Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Maquilan

Publications and source records attributed to M Maquilan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Feasibility, safety, and determinants of extraction time of percutaneous extraction of endocardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads by intravascular countertraction method.

Previous studies of the removal of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads have been restricted to case reports or small series. In this report, we describe our experience in ICD lead extraction by intravascular countertraction method using Cook's extraction kit. A total of 47 high-voltage (HV) leads, 3 rate sensing (S) leads, and 2 subcutaneous arrays were removed from 42 patients (33 men, 9 women; mean age 59 years [range 14 to 81]). One HV superior vena cava (SVC) lead and 11 HV right ventricular (RV) leads were explanted by manual traction only and defined in the "lead removal" category. One S lead was removed using a femoral venous approach. The remaining 37 leads were explanted by SVC approach using extraction sheaths and defined in the "lead extraction" category. Twenty leads were extracted for "infectious" (group A) and 17 leads for "noninfectious" (group B) etiologies for which extraction times of 27.0+/-18.0 and 27.0+/-15.0 minutes (mean+/-SD), respectively, were not different. Although extraction time, 34.0+/-11.0 minutes, for leads implanted for >48 months was longer than 23.0+/-16.0, 28.0+/-18.0, and 24.0+/-14.0 minutes, for leads with implant durations of 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively, such differences were not statistically significant. The extraction time, however, was directly related to the degree of fibrosis around the lead, 39.0+/-15.0 minutes for leads with severe fibrosis compared with 13.0+/-6.0 minutes for the leads with mild fibrosis (p<0.001). Patient's age, sex, or history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery did not significantly affect extraction time. All except the initial 2 lead extractions were performed in the electrophysiology laboratory. No mortality or serious complications associated with the procedure using these methods were observed.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1997

Extraction and replacement of permanent pacemaker leads through occluded vessels: use of extraction sheaths as conduits--balloon venoplasty as an adjunct.

Patients (pts) may present for lead extraction with symptomatic or asymptomatic subclavian vein or superior vena cava thrombosis. Replacement of permanent pacemaker leads (PPLs) in these pts may be difficult and may require accessing a new site. We examined the utility of replacing PPLs through completely occluded vessels using extraction sheaths as conduits through the total occlusion. Over six years, a total of 210 atrial and/or ventricular PPLs were extracted from 137 pts. Two pts presented with angiographically documented thrombotic occlusion of the subclavian vein. One additional pt. who had presented with a superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, had a totally occluded innominate vein and SVC occlusion. Balloon venoplasty was used as an adjunct to dilate the SVC. In all pts, after PPLs were removed via a subclavian extraction sheath through the occluded vessel, the retained sheath was used to place a guide wire, then a peel away dilating sheath, to insert new PPLs, in each case on the side of total venous occlusion. Seven PPLs and two lead fragments were extracted, and five new PPLs replaced, ipsilateral to the venous occlusion. These data show that extraction of PPLs through thrombosed veins may be performed successfully and may not require replacing the leads through a new site. This technique spares the pt the need to access the opposite subclavian vein, and it avoids an excessive number of PPLs in the subclavian vein and SVC. The procedure illustrates an efficient means to reintroduce new PPLs with the potential to reduce associated morbidity, since repeat puncture of the subclavian vein is not required. Safety of the procedure as a whole must be considered with regard to the known risks of lead extraction, some complications of which may be substantial using current techniques.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Clinical experience with a new multiprogrammable dual chamber pacemaker.

We evaluated the clinical performance of a new dual chamber pacemaker, ELA Chorus, in 35 patients. This device incorporates linear rate adaptive AV delay (AVDR), rate smoothing, fallback, impedance telemetry, pacemaker mediated tachycardia (PMT) recognition and reprogramming software, intracardiac electrogram displays, autothreshold testing, diagnostic data, battery depletion curves, and laptop computer programming. Mean patient age was 68 years; 18 patients had AV block, six had sinus node dysfunction (one with AV block), nine had carotid sinus hypersensitivity (three with AV block), and two had vagally mediated syncope. At hospital discharge, programming was DDD with a mean low rate of 60 (50-70) beats/min, mean high rate of 126 (120-154) beats/min; AVDR was ON in 21 patients, rate smoothing ON in six patients, fallback ON in six patients, and PMT reprogramming algorithm ON in 27 patients. Pacemaker follow-up involved 500 clinic visits over 14.3 months (1-36). Three patients developed atrial fibrillation, reprogrammed to DDI mode (two patients) or fallback (one patient). Fallback was used 617 times. PMT occurred 427 times in six patients; the PMT algorithm reprogrammed AV delay and postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) automatically, a function unique to the Chorus. Intracardiac electrograms and autothreshold testing improved follow-up efficiency. This new dual chamber pacemaker enhances programming flexibility and improves diagnostic accuracy at follow-up.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Incidence and timing of activity parameter changes in activity responsive pacing systems.

The incidence and timing of rate response parameter reprogramming in activity responsive pacing systems during the year after implantation was evaluated in two groups of patients: 24 patients in whom a VVI,R system was implanted (Activitrax, Medtronic, Inc.), and 21 patients in whom a DDD,R system was implanted (Synchrony, Siemens Pacesetter, Inc.). Activity parameter changes in Activitrax patients were made based on the presence of symptoms, while in Synchrony patients, changes were based on objective data obtained using a sensor indicated rate histogram with a slow and fast walk protocol. No significant difference in the incidence of activity parameter reprogramming was noted at various time intervals during the first year in Activitrax patients; in Synchrony patients a greater incidence of reprogramming changes was noted at the 1-month follow-up visit compared to later follow-up visits (P less than 0.02). Further, the incidence of changes at 1 month was greater for Synchrony compared to Activitrax patients (P less than 0.001), while no difference was detected between groups at subsequent follow-up intervals. Use of the slow and fast walk protocol, by permitting serial evaluation of sensor response, demonstrated alterations in sensor drive rates with similar levels of activity over the initial 4 to 6 postimplant weeks. This may result from postoperative changes at the pacemaker insertion site. Based on this experience, predischarge programming may not predict long-term rate response requirements. We recommend evaluation of sensor function using an exercise protocol performed at 4 to 6 postimplant weeks in all rate responsive pacing systems that utilize a piezoelectric crystal.

Aged↗