PubMed1999
OBJECTIVES: Participation in a Round Robin study of potentiostatic corrosion test guidelines for dental amalgam was undertaken for the purpose of developing an accurate set of draft guidelines. METHODS: Dispersalloy, sybraloy, aristalloy, phasealloy, and tytin were used as the amalgam specimens. They were prepared following the guidelines, then coupled to a copper wire, cemented into glass tubes, and polished to a 600-grit finish. A corrosion cell was prepared using a carbon counter-electrode, a standard calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, and amalgam as the working electrode. A 37 degrees C solution of 10 g/l NaCl with a minimum volume of 300 ml was used. Within 5 min of polishing, the open circuit potential (OCP) was recorded for 10 min. Next, the specimen was polarized to 0 mV versus SCE, and the currents were recorded for a 24-h time period. Corrosion results were analyzed statistically with one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) and the multiple comparisons Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. RESULTS: Problems that occurred with evaporation, beaker size, carbon electrode length, SCE cap removal, glass tube fracture, polishing technique, and fresh electrolyte are easily avoidable with further explanation or reminder notes. Observations made concerning starting time, initial OCP recording, millivoltage, and solution temperature were determined to be necessary for the accuracy of test results. Analysis of results should include clarification of units, and graph interpretations. Finally, the number of specimens per amalgam should be increased from one to three so that statistical analysis can be performed. Using three specimens per amalgam, the method revealed corrosion susceptibility as measured by the improved test: aristalloy > sybraloy > (dispersalloy, phasealloy, tytin). SIGNIFICANCE: Having run the initially proposed guidelines, a number of clarifying changes were made so that the corrosion susceptibilities of five dental amalgams could be clearly differentiated.
American Dental Association↗