Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M O Ahn

Publications and source records attributed to M O Ahn.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Intrapartum Doppler velocimetry, amniotic fluid volume, and fetal heart rate as predictors of subsequent fetal distress. I. An initial report.

This study examines the usefulness of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, amniotic fluid volume assessment, and fetal heart rate data in the early intrapartum period as predictors of subsequent fetal distress. A total of 109 patients seen in the latent phase of labor in the labor and delivery area were studied. Both an abnormal initial fetal heart rate and an amniotic fluid index less than or equal to 5.0 cm were associated with a significant increase in the incidence of intrapartum fetal distress. Conversely, a systolic/diastolic ratio greater than 3.0 by Doppler ultrasonography was not associated with increased fetal morbidity. Overall, the sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values of the fetal heart rate tracing and the amniotic fluid volume assessment were comparable. Doppler systolic/diastolic ratios showed very poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. We conclude that the fetal heart rate tracing or the assessment of amniotic fluid volume in the early intrapartum period are reasonable predictors of subsequent fetal condition. The lack of patients with the absence of or reverse umbilical velocity preclude conclusions with regard to Doppler systolic/diastolic ratios for this purpose.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Trial of labor in women with breech presentation.

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a woman with breech presentation is a controversial issue. In this prospective study, 137 patients had a breech presentation. Of them, 27 (19.7%) met the protocol criteria for attempted vaginal delivery and desired a trial of labor. Thirteen (48%) achieved vaginal delivery, with no increase in fetal or maternal morbidity. Our data suggest that in selected patients, a trial of labor after a cesarean delivery with a breech presentation is a reasonable consideration.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed1989

Twice a cesarean, always a cesarean?

The cesarean delivery rate has quadrupled during the past two decades, resulting in considerable attention focused on alternatives to cesarean birth. One option, vaginal birth after one previous cesarean, has come to be recognized as an acceptable alternative to routine elective repeat cesarean delivery. The purpose of this report was to evaluate whether women with two previous cesareans can safely undergo a trial of labor. Between July 1, 1982 and June 30, 1986, data were collected prospectively on all women with previous cesareans. Those with a known classical incision or a medical or obstetric contraindication to a trial of labor were excluded from an attempted vaginal delivery. During this period, 67,784 patients were delivered, of whom 6250 (9.2%) had had a previous cesarean. Of the 6250 previous-cesarean patients, 1088 (17.4%) had had two previous cesareans; of these, 501 (46%) underwent a trial of labor and 346 (69%) delivered vaginally. Whereas the overall rate of uterine dehiscence was 3%, the rate in those women who attempted a vaginal delivery was 1.8%, versus 4.6% in those who did not. Overall, oxytocin was used in 284 (57%) and was associated with a dehiscence rate of 2.1%, versus 1.4% in the no-oxytocin group. Successful vaginal delivery was related significantly to the use of oxytocin and to a previous vaginal delivery. Trial of labor in patients with two previous cesareans appears to be a reasonable consideration.

Cesarean Section↗
PubMed1988

Multiple pregnancy: antepartum management.

The critical aspects of twin pregnancy begin with early diagnosis. After that, diet, bed rest, and frequent visits to the physician's office will enhance fetal outcome. Additionally, frequent ultrasound evaluations to assess fetal growth and fetal surveillance are also invaluable adjuncts. Prompt treatment of any medical or obstetrical complications will contribute to an overall improvement in maternal and fetal outcome.

Amniocentesis↗
PubMed1987

Antepartum fetal surveillance in the patient with decreased fetal movement.

Whenever a patient has the subjective perception of decreased fetal movement, prompt evaluation in the form of antepartum fetal surveillance has been undertaken. The purpose of this report is to describe our experience with 489 pregnant women who came between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 1985 to our Antepartum Fetal Surveillance Clinic with this complaint alone or in association with another indication for fetal surveillance. Overall, 838 nonstress tests were performed, and the results were reactive, 93.2%; nonreactive, 6.8%; and fetal heart rate decelerations, 6.1%. Comparison of the first nonstress test results between those with decreased fetal movement alone or in combination with another diagnosis demonstrated a similar incidence of nonreactivity and fetal heart rate decelerations. In those patients whose indication was decreased fetal movement alone, there was a 3.7 times greater likelihood of diminished amniotic fluid volume. When the last test within 7 days of delivery was analyzed, the decreased fetal movement alone group had a lower incidence of cesarean delivery, cesarean delivery for fetal distress, and Apgar scores less than 7 than patients with an additional indication for testing. In summary, decreased fetal movement continues to be an acceptable indication for fetal surveillance. Based on our retrospective experience, the most reasonable approach appears to be a combination of nonstress test and amniotic fluid volume assessment. Unless the patient has additional indications for fetal surveillance, the patient with decreased fetal movement with a reactive nonstress test and a normal amniotic fluid volume does not appear to warrant additional testing.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1987

Four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume. Interobserver and intraobserver variation.

While the use of the four-quadrant technique, or the amniotic fluid index (AFI), for amniotic fluid volume assessment has been shown to correlate with perinatal outcome, one concern among clinicians is the reliability of a single AFI measurement. The purpose of this investigation was to ascertain the margin of error using this technique among 23 term and postterm women. The AFI was obtained using linear array real-time B-scan ultrasound to measure the vertical diameter of the largest amniotic fluid pocket in each of the four quadrants. The sum of these measurements was expressed as the AFI. Eight women underwent ten consecutive AFI measurements by the same sonographer to determine intraobserver variation. Interobserver variation between five sonographers was measured by assessing the AFI in 15 additional patients. With the amniotic fluid volume in the low or normal range, our results demonstrated the intraobserver and interobserver variations in AFI to average 1.0 and 2.0 cm, respectively. With an above-normal amniotic fluid volume, a 2.5- to 3-fold greater variation was observed. A relatively small margin of error appears to exist between observers using the four-quadrant technique to assess amniotic fluid volume.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1987

Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy.

Amniotic fluid volume assessment has become an important part of antepartum fetal surveillance. The amniotic fluid index (AFI), or four-quadrant technique, has been suggested for this purpose. While previous reports have outlined this technique and correlated the results with pregnancy outcome, none have reviewed the changes in AFI throughout pregnancy. We studied AFI changes from 11 through 43 weeks' gestation. As part of the entry criteria, only patients with good dates were evaluated. The AFI was determined by the summation of the vertical diameter of the largest pocket in each of the four quadrants. All amniotic fluid studies were conducted using real-time linear array B-scan. During the study period, 197 patients with good dates confirmed clinically and sonographically underwent 262 AFI assessments. From 11 to 26 weeks the AFI rose progressively. Thereafter until term, the AFI remained approximately 16.2 +/- 5.3 cm. After 38 weeks the AFI appeared to gradually decline. Data obtained from this study population corroborate previously defined normal amniotic fluid volumes. These results also suggest that serial measurements of the AFI may be an effective means of assessing fetal status throughout pregnancy.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intrapartum fetal asphyxial brain injury with absent multiorgan system dysfunction.

Current understanding of the physiologic mechanisms of intrapartum fetal asphyxial brain injury has suggested a strong association with multiorgan system injury. Thus the purpose here is to describe 14 cases of severe fetal brain injury with absent multiorgan system dysfunction (MSD). The study population was drawn from a national registry for brain injured infants. MSD was defined by clinical criteria demonstrated to reflect asphyxial injury to the pulmonary, renal, cardiac, hematologic, hepatic, and gastrointestinal systems. Involvement of one other organ in addition to the brain was defined as multiorgan system dysfunction. All infants were diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in the neonatal period and went on to have permanent central nervous system (CNS) injury and MSD criteria were not met. Of the 292 term, singleton infants with HIE and permanent neurologic injury, 57 (20%) satisfied the entry criteria; of these, 14 (36%) had no MSD. The underlying basis for the fetal brain injury were: uterine rupture, 6 (43%), prolonged FHR deceleration, 5 (36%), fetal exsanguination, 1 (7%), cord prolapse, 1 (7%), and maternal cardiopulmonary arrest, 1 (7%). The mean duration of the prolonged FHR deceleration was 32.1 +/- 9.1 (range 19-51) minutes. All infants were later diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Intrapartum fetal asphyxial brain injury may not necessarily proceed through a physiologic mechanism in which the fetal circulation is centralized and endorgans damaged. These acute injuries, associated with a prolonged FHR deceleration, may be linked to severely decreased cardiac output and hypotension that cause vulnerable portions of the brain to be injured before other organs.

Asphyxia Neonatorum↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Acute fetal asphyxia and permanent brain injury: a retrospective analysis of current indicators.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a term neonate who has had sufficient intrapartum asphyxia to produce persistent brain injury will manifest the following four criteria: profound acidemia (arterial pH <7.00), an APGAR score < or =3 for 5 min or longer, seizures within 24 h of birth, and multiorgan system dysfunction. METHODS: Singleton, liveborn, neurologically impaired neonates > or =37 weeks gestation who lived at least 6 days and had sufficient documentation of current intrapartum asphyxia criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Of these infants, solely neonates with acute fetal asphyxia due to a sudden prolonged FHR deceleration that lasted until delivery from a catastrophic event, e.g., uterine rupture, cord prolapse, were included. Organ system dysfunction was defined by separate criteria for each organ system. Dysfunction in one or more was defined as multiorgan system dysfunction. RESULTS: Of the 292 eligible infants in the registry, 47 satisfied the entry criteria. In these 47 neonates, 10 (21%) satisfied all 4 criteria for intrapartum asphyxia. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study suggests that currently used indicators to define permanent fetal brain injury are not valid.

Apgar Score↗