[The woman-(un)friendly speculum].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M R Van Santen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The new low-dose hormonal postcoital method, a combination of 200 mcg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg norgestrel was used in 633 women, and a statistically significantly lower observed pregnancy rate was found compared to the expected number of pregnancies if no contraception was used. Patterns of menstruation, its onset and duration, after use of this morning-after pill, are documented in respect to follicular, midcycle and luteal administration. Individual side effects such as nausea, vomiting and mastalgia are noted, but antiemetics did not reduce the incidence. Though efficacy of this technique is not found to be favorable in comparison to the 5 mg ethinylestradiol treatment, the low-dose of steroid, the one-day treatment and its lesser side effects show this alternative morning-after pill suitable for use as a first choice in case of an unprotected sexual encounter.
Ethinylestradiol (EE), at a dosage of 5 mg/day for 5 consecutive days (5 mg EE), has generally been used for interception. A combination of 200 micrograms EE and 2 mg dl-norgestrel (EE + NG) was proposed as an effective alternative. Efficacy and tolerance of these methods were compared in a randomized, double-blind study. A group of 465 women was studied with a follow-up rate of 94.3%. In the 5 mg EE group a pregnancy rate of 0.9% was observed, and in the EE + NG group a rate of 0.4% was found. These rates differ significantly from the expected rates (P less than 0.0005, in both series). Nausea was noted in 59.1% of the 5 mg EE group and in 54.0% of the EE + NG series. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 20.8% and 15.8%, respectively. The efficacy of both methods as alternative morning-after medication was confirmed. The new method is preferable because treatment is limited to only 1 day.
After the development of postcoital hormonal interception, the postcoital use of IUDs to prevent pregnancy was proposed by Tatum. The major advantage of this treatment is that it avoids the use of the usual massive doses of estrogens (a very effective postcoital method) which is associated with nausea and vomiting. This is the 1st method to be effective up to 5 days after exposure, 3 days more than the estrogen treatment. It may also provide long-term contraception in women who wish to continue using the IUD.
After the development of postcoital hormonal interception, the postcoital use of IUDs to prevent pregnancy was proposed by Tatum. The major advantage of this treatment is that it avoids the use of the usual massive dose of estrogens (a very effective postcoital method) which is associated with nausea and vomiting. This is the 1st method to be effective up to 5 days after exposure, 3 days more than the estrogen treatment. It may also provide long-term contraception in women who wish to continue using the IUD. A major disadvantage of postcoital IUD use is that IUD insertion can produce serious complications if a patient has a vaginal or venereal infection or an asymptomatic cervicitis or even pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). After proper physical examination, suitable patients are selected from those requesting postcoital treatment. Cases involving rape are mostly excluded from these services; but, if they present early, proper work up and treatment can be performed within the time span of 5 days available for this method and it will still be possible to fit a postcoital IUD. The potential risk of future infertility should be considered as PID rates in nulliparous IUD users are up to 7 times higher than in nonusers. Young nulliparous, sexually active women--especially of the lower socioeconomic strata--are identified as high-risk patients. Over 70% of women requesting interception are nulliparous. Clients asking for postcoital insertion should be informed of its potential risk, as women under 25 years of age are more prone to infection. The risk of septic abortion exists if an IUD is inserted into a gravid uterus due to pregnancy resulting from unreported previous sexual intercourse. Septic abortion is a life-threatening condition. Out of several series, no pregnancies are reported in the month of treatment. The IUD preferred is the Multiload copper IUD or the copper T; the highest expulsion rate proved the Copper-7 Gravigard (Cu-7) inefficient. In suitable circumstances, the IUD can be the 1st choice in postcoital interception.