Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M P Busch

Publications and source records attributed to M P Busch.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate estimates of the risk of transfusion-transmitted infectious disease are essential for monitoring the safety of the blood supply and evaluating the potential effect of new screening tests. We estimated the risk of transmitting the human Immuno-deficiency virus (HIV), the human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV), the hepatitis C virus (HCV), and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) from screened blood units donated during the window period following a recent, undetected infection. METHODS: Using data on 586,507 persons who each donated blood more than once between 1991 and 1993 at five blood centers (for a total of 2,318,356 allogeneic blood donations), we calculated the incidence rates of seroconversion among those whose donations passed all the screening tests used. We adjusted these rates for the estimated duration of the infectious window period for each virus. We then estimated the further reductions in risk that would result from the use of new and more sensitive viral-antigen or nucleic acid screening tests. RESULTS: Among donors whose units passed all screening tests, the risks of giving blood during an infectious window period were estimated as follows: for HIV, 1 in 493,000 (95 percent confidence interval, 202,000 to 2,778,000); for HTLV, 1 in 641,000 (256,000 to 2,000,000); for HCV, 1 in 103,000 (28,000 to 288,000); and for HBV, 1 in 63,000 (31,000 to 147,000). HBV and HCV accounted for 88 percent of the aggregate risk of 1 in 34,000. New screening tests that shorten the window periods for the four viruses should reduce the risks by 27 to 72 percent. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of transmitting HIV, HTLV, HCV, or HBV infection by the transfusion of screened blood is very small, and new screening tests will reduce the risk even further.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed1996

[Residual risks of viral transmission by transfusions and projected yields of additional screening tests. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donors Study (REDS)].

The residual risk of virus transmission associated with infectious seroconversion, window period donations can be estimated by combining the incidence rate of infection among repeat donors with the duration of the pre-seroconversion window period, thus deriving the rate of window phase donations missed by current screening. The residual risks are for HIV 2.0/10(6); HTLV 1.6/10(6); HCV 9.7/10(6); HBV 15.0/10(6). Similarly the net yield and incremental reduction in risk of routine implementation of new tests can be estimated, demonstrating the potential interest of nucleic acid detection.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed1996

Frequency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among contemporary anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-1/2 supplemental test-indeterminate blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up studies from the mid-1980s showed that 1 to 5 percent of blood donors testing reactive in anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and testing indeterminate in Western blot were infected with HIV-1 and were in the process of seroconverting. The present study was conducted to establish the rate of HIV infection among contemporary anti-HIV-1/HIV type 2 (HIV-2) EIA-reactive, Western blot-indeterminate donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donations (n = 607) with indeterminate HIV supplemental test results were identified by screening 3,021,342 donations given from November 1990 through August 1993 at five participating blood centers. Consenting donors were enrolled and samples taken 4 to 8 weeks after donation. Follow-up sera were tested by EIA and Western blot for anti-HIV-1 seroconversion and by type-specific peptide assays for antibodies to HIV-2 and HIV-1 subtype O. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and/or plasma from the follow-up samples were tested for HIV-1 DNA and/or RNA by polymerase chain reaction. The rate of HIV-1 infection among Western blot-indeterminate donors was also estimated by multiplying the incidence rate of HIV-1 seroconversion in this donor population by the estimated duration of the EIA-reactive and Western blot-indeterminate window during seroconversion (8.5 days). RESULTS: Supplemental test-indeterminate donors (n = 355) enrolled a median of 38 days after donation; 265 (75%) of these donors were identified as indeterminate after an anti-HIV-1/2 EIA-reactive donation. Enrolled and non-enrolled donors had similar distributions of demographic characteristics and band patterns. Follow-up samples from all 355 donors tested negative for HIV-1 in polymerase chain reaction. Follow-up sera tested Western blot-negative in 54 cases (15%) and Western blot-indeterminate in 299 (84%). Two follow-up sera (0.6%) were interpreted, according to manufacturer's package insert criteria, as Western blot positive with p24 and gp41 bands and/or gp120/160 bands; however, paired testing of index and follow-up sera from these two cases showed identical Western blot and EIA reactivity, and polymerase chain reaction was negative for HIV RNA and DNA, which ruled out HIV infection. The absence of HIV infection in 355 Western blot-indeterminate donors was consistent with our incidence-based model analysis, which yielded an estimate of one HIV-1 infection for every 215 Western blot-indeterminate donations (95% CI, 1/39-1/8333). CONCLUSION: Contemporary blood donors classified as indeterminate in supplemental HIV testing are infrequently infected with HIV. Donors whose follow-up samples test negative in anti-HIV-1/2 EIAs and negative or persistently indeterminate in Western blots should be considered eligible for reinstatement.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

False-positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 western blot tests in noninfected blood donors.

BACKGROUND: The manufacturers' criteria for a positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Western blot (WB) test were recently revised to require reactivity to only two of the following bands: p24, gp41, and gp120/160. In a recent report, low-risk blood donors were identified in whom nonspecific reactivity to multiple env antigens in WB testing resulted in apparently false-positive WBs by these criteria. The present study was conducted to verify the existence of false-positive WBs among noninfected donors and to assess the extent of this problem. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four donors classified as WB-positive on the basis of env-only (3 cases) or p24/env-only (1 case) patterns were investigated. Index and/or follow-up specimens were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), by overlapping recombinant env antigens and synthetic peptides in enzyme immunoassays, and by deglycosylated and denatured antigen WBs. WB records from American Red Cross blood centers were reviewed to determine the frequency of env-only and p24/env-only patterns, relative to all positive WBs, from 1988 through 1993. RESULTS: The four index-case donors denied risk and had stable WB reactivity during follow-up. HIV PCR was negative in all. Env reactivity was restricted to nonglycosylated gp41 epitopes; no gp120-specific reactivity was detected. For three of the four donors, env reactivity was mapped to a 20-amino acid N-terminal epitope of gp41. The rate of detecting WBs with these false-positive patterns increased from 0.6 percent of all positive WBs from 1988 to 1990 (4/776) to 8 percent in 1991 and 1992 (52/683), and then it declined to 6 percent in 1992 and 1993 (47/783). Env-only patterns predominated in 1991 and 1992, whereas p24/env-only patterns were more frequent following implementation of combined anti-HIV-1/HIV type 2 enzyme immunoassays in 1992. CONCLUSION: Low-risk blood donors can have false-positive results on WB tests. Increased detection of env-only and p24/env-only WBs appears related to the enhanced sensitivity of newer enzyme immunoassays to gp41 and p24 antibodies. Donors with these patterns should undergo follow-up testing to document the presence or absence of HIV infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Antigen testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the magnet effect: will the benefit of a new HIV test be offset by the numbers of higher risk, test-seeking donors attracted to blood centers? Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

BACKGROUND: There currently is debate on whether to include new assays for viral antigens and nucleic acids in the battery of screening tests applied to all blood donations. Proposals call for implementation of p24 antigen screening tests to help identify donors who are infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) but have not yet seroconverted (window-period donors). There is concern, however, that people at higher risk for HIV infection will be attracted to blood centers in order to obtain the results of an HIV assay that is not routinely available elsewhere. Therefore, the benefit of antigen testing may be offset by an increase in the HIV incidence rate among blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Estimates were obtained from previous reports for the HIV incidence rate among blood donors, the percentage of donations from test-seeking donors, the duration of the HIV-infectious window period, and the performance of p24 antigen screening assays. Sensitivity analyses were performed by using various percentages of test-seeking donors following implementation of antigen testing and various HIV incidence rate ratios of test-seekers to nonseekers. Hypothetical residual HIV risks were calculated for multiple scenarios and compared to the current estimate of HIV risk without antigen screening of blood donations. RESULTS: If antigen testing reduces the window period by 27 percent (e.g., from 22 days to 16 days), and the HIV incidence rate among test-seekers is 30 times that among nonseekers, then the benefit of antigen testing will be eliminated if the percentage of test-seekers (currently estimated at 3.2%) increases to 5.7 percent. If antigen testing reduces the window period by approximately 45 percent (e.g., from 22 days to 10 days or from 13 days to 6 days) and the HIV incidence rate ratio (test-seekers vs. nonseekers) is assumed to be equal to the HIV prevalence ratio (5.3), then the percentage of donations from test-seeking donors would have to increase to 25 percent of all donations to offset the benefit of antigen screening. CONCLUSION: This model helps identify the key measures for assessing the potential adverse effect of increased test seeking as a consequence of the addition of p24 antigen (or other direct virus) assays to blood donor screening programs. In most scenarios, the beneficial effect of antigen screening exceeded the potential detrimental effect of attracting higher-risk, test-seeking donors. The possibility cannot be ruled out, however, that a subgroup of high-risk, test-seeking donors attracted to the blood centers by a new HIV test will offset the reduction in the residual risk of HIV infection associated with antigen screening.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗
PubMed1996

Relationship between antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and retroviral infections in blood from volunteer donors.

BACKGROUND: The value of the test for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) as a surrogate screening assay in the time before sensitive, virus-specific screening tests were available has been well established. There is significant debate, however about the residual value of anti-HBc screening after the implementation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-, human T-lymphotrophic virus (HTLV)-, and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific assays and, in particular, about its utility as a lifestyle marker to identify persons at risk for retrovirus infections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Screening tests for antibodies to HIV, HTLV, and HBc, as well as confirmatory or supplemental test results for anti-HIV and anti-HTLV, were obtained from approximately 2.8 million donations collected from 1991 through 1993 by five blood centers within the United States. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and relative prevalence of anti-HBc for each retrovirus were calculated and compared among demographic subgroups. RESULTS: The overall relationship between anti-HBc and anti-HIV was similar to that between anti-HBc and anti-HTLV. When calculated from the measured endpoint of the prevalence of anti-HIV-positive and anti-HTLV-positive donations, the sensitivities were 31.1 and 26.2 percent, the positive predictive values were 0.18 and 0.21 percent, and the relative prevalences were 30.1 and 23.8, respectively. Among 27 anti-HIV-seroconverting donors and 9 anti-HTLV-seroconverting donors, the sensitivities were 7.4 percent (95% CI: 0.9-24.3%) and 0 percent (95% CI: 0.0-28.3%), respectively. It was estimated that for each HIV-infected window-period donation detected by anti-HBc, from 19,000 to 81,000 HIV-noninfected donations are discarded. Similarly, more than 33,000 HTLV-noninfected donations are likely to be discarded for each HTLV-infected donation detected by anti-HBc. CONCLUSION: Although anti-HBc-reactive donations are more likely to be seropositive for a retrovirus than are anti-HBc-nonreactive donations, the low positive predictive value limits the test's effectiveness. If the anti-HBc test is retained in the blood donor setting, efforts should be focused on reducing the number of false-positive results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Surveillance for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O infections in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Reports that the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group O variants are not reliably detected by some commercial diagnostic tests have raised concerns about the sensitivity of existing screening tests, especially with regard to blood safety. Although it is unlikely that these divergent strains are prevalent in North America, systematic, continuous surveillance is needed to monitor the potential spread of HIV variants into that region. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Stored serum samples (n = 1072) from both high- and low-risk population groups at several sites in the United States and Puerto Rico were tested by peptide enzyme immunoassays specific for the prototypic HIV-1 group O strains, MVP5180 and ANT70. RESULTS: None of the 1072 samples examined had peptide reactivity that was consistent with HIV-1 group O infection. CONCLUSION: While no evidence of specific HIV-1 group O (MVP5180 or ANT70) infection was found in this study, the sensitivity of current tests has not been fully evaluated against the wide range of genetic variation of HIV. Therefore, it is important to continue active surveillance for HIV-1 and HIV type 2 strains, to characterize any divergent strains, and to judiciously modify tests to correct for any deficiencies in sensitivity.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

Factors influencing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission by blood transfusion. Transfusion Safety Study Group.

One hundred thirty-two recipients of blood components that retrospectively tested positive for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (anti-HIV-1) were identified. Fourteen (11%) remained seronegative throughout follow-up. Donor and recipient characteristics that could have influenced transmission were examined. Attributes did not differ for infected and uninfected recipients. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from uninfected recipients were HIV-1-negative by DNA amplification and culture but were susceptible to in vitro infection. Transmitting and nontransmitting donors at donation differed only for HIV-1 RNA positivity. By immunocapture reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, 6 of 11 transmitters and 0 of 11 nontransmitters tested RNA-positive (P = .02). A more sensitive quantitative RNA assay detected RNA in all donation sera, but median levels were higher in transmitting than nontransmitting sera (P = .01). Median CD4 cell counts were lower for transmitting than nontransmitting donors at enrollment (P = .02). Level of viremia is an important determinant of HIV infection by blood transfusion.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

Distribution of HIV-1 subtypes seen in an AIDS clinic in Sao Paulo City, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes in Sao Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Samples were obtained from 80 consecutive HIV-1-infected individuals attending the Immunodeficiency Clinic at the University of Sao Paulo in 1993. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and a portion was used for routine CD4 counts; the remainder were frozen. PBMC were proteinase-K-digested and DNA-purified by organic extraction. Samples were amplified for the env region of HIV, and envelope sequence subtypes determined by heteroduplex mobility analysis using prototypic subtypes as references. A subset of these were also sequenced through the C2-V3 region of env. RESULTS: A total 69 of 80 samples yielded env polymerase chain reaction product enabling subtype determination; samples that did not amplify were those with low DNA yields. Among 12 injecting drug users (IDU) or sexual partners of IDU, four were typed as clade F and eight as clade B. Forty-three homosexual men or female sexual partners of bisexual men were typed as clade B. The 14 additional cases without known risk factors were typed as clade B. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that subtype F is related to injecting drug use in Brazil.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1995

Induction of tolerance in nondefective mice after in utero transplantation of major histocompatibility complex-mismatched fetal hematopoietic stem cells.

Significant morbidity and mortality are associated with the conditioning therapy needed for postnatal bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for inherited diseases. This could be eliminated with hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation in utero, when the immunoincompetence of the fetus permits engraftment without the need for immunosuppressive therapy. We have established an in utero (day 11 to day 13) model of HSC transplantation in nondefective, allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched mice. Donor cells wre from pooled fetal livers of C57BL/6 (H-2b, GPI-1b) mice. Engraftment was tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the Y chromosome in female recipients (with 0.00001% sensitivity). Eight percent (3 of 36) of allogeneic mismatched (Balb-c, H-2d) recipients and 25% (3 of 12) of congenic (C57B1/6, GPI-1a) recipients showed durable engraftment (male donor cells detected beyond 20 weeks of age) based on analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes (P > .08). When spleen and liver were analyzed, 51% (17 of 33) of allogeneic recipients and 50% (6 of 12) of congenic recipients showed durable engraftment (P > .3). The percent donor cells that durably engrafted varied from as low as 0.0001% in spleen and liver to as high as 0.6% in peripheral blood. Postnatal boosting with a single dose of allogeneic MHC-mismatched donor cells in a tolerant, engrafted mouse resulted in a significant increase in donor cells in the peripheral blood from 0.2% pre-boost to 5% 6 months after the boost. There was no evidence of engraftment in nontolerant mice after the postnatal boost with a similar dose of donor cells. Twenty-two allogeneic recipients were evaluated for donor skin graft acceptance at 6 to 12 months of age. Three mice with engraftment in blood and/or tissue permanently accepted donor skin grafts, one of them with donor cells detectable only in the liver. Six additional mice that showed prolonged skin graft acceptance had no evidence of durable engraftment in the blood but were engrafted in the liver and/or spleen. The degree of engraftment in tolerant mice was low (< or = 0.1% donor cells). We conclude that at an early gestational age in nondefective mice (1) high rates of durable engraftment are achievable, although the degree of engraftment is usually low (less than 1%); (2) the percent of donor cells in the peripheral blood may be increased by a postnatal boost of donor cells in tolerant animals without conditioning therapy; (3) MHC appears to have little influence on engraftment efficiency at an early gestational age; (4) a very small number of circulating donor cells in the blood or the tissues is sufficient for the induction and maintenance of tolerance, and (5) the presence of donor cells in the circulating blood is not necessary for prolonged skin graft acceptance or maintenance of permanent skin graft acceptance.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Evaluation of four alternative methodologies for determination of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

Standard methods for determining absolute CD3+CD4+ T-lymphocyte concentrations using combined results from flow cytometry and hematology analyzers are expensive and require fresh (< 18 h old) blood. We evaluated four new "alternative" methods for determining absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts; (a) the FACSCount System (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems), (b) VCS Technology/Coulter Cyto-Spheres (Coulter Corporation), (c) Zymmune CD4/CD8 Cell Monitoring Kit (Zynaxis, Inc.), and (d) TRAx CD4 Test Kit (T Cell Diagnostics). EDTA-anticoagulated whole-blood specimens from HIV-seropositive patients and anti-HIV-negative adult blood donors and staff were tested by the standard flow cytometry method on fresh blood (0-6 postphlebotomy) and by the four alternative methods at 0 to 6 h and 24 to 30 h postphlebotomy. Representative specimens (< 6 h old) were tested five times with each system to evaluate reproducibility. Correlation coefficients for absolute CD4+ counts between standard flow cytometry and the alternative methods ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 for both fresh and 24- to 30-h-old specimens. Average coefficient of variation for reproducibility ranged from 4.5 to 7.1%. The four alternative CD4+ T-lymphocyte counting methods performed well relative to standard methods. Each alternative method offers advantages over standard flow cytometry with respect to sample throughout, required technical expertise, and cost per result. These methods should facilitate wider availability of low-cost CD4 counts.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed1995

Virologic and immunologic characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic primary HIV-1 infection.

To define virologic and immunologic differences in patients with acute symptomatic and asymptomatic primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, sequential plasma specimens were obtained longitudinally for 1-2 years postseroconversion from subjects with well-documented time of seroconversion. Thirteen of them had an acute symptomatic primary infection, eight subjects had asymptomatic primary infection and long-term follow-up, and 27 had asymptomatic seroconversion and short-term follow-up. Quantitative plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4+ lymphocyte counts, and levels of antibodies to gp120, p66, p41, p31, p24, and p17 were measured. At the time of seroconversion, there was no significant difference in HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ counts between symptomatic (n = 13) and asymptomatic (n = 27) subjects. Subsequently, however, establishment of low levels of plasma HIV-1 RNA was seen significantly more frequently in asymptomatic (n = 8) than in symptomatic (n = 13) primary infection; this correlated with higher levels of some (anti-gp120 and anti-p31) anti-HIV-1 antibodies and a slower decline in CD4+ lymphocyte counts. These results indicate that immunologic control of viremia early after infection may be a critical determinant to subsequent clinical course of HIV-1 infection. They also suggest that persons with acute symptomatic primary infection may generally progress to having acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) more rapidly than people with low-grade symptoms or asymptomatic primary infection.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1995

Transient increase in circulating donor leukocytes after allogeneic transfusions in immunocompetent recipients compatible with donor cell proliferation.

Donor leukocytes in therapeutic blood components are implicated in transfusion-related complications ranging from alloimmunization to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to viral transmission and reactivation. To further characterize the kinetics of donor leukocyte clearance after allogeneic transfusion, we developed allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays directed at a single-copy Y chromosome gene and HLA class II alleles. These assays enable sensitive detection and quantitation of donor leukocytes at concentrations ranging from one cell to greater than 1,000 cells per 125 microL of recipient blood. When applied to serial samples from five consecutive orthopedic surgery patients who met study criteria, we observed 99.9% clearance of donor leukocytes over the initial 2 days posttransfusion, followed by a transient, 1-log increase in circulating donor leukocytes on days 3 to 5. This phenomenon was reproduced in a canine transfusion model, where the transient donor leukocyte expansion phase was prevented by gamma irradiation of donor blood, and was not observed after transfusions into alloimmunized dogs. We hypothesize that this transient increase in circulating allogeneic donor cells represents one arm of an in vivo mixed lymphocyte reaction, with activated donor T lymphocytes proliferating in an abortive GVHD reaction to HLA-incompatible recipient cells. Further investigation of this phenomenon should provide insight into the mechanisms involved in donor-recipient leukocyte interactions posttransfusion and the relationship of these interactions to leukocyte-induced complications.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Unusual kinetics of white cell clearance in transfused mice.

BACKGROUND: Donor white cells (WBCs) in blood transfusions are responsible for complications in recipients, including alloimmunization, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and virus transmission and reactivation. The recent use of sequence-specific polymerase chain reaction assays to monitor the kinetics of clearance of donor WBCs in transfused humans and dogs found transient recirculation of donor lymphocytes on Days 3 to 5 after transfusion; this presumably reflected an abortive GVHD reaction to major histocompatibility complex-incompatible recipient cells, after which donor WBCs were cleared to undetectable levels. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study sought to develop a murine model to further characterize the kinetics and major histocompatibility complex restriction of donor WBC clearance. A sensitive murine Y chromosome-specific polymerase chain reaction assay was developed and applied to serial blood samples collected after transfusions of allogeneic blood to naive inbred, primed inbred, and outbred mice, as well as after transfusions of gamma-radiated blood to naive inbred mice. RESULTS: In inbred mice, both naive and primed to the allogeneic blood donor, transfused WBCs were not cleared to undetectable levels for more than 1 month after transfusion. Transfused outbred mice also showed prolonged donor WBC survival, although at lower levels than inbred mice. There was no evidence of GVHD in either inbred or outbred mice, and gamma radiation had no significant impact on donor WBC persistence. CONCLUSION: These results contrast with the rapid clearance of donor WBCs observed in humans and dogs. The immunologic basis for this discrepancy remains unclear. Caution should be exercised in any extrapolation to humans of conclusions drawn from results in transfused mice.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Time course of detection of viral and serologic markers preceding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 seroconversion: implications for screening of blood and tissue donors.

BACKGROUND: Almost all human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission via blood or tissues that has occurred since anti-HIV screening was implemented in 1985 is traceable to blood given after infection but before antibody seroconversion, a time that is referred to as the window period. In this study, the performance of newer assays designed to detect viral and serologic markers soon after infection is assessed, and the reduction in the window period achieved by these assays is estimated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three cohort studies of persons at high risk for acquiring HIV infection were identified. These studies included well-controlled HIV type 1 (HIV-1) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of serial preseroconversion specimens from HIV-1-seroconverting homosexual men or intravenous drug users. Of 81 enrollees with anti-HIV-1 seroconversion documented by a viral lysate anti-HIV-1 enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) available in 1989, 13 (16%) had PCR-positive preseroconversion specimens. In the present study, sera from these 13 PCR-positive samples were further tested for anti-HIV by 10 contemporary EIAs and 6 supplemental assays, as well as being tested for plasma p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA. Preseroconversion sera from 38 HIV-1 DNA PCR-negative cohort participants were also tested by selected anti-HIV EIAs and tested for p24 antigen and HIV-1 RNA. On the basis of these laboratory data and the intervals between blood drawing in all 81 men, the reduction in the preseroconversion window period achieved by these new assays was estimated with a mathematical model developed to analyze seroconversion data. RESULTS: Nine (69%) of the 13 preseroconversion PCR-positive samples had anti-HIV that was detectable by one or more contemporary anti-HIV-1 or anti-HIV type 2 EIA. Supplemental antibody assays were negative on all four EIA-nonreactive preseroconversion samples and negative or indeterminate on a high proportion of the nine EIA-reactive PCR-positive samples. Eight (61%) of the 13 samples were p24 antigen-positive, and 11 (85%) were HIV-1 RNA-positive. The estimated reductions in the window period (relative to the index viral lysate-based anti-HIV EIA) were as follows: contemporary anti-HIV-1/2 EIAs, 20.3 days (95% Cl, 8.0-32.5); p24 antigen and DNA PCR, 26.4 days (95% Cl, 12.6-38.7); and RNA PCR, 31.0 days (95% Cl, 16.7-45.3). CONCLUSION: Recent improvement in the sensitivity of anti-HIV assays has resulted in significant shortening of the preseroconversion window period. Consequently, the incremental reduction in the window period that could be achieved by implementing direct virus-detection assays has diminished significantly.

Blood Donors↗