Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Marty

Publications and source records attributed to M Marty.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

[Clinical activity spectrum of irinotecan].

Irinotecan (CPT11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is a new cytotoxic agent with a broad spectrum of clinical activity. Two main schedules have been studied and produce similar activity and side-effects: the "european" one--350 mg/m2 every 21 days-, and the "japanese-north american" one where CPT11 is given at a weekly dose of 100-120 mg/m2 for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2 week rest period. Activity was initially characterized in advanced colorectal cancers; response rates, disease free-survival and overall survival were 11%, 7-10 months and 8-11 months in patients failing fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy--statistically improved as compared to best supportive care and infusional fluorouracil-, and 20-30% in patients not previously treated. An interesting activity with response rates of 20-22% (increased to 65% in combination with CDDP) has been shown in relapsed cervix carcinomas; in gastric carcinomas response rates of 20% have been shown, reaching 48% in combination with CDDP. Response rates of 20-22%, increased to 40-60% when irinotecan was associated to CDDP have been reported in non small cell lung cancer and esophagal carcinomas. Further studies are needed for other GI tract cancers, ovarian and head and neck carcinomas while minimal or no clinically meaningful activity has been reported in advanced breast cancer, and haematological malignancies. Irinotecan can be combined to fluoropyrimidines, raltitrexed, cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin, to gemcitabine, etoposide, vinorelbine and taxanes with flexible schedules (weekly, every 2 weeks, every 21 days. Most of these combinations have an additive or supra additive activity. Its mechanism of action, the spectrum of activity and the acceptable risk-benefit ratio point to irinorecan as a major advance in the field of cytotoxic anticancer therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Prospects with docetaxel in the treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) has been shown to be one of the most active cytotoxic agents in patients with breast cancer, achieving response rates of 41% when used as second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (34% in anthracycline-refractory patients) and 50-72% when used as first-line therapy. In both situations meaningful response durations of 7-8 months have been obtained. Based on these results, docetaxel is a promising candidate for new therapeutic strategies in patients with breast cancer. Studies comparing docetaxel with paclitaxel or anthracyclines in first-line therapy are ongoing. These studies should allow for an unequivocal definition of activity of docetaxel, yet not alter--as such--therapeutic strategies. A number of regimens are currently being explored combining docetaxel with anthracyclines, vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. The preliminary conclusions are as follows: the main side-effect is non-cumulative neutropenia of short duration, and response rates are > 75%. Further, no cumulative cardiotoxicity has been observed with doxorubicin. The duration of response and length of the progression-free survival cannot yet be defined. Another option for combination chemotherapy is sequential combinations, the value of which has been demonstrated in advanced breast cancer as well as in the adjuvant setting. The short duration and non-cumulative character of docetaxel-induced neutropenia are good rationales for the use of dose-densified docetaxel-containing regimens. A dose of 100 mg/m2/14 days can be used as single-agent therapy. A phase I trial combining cyclophosphamide at doses increased from 750 to 1200 mg/m2 and docetaxel at doses increased from 66 to 100 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, is ongoing; at the first dose-levels, the combination appears feasible although cumulative asthenia has been observed. Further, responses have been observed at all dose levels. The value of single-agent chemotherapy added to tamoxifen has been emphasised for stage I-II breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. A randomised phase III study comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/day for 5 years) and epirubicin (50 mg/m2 days 1 and 8/28 days for 6 cycles) with the same regimen with epirubicin for 3 months followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2/21 days x 3) was initiated at the end of 1996. Thus, docetaxel is currently under study in most therapeutic situations to better define its impact on the prognosis and curability of patients with breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1997

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

High dose-intensity of irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in advanced cancer patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To assess, on a multicenter basis, the feasibility of treating advanced cancer patients with high-dose irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients who met the usual phase I criteria (26 men and nine women) were included. Primary tumor sites were colon, head and neck, unknown primary, kidney, liver, and others. All had been previously treated. Irinotecan was given at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (600 mg/m2) or the level below (500 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were entered in the four participating centers at the MTD of 600 mg/m2. This dose level was clearly shown not to be feasible: 14 patients (78%) had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, with febrile episodes in 11 patients; grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in nine patients; and one toxic death occurred. Subsequently, 17 not heavily pretreated patients were included at 500 mg/m2 and carefully monitored. The safety of this dose level was considered acceptable: 41% of patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 24% experienced grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, and no febrile granulocytopenia or toxic death occurred. Six partial responses were documented in metastatic colorectal cancer, all in patients who had previously received conventional chemotherapy, four in patients who had exhibited progressive disease under fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We plan to study the higher dose-intensity 500-mg/m2 level on good-risk and carefully monitored patients. This could enlarge the spectrum of tumors sensitive to irinotecan and improve the already good results observed in colorectal cancers.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Two consecutive phase II studies of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma who were resistant to previous treatment with fluoropyrimidines.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a platinum complex that possesses activity against human and murine cells in vitro and in vivo, including colorectal carcinoma-derived cell lines, and cells that have been selected for resistance to cisplatin. We report two consecutive phase II trials of L-OHP for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were entered in study I, and 51 patients in study II. All of the patients had tumor progression when they were treated, prior to their enrollment, with a fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen. In both trials treatment consisted of L-OHP, 130 mg/m2, by i.v. infusion for two hours; the treatment was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Response to therapy: Study I: Fifty-five patients were assessed for response. The response rate was 11% (95% CI, 0.03-0.19). Study II: All 51 patients were assessed for response. The response rate was 10% (95% CI, 0.017-0.18). The overall response rate for the 106 evaluated patients was 10% (95% CI, 0.046-0.16). Times to disease progression in responders were 4, 4, 4.5+, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6+, 9, and 13 months. The dose-limiting toxic effect was sensory peripheral neuropathy. The incidence of severe peripheral neuropathy grades was: Study I: grade 3, 23% of patients, and grade 4, 8% of patients. Severe neuropathy had a favorable course in all of the patients who had long-term neurologic follow-up. Diarrhea and myeloid impairment were minor. CONCLUSION: L-OHP produced modest, but definite antitumor activity in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma who were previously resistant to chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidines. Toxicity is within acceptable limits of tolerance at the dose and schedule of oxaliplatin used in this trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Rationale for the dosage and schedule of CPT-11 (irinotecan) selected for phase II studies, as determined by European phase I studies.

BACKGROUND: CPT-11 (irinotecan), a camptothecin-derived anticancer agent with DNA topoisomerase 1 inhibitory activity, has demonstrated a broad spectrum of in vitro and in vivo activity in solid tumour models including multidrug-resistant tumours. This review details the rationale for the dosage schedule of CPT-11 selected for phase II studies, based on the results of 3 European phase I dose-escalating trials in patients with solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks (schedule 1), once daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks (schedule 2) or once weekly every 3 out of 4 weeks (schedule 3). RESULTS: Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the major dose-limiting toxicities in all of the studies. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 115 and 145 mg/m2/day for schedules 2 and 3, respectively. With schedule 1, diarrhoea became dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2 but was manageable with high-dose loperamide therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 350 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks was chosen for further evaluation in early phase II studies, since this dosage regimen allowed the highest dose intensity with the least toxicity and was convenient for outpatient use. The place of higher doses (with intensive antidiarrhoeal support) and other administration schedules (e.g., protracted infusion) warrant further investigation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a combination chemotherapy regimen that contains epirubicin (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide [FEC]) is superior to the standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) combination in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) conducted a large randomized trial in which two alternative schedules were used according to participating center: CMF1 versus FEC1 and CMF2 versus FEC2. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-nine patients were entered onto the trial. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, no significant benefit for the anthracycline-containing regimen was observed in terms of relapse-free (P = .61) or overall survival (P = .13). FEC1 and CMF1 appear to be of similar efficacy, but there is a suggestion that FEC2 may be superior to CMF2, since patients who received FEC2 had improved overall (P = .02) and relapse-free survival (P = .03) rates. Nausea and vomiting and alopecia were more common in the epirubicin-containing regimen (P = .001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the FEC2 regimen, in which epirubicin replaced the methotrexate in CMF, is the preferable adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for premenopausal patients with operable axillary node-positive breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine and fluorouracil combination as first-line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study using a sequential group method.

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of the combination of Fluorouracil (5FU) and vinorelbine given as first-line therapy to patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As defined in the seven consecutive steps of a phase II group sequential design, 63 patients received 5FU 750 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days as a continuous infusion and vinorelbine 30 mg/ m2 on days 1 and 5 as a short intravenous (I/V) infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-one of 63 patients achieved an objective response, which allowed us to discontinue the study and reject a response rate less than 50% with a statistical power of 90%. The unbiased estimate of the response rate was 61.6%. Response rate did not differ significantly according to the following: (1) type of prior adjuvant therapy (none, n = 23; without anthracycline, n = 6; with anthracyline, n = 34); (2) site of metastatic disease; and (3) number of metastatic sites. The median time to progression was 8.4 months. The median response duration was 12.3 months, and the median duration of complete response (CR), from the first assessment of CR, was 7.3 months. The median overall survival time was 23 months (28.1 months for patients with a CR). The main toxicities (grades 3 and 4) were neutropenia (90% of patients), infection (12.7%), mucositis (37%), and constipation (9.5%). Nevertheless, treatment could be given on an outpatient basis to the majority of patients, and the median relative dose-intensity was 86%. CONCLUSION: This phase II study, which used a group-sequential design, shows that the combination of 5FU and vinorelbine is an active and tolerable regimen for the treatment of first metastatic progression of breast cancer. It provides an alternative regimen for patients who have previously received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy or in whom anthracyclines cannot be used.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: from experimentation to experience].

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, two of the most distressing side-effects of cancer chemotherapy, have been the subject of a number of fundamental and clinical investigations. These have led to the development of a novel class of antiemetic agents, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The pathophysiology of the emetic reflex and the clinical management of emesis are very complicated. Two experimental preclinical animal models are available (ferret and dog) and are particularly used to assess monochemotherapy as a single dose. Results are fairly good for acute nausea and vomiting. However, no optional animal model is available for the assessment of delayed and anticipated emesis. The clinical settings are so complex and variable that they preclude the development of an adequate model in all cases. It is also impossible to carry out clinical studies to assess each issue. Management of nausea and vomiting depends on the analysis by the physician of individual and drug-related parameters and on his own expertise. Scores can be assigned to each parameter and a decision tree can be elaborated to help the decision and improve the management of patients. The first goal is to obtain an optimal control of emesis from the very first cycle of chemotherapy in order to ensure good control during subsequent cycles.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

[Knee joint arthroscopy in the growth years].

An increasing number of children and adolescents are complaining about knee pain. Because of unspecific patient history and the difficulty of clinical examination a correct diagnosis can be made in only half of the patients. The importance of the diagnostic and therapeutic knee arthroscopy has therefore increased. Indication, technique, complications and results are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during phase I studies using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling and nonparametric maximum-likelihood estimation.

Docetaxel, a novel anticancer agent, was given to 26 patients by short i.v. infusion (1-2 h) at various dose levels (70-115 mg/m2, the maximum tolerated dose) during 2 phase I studies. Two population analyses, one using NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling) and the other using NPML (nonparametric maximum-likelihood), were performed sequentially to determine the structural model; estimate the mean population parameters, including clearance (Cl) and interindividual variability; and find influences of demographic covariates on them. Nine covariates were included in the analyses: age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, performance status, presence of liver metastasis, dose level, and type of formulation. A three-compartment model gave the best fit to the data, and the final NONMEM regression model for Cl was Cl = BSA(Theta1 + Theta02 x AGE), expressing Cl (in liters per hour) directly as a function of body surface area. Only these two covariates were considered in the NPML analysis to confirm the results found by NONMEM. Using NONMEM [for a patient with mean AGE (52.3 years) and mean BSA (1.68 m2)] and NPML, docetaxel Cl was estimated to be 35.6 l/h (21.2 lh-1 m-2) and 37.2 l/h with interpatient coefficients of variations (CVs) of 17.4% and 24.8%, respectively. The intraindividual CV was estimated at 23.8% by NONMEM; the corresponding variability was fixed in NPML in an additive Gaussian variance error model with a 20% CV. Discrepancies were found in the mean volume at steady state (Vss; 83.21 for NPML versus 1241 for NONMEM) and in terminal half-lives, notably the mean t1/2 gamma, which was shorter as determined by NPML (7.89 versus 12.2 h), although the interindividual CV was 89.1% and 62.7% for Vss and t1/2 gamma, respectively. However, the NPML-estimated probability density function (pdf) of t1/2 gamma was bimodal (5 and 11.4 h), probably due to the imbalance of the data. Both analyses suggest a similar magnitude of mean Cl decrease with small BSA and advanced age.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Phase II study of a new vinca alkaloid derivative, S12363, in advanced breast cancer.

Vinca alkaloids are widely used in the medical treatment of breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic activity of a new vinca alkaloid derivative, S12363 (vinfosiltine), which is 36 and 72 times more cytotoxic in vitro than vincristine and vinblastine, respectively. Because phase I studies did not allow a choice of the best treatment schedule, a randomization was performed between two schedules with the same dose intensity, that is, 0.3 mg/m2 given weekly or 0.6 mg/m2 given every 2 weeks. A total of 16 patients with advanced breast cancer who had failed a first-line treatment without any vinca alkaloid were entered in the study. Additionally, 6 women received the bimonthly regimen as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. Altogether, 17 patients received, prior to vinfosiltine, an anthracycline-based regimen given either as adjuvant (n = 4) or as first-line palliative treatment (n = 13). All 22 patients were evaluable for both toxicity and response. Neutropenia was the main toxic event (maximal toxicity per patient) with grade 3 (WHO) toxicity developing in 7/22 patients and grade 4, in 8/22. Other severe toxicities included leukopenia (n = 9), anemia (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1), constipation (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 1). No patient achieved a complete or partial response. Vinfosiltine does not appear to have significant single-agent activity in advanced breast cancer at the doses and the schedules used in our study.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Phase I-II and pharmacokinetic study of a new fotemustine schedule in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: Fotemustine, a new nitrosourea derivative has already demonstrated activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to improve its therapeutic index, we designed a protocol in which Fotemustine was delivered with dose escalation on 3 consecutive days as induction therapy followed by a 5-week rest period. Maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic data were assessed during this Phase I-II study and reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with metastatic (17) or locally advanced (2) NSCLC were included in the present study. Ten of those with metastatic disease had brain metastases and 15 had previously received chemotherapy. Fotemustine was given at 50 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 1: four patients), 75 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 2: 16 patients including two who had already received 50 mg/m2) and 100 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 3: one patient). RESULTS: The maximal tolerated dose was 75 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (total cumulated dose 225 mg/m2). At this dose level, we observed 25% of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and 31% of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. One patient died of pulmonary infection during aplasia. No other significant toxicity occurred. Of the 17 evaluable patients, one obtained a PR lasting 6 months in group 2 and 1 PR lasting 3 months in group 3. No significant difference was noted in the AUC between days 1, 2 or 3 in any of the seven patients in whom a pharmacokinetic study of Fotemustine was performed. CONCLUSION: Administered on 3 consecutive days, Fotemustine seems to be less effective and more toxic than other schedules tested in NSCLC. Despite the quality of the two responses observed, this protocol has been discontinued and the standard administration on days 1 and 8 remains the schedule of choice in NSCLC.

Adult↗