Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M P Shelly.
The upper airway is an organ not often investigated. Relatively little is known about its complex functions, and misunderstandings abound. The paper by Thomachot et al in this issue provides an opportunity to ponder on this important organ. Although the main result seems to be negative, the study provides some interesting physiological information on the upper airway and how it works.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To provide a simple, practical guide to communication skills which might be useful to practising anesthesiologists. SOURCE: Selected citations from the literature on patient-physician communication, and the personal observations of the authors based on their reading and experiences. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Basic communication skills are introduced, and then their application to clinical anesthesiology described. The possible benefits resulting from the enhancement of clinical communication are outlined. Strategies for tackling four commonly-encountered situations - handling others' feelings, imparting information, explaining complex concepts simply and breaking bad news - are presented. By taking a skills-oriented approach, we hope that readers will be encouraged to view this area of their work as one that can be improved upon with continued observation and practice. CONCLUSION: Communication skills can enhance medical practice and improve patient outcomes. We suggest that all anesthesiologists should give thought to their effectiveness in this area.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a planned, midstudy, interim analysis. SETTING: Ninety-one academic medical center intensive care units in North America and Europe. PATIENTS: Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (n = 696) received standard supportive care and antimicrobial therapy for sepsis, in addition to rhIL-1ra or placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either rhIL-1ra (100 mg) or placebo (vehicle) by intravenous bolus, followed by a 72-hr continuous intravenous infusion of either rhIL-1ra (2.0 mg/kg/hr) or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study was terminated after an interim analysis found that it was unlikely that the primary efficacy end points would be met. The 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 33.1% (116/350) in the rhIL-1ra treatment group, while the mortality rate in the placebo group was 36.4% (126/346), yielding a 9% reduction in mortality rate (p = .36). The patients were well matched at the time of study entry; 52.9% of placebo-treated patients were in shock while 50.9% of rhIL-1ra-treated patients were in shock at the time of study entry (p = .30). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between treatment groups when analyzed on the basis of site of infection, infecting microorganism, presence of bacteremia, shock, organ dysfunction, or predicted risk of mortality at the time of study entry. No excess number of adverse reactions or microbial superinfections were attributable to rhIL-1ra treatment in this study. CONCLUSIONS: A 72-hr, continuous intravenous infusion of rhIL-1ra failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in mortality when compared with standard therapy in this multicenter clinical trial. If rhIL-1ra treatment has any therapeutic activity in severe sepsis, the incremental benefits are small and will be difficult to demonstrate in a patient population as defined by this clinical trial.
Plasma concentrations of the eicosanoids leukotriene (LT)B4, LTC4D4E4, thromboxane (TX)A2 and prostaglandin (PG)I2, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) were measured during acute bacteremic shock and injury/hemorrhage in two porcine models. As TXA2 and PGI2 are rapidly metabolized, we measured their stable metabolites TXB2 and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha. Bacteremic shock was induced by a graded infusion of Aeromonas hydrophila over 4 h. Injury/hemorrhage was produced by a 30 min, 30% total blood volume hemorrhage followed by a 30 min shock period and then reinfusion of shed blood. Nociceptive afferent nerve stimulation was applied to the brachial plexi to mimic the cardiovascular responses to tissue injury. There was no increase in eicosanoid or TNF levels in the injury/hemorrhage model. In sepsis there was an early peak in TNF (at 60 min) followed by peaks in LTB4 and LTC4D4E4 at 180 min. Both TXB2 and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha showed large increases at the end of the study but there was no evidence that they had reached a peak. These results suggest that the very early inflammatory response in bacteremic shock and injury/hemorrhagic shock may be quite different. This may have implications for any therapies aimed at reducing the incidence of multiple organ failure after either of these physiological insults.
Working on an intensive care unit is perceived as stressful. This study investigated occupational stress in staff working on an intensive care unit using the occupational stress indicator. Questionnaires were given to all intensive care staff; the replies were then analysed and compared with normative data. The response rate was 62%. Intensive care unit staff found aspects of their job relating to career and achievement and organisational design and structure more stressful than a normal working population. Their coping strategies differ but the only significantly different measure of adverse outcome was related to personal relationships at work. The job itself was not found to be a significant source of stress. Nursing staff have different sources of stress from medical staff and individuals with partners or children are relatively protected from stress.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aims of this review are to provide a basic introduction to the biology of cytokines and to summarise the results of studies, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the cytokine response to critical illness. Elucidation of the cytokine response to conditions such as sepsis, trauma, and burns may be important for several reasons. It may improve understanding of the pathophysiological processes triggered by these insults. It may allow the severity of the insult to be gauged, and maybe even provide prognostic information about individual patients. Similarly it may allow the effectiveness of resuscitation and further treatment to be monitored. Finally, knowing about the cytokine response may provide the key to developing new treatments.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the management of the bereaved on Intensive Care Units (ICU) throughout the United Kingdom, and to identify inadequacies that may exist either in the provision of staff training in dealing with bereavement or in the facilities or support available for the bereaved. DESIGN: Questionnaires were sent to the senior nurse and senior doctor in all general ICUs with more than four beds nationwide. The questions asked about nursing and medical practice around the time of a patient's death, as well as about staff attitudes towards, and training in, dealing with bereavement and the support they received for this role. RESULTS: We obtained a 68% (293/430) response rate. Most ICUs had facilities for relatives, but little for the specific needs of the bereaved. Only 6% of doctors and 21% of nurses had training in dealing with bereavement and grieving. A staff support group was available in 23% of ICUs, and 75% of the remainder thought it would be useful to have one. Lack of staff training and poor facilities for relatives were identified as the major concerns of ICU staff. CONCLUSION: Many doctors and nurses working in Intensive Care Units feel inadequately trained to deal confidently with the bereaved. A minority of ICUs have support mechanisms available for their staff, inspite of the perceived need for them. Furthermore, many ICU staff feel the facilities they are able to offer the bereaved are inadequate. We have identified the major inadequacies and the needs of ICU staff for improved training. Meeting these needs would play a significant role not only in reducing staff stress but also minimising the morbidity in surviving relatives.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.