Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Goldberg

Publications and source records attributed to M R Goldberg.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Spatial and temporal expression of cell surface molecules during nephrogenesis.

Cell-to-cell interaction is fundamental to the development of the kidney. Ureteric bud cells, through cell contact or short-distance interactions, induce the metanephric mesenchyme to convert, to epithelia and begin the process of tubulogenesis. To identify new molecules that are involved in these processes, we generated a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the surface of induced mesenchymal cells taken from a day 15 rat embryonic kidney rudiment. MAbs were chosen for further study based either on a distinctive pattern of expression of their antigens or their functional effect on tubulogenesis. We identified a set of MAbs that preferentially stained the glomerular crevice, the first site for formation of the glomerular anlage. Another MAb inhibited tubulogenesis by producing widespread apoptosis in induced mesenchymal cells. This approach promises to identify new molecules that are central to kidney development.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Endothelial cell targeting during renal development: use of monoclonal antibodies.

Development of the different renal capillary beds requires that the transformation of the metanephrogenic mesenchyme and ureteric bud into the different nephron segments be temporally and spatially coordinated with the migration and growth of the endothelial cells present in the renal anlage. This suggests that ureteric bud and/or metanephrogenic mesenchymal cells provide molecules which guide endothelial cells to their appropriate locations. We found that monoclonal antibody (MAb) 5B6-E4, obtained with mechanically dispersed cells of embryonic day 15 (E15) rat renal anlage, identifies an antigen that is temporally and spatially associated with endothelial cell location and migration during renal development. Furthermore, 5B6-E4 disrupts the close association between ureteric bud ampullae and endothelial cells in E14 renal anlages grown in vitro: whereas 43% of the ureteric bud ampullae were in contact with endothelial cells in control conditions, the presence of 20 microg/ml 5B6-E4 reduced this number to 22% (P < 0.02). These results suggest that the antigen recognized by 5B6-E4 is involved in endothelial cell targeting during renal development.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Phenobarbital minimally alters plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite E-3174.

Losartan, a selective angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonist for hypertension, is metabolized to an active carboxylic acid metabolite, E-3174, which has a longer half-life. To investigate the effects of induction of cytochrome P450 on the metabolism of losartan, we evaluated the effects of phenobarbital on the plasma profiles of losartan and E-3174 in 15 healthy male subjects. Ten subjects received a single 100 mg oral dose of losartan before and during phenobarbital administration (100 mg/day for 16 days), and five subjects received losartan before and during placebo. Urinary excretion of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol (relative to 17-hydroxycorticosteroids) was measured as an endogenous marker of cytochrome P450 induction. The geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios (with/without phenobarbital and 90% confidence intervals) for losartan and its metabolite (E-3174) were 0.795 (0.723, 0.875) and 0.799 (0.778, 0.820), respectively, indicating that phenobarbital treatment significantly but to a clinically minor extent reduced plasma concentrations of losartan and E-3174 (p<0.01). Half-life values of losartan and E-3174 were unchanged. The ratio of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol to 17-hydroxycorticosteroids doubled in the phenobarbital group (p < 0.001) and did not change appreciably in the placebo group.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Differential effects of oral losartan and enalapril on local venous and systemic pressor responses to angiotensin I and II in healthy men.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was designed to differentiate the pharmacodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan from the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. Effects of placebo, enalapril (10 mg), and losartan (20 and 100 mg) on local venous and systemic pressor responses to angiotensin I and II were compared in eight healthy male subjects. Treatments were administered orally approximately 4 hours before agonist infusions into a dorsal hand vein. Local changes in hand vein diameter and systemic blood pressure were monitored during the infusions. The 100 mg dose of losartan attenuated local venoconstrictor and systemic pressor responses to angiotensin I and II. In contrast, enalapril blocked only responses to angiotensin I. Both losartan and enalapril increased plasma renin concentration compared with placebo. These results are consistent with direct antagonism of angiotensin II receptors by losartan and with indirect effects of enalapril through inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

An approach to the assessment of therapeutic drug interactions with fixed combination drug products.

Several complex clinical and statistical issues are involved in the development of a combination drug product. The medical rationale for the combination, the intended clinical use, drug-drug interactions, and dose response are just a few of the considerations. The factorial design is a useful experimental model for evaluating combination therapies. This paper outlines some of the considerations involved in the use of this design in the study of combination drugs. Questions related to design and methods of analysis are discussed in general and through use of an example. Such a design was applied to study the combination of a vasodilator with a diuretic in the treatment of hypertension. The sample size derivation, the evaluation of "interaction," the use of ANOVA versus regression techniques, and methods of data display are reviewed. It is recognized that although these are complex issues, substantially more information per patient can be obtained than with standard parallel-design approaches. The design could be an especially powerful tool early in the development of a drug.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1995

Losartan does not affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin.

Losartan, on orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist is being developed as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. Many patients requiring anticoagulant therapy with warfarin also may have hypertension or heart failure, and thus, are potential candidates for losartan therapy. This study was designed to investigate whether losartan at likely dosage levels would alter the anticoagulant response to warfarin. In a two-period, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, ten healthy male subjects received a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin sodium on the seventh day of a 13-day treatment with losartan, 100 mg daily by mouth, or placebo. Multiple plasma samples were collected over a 6-day period after both warfarin doses for the measurements of R- and S-warfarin concentrations and prothrombin times. The pharmacokinetics of R- and S-warfarin were comparable in the absence and presence of losartan (no significant effects of losartan on area under the curve, Cmax, or tmax). Losartan also had no significant effect on the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, as assessed by the area under the prothrombin time versus time curve and the maximum response for prothrombin time. The lack of pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between warfarin and losartan observed in this investigation suggests that a clinically important interaction between these drugs is unlikely to occur in patients requiring concomitant administration of both drugs.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between losartan and hydrochlorothiazide.

To support the use of a combination of losartan, a highly specific and selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and hydrochlorothiazide for treatment of hypertension, a pharmacokinetic drug interaction study was conducted. In this open-label, randomized, three-period, crossover study, patients with mild to moderate hypertension received a 12.5-mg tablet of hydrochlorothiazide, a 50-mg losartan tablet, or a combination tablet of 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide and 50 mg of losartan for 7 days. Twelve patients (age range, 35-55 years; mean age, 44 years) were allocated to treatment. Drug interactions were evaluated by comparing the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) for losartan and its active metabolite, E-3174, when losartan (50 mg) was given alone or in combination with 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide. The urinary recovery over the 24-hour period of hydrochlorothiazide was compared for hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg) given alone or in combination with 50 mg losartan. A clinically significant interaction was defined as a treatment difference of more than 35%. There was no evidence of a clinically significant effect of hydrochlorothiazide on the pharmacokinetics of losartan or E-3174, as the geometric mean AUC24 ratio (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 1.02 (0.95, 1.09) for losartan and 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) for E-3174. Based on urinary recovery over a 24-hour period of hydrochlorothiazide, losartan did not affect the pharmacokinetics of hydrochlorothiazide, as the geometric mean ratio of urinary hydrochlorothiazide recovery (90% CI) was 0.898 (0.79, 1.20). There was a minor (17%) decrease in the AUC24 of hydrochlorothiazide after administration of the combination tablet. Coadministration of hydrochlorothiazide and losartan was well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effects of cimetidine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan, an AT1-selective non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

This was a 2-period randomized, crossover study in 8 healthy males to determine the effects of cimetidine (400 mg q.i.d. for 6 days) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan (100 mg). Cimetidine increased the AUC for losartan 18% without affecting the AUC for E-3174, the active metabolite of losartan. The increase in plasma renin activity following losartan was not affected by cimetidine (maximum mean increases 12.6 and 12.1 ng Ang I.ml-1.h-1 without and with cimetidine, respectively). These results indicate that cimetidine does not appear to alter the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of losartan to a clinically significant extent.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Pharmacokinetics of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and its active metabolite EXP3174 in humans.

The pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan potassium and its active carboxylic acid metabolite EXP3174 were characterized in 18 healthy male subjects after administration of intravenous losartan, intravenous EXP3174, and oral losartan. In these subjects, the average plasma clearance of losartan was 610 ml/min, and the volume of distribution was 34 L. Renal clearance (70 ml/min) accounted for 12% of plasma clearance. Terminal half-life was 2.1 hours. In contrast, the average plasma clearance of EXP3174 was 47 ml/min, and its volume of distribution was 10 L. Renal clearance was 26 ml/min, which accounted for 55% of plasma clearance; terminal half-life was 6.3 hours. After oral administration of losartan, peak concentrations of losartan were reached in 1 hour. Peak concentrations of EXP3174 were reached in 3 1/2 hours. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of EXP3174 was about four times that of losartan. The oral bioavailability of losartan tablets was 33%. The low bioavailability was mainly attributable to first-pass metabolism. After intravenous or oral administration of losartan the conversion of losartan to the metabolite EXP3174 was 14%.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Effect of acute and chronic losartan therapy on active and inactive renin and active renin glycoforms.

Plasma active renin consists of multiple glycoforms, which are differentially stored and secreted by the kidney, have varying plasma half-lives, and appear to have differing effects on renal sodium and water metabolism. Acute stimulation of renal renin secretion results in a disproportionate increase in plasma concentrations of the less negatively charged renin glycoforms and a decrease in the plasma half-life of active renin. The effects of chronic stimulation have not been well studied. We studied the effect of acute and chronic (42 days) stimulation of the renin angiotensin system with the AT1 selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on plasma active renin, active renin glycoforms separated by isoelectric focusing, and inactive renin in 11 essential hypertensive patients. A single 50 mg dose of losartan significantly increased plasma active renin concentration (ARC) from a pretreatment baseline of 3.2 +/- 1.1 to 7.2 +/- 2.3 ng AI/mL/h, 4 h postdose. This was primarily due to an increase in plasma concentrations of the less negatively charged active renin forms. After 42 days of losartan monotherapy, plasma ARC at losartan trough had increased significantly to 7.8 +/- 3.1 ng AI/mL/h, although the proportions of active renin forms were identical to baseline. Plasma ARC also increased significantly from 7.8 +/- 3.1 to 14.9 +/- 6.0 ng AI/mL/h acutely after the losartan dose on day 42 primarily due to increased plasma concentrations of less negatively charged active renin forms. Although plasma inactive renin concentrations did not change acutely after losartan dosing on day 1 or 42 they did increase from 27.3 +/- 7.8 before losartan day 1 to 37.0 +/- 13.7 ng AI/mL/h (P = .14) before losartan day 42. Thus, both acute and acute on chronic stimulation of renal renin secretion increased circulating ARC and shifted the profile of circulating renin toward the less negatively charged forms but did not change inactive renin concentrations. Chronic stimulation of renal renin secretion with losartan increased plasma concentrations of both active and inactive renin, but did not alter the proportions of active renin forms. Since the less negatively charged active renin forms have relatively short plasma half-lives, acute, but not chronic renal renin secretion is associated with a change in plasma renin half-life. Chronic stimulation of renal renin secretion with losartan presumably increased renin gene expression and resulted in increased constitutive secretion of inactive renin, increased constitutive secretion of negatively charged active renin forms, and increased renal storage of less negatively charged renin forms that were then available for acute regulated release.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1995

Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of digoxin in healthy volunteers.

1. Losartan (DuP 753, MK-954) is a novel, potent and highly selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The effect of multiple oral doses of losartan on digoxin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in healthy male subjects. 2. In a double-blind and randomized fashion, subjects received 50 mg losartan or placebo once daily for 15 days in each period. At least 7 days elapsed between the two treatment periods. On days 4 and 11 of each period, subjects also received a single 0.5 mg dose of digoxin intravenously and orally respectively. 3. Eleven of 13 subjects completed the study. Side effects were mild and transient (12 out of 13 subjects reported at least one adverse experience). During the study, no laboratory abnormalities were noted. 4. Multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of 0.5 mg of digoxin i.v. AUC(0.48h) of immunoreactive digoxin during losartan 28.8 +/- 2.9 vs 28.5 +/- 3.9 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 54.0 +/- 7.2 vs 51.9 +/- 6.5% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) and 1.09 (0.98, 1.21). 5. Multiple oral doses of losartan did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral digoxin AUC(0.48 h) during losartan 23.6 +/- 3.7 ng ml-1 h vs 22.4 +/- 2.6 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, Cmax 3.5 +/- 0.7 ng ml-1 with vs 3.1 +/- 0.5 ng ml-1 without losartan; not significant and tmax 0.6 +/- 0.2 h with vs 0.9 +/- 0.7 h without losartan; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 51.2 +/- 6.3 vs 46.3 +/- 2.4% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) and 1.12 (0.97, 1.28). 6. We conclude that multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) do not alter the pharmacokinetics of immunoreactive digoxin, following either intravenous or oral digoxin. Furthermore, the co-administration of digoxin with losartan is well tolerated by healthy male volunteers.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Biochemical effects of losartan, a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients.

We investigated the effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor blockade with losartan on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients (supine diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 110 mm Hg). Qualifying patients (n = 51) were allocated to placebo, 25 or 100 mg losartan, or 20 mg enalapril. Blood pressure, plasma drug concentrations, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system mediators were measured on 4 inpatient days: end of placebo run-in, after first dose, and 2 and 6 weeks of treatment. Plasma drug concentrations were similar after the first and last doses of losartan. At 6 weeks, 100 mg losartan and 20 mg enalapril showed comparable antihypertensive activity. Four hours after dosing, compared with the run-in day, 100 mg losartan increased plasma renin activity 1.7-fold and Ang II 2.5-fold, whereas enalapril increased plasma renin activity 2.8-fold and decreased Ang II 77%. Both drugs decreased plasma aldosterone concentration. For losartan, plasma renin activity and Ang II increases were greater at 2 than at 6 weeks. Effects of losartan were dose related. After the last dose of losartan, plasma renin activity and Ang II changes were similar to placebo changes by 36 hours. These results indicate that long-term blockade of the feedback Ang II receptor in hypertensive patients produces modest increases of plasma renin activity and Ang II that do not appear to affect the antihypertensive response to the antagonist.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Phase I clinical study of the recombinant oncotoxin TP40 in superficial bladder cancer.

Transforming growth factor alpha-Pseudomonas exotoxin-40 (TP40) is a hybrid fusion protein that selectively binds to cancer cells that express the epidermal growth factor receptor. TP40 is then internalized and kills these cells by virtue of its Pseudomonas exotoxin-derived domains. We studied the safety and short-term antitumor activity of intravesical TP40 in 43 patients with refractory superficial bladder cancer. These patients had resected Ta/T1 disease (n = 19), visible Ta or T1 lesions (n = 11), or carcinoma in situ (n = 13). Patients were treated with increasing dose levels of TP40 at 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, or 9.6 mg/week for 6 weeks and evaluated by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment cystoscopic examinations, cytology, and histopathology. All TP40 doses were well tolerated. No evidence of antitumor activity was seen in any of the patients with Ta or T1 lesions. However, 8 of 9 patients with evaluable carcinoma in situ were judged by histopathology of multiple biopsy specimens to exhibit clinical improvement following TP40 therapy. In most of these responsive patients, cystoscopic examination supported the histopathological findings, although cytology of urine and bladder washings persistently demonstrated malignant cells. Therefore, TP40 appears to be a well-tolerated biological agent that may prove to have utility in treating carcinoma in situ of the bladder.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

The effects of a peripherally selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, MK-467, on the metabolic and cardiovascular response to exercise in healthy man.

1. A double-blind, placebo controlled study has been conducted to investigate the consequences of i.v. treatment with MK-467, a peripherally selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist in exercising healthy male subjects. In particular, the effects on blood pressure, heart rate, circulating catecholamines (noradrenaline (NA) and adrenaline (A)), insulin, glucose and free fatty acids (FFA) were determined. 2. Exercise produced increases in catecholamines, blood pressure and heart rate. FFA increased at the start of the exercise but then declined as exercise progressed. 3. MK-467 significantly increased NA, in a dose-dependent manner, before and during exercise without altering A. Blood pressure and heart rate were not affected by drug treatment. 4. The insulin and FFA response to exercise was significantly enhanced by MK-467 although glucose was unaltered by drug. 5. It is concluded that both pre- and post-junctional peripheral alpha 2-receptors play an important role in the metabolic response to exercise in man.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with angiotensin II receptor antagonism in the human forearm.

The object of this study was to differentiate losartan, an AT1-selective angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonist, from enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, by measuring forearm vascular responses to AI, AII, and bradykinin. Eight healthy men were studied in a randomised, 4-period crossover study in which placebo, enalapril (10 mg), losartan (20 mg) and losartan (100 mg) were given double-blind on separate occasions. Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography during sequential infusions of ANG I, ANG II, and bradykinin into the brachial artery 4-6 h after dosing. Analysis of variance for repeated measures indicated that losartan inhibited constriction to ANG I and ANG II (both p < 0.02) in a dose-dependent manner without significantly influencing vasodilator responses to bradykinin. Enalapril (10 mg) inhibited AI similarly to losartan 100 mg without significantly influencing responses to angiotensin II, and augmented vasodilator responses to bradykinin (p < 0.0001). In human forearm vasculature, oral losartan (20-100 mg) inhibits vasoconstriction to ANG I and ANG II without significantly influencing bradykinin-induced vasodilation, whereas enalapril selectively inhibits ANG I-induced vasoconstriction while potentiating the vasodilator effect of bradykinin.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Effects of losartan on blood pressure, plasma renin activity, and angiotensin II in volunteers.

Losartan is an orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) (site-1) receptor antagonist. We conducted a multiple-dose study in healthy male volunteers to investigate the tolerability, blood pressure effects, and changes in plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma Ang II concentration associated with once-daily administration of 100 mg losartan for a week. Subjects were studied on a standardized sodium diet (24-hour urinary sodium excretion, 98 +/- 37 [SD] mEq per 24 hours on the placebo run-in day). Measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, PRA, Ang II, and aldosterone were taken during a placebo run-in day and after single and multiple (7 days) daily doses of losartan (100 mg, n = 10) or placebo (n = 4). Ang II was measured specifically by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with radioimmunoassay. In subjects given losartan, respective decreases (systolic/diastolic) from run-in in supine blood pressure 6 hours after dosing were (mean +/- SD), compared with the placebo run-in day, first dose: -8.8 +/- 9.6/-6.8 +/- 5.0, last dose: -11.6 +/- 8.9/-7.0 +/- 4.8 mm Hg (p < 0.05 for all changes). At this 6-hour time point, corresponding increases from run-in in PRA were from 1.2 +/- 0.6 to 12.0 +/- 6.3 (first dose) and 9.6 +/- 4.9 (last dose) ng angiotensin I per milliliter per hour and in Ang II were from 4.3 +/- 1.7 to 72.4 +/- 33.3 and 45.7 +/- 14.1 pg/mL. All changes in PRA and Ang II were statistically significant within the losartan-treated group, and the biochemical changes were significantly greater than those in the placebo-treated group. The increment in Ang II was less after the last dose than after the first (p < 0.05). The drug was well tolerated by all subjects. These data indicate that, under the conditions of this study, losartan administration (100 mg/day for eight doses over 9 days) results in treatment-related decreases in blood pressure and increases in PRA and Ang II octapeptide.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Clinical pharmacology of angiotensin and bradykinin in human forearm vasculature.

HYPOTHESIS: Losartan inhibits the renin-angiotensin system by blockade of angiotensin II receptors, whereas enalapril blocks the renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II by the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Since ACE inactivates bradykinin in addition to its action on angiotensin I we hypothesized that losartan and enalapril have different effects on the response to angiotensin and bradykinin. METHODS: We studied healthy volunteers dosed with placebo, enalapril and losartan 4-6 h before measurement of forearm blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography. Saline, angiotensin I, angiotensin II and bradykinin were infused into the left brachial artery. RESULTS: Losartan produced a similar inhibition of the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin I and angiotensin II without significantly influencing the bradykinin-induced vasodilation, whereas enalapril potentiated the vasodilator effect of bradykinin and selectively inhibited the vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin I without altering the response to angiotensin II. CONCLUSION: These pharmacological differences suggest that angiotensin II receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors may not be therapeutically equivalent.

Angiotensin II↗