Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Morrow

Publications and source records attributed to M Morrow.

117 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Expression of epithelial mucins Muc1, Muc2, and Muc3 in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Epithelial mucins are glycoproteins secreted by epithelial cells and their carcinomas. At least nine mucin genes have been identified, and their products (MUC1-MUC9) are expressed in various epithelia. MUC1 is a mucin expressed in breast epithelial cells, whereas MUC2 and MUC3 are primarily intestinal mucins. Although MUC1 and MUC2 expression has been documented in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, mucin expression in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been investigated. Sixty-one of 105 cases of DCIS without coexisting infiltrating carcinoma diagnosed during a 30-month period were selected as having sufficient tissue for study. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained using immunohistochemical techniques with mouse monoclonal anti-MUC1, anti-MUC2, and rabbit-specific polyclonal anti-MUC3 antibodies. Immunoreactive epitopes of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC3 were expressed in DCIS in 61, 19, and 16 of 61 cases, respectively. MUC2 and MUC3 staining intensity in DCIS was markedly less than that observed for MUC1. Luminal and/or cytoplasmic patterns of staining were observed for MUC1. MUC2 and MUC3 showed only cytoplasmic staining. Cytoplasmic-only staining of MUC1 was associated with a higher grade of DCIS. Any MUC2 staining was also associated with a higher grade of DCIS. Coexpression of MUC2 and MUC3 was present in only 6 of 61 cases, and MUC3 staining was unrelated to the grade of DCIS. Cytoplasmic expression of MUC1 and MUC2 appears to be associated with a higher grade of DCIS. MUC3 expression appears to be independent of grade and expression of MUC1 and MUC2. The relationship of mucin expression and grade warrants further study.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Quality in cancer care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

The increased use of screening mammography in the past two decades has led to a marked increase in the number of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ. Treatment has traditionally involved mastectomy, but this approach has come under increasing scrutiny, and the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ has become one the most controversial areas in the field of breast disease. This article reviews current concepts regarding the diagnosis, natural history, and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Breast Neoplasms↗

The woman at increased risk for breast cancer: evaluation and management strategies.

Increased understanding of risk factors for breast cancer, especially the identification of genes associated with a predisposition to breast cancer, has focused attention on the issue of breast cancer prevention. At present, the only clinically available method of breast cancer prevention is prophylactic mastectomy. However, there are no absolute indications for its use, and it is not often appropriate in relation to actual risk for disease. This article reviews what is known about major breast cancer risk factors, reviews the available data on prophylactic mastectomy, and discusses current strategies for the management of the woman at increased risk for breast cancer.

Adult↗

Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: a report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists.

A national task force consisting of members from the American College of Radiology, the American College of Surgeons, and the College of American Pathologists examined the issues surrounding stereotactic core-needle biopsy for occult breast lesions. Their report includes indications and contraindications, informed consent, specimen handling, and management of indeterminate, atypical, or discordant lesions.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Evaluation of common breast problems: guidance for primary care providers.

The evaluation of common breast problems requires an assessment of the patient's risks and symptoms and a thorough physical examination. When indicated, appropriate imaging studies should be done, the patient should be referred to a surgeon or a breast specialist, and operative interventions should be used.

Adult↗

Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base, 2000.

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) is the empirical data collection and analysis arm of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, and is supported in part by the American Cancer Society. The NCDB collects oncology patient demographic information, diagnostic and treatment information, and outcomes data from a broad spectrum of hospital-based cancer registries throughout the US, ranging from large research and teaching facilities to small community hospitals. Through this unique network, data are aggregated and reported back to participating hospitals to allow individual facilities to evaluate local patient care practices and outcomes. This article highlights the principal findings of articles published in 1999 and early 2000 that used NCDB data as the empirical basis of their analyses. Included among these are articles on breast cancer, gastric carcinoma, head and neck cancers, leukemia, liver carcinoma, lung cancer, parathyroid tumors, prostate carcinoma, small bowel adenocarcinoma, testicular malignancies, and vulvar melanoma. These articles are based on cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1996. The NCDB has accrued more than 6.4 million cancer cases for this time period. Sufficient numbers of rare cancers are reported to the NCDB to permit some types of clinical evaluation not possible using other data sources.

Adult↗