Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Malach

Publications and source records attributed to M Malach.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Concurrent improvements in ambulatory cardiac catheterization practices following inpatient interventions.

Questions have been increasingly raised about the value of performing right heart catheterization. A preliminary analysis done in 1992 revealed significant interhospital variation in the frequency of the procedure among Medicare Part A and Medicaid patients in New York State, and it also suggested that the procedure was being performed routinely in some hospitals. In 1993, IPRO initiated a cooperative health care quality improvement program involving the state's 53 catheterization laboratories. As a result of this educational intervention, the rate of bilateral catheterization among Medicare Part A patients fell from 89/100,000 beneficiaries in 1992 to 65/100,000 in 1996, and the overall percentage of catheterized Medicare patients undergoing bilateral catheterization fell from 30.5% in 1992 to 17.4%. A major question was whether a corresponding decrease had occurred among ambulatory patients (Medicare Part B). To determine the answer, the Medicare Part B database was analyzed for the identical period of time. It was found that the percentage of ambulatory Medicare patients who underwent bilateral catheterization at the 53 laboratories fell from 37.6% in 1992 to 17.0% in 1996, paralleling the decline observed among inpatients. The results of this quality improvement study show that an educational intervention directed at inpatient practice patterns can have a similar impact on outpatient patterns.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

Impact of an educational program on bilateral heart catheterization practice patterns.

The value and necessity of performing right heart catheterizations for coronary artery disease have been increasingly questioned. Preliminary analyses of the procedure among Medicare and Medicaid patients in New York State revealed significant inter-hospital variations in the frequencies with which such catheterizations were performed. These data suggested that right heart catheterizations (RHC) were being performed routinely. Medicare and Medicaid claims data for bilateral catheterizations were analyzed before and after an educational intervention program involving the state's 53 catheterization laboratories. The educational intervention was multifaceted and consisted of disseminating suggested guidelines established with the assistance of the New York State Chapter of the American College of Cardiology, the Committee on Cardiovascular Disease of the Medical Society of the State of New York, and the Cardiac Advisory Council of the New York State Department of Health. Posteducational intervention assessments were made over a 4-year period. The baseline data for 1992 demonstrated that 10 (18.4%) laboratories had performed RHC routinely (70-100%) on Medicare and Medicaid patients undergoing catheterization. In contrast, 34 (64.2%) laboratories performed RHC in less than 20% of their Medicare cases, whereas 39 (73.5%) did so among Medicaid cases. Eighteen (34%) laboratories performed RHC in less than 10% of Medicare cases. These data indicated that there was significant inter-hospital variation in the frequency with which RHC was performed. Beginning in 1993, ongoing educational meetings and conferences were held with all laboratories, but especially with the 10 that were at the high end of the RHC performance level. As a result of this ongoing intervention, the rate of RHC among Medicare patients fell from 89/100,000 in 1992 to 65/100,000 beneficiaries in 1996. From another perspective, the percentage of catheterized Medicare patients undergoing RHC fell from 30.5% in 1992 to 17.4% in 1996. The decline among the 10 laboratories was even more dramatic; the percentage of catheterized Medicare patients undergoing RHC fell from 89.1% in 1992 to 31.6% in 1996. The parallel drop for Medicaid patients over the same time period was from 92.8 to 32.7%. The results of the study indicate that many previously performed RHC in patients with coronary artery disease were routine and not medically indicated. The dramatic decreases in RHC documented in this study over a 4-year period demonstrate the success of quality improvement efforts jointly undertaken by providers and a peer review organization.

Age Distribution↗

Impact of peer review in reduction of permanent pacemaker implantations.

Because of a sharp increase in the number of permanent pacemakers inserted at The Brooklyn Hospital between 1972 and 1976, a peer-review committee was established to monitor subsequent pacemaker implantation. Total initial implants declined from 48 to 22 per year in the two years that followed. The number of implantations for sinoatrial bradycardias declined from 50 to 27 and the number of implantations for intraventricular conduction defects declined from 32 to five in the two years after peer review, compared with the two years before. There was no change in the number of pacemakers implanted for complete or advanced heart block. Almost 10% of patients who received a pacemaker between 1972 and 1976 had other conditions that might have accounted for the events that precipitated the decision to implant a pacemaker. The symptoms for which the pacemaker was implanted persisted in 19% of patients, despite a normally functioning pacemaker system. Patients receiving a permanent pacemaker before peer review had a 17% one-year and a 43% three-year mortality. When a more critical patient selection process was instituted, a smaller percentage remained symptomatic (9% vs 19%) and three-year survival rate was improved (86% vs 57%). From 1977 through 1978, when permanent pacemaker implantations declined, the number of hospital, medical service, and coronary care unit admissions increased. It is concluded that peer review can have substantial impact on permanent pacemaker implantations.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

Changing times.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Health Policy↗