Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M R Bortolussi

Publications and source records attributed to M R Bortolussi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Measuring moment-to-moment pilot workload using synchronous presentations of secondary tasks in a motion-based trainer.

A simulation was conducted to determine whether the sensitivity of secondary task measures of pilot workload could be improved by synchronizing their presentation to the occurrence of specific events or pilot actions. This synchronous method of presentation was compared to the more typical asynchronous method, where secondary task presentations are independent of pilot's flight-related activities. Twelve pilots flew low- and high-difficulty scenarios in a motion-base trainer with and without concurrent secondary tasks (e.g., choice reaction time, time production). The difficulty of each scenario was manipulated by the addition of 21 flight-related tasks superimposed on a standard approach and landing sequence. Secondary task performance did reflect workload differences between scenarios and among flight segments within scenarios, replicating the results of an earlier study in which the secondary tasks were presented asynchronously. In addition, the choice reaction time secondary task was also sensitive to the workload of specific activities within flight segments. Workload ratings were virtually identical between this and the earlier study.

Aerospace Medicine↗

Measuring pilot workload in a motion base trainer. A comparison of four techniques.

Various techniques have been developed to predict and measure pilot workload. This simulation was conducted in order to compare four widely used methods: a visual two-and four-choice reaction time task, time production, retrospective multi-dimensional subjective ratings and in-flight verbal workload estimates. Two scenarios with different levels of difficulty determined by preliminary research were designed to test these techniques. The insertion of the secondary tasks did not significantly affect flight performance. All four techniques were able to distinguish between the overall levels of scenario complexity. In addition, the three secondary tasks and workload ratings obtained in-flight were generally able to distinguish among levels of difficulty for different segments within the scenarios.

Journal Article↗