Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

M Q Choyce

Publications and source records attributed to M Q Choyce.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

A profile of sports hand injuries in an accident and emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a profile of sports hand injuries requiring treatment in an urban accident and emergency (A&E) department, and to determine the extent to which these injuries resulted in morbidity. METHODS: A one year prospective observational study at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne. All patients presenting to the A&E department between 29 July 1995 and 28 July 1996 with a hand injury sustained during sporting activity and who received follow up by A&E or plastic surgery units were enrolled. Patients were contacted by telephone or post at median of four months after injury (range two to 13) for their assessment of the outcome. RESULTS: 262 cases were enrolled into the study. The median age for males was 21 years (range 7 to 55) and for females 16 (range 9 to 40). Follow up data were obtained by telephone in 206 (79%), and by letter in a further 26 (10%). Fractures were the commonest injury (68%), followed by soft tissue injuries (20%) and dislocations (11%). The thumb was the site affected most commonly overall, and in 10 of 17 ski related injuries; next most frequent sites were little and ring fingers. Males sustained 79% of the injuries, and 54% of these occurred during football. Netball/basketball caused 63% of female injuries. Follow up indicated that mild impairment in terms of pain, stiffness, or deformity was common (45%), while the incidence of moderate pain or serious problems was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Sporting injuries to the hand commonly require treatment in the A&E department. Telephone/postal follow up of such injuries indicates that significant short term and longer term impairment of function may result. Suitable target areas for injury prevention are secondary schools, football (in males), and netball/basketball.

Adolescent

Satisfaction with the accident and emergency department--a postal survey of general practitioners' views.

OBJECTIVE: To survey general practitioners' opinions of the quality of care offered by an urban accident and emergency (A&E) department. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was used. The questionnaire addressed issues of patient treatment, communications between hospital and GPs, and the GPs' perceptions of patient satisfaction. Questions required graded responses. Response rate was 57% (91 of 160 GPs mailed). RESULTS: 96% and 91% of responders respectively were satisfied with patient assessment and treatment, and 70% were satisfied with the explanation given to the patient. Problems were highlighted in communications between the department and GPs. 68% reported that adult patients always/usually gave their practice a hand written letter detailing their initial A&E attendance. Concerns were expressed about the content, illegibility, and inconvenience of this form. 42% of GPs reported never/rarely receiving a typed summary of patients discharged from the A&E review clinic. 28% of GPs would have appreciated a telephone call from the department on occasions. The areas of most patient dissatisfaction were perceived by GPs as: waiting time (67%), communication (19%), staff attitude (7%), and actual treatment (7%). CONCLUSIONS: A postal survey of local GPs can give valuable information about the quality of care provided by a hospital department. Overall GP satisfaction with the service was high, but there are concerns about aspects of written and telephone communications between the department and GPs, which can be addressed.

Adult

Plaster checks.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aftercare

A critical look at accident and emergency review clinics.

The reasons for and appropriateness of referral of patients after initial visit to accident & emergency (A&E) follow-up clinics by the A&E doctors were prospectively analysed in 500 patients. Fifteen per cent of patients were judged to have been inappropriately referred. Two main reasons for referral were the need for further treatment and uncertainty about diagnosis and management. The implications of reductions of A&E clinic attendances are discussed.

Emergency Medicine