The role of platinum dose intensity in the management of ovarian cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Markman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Recent attention has focused on evaluating those clinical situations in which intraperitoneal drug delivery may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer. When employed as a second-line strategy, approximately 20% to 30% of patients with small-volume residual disease (microscopic, largest tumor mass < or = 0.5 to 1 cm in maximum diameter) at initiation of treatment are expected to achieve a surgically documented complete response with a variety of organoplatinum-based intraperitoneal regimens. However, responses are rarely observed in such patients who have failed to demonstrate tumor sensitivity to systemically delivered organoplatinum drugs, despite the presence of small-volume residual disease. Investigators at several centers are currently exploring a possible role for regional drug delivery in the initial management of selected patients (ie, small-volume disease) with ovarian cancer. A recently reported trial of intraperitoneal taxol suggests this may be an ideal drug for regional therapy of ovarian cancer due to a major pharmacokinetic advantage associated with this route of drug delivery.
The safety and pharmacology of the intraperitoneal administration of Taxol was evaluated by treatment of 25 patients (24 with ovarian cancer) on a phase I dose-escalation trial. The drug was delivered in 2 L of normal saline every 3 to 4 weeks, with a starting dose of 25 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was abdominal pain at Taxol doses greater than 125 mg/m2. A 3-log pharmacokinetic advantage for peritoneal cavity exposure to Taxol, compared to the systemic compartment, was demonstrated following intraperitoneal delivery. In addition, high levels of Taxol persisted within the cavity for more than 48 hours following a single treatment. Despite the major pharmacokinetic advantage for peritoneal cavity exposure, significant concentrations of Taxol were demonstrated within the systemic compartment after intraperitoneal treatment. Several patients exhibited clinical and laboratory evidence of an antitumor response. Further exploration of a possible role for the intraperitoneal administration of Taxol in the management of ovarian cancer appears indicated.
One possible explanation for the failure of the high concentrations of cytotoxic agents achieved following intraperitoneal (i.p.) drug delivery to produce a favorable response in patients with ovarian cancer is the inability of the drug-containing fluid to be adequately distributed throughout the peritoneal cavity, usually because of intraabdominal adhesion formation. To evaluate the influence of the severity of adhesions, observed at the time of laparotomy performed immediately preceding the initiation of i.p. therapy, on the ability to achieve a surgically defined complete response (S-CR), we retrospectively reviewed the operative reports of 70 patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer treated on one of three phase-2 salvage i.p. trials at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The S-CR rate in the 36 patients with limited adhesion formation observed upon entering the peritoneal cavity was 28%, compared to 35% in the 34 patients with extensive adhesions (P greater than 0.05). In 33 patients treated with a phase-2 cisplatin-based i.p. program, who had previously responded to systemic platinum, 47% (8/17) and 44% (7/16) of those with limited and extensive adhesions, respectively, achieved a S-CR (P greater than 0.05). We conclude that the presence of extensive adhesions observed within the peritoneal cavity at the time of a laparotomy performed immediately prior to the initiation of i.p. therapy does not have a negative impact on the potential to achieve an S-CR, assuming it is technically feasible to lyse all significant adhesions prior to the completion of the operative procedure.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Eighteen previously treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer were entered into a phase 2 trial of chronic low-dose oral etoposide (50 mg/day for 20 days, repeated every 28 days) to determine the activity of this therapeutic strategy in organoplatinum-refractory disease. The treatment program was generally well tolerated, with mild neutropenia the most common side-effect encountered. One patient (6%; 95% confidence interval = 0-17%) achieved a partial response, which lasted for 11 months. Three additional patients (17%), who failed to meet the criteria of a partial response, demonstrated objective evidence of antineoplastic activity. Chronic low-dose oral etoposide administration is associated with definite, although modest, activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In an effort to examine the potential clinical utility of intraperitoneal (i.p.) therapy in the management of patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, 19 individuals with this disease were treated with a cisplatin-based i.p. treatment regimen. All but 1 patient also received i.p. mitomycin. The treatment was generally well tolerated, although a maximum of only four or five courses of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 every 28 days) and mitomycin (5-10 mg/treatment given 7 days after each i.p. cisplatin administration) could be administered, the treatment principally being stopped because of disease progression or catheter failure. Of 15 patients with malignant ascites, 7 (47%) experienced control of fluid reaccumulation ranging from 2 months to 73+ months (median 8 months). While the median survival for the 19 patients was only 9 months, 4 (21%) patients survived for more than 3 years from the initiation of therapy, and 2 patients are currently alive and clinically disease-free more than 5 years from the start of the i.p. treatment program. We conclude that a subset of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma, principally those with small-volume residual disease following surgical tumor debulking, can benefit from a cisplatin-based i.p. treatment strategy with control of ascites and prolonged disease-free survival.
Approximately 20%-40% of patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer, following systemically administered platinum-based chemotherapy, will respond to a second-line intraperitoneal treatment regimen. In an effort to improve the selection criteria for patients being considered for this regional therapeutic approach, we retrospectively evaluated the influence of pretreatment CA-125 levels on the ability of a group of 70 patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer (no tumor mass greater than 1 cm in diameter) to achieve a surgically defined complete response (S-CR) following treatment on one of three phase-2 intraperitoneal chemotherapy trials conducted at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Overall, 18/46 (39%) patients with normal pretreatment CA-125 levels (less than or equal to units/ml) achieved a S-CR, compared to only 4/24 patients (17%) with an elevated pretreatment value (chi 2 = 3.7, P greater than 0.5). Despite the lower S-CR rate in patients with elevated CA-125 levels, the duration of response and survival were similar in the two patient populations achieving a S-CR. Thus, we conclude that an elevated pretreatment CA-125 level in a patient with small-volume residual ovarian cancer should not be used by itself to disqualify an individual from consideration for a second-line intraperitoneal treatment regimen, although the finding suggests a reduced likelihood of achieving a S-CR with this therapeutic approach.
Second-line intraperitoneal (i.p.) therapy has been demonstrated to result in surgically defined complete responses (S-CR) in 25%-40% of patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer (microscopic disease or largest tumor mass less than 1 cm in diameter). To evaluate the influence of the surgical finding of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis on the S-CR rate to salvage i.p. therapy in this patient population, we retrospectively reviewed the operative reports of 70 patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer treated on one of three phase-2 second-line i.p. trials at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Of the 11 patients with diffuse carcinomatosis, none achieved a S-CR compared to a S-CR rate of 37% (22/59) in patients without this surgical finding (chi 2 = 6.0; P less than 0.025). However, of the 7 patients with diffuse carcinomatosis treated on a cisplatin-based i.p. program, the only 2 who had previously responded to systemic platinum also experienced a response (partial) to the i.p. cisplatin regimen. In conclusion, while the surgical finding of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis indicates a poor prognosis in patients with small-volume residual ovarian cancer for response to i.p. chemotherapy, patients in this clinical setting with prior evidence of platinum sensitivity may experience some benefit from an i.p. cisplatin-based treatment strategy.
To evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin-based therapy as salvage treatment of ovarian cancer, 46 patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer following initial systemic chemotherapy were treated with a regimen of carboplatin (200-300 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2) administered on a monthly schedule. A maximum of six courses of therapy was delivered, followed by a response laparotomy. The treatment program was well tolerated, except for bone marrow suppression, with one-quarter of patients developing platelet count depressions to < or = 50,000/mm3, and one-third experiencing hemoglobin levels of < or = 8 g/dl during treatment. Twelve (38%) of 32 patients evaluable for efficacy of the treatment program achieved a surgically documented response, including 8 (25%) complete responses. Of 25 patients whose largest tumor mass at the initiation of therapy measured < or = 0.5 cm, 11 (44%) responded, including 8 (32%) complete responses. We conclude that the IP administration of carboplatin can result in surgically documented responses when used in the salvage setting in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The relative efficacy of carboplatin versus cisplatin when administered by the IP route to patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum-based systemic therapy remains to be defined.
Five versus ten cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) were compared in advanced ovarian carcinoma by a prospective randomized study of 78 patients, 41 receiving 5 cycles (CAP5) and 37 receiving 10 cycles (CAP10) of chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by histologic grade and size of residual disease. Cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2, doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, were administered every 4 weeks for 5 or 10 cycles. Second-look laparotomy was performed to evaluate response and plan further therapy. CAP5 patients found a second-look laparotomy to have partially responded to chemotherapy were treated with 5 additional cycles of CAP. CAP10 was more toxic than CAP5 with respect to myelosuppression, hospital admissions for nadir fever, median elevation of creatinine, and degree of peripheral neuropathy. Median follow-up is 64 months. CAP5 and CAP10 were equivalent in surgically documented complete responses (34 versus 35%) and survival (P = 0.41). Twelve partial responders to CAP5 received additional CAP chemotherapy; one complete response resulted. We conclude that CAP5 is preferable to CAP10 in treatment of advanced ovarian cancer as it is equally effective and less toxic.
The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial of intraperitoneal (ip) cisplatin plus recombinant human alpha-interferon in patients with small-volume persistent/recurrent ovarian cancer. This study was based on the known single agent activity of the drugs administered by the ip route and experimental evidence of cytotoxic synergy between the agents. In 18 evaluable patients, only 1 partial response was observed (5.5% response rate). In an effort to explain these disappointing findings, patients were retrospectively divided into two groups; those with favorable disease (documented response to systemic platinum and absence of surgical findings of diffuse carcinomatosis at laparotomy prior to initiation of ip therapy) or unfavorable disease (no evidence of response to systemic platinum and/or laparotomy findings of diffuse carcinomatosis before ip treatment). The favorable patient population would be predicted to have a far greater chance of responding to local therapy, but only 3 of the evaluable patients fell into this category. In the 15 unfavorable patients, only 1 partial response was observed (7% response rate). We conclude that patients who have failed to demonstrate a response to systemic cisplatin or carboplatin or who have diffuse carcinomatosis at second-look laparotomy are poor candidates for second-line ip cisplatin-based therapy, even if they are considered to have small-volume residual disease (each individual tumor nodules less than 0.5-1 cm). Such patients should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies.
Over the past year, a number of important papers have appeared in the medical literature dealing with the chemotherapeutic management of gynecologic cancers. Among these papers, several studies have again demonstrated the superiority of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens for ovarian cancer compared with non-platinum-containing regimens, and have confirmed the equivalence of carboplatin to cisplatin in advanced disease. A number of trials have reported activity for intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens in patients with small-volume residual disease. In endometrial cancer, combination cisplatin-based chemotherapy programs have been reported to achieve an overall 40% to 50% objective response rate. Although induction chemotherapy has been advocated in the management of advanced localized cervical cancer, this conclusion has yet to be supported by the results of randomized trials. The etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine regimen has been demonstrated to be highly effective in patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors. Finally, a recent report has demonstrated that it is possible to perform conservative surgery in patients with germ cell tumors to preserve fertility without compromising therapeutic efficacy.
PURPOSE: There is a critical need to find new antineoplastic drugs that are active in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of single-agent ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with an organoplatinum compound to assess its activity in this clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ifosfamide (1.0 or 1.2 g/m2/d for 5 days, delivered on a monthly schedule) was administered to the 57 patients entered onto this trial. Dose reductions were permitted for unacceptable toxicities. RESULTS: Toxicity included severe bone marrow suppression (WBC count less than 1,000/microL and/or platelet count less than 50,000/microL), renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level greater than 2.0 mg/dL), and reversible CNS dysfunction (disorientation, hallucinations, somnolence, and agitation), which occurred in 20%, 14%, and 12% of patients, respectively. Of 41 patients with strictly defined platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, five (12%) demonstrated a partial (four) or complete (one) response to this treatment program. CONCLUSION: Single-agent ifosfamide has modest but unequivocal activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Further studies of this drug used as a front-line agent along with an organoplatinum compound or as part of a dose-intensification program with bone marrow, peripheral stem cell, or colony-stimulating factor support are indicated. In addition, single-agent ifosfamide is a reasonable standard second-line treatment strategy in appropriately selected patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.