Minimal beam exposure with a field emission source.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Ohtsuki.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In order to establish the virological significance of HBeAg subtypes (HBeAg/1 and HBeAg/2) during hepatitis B virus infection, HBsAg, HBeAg and hepatitis B virus DNA in serum and HBcAg in liver were determined quantitatively in relation to the detection of HBeAg subtypes in agar gel diffusion. Thirty-eight chronic HBsAg carriers with HBeAg, including 16 non-specific reactive hepatitis, 8 chronic persistent hepatitis, 11 chronic active hepatitis and 3 liver cirrhosis, who were seen at Tohoku University Hospital from 1983 to 1985, were examined. Significantly larger amounts of HBsAg, HBeAg and hepatitis B virus DNA in serum and HBcAg in liver were found in patients positive for both HBeAg/1 and HBeAg/2 in serum than in those positive for only HBeAg/1 or negative for both subtypes. These results suggest that the presence of HBeAg/2 in serum may reflect the occurrence of active viral replication. When the detection pattern of HBeAg subtypes was examined during serial follow-up for at least 1 year, three groups of patients were classified with respect to the presence of HBeAg/2, i.e., Type I, consistently positive for HBeAg/2; Type II, consistently negative for HBeAg/2, and Type III, intermittently positive for HBeAg/2. More than 80% of Type I patients were histologically diagnosed having as nonspecific reactive hepatitis, while more than 80% of Type II and III patients had more progressive liver diseases such as chronic persistent hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis and liver cirrhosis. These results suggest that the serial examination of HBeAg subtypes in serum may be important for more detailed evaluations of type B hepatitis.
FTY720, a new class of immunomodulator, induces lymphopenia by sequestration of circulating lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid tissues. FTY720 at 0.1 to 1 mg/kg significantly prolonged the allograft survival in a dose-dependent manner and showed a marked synergistic effect in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) in rat skin and cardiac allograft models. In addition, the canine renal allograft survival was significantly prolonged by combination therapy with FTY720 at 0.03 to 1 mg/kg and CsA at 10 mg/kg as compared with monotherapy of FTY720 or CsA. By contrast, the combination therapy with CsA and azathioprine or CsA and mycophenolate mofetil resulted in only an additive effect in rat skin allograft. When FTY720 was administered to rats, FTY720 was metabolized by omega-oxidation of the octyl side chain, and beta-oxidation subsequently, or phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase. Omega- and beta-oxidized 4 metabolities of FTY720 at 10 mg/kg i.v. showed neither lymphopenia nor immunosuppressive activity in rat skin allograft. On the other hand, (S)-enantiomer of FTY720-phosphate at 0.1 and 1 mg/kg intravenously induced a marked lymphopenia and significantly prolonged the allograft survival in the rat allotransplantation. From these results, it is suggested the lymphopenia and the immunosuppression induced by FTY720 administration is due to the agonistic activity against SIP receptors of the active metabolite, (S)-FTY720-phosphate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Using two methods (continuous monotherapy and intermittent therapy) for the treatment of psoriasis with cyclosporine, we observed the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of each treatment method for more than 36 months to evaluate the clinical usefulness of both methods. Thirty-seven cases were analyzed and the following results were obtained: 1) The PASI score evaluated at each visit was maintained between 5 and 10 by both treatment methods and the improvement rate was more than 70%, while there was no difference in the daily dose between the two treatment methods; 2) The period required to achieve remission tended to be prolonged by intermittent therapy, while no change was observed with continuous monotherapy; 3) The period up to relapse tended to become shorter with both treatment methods but this tendency was more marked with intermittent therapy; 4) E-PAP(evaluation for prognosis with averaged PASI) was lower in the continuous monotherapy group and the patients were more satisfied; 5) The incidence of adverse reactions was similar to that reported in previous studies, with no difference between the two treatment methods in this regard; 6) A significant increase in BUN levels was observed in elderly patients; 7) There were only three cases in which the drug was discontinued due to exacerbation and adverse reactions. Based on the above findings, continuous monotherapy seems to be of greater clinical usefulness than intermittent therapy.