Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Markman

Publications and source records attributed to M Markman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Prevention and management of antineoplastic-induced hypersensitivity reactions.

Acute hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are an unpredictable and potentially catastrophic complication of treatment with chemotherapeutic agents. Reactions may affect any organ system in the body and range widely in severity from mild pruritus to systemic anaphylaxis. Certain classes of chemotherapeutic agents, such as the taxanes, platinum compounds, asparaginases, and epipodophyllotoxins are commonly associated with HSRs. The clinical characteristics of these high risk agents with respect to HSRs are discussed in this review. Protocols to prevent or reduce the severity of these reactions have been developed, but despite these attempts, HSRs will still happen. Should a reaction occur, it is imperative that it be recognised quickly in order to minimise exposure to the inciting agent and implement appropriate therapeutic and supportive measures. When a patient becomes sensitised to a chemotherapeutic agent, avoidance of re-exposure is the mainstay of future prevention. For sensitised patients who have derived clinically meaningful benefit from a particular agent, however, continuation of treatment with the agent is desirable. Options may include attempting a trial of desensitisation or treatment with a related compound. Virtually all patients demonstrating HSRs to paclitaxel and docetaxel are able to successfully tolerate re-treatment following discontinuation and administration of diphenhydramine and hydrocortisone. Re-treatment has generally been less successful with platinum compounds. with recurrent HSRs occurring in up to 50% of patients following desensitisation protocols. Patients sensitised to asparaginase are often able to tolerate the alternative preparations, Erwinia carotovora asparaginase or polyethylene glycol-modified Escherichia coli asparaginase. There is very little experience with re-treatment following sensitisation to the epipodophyllotoxins. As re-treatment may have serious consequences, careful consideration of the risks and benefits of these strategies is imperative when deciding among these options.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Intraperitoneal drug delivery of antineoplastics.

The administration of antineoplastic agents directly into the peritoneal cavity as treatment of localised cancer is based on sound pharmacokinetic principles. This unique technique has to the potential to optimise outcome in settings where preclinical and clinical data suggest that cytotoxicity of a specific drug against a particular tumour type is enhanced by either increasing the drug concentration or duration of exposure. Phase I trials have confirmed the safety and pharmacokinetic advantage for a number of agents delivered by the intraperitoneal relative to the systemic route, including cisplatin (10- to 20-fold advantage for regional delivery), carboplatin (10- to 20-fold advantage), and paclitaxel (1,000-fold advantage). In phase II trials, performed mostly in patients with ovarian cancer, this approach has achieved objective responses in settings where intravenous drug delivery has not achieved the desired effect (e.g. surgically documented complete response using intraperitoneal cisplatin as second-line therapy of ovarian cancer). Phase III trials employing intraperitoneal cisplatin as initial treatment of small volume advanced ovarian cancer have demonstrated that regional therapy results in a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in both progression-free and overall survival compared to intravenous cisplatin. Further exploration of this novel method of treatment, including the conduct of definitive randomised phase III clinical trials, is indicated in ovarian cancer and in other tumour types where clinical manifestations are principally localised to the peritoneal cavity.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Is there a role for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer?

Phase I and II clinical trial data have demonstrated the safety, pharmacokinetic advantage, and potential for enhanced cytotoxicity associated with the intraperitoneal administration of antineoplastic agents in the management of ovarian cancer. In two randomized phase III studies comparing the intraperitoneal and intravenous administration of cisplatin (Platinol) as initial therapy for small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal delivery of the agent produced superior progression-free and overall survival. Reluctance to employ intraperitoneal cisplatin in the standard management of ovarian cancer appears to be related to the added time, effort, and potential morbidity associated with the approach, as well as a general preference for the less toxic, less complicated carboplatin (Paraplatin)-based regimen. However, existing data support the use of this unique method of drug delivery in carefully selected patients outside of the clinical trial setting.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Supportive care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2000

Phase II evaluation of 24-h continuous infusion topotecan in recurrent, potentially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop an alternative effective and more convenient administration schedule for intravenous topotecan when used as palliative treatment in ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of 24-h infusional topotecan (8.5 mg/m(2)) with treatment repeated every 3 weeks in 29 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy with a minimum treatment-free interval >/=6 months). RESULTS: The major toxicities of therapy were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia which developed in 86 and 14% of patients, respectively. Other severe side effects were uncommon. Only 2 partial responses (7%) were observed in the 28 patients evaluable for response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively favorable ovarian cancer patient population treated in this trial (platinum-sensitive recurrent disease), the response rate was disappointingly low. Considering the three- to fivefold higher objective response rates observed in other trials employing topotecan in individuals with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer utilizing a 5-day treatment program (delivered every 3 weeks), the results of the current study provide strong support for the conclusion that clinically relevant antineoplastic activity of this agent is highly schedule dependent.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Declining CA-125 in an ovarian cancer patient with progression of measurable disease: a rational hypothesis for discordant results.

OBJECTIVES: While a declining CA-125 has been demonstrated to be a useful indicator of response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer, occasional patients will demonstrate discordant results between the level of this antigen and changes in the size of measurable tumor masses. CASE: The patient was seen in the Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center. RESULTS: This patient exhibited a "major response" by CA-125 criteria, significant shrinkage of multiple peritoneal and perirectal implants, but clear progression of a pelvic side wall mass. The discordant results in this case are likely an example of a "mixed response" to the chemotherapy regimen, with the declining CA-125 corresponding to shrinkage of the responding tumor cell population. CONCLUSION: An evaluation of changes in both the serum CA-125 level and measurable masses may represent a more complete analysis of the status of disease in an individual with ovarian cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The antiemetic efficacy of oral ondansetron plus intravenous dexamethasone in patients with gynecologic malignancies receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a cost-effective prophylactic antiemetic regimen for the prevention of carboplatin-induced emesis. METHODS: Patients being treated in the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center with a carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimen received a prophylactic antiemetic program consisting of a single dose of oral ondansetron (16 mg) plus intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg) approximately 30 min prior to chemotherapy. Evaluation of the effectiveness of this antiemetic regimen was performed during a single treatment course. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (median age, 62; range, 41-83) participated in this phase 2 trial. Three patients received single-agent carboplatin, and 24 were treated with either a carboplatin/paclitaxel or carboplatin/docetaxel regimen. The carboplatin AUC dosing level was 4, 5, or 6 in 6, 5, and 16 individuals, respectively. No patient developed vomiting; 2 (7%) individuals experienced nausea during the 24-h period following chemotherapy administration. CONCLUSION: The combination of a single dose of oral ondansetron (16 mg) plus intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg) is an effective prophylactic antiemetic regimen for patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Limits to the "benefits" from our oncologic interventions: a case report.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to discuss the potential implications of prolonged and aggressive treatment of long-term survivors of ovarian cancer. METHODS: A case report of a patient with ovarian cancer extensively treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and aggressive surgery is presented. RESULTS: A woman with a >15-year history of ovarian cancer experienced severe neurotoxicity (peripheral neuropathy, hearing loss), underwent aggressive resection of asymptomatic and long-standing metastatic disease in the liver (with tumor recurrence <1 year after surgery), and subsequently died of secondary acute leukemia. CONCLUSION: It is critical that oncologists remember that the theoretical benefits of available anti-neoplastic interventions must be carefully and constantly weighted against the potential harm they may cause.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2000

Safety and efficacy of adjuvant single-agent ifosfamide in uterine sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The role of adjuvant therapy for completely resected uterine sarcoma continues to be debated. Previous chemotherapy trials have shown little, if any, advantage over surgery alone, with significant added toxicity. To our knowledge, the current study is the first to evaluate adjuvant ifosfamide in completely resected uterine sarcomas. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1999, 13 consecutive patients with completely resected moderate- to high-grade uterine sarcoma received three cycles of adjuvant ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2)/day x 3 days, repeated every 28 days). Mesna was given 30 min prior to infusion. Postinfusion mesna was administered to 10 of the patients in the outpatient setting utilizing a subcutaneous infusion pump. The remaining 3 patients received traditional intravenous mesna at 4 and 8 h after infusion. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the patient population was 26 months. For early-stage patients (n = 10), the 2-year progression-free survival was 60%, with a median of 26 months. The 2-year overall survival was 100%, dropping to 67% at 3 years. Early-stage patients showed an advantage in both progression-free and overall survival. Early-stage patients with mixed müllerian tumor (MMT) had a significantly longer time to progression that those with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (2-year progression-free survival of 100% versus 33%; P = 0.019). Three patients required dose reduction secondary to grade 2-3 toxicities (neutropenia x2, nausea and vomiting x1). All significant toxicity was eliminated with dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant ifosfamide appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients with completely resected uterine sarcoma. It can easily be given in the outpatient setting if mesna is administered via a subcutaneous pump. Our data, consistent with previous studies in advanced sarcoma, suggest a potentially greater role for ifosfamide in MMT than in LMS.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase 2 trial of liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2)) in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) to be an active antineoplastic agent in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, with dose limiting toxicity of the standard dosing regimen (50 mg/m(2) q 4 weeks) being severe erythrodysesthesia ("hand-foot syndrome") and stomatitis. We wished to develop a more tolerable liposomal doxorubicin treatment regimen and document its level of activity in a well-defined patient population with platinum/paclitaxel-refractory disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with ovarian or fallopian tube cancers or primary peritoneal carcinoma with platinum/paclitaxel-refractory disease (stable or progressive disease following treatment with these agents or previous objective response <3 months in duration) were treated with liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) q 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients (median age: 60; range 41-81) entered this phase 2 trial. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (range: 1-6). Six (12%) and 4 (8%) patients experienced grade 2 hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis, respectively (no episodes of grade 3). One patient developed grade 3 diarrhea requiring hospitalization for hydration. Six (12%) individuals required dose reductions. The median number of courses of liposomal doxorubicin administered on this protocol was 2 (range: 1-12). Four of 44 patients (9%) evaluable for response exhibited objective and subjective evidence of an antineoplastic effect of therapy. CONCLUSION: This modified liposomal doxorubicin regimen results in less toxicity (stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome) than the standard FDA-approved dose schedule. Definite, although limited, antineoplastic activity is observed in patients with well-defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Treatment of relapsed carcinoma of the ovary with single-agent paclitaxel following exposure to paclitaxel and platinum employed as initial therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of paclitaxel to achieve a second clinical response in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma who responded to standard therapy with platinum and paclitaxel in the initial setting. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with epithelial ovarian who demonstrated a complete response to paclitaxel and platinum in the initial treatment setting were retreated with paclitaxel as a single agent for relapse of their disease. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 135-175 mg/m(2) over 3 h at 21-day intervals. Fifteen patients had platinum-resistant disease and 19 had potentially platinum-sensitive disease. Response was documented by physical examination, serial serum CA125 measurement, or radiologic evaluation. RESULTS: An objective response to paclitaxel retreatment was demonstrated in 15 patients (44%), with a median progression-free interval (PFI) of 8.6 months (range 4-17 months). An additional 14 patients (41%) demonstrated disease stabilization, with a median PFI of 7.4 months (range 3-13 months). Overall, retreatment with paclitaxel was well tolerated, with minimal cumulative toxicities, despite repetitive dosing. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that patients with ovarian cancer who relapse after initial treatment with paclitaxel often have disease that is still responsive to the agent. Given its relative lack of cumulative toxicity, retreatment with paclitaxel as a single agent is a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2000

Experience with prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin in gynecological cancer patients developing severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

The development of significant neutropenia is a relatively frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy of malignant disease. In an effort to develop a cost-effective management strategy to prevent serious infectious events associated with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, patients treated in the Gynecological Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center have been administered ciprofloxacin, a potent broad-spectrum antibiotic, 500 mg orally twice a day, beginning at the time of documentation of grade 4 neutropenia. The antibiotic is continued until granulocyte recovery. A total of 44 patients (57 treatment courses) have been treated in this manner. There have been no complications of therapy and no episodes of subsequent infections due to ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms. Two patients required hospital admission following the development of significant fever, despite the use of ciprofloxacin. While these results are encouraging and suggest that the use of prophylactic ciprofloxacin is a highly cost-effective management approach in this setting, randomized controlled trials are necessary to define the ultimate benefit of this clinical strategy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions: experience of the gynecologic oncology program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: : This study expands the existing limited data as to whether patients developing clinically significant paclitaxel-induced hypersensitivity reactions can continue to be treated with this important antineoplastic agent and how such retreatment might be undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: More than 450 patients received paclitaxel, either as a single agent or in a combination regimen, for a female pelvic malignancy in the Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center from January 1995 through December 1998. RESULTS: Of the more than 450 patients, 44 (approximately 9%) developed at least one episode of a clinically relevant hypersensitivity reaction to the cytotoxic drug. All 43 individuals (plus an additional four patients referred to our center after having previously experienced a severe paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reaction at another institution) who were retreated with paclitaxel were ultimately able to receive the agent. Five patients required treatment with a standardized desensitization regimen, developed by our group, to successfully receive paclitaxel. DISCUSSION: On the basis of this large single-institution study of paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions, we conclude that with appropriate precautions essentially all individuals experiencing these reactions can be safely treated with this agent.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Second-line treatment of ovarian cancer.

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are often diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Although clinical complete remissions are obtained in the majority of patients through a combination of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, relapse is common. A number of agents with diverse biologic mechanisms have been identified with activity in the setting of recurrent disease. Strategies for management of patients with recurrent disease, including classification, treatment goals, and therapeutic options will be reviewed.

Antineoplastic Agents↗