Thrombosis and cancer: implications beyond Trousseau.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Biomedical subjects
M N Levine
Publications and source records attributed to M N Levine.
From Trousseau to targeted therapy: new insights and innovations in thrombosis and cancer.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) commonly occurs in patients with malignant disease. At the 1997 ISTH meeting, cancer and thrombosis was discussed in a state-of-the-art symposium. Since then, there have been many new developments on this topic. Tumors, through expression of tissue factor can activate coagulation. Furthermore, local peritumor activation of coagulation may have important effects on the biology of cancer. A randomized trial has been conducted which evaluated extensive screening to detect underlying malignancy vs. no screening in patients presenting with idiopathic VTE. No statistically significant difference was detected in cancer-related mortality between the two groups. A trial has evaluated extended prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for abdominal malignancy. There was a statistically significant reduction in venographically detected deep vein thrombosis in favor of 4 weeks of treatment. In contrast, there is clearly a need for more information on the use of thromboprophylaxis in medical cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has replaced unfractionated heparin as the first line treatment in the majority of patients with acute VTE. Many cancer patients with acute VTE can be treated safely at home with subcutaneous LMWH without admission to hospital. The results of a recent trial demonstrated that long-term low molecular weight heparin administered over a 6-month period substantially reduced the rate of recurrent VTE compared with oral anticoagulant therapy with no increase in bleeding. Finally, the first trial specifically designed to evaluate the anticancer effect of long-term LMWH in cancer patients has been conducted and will no doubt stimulate future research.
Anticoagulants↗
Epidemiology of thrombosis in cancer.
We have utilized epidemiological data to address three questions in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE): (1) What is the risk for occult cancer in patients with idiopathic versus secondary VTE? (2) What is the risk for thrombosis in patients with cancer (vs. noncancer patients)? (3) What is the risk of recurrent VTE in cancer patients with an initial episode of VTE compared to noncancer patients? The risk for a new cancer diagnosis within 6-12 months of the diagnosis of idiopathic VTE (including pulmonary embolism) is well supported by retrospective analyses of large numbers of unselected patients, population-based retrospective cohort analyses from large registries and prospective studies. The odds ratios for these studies are in the range of 4- to 7-fold increased risk. In surgical patients with known cancer the odds ratio for an episode of postoperative VTE is approximately 2, when compared to a control group of noncancer patients subjected to the same procedures. A similar odds ratio of approximately 2 exists for the relative risk for recurrence of VTE in the first 3 months after an initial episode in cancer patients treated with heparin and warfarin (Coumadin) compared to noncancer patients. Therefore, patients with idiopathic VTE are at increased risk for occult cancer and cancer patients are at increased risk for VTE. Appropriate studies are underway to determine the best strategies for anticoagulant management of these patients.
Anticoagulants↗
Treatment of venous thrombosis in the cancer patient.
Venous thromboembolism is a common complication in patients with cancer. The management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism can be a considerable challenge in patients with cancer. The cancer itself and associated treatments contribute to an ongoing thrombogenic stimulus, while cancer patients are thought to be at increased risk for anticoagulant-induced bleeding. Initial treatment of acute thromboembolism is with intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin. Treatment at home with low molecular weight heparin is an attractive option in patients with malignant disease. Long-term treatment of acute venous thromboembolism has traditionally been with oral anticoagulants. However, the inconvenience and narrow therapeutic window of oral anticoagulants make such therapy unattractive and problematic in cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparins are being evaluated as an alternative for long-term therapy because their anticoagulant effects are more predictable and laboratory monitoring is unnecessary. Although many clinical issues remain unresolved in the treatment of cancer patients with venous thromboembolism, the future holds much promise as new antithrombotic agents, including factor Xa antagonists and oral thrombin inhibitors, are being tested in clinical trials.
Anticoagulants↗
Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment.
Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The criteria for defining the severity of bleeding varied considerably between studies, accounting in part for the variation in the rates of bleeding reported. Since the last review, there have been several meta-analyses published on the rates of major bleeding in trials of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease. The major determinants of oral anticoagulant-induced bleeding are the intensity of the anticoagulant effect, underlying patient characteristics, and the length of therapy. There is good evidence that low-intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (targeted INR of 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) is associated with a lower risk of bleeding than therapy targeted at a higher intensity. Lower-intensity regimens (INR < 2.0) are associated with an even smaller increase in major bleeding. In terms of treatment decision making for anticoagulant therapy, bleeding risk cannot be considered alone, ie, the potential decrease in thromboembolism must be balanced against the potential increased bleeding risk. The risk of bleeding associated with IV heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism is < 3% in recent trials. There is some evidence to suggest that this bleeding risk increases with the heparin dosage and age (> 70 years). LMW heparin is not associated with increased major bleeding compared with standard heparin in acute venous thromboembolism. Standard heparin and LMW heparin are not associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic coronary syndromes, but are associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic stroke.
Anticoagulants↗
Management of thromboembolic disease in cancer patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Fibrinolytic Agents↗
Better treatments that cost more: the dilemma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.
Venous thromboembolism is a common complication in patients with cancer. The management of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism can be a considerable challenge in these patients. Diagnosing venous thrombosis requires objective testing, and noninvasive investigations may be less accurate in patients who have cancer than in those who do not. Treatment of acute venous thrombosis at home with low-molecular-weight heparin is an attractive option in patients with malignant disease, in whom quality of life is especially important. Comorbid conditions, warfarin resistance, difficult venous access, and a potentially high bleeding risk are some of the factors that often complicate the prolonged course of anticoagulant therapy needed in this group. In addition, the use of central venous catheters is increasing, but the optimal treatment of catheter-related thrombosis remains controversial. This article reviews the current diagnostic and treatment approaches to venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and provides several clinical scenarios to illustrate and discuss some common management problems.
Adult↗
Clinical utility of a rapid whole-blood D-dimer assay in patients with cancer who present with suspected acute deep venous thrombosis.
BACKGROUND: Although D-dimer assays have high negative predictive values for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis, their accuracy in patients with cancer is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utility of a whole-blood D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in patients with and those without cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of three prospective studies. SETTING: Two tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: 1068 consecutive outpatients with suspected deep venous thrombosis. MEASUREMENTS: All patients underwent D-dimer testing and assessment with a priori diagnostic strategies that incorporated impedance plethysmography, compression ultrasonography, or contrast venography. Patients in whom deep venous thrombosis was not diagnosed initially were followed for 3 months for the development of thrombosis. Results of D-dimer testing were assessed according to the final diagnosis based on objective testing and clinical follow-up. Cancer status was identified at presentation. RESULTS: The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis was 48.8% in 121 patients with cancer and 14.6% in 947 patients without cancer. Although the sensitivity of the D-dimer assay was similar in patients with and those without cancer (86.4% [95% CI, 75.0% to 94.0%] and 82.6% [CI, 75.2% to 88.5%], respectively), the specificity was significantly lower in patients with cancer (48.4% [CI, 35.5% to 61.4%] and 82.2% [CI, 79.4% to 84.8%]), as was the negative predictive value (78.9% [CI, 62.7% to 90.4%] and 96.5% [CI, 94.9% to 97.8%]). In contrast, the likelihood ratios of a negative test result (0.28 [CI, 0.14 to 0.56] and 0.21 [CI, 0.15 to 0.31]) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A negative D-dimer test result in patients with cancer does not reliably exclude deep venous thrombosis because the negative predictive value of the test is significantly lower in these patients than in patients without cancer.
Acute Disease↗
The thrombophilic state induced by therapeutic agents in the cancer patient.
Multiple risk factors contribute to the hypercoagulable state in cancer patients. Antineoplastic therapy, including single- or multiagent chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and hematopoietic growth factors, is an unavoidable and a significant precipitant of venous and arterial thromboses. The risk of thrombosis following cancer treatment also depends on the interaction between treatment agents, type and stage of cancer, and the presence of other risk factors for thrombosis such as advanced age, surgery, immobilization, and the use of central venous catheters. Therefore, although a causal role of cancer treatment in thrombosis is widely accepted, the pathogenic mechanisms are poorly understood and are difficult to investigate because of the multiple confounding factors that are involved. Alterations in coagulation factors, anticoagulant proteins, and endothelial damage have all been shown to occur following cytotoxic agents. The best-studied drugs with definite hypercoagulable effects are L-asparaginase and tamoxifen.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.
The occurrence of venous thromboembolism complicates the management of the patient with malignant disease because of the need for anticoagulant therapy. Cancer patients have an ongoing thrombotic stimulus due to the underlying cancer and its associated treatments, but are also considered to be at increased risk for anticoagulant-related bleeding. In recent years, the results of clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of weight-adjusted subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin, administered at home, for patients with acute deep vein thrombosis. This approach is particularly attractive to patients with cancer where quality of life is an important consideration. There are no trials that specifically address the question of the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients. However, data can be extrapolated from trials evaluating the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy in other high-risk patients. Hence, cancer patients should continue oral anticoagulant therapy for as long as the cancer remains active (usually at least 6 months). There still remain a number of unanswered questions about the clinical management of thromboembolism in the cancer patient.
Administration, Cutaneous↗
Venous thromboembolism in malignancy and malignancy in venous thromboembolism.
The activation of coagulation in patients with cancer contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality rates and may play a fundamental role in the host response to growing tumours. Patients with cancer are clearly at high risk for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly during chemotherapy and surgery. This situation is aggravated by the use of venous access catheters and possibly growth factors. Data derived from large, randomized, controlled trials have been used to determine the true incidence of this complication of cancer and its treatment. The incidence based on the analyses of these randomized controlled trials varies from 1% for limited stage patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen to 60% for patients with any type of cancer who are subjected to orthopaedic surgery and do not receive prophylactic therapy. In view of the morbidity and mortality attributable to VTE in cancer, widespread utilization of prophylactic anticoagulation therapy, which has proven safe and effective in a variety of situations, should be considered. While migratory thrombophlebitis is a clear indicator of an underlying neoplasm, the risk of cancer in patients with the more typical form of VTE has been the subject of intense debate over recent years. Some investigators have suggested that the relative risk of being diagnosed with an occult cancer within 6 months of an episode of VTE (particularly recurrent VTE) could be up to 10-fold. However, the cost-effectiveness of aggressive screening for cancer in patients with VTE has not yet been defined adequately.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Progress of clinical oncology guidelines development using the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle: the role of practitioner feedback.
PURPOSE: To present an update on the development of oncology practice guidelines (PGs) using the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle (Cycle), and to present the results of surveys of oncologists on the first 10 guidelines from the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. METHODS: Practitioners' opinions about guidelines in development were sought using a mail survey method with systematic follow-up. Practitioners were identified by cancer center representatives. Survey packages included evidence-based recommendations (EBRs) and a one-page, nine-item feedback questionnaire. Data were collected between February 1995 and February 1996. RESULTS: Nine hundred fourteen surveys that pertained to 10 guidelines were mailed to 423 practitioners in Ontario. Practitioners included 112 medical oncologists/hematologists, 34 radiation oncologists, 195 surgeons, and 82 practitioners from other medical specialities. One hundred practitioners were located in cancer centers and 323 had community-based practices. The overall response rate by practitioner was 72% and by survey questionnaire, 70%. For the five questionnaire items that assessed guideline quality, approval ratings ranged from 86% to 92%. For the 10 recommendations, 77% ( 63% to 82%) of respondents agreed that the EBR could be approved as a PG. Response and approval rates were consistent across medical specialities and locations of practice. CONCLUSION: The process of obtaining practitioner feedback in the development of PGs is both feasible and useful. The high response rates to the survey indicate that it is possible to obtain broad participation in evidence-based guidelines development throughout Ontario. The changes made to the EBRs in response to feedback suggest that practitioners' opinions can be valuable in shaping evidence-based guidelines.
Evidence-Based Medicine↗
Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
PURPOSE: To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphomide 75 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.
Adult↗
Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Administration, Oral↗
The effect of very-low-dose warfarin on markers of hypercoagulation in metastatic breast cancer: results from a randomized trial.
Malignancy is a risk factor for thromboembolism and anti-cancer chemotherapy can increase this risk. Prophylaxis of thrombosis with very-low-dose warfarin given concurrently with chemotherapy has a significantly reduced rate of thromboembolism in a randomized trial in women with stage IV breast cancer. In a group of 32 patients randomized in one center (16 subjects on warfarin and 16 on placebo), we have prospectively studied the plasma levels of: 1. Markers of 'in vivo' clotting activation (thrombin-antithrombin complex [TAT], prothrombin fragment 1+2 [F1+2] and D-dimer), 2. Factor VII (FVII), and 3. Natural anticoagulants (protein C [PC] and antithrombin [AT]). The aims of this study were: 1. to examine whether laboratory tests predicted those patients who developed thrombosis, and 2. to evaluate the effect of very-low-dose warfarin on hemostatic variables. The patients' hemostatic parameters were evaluated before entry into the study and after starting chemotherapy +/- prophylaxis, before each course for nine courses. Before-treatment results were compared to those of a sex and age-matched non-cancer control group. There was a significant elevation of plasma levels of TAT (p <0.001), F1+2 (p <0.001), D-dimer (p <0.0001) and FVIIa (p <0.05), as well as an increase of FVII proteolysis (p <0.05), whereas plasma PC and AT concentrations were not different from controls. After starting chemotherapy, markers of clotting activation were progressively lower in the group receiving warfarin prophylaxis compared to the group on placebo. Differences between the groups became statistically significant (p <0.01) after the 4th course of chemotherapy. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in two patients in the placebo arm. The results of this study indicate that before therapy, an hypercoagulable state is present in stage IV breast cancer, and after starting chemotherapy, abnormalities of hypercoagulation markers persist, however they are reduced by very-low-dose-warfarin. None of the laboratory variables could predict thrombosis in the single patient.
Adult↗
The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the physical and emotional health status, self-perceived problems, and needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients to determine and plan supportive care strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center during a 6-month period was performed. Patients with breast, colorectal, head and neck, lung, and prostate carcinoma as well as nonmelanoma of the skin were selected randomly. Patients were interviewed prior to their first appointment at the clinic. Physical health status was assessed using the Symptom Distress Scale, psychologic health status was assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), day-to-day functioning with the Rapid Disability Scale, and social support with the modified Sarason's Social Support Scale. Perceived needs were assessed in a number of ways, including identification of patients' specific social concerns and informational needs, and by asking them to list their current problems or concerns. RESULTS: Of 156 eligible patients, 134 completed the interview. One hundred and twenty-nine patients (96%) reported current symptoms that included fatigue (66%), worried outlook (61%), difficulty sleeping (48%), and pain (42%). Forty-four patients (33%) were identified as psychologically distressed with a GHQ score of > or = 6. One hundred and fourteen patients (85%) had informational needs, 89 (66%) indicated > or = 1 social concerns, and 55 (41%) reported a need for assistance with day-to-day living. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with newly diagnosed cancer commonly report symptoms related to fatigue, pain, and psychologic distress. Other frequently reported issues relate to the need for information and social concerns regarding the patients' ability to take care of their home and maintain family and other relationships. Awareness of these issues is important for planning supportive care interventions for newly diagnosed cancer patients.
Aged↗
Fibrinogenolysis and thrombin generation after reduced dose bolus or conventional rt-PA for pulmonary embolism. The Coagulation Project Investigators of the Bolus Alteplase Pulmonary Embolism Group.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects on fibrinogenolysis and thrombin generation of two recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimens in patients with pulmonary embolism entering a randomised, controlled study with a 1:2 allocation ratio to rt-PA, 100 mg over 2 h (Group A) or rt-PA, 0.6 mg/kg, maximum dose 50 mg, over 15 min (Group B). In both groups the heparin infusion was stopped 2-4 h before starting thrombolytic treatment and resumed accordingly to the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or thrombin clotting time (TcT). Seventeen patients in Group A and 30 patients in Group B were evaluated before starting thrombolytic treatment and 2, 6 and 24 h after its end for the following parameters: aPTT, TcT, fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), plasmin-alpha 2 antiplasmin (PAP) and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) complexes. The two groups had similar coagulation parameters at baseline. Two h after starting rt-PA, the aPTT was more prolonged in Group A than in Group B patients (P = 0.01). Patients in Group B showed less reduction in plasma fibrinogen levels at all study times after rt-PA treatment (P = 0.008). The increase in plasma FDP (P = 0.037) and PAP (P = 0.001) levels was lower at 2 and 6 h samples in Group B compared with Group A. TcT was prolonged (P = 0.003) and TAT increased (P = 0.001) during treatment without differences between the two groups. AUC0-24 of fibrinogen, FDP and PAP levels confirmed the statistically significant differences (P = 0.04) between the two groups over the entire 24 h period of the study. Three patients in Group A (17.6%) and three (10.0%) in Group B suffered major or other important bleeding. Our results indicate that the administration of weight-adjusted reduced-dose rt-PA bolus produces less impairment of blood coagulation than the FDA approved regimen.
Adult↗