management have given present patients and their families a variety of options that allow them a renewed dimension to the quality of their lives; an ability to live more productively and face the end of life in comfort. Because all nurses must keep up to date on basic principles of assessment, pain management, and current pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches to pain, AJN and Home Healthcare Nurse are proud to provide our readers with important information about pain management and a new medication recently approved by the FDA: oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (Actiq). You can apply the information in this supplement in your daily practice as you assess your patients' level of pain, plan and evaluate interventions, and collaborate with members of the interdisciplinary team. Your goal--to help patients determine the appropriate treatments and dosages for their own unique pain needs--is supported throughout the following pages. We would like to thank the Anesta Corp. and Abbott Laboratories, Hospital Products Division, for making this supplement possible through an educational grant. We know that not only our colleagues but our patients and their families will greatly benefit from the information presented.

Administration, Oral↗

Survey of the provision of supportive care services at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this survey was to determine the scope of supportive care services (SCS) designed to promote quality of life during cancer therapies at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers. METHODS: A survey was mailed to the medical directors and nursing directors of 52 NCI-designated comprehensive (n = 26), clinical (n = 11), and planning cancer centers (n = 15) in the United States. Only one survey was completed from each institution. Survey questions identified services provided such as pain management, terminal care, psychosocial programs, and spiritual care. RESULTS: Thirty-nine questionnaires were received for a total response rate of 75%. Of the respondents, 45% were comprehensive cancer centers, 24% clinical cancer centers, and 29% planning centers. One center did not identify their NCI designation. Sixty-one percent of the centers reported research programs in supportive care. Outside funding was reported in 51% of the respondents, with 39% having American Cancer Society (ACS) or National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding and 28% having private industry funding. Overall SCS self-ratings improved from a 21% rating of excellent to very good 5 years ago to the current 54% rating. CONCLUSION: Survey results provide data on SCS across a representative sample of NCI cancer centers and can be used to develop standards for future cancer control programs.

Cancer Care Facilities↗

The experience of pediatric cancer pain, Part I: Impact of pain on the family.

This two-part article reports on the results of qualitative data derived from the study on the impact of pediatric cancer pain on the family. Part I of this two-part article explores the family caregivers' description of a child with cancer, the helplessness experienced in the management of the child's pain, and the impact of pain on the entire family. Study findings support existing literature identifying inadequate assessment and management of pediatric cancer pain. Parents identified the benefits of pain management teams for the child and for themselves. Family caregivers also identified the stresses associated with managing pain at home. Part II will describe the role of the parents in managing their child's pain. This study provided valuable information that can enable health care professionals with an opportunity to intervene not only with the child but also with the family.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

The experience of pediatric cancer pain, Part II: Management of pain.

This paper reports on the results of qualitative data derived from a study on the impact of pediatric cancer pain on the family. Part I of this two-part article reported on the family caregivers' description of a child with cancer, the helplessness experienced in the management of the child's pain, and the impact of pain on the entire family. This article will describe the role of the parents in managing their child's pain, including use of pharmacological and nondrug interventions, family caregivers' perspectives on what physicians and nurses could do to improve the care of patients in pain, and family caregivers' advice to other families when placed in a similar situation of trying to manage pediatric pain. Five major themes were identified related to the role of family caregivers in managing the child's pain. Parents also identified six major ways in which physicians and nurses could help to improve care related to pain management. Although some parents were unable to identify information that may be useful for other parents in similar situations, nine major themes were identified. Study data demonstrates the experience of family caregivers in caring for a child with cancer pain and provides health care professionals with information that can promote effective pain relief for the pediatric cancer patient with pain as well as address issues affecting the family.

Adolescent↗

Development and implementation of a pain education program.

Pain is a significant problem for cancer patients and is of particular concern for the elderly. This article reports on the development and implementation of a pain management educational intervention for elderly cancer patients and their family caregivers. This patient education program was developed within a research study funded by the American Cancer Society. Subjects were stratified as either elderly (60-75 years) or oldest (greater than 75 years) and then were randomly assigned to an experimental group that received the three-part, structured pain education program or a control group that received usual care. Control group subjects were offered the intervention at the conclusion of data collection. The outcomes of the pain education were measured at two times after the intervention. Study variables included patient outcomes such as pain intensity, pain knowledge and attitudes, medication compliance, and quality of life as well as family caregiver outcomes. This pain education program was developed, implemented, and evaluated in 40 patients and family caregivers in the first year of a 2-year project. In this article, the investigators present the development and structure of the three-part education program, general principles of patient education regarding pain, methods of evaluating pain education, and initial results of the pain education. Pain education includes basic principles of pain relief, pharmacologic interventions, and nondrug interventions for relief of pain. This program has demonstrated that both cancer patients and their family caregivers benefit from a structured education program for relief of cancer pain.

Aged↗

Health quality of life and colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life associated with cancer and radiation treatment includes the dimensions of psychologic and physical well-being, nutrition concerns/side effects, and radiation treatment-related anxiety/adjustment. An understanding of the impact of colorectal cancer and radiation treatment on these aspects of health quality of life can be reached by comparing this diagnostic group to others undergoing similar treatment. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with colorectal cancers, 41 with uterocervical cancers, 43 with genitourinary tumors, 13 with leukemia or bone metastasis, and 129 with head and neck cancers undergoing radiation therapy provided complete health quality of life index (QLI-RT) data during weeks 1 and 3 of treatment and at the first follow-up visit after treatment completion. The QLI-RT was found to be reliable and valid. RESULTS: Those with colorectal cancer had similar QLI-RT summary scores as the other groups at the beginning of treatment and during the follow-up period. QLI-RT scores tended to range from 62 to 84 for the summary score and individual-item scores; this was a narrow span considering the QLI-RT uses a 0-100-mm linear analog-response scale. The exceptions were strength, which elicited scores in the 46-68 range and a couple of responses to worrying about radiation therapy. The largest change in QLI-RT score in relation to the treatment trajectory was 11 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings tend to support the notion that patients with cancer try to maintain health quality of life at an acceptable level despite the occurrence of stressful negative events. Future research should explore the stable versus dynamic attributes of health quality of life to learn more about the factors that contribute to the adaptive process that maintains such quality of life at an acceptable level.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

Pain and addiction: an urgent need for change in nursing education.

Lack of education of health care professionals, including nurses, is frequently cited as a major reason for undertreatment of patients with pain. A reason for undertreatment of pain with opioid analgesics is the irrational fear of creating opioid addiction. To characterize the information nurses receive in their basic education that could contribute to misinformation about this issue, the authors reviewed 14 nursing textbooks, published since 1985, including 8 pharmacology texts and 6 medical surgical texts. An analysis of content revealed that only one textbook correctly stated the definition of opioid addiction and its likelihood following use of opioid analgesics for pain control. Almost all of the texts used confusing terminology, and some erroneously promoted the fear of addiction when opioids are used for pain relief. A simple solution to this problem is to encourage nursing educators to use the American Pain Society publication "Guidelines for Analgesic Use" until textbooks have the opportunity to incorporate correct information.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

The meaning of quality of life for bone marrow transplant survivors. Part 2. Improving quality of life for bone marrow transplant survivors.

Surviving bone marrow transplant (BMT) represents a major victory against malignant disease but also creates challenges of survivorship for patients and the professionals who care for them. Part 2 of this report presents the findings of a qualitative study (N = 119) related to improving quality of life (QOL) for BMT survivors. Results are shared based on BMT survivors' perceptions of (a) what makes QOL better, (b) what makes QOL worse, and (c) what doctors or nurses could do to enhance QOL. The findings of the study have been useful in constructing a quantitative instrument to measure QOL in BMT and in understanding the conceptual basis of QOL for the BMT population. Nursing interventions can improve the QOL for the BMT patient across all phases of the transplant process and long-term issues related to survival.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗

Home care: maintaining quality of life for patient and family.

Cancer affects the family as well as the patient. The home is a primary site of care, which often must be intensive and complex. Attention to home care of the cancer patient is therefore a major concern in maintaining quality of life for both patient and family. The authors explore the major burdens of home care that affect both patient and family and describe four specific interventions that the health care team can initiate to optimize quality of life in these difficult situations.

Aged↗

The meaning of quality of life for bone marrow transplant survivors. Part 1. The impact of bone marrow transplant on quality of life.

Quality of life (QOL) is an important concept in cancer nursing and has particular significance for bone marrow transplant (BMT). BMT survivors are faced with the demands of acute transplant symptoms as well as chronic illness demands posttransplant. The purpose of this study was to explore the concept of QOL for BMT survivors and to gain understanding of nursing interventions that may improve QOL in this population. The conceptual framework for this study was derived from the model of QOL developed by Ferrell, Grant, and Padilla (1989) that depicts the QOL domains of physical well-being, psychological well-being, social concerns, and spiritual well-being. This qualitative study consisted of a one-time interview of 119 BMT survivors using six open-ended questions. The items were based on previous research of the authors and content validity was established by a panel of BMT experts. Content analysis was performed on verbatim written responses to six questions regarding BMT and QOL. Part one of this two-part report provides analysis based on the questions regarding the meaning of QOL to BMT survivors and the impact of BMT on QOL.

Adult↗

The experience of pain and perceptions of quality of life: validation of a conceptual model.

Pain is a common symptom of terminally ill cancer patients and a major challenge for hospice care. This paper presents a conceptual model of the relationship between pain and quality of life that was derived from the authors' previous research. The model should prove useful to hospice clinicians and researchers in evaluating the impact of palliative care on the quality of life.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Family factors influencing cancer pain management.

The purpose of this study was to describe family factors which influence cancer pain. Previous research has focused on the patients' and professional caregivers' perspective of pain. Cancer pain is an intense burden on the entire family as well as on the patient. Findings of the study demonstrate family perceptions of pain, caregiver burden associated with pain, caregiver moods and differences in caregiver experiences of pain between three sites of care including a hospice, a community hospital and a cancer centre. Understanding the perspective of the family caregivers and their role in pain management can assist health care providers in management of the patient's pain.

Adult↗