Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Maccario

Publications and source records attributed to M Maccario.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin, a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, and GH-releasing hormone.

An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-receptor) has recently been isolated, from both the rat and the human stomach, and named ghrelin. It is a 28-amino-acid peptide showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at its third serine residue, which is essential for its potent stimulatory activity on somatotroph secretion. In fact, it has been demonstrated that ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from both rat pituitary cells in culture and rats in vivo. The aim of the present study was to test the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans and to compare it with that of GHRH and hexarelin (HEX), a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also significantly stimulates PRL, ACTH, and cortisol secretion. To clarify the mechanisms of action underlying the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans, its interaction with GHRH and HEX was also studied. Seven normal young volunteers (7 men; 24-32 yr old; body mass index, 20-24 kg/m(2)) were studied. All subjects underwent the administration of ghrelin, HEX, and GHRH-29 (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) as well as placebo (2 mL isotonic saline i.v. at 0 min). Six subjects also underwent the combined administration of ghrelin and GHRH or HEX. Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -15 up to +180 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH, cortisol, and aldosterone levels were also assayed after administration of ghrelin and/or HEX. Ghrelin administration induced a prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (Cmax, mean +/- SEM, 92.1 +/- 16.7 microg/L; area under the curve, 1894.9 +/- 347.8 microg/L.h). The GH response to ghrelin was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than the one recorded after GHRH (26.7 +/- 8.7 microg/L; 619.6 +/- 174.4 microg/L.h) and even significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after HEX (68.4 +/- 14.7 microg/L; 1546.9 +/- 380.0 microg/L x h). Ghrelin administration also induced an increase in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; these responses were higher (P < 0.05) than those elicited by HEX. A significant increase in aldosterone levels was recorded after ghrelin but not after HEX. The endocrine responses to ghrelin were not modified by the coadministration of HEX. On the other hand, the coadministration of ghrelin and GHRH had a real synergistical effect (P < 0.05) on GH secretion (133.6 +/- 22.5 microg/L; 3374.3 +/- 617.3 microg/L x h). In conclusion, ghrelin, a natural ligand of GHS-receptor, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans, releasing more GH than GHRH and even more than a nonnatural GHS such as HEX. Ghrelin, as well as HEX, also stimulates lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Ghrelin shows no interaction with HEX, whereas it has a synergistical effect with GHRH on GH secretion. Thus, ghrelin is a new hormone playing a major role in the control of somatotroph secretion in humans, and its effects are imitated by nonnatural GHS.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2001

Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade by canrenoate increases both spontaneous and stimulated adrenal function in humans.

Animal studies indicate that mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) in the hippocampus play a major role in the glucocorticoid feedback control of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Specifically, MR mediate the proactive feedback of glucocorticoids in the maintenance of basal HPA activity. The stimulatory effect of intracerebroventricular and intrahippocampal MR blockade on the HPA axis in animals has been clearly shown, whereas the effect of systemic administration of mineralocorticoid antagonists in humans is still contradictory. To clarify this point, in seven normal young women (aged 25-32 yr; body mass index, 19.0-23.0 kg/m(2)) we studied the effects of canrenoate (CAN; 200 mg as iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 200 mg infused in 500 mL saline over 4 h up to 2400 h) or placebo (saline, 1.0 mL as iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 500 mL over 4 h up to 2400 h) on the spontaneous ACTH, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and aldosterone secretion as well as on the ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA responses to human CRH (2.0 microg/kg as iv bolus at 2200 h) or arginine vasopressin (AVP; 0.17 U/kg as im bolus at 2200 h). Blood samples were taken every 15 min from 2000-2400 h. During placebo, spontaneous ACTH and cortisol levels showed progressive decreases (P < 0.05) from 2000-2400 h (baseline vs. nadir, mean +/- SEM, 2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.2 pmol/L and 115.1 +/- 23.7 vs. 63.5 +/- 24.3 nmol/L), whereas DHEA and aldosterone levels did not change. CRH induced clear increases in ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels (peaks, mean +/- SEM, 7.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.2 pmol/L, 322.9 +/- 19.5 vs. 92.8 +/- 24.5 nmol/L, and 44.2 +/- 2.7 vs. 20.0 +/- 3.0 nmol/L; P < 0.05). Similarly, AVP elicited significant increases in ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels (3.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 pmol/L, 211.9 +/- 27.2 vs. 67.7 +/- 9.7 nmol/L, and 51.6 +/- 4.0 vs. 16.3 +/- 2.0 nmol/L; P < 0.05). During CAN treatment, ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels showed progressive rises, which begun at approximately 60 min and peaked between 2300 and 2400 h (ACTH, 3.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.3 pmol/L; cortisol, 314.5 +/- 49.6 vs. 123.3 +/- 13.2 nmol/L; DHEA, 52.0 +/- 8.8 vs. 21.0 +/- 2.3 nmol/L; P < 0.05 vs. baseline as well as vs. the same time points during placebo). Aldosterone secretion was not modified by CAN. The ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA responses to human CRH were enhanced by CAN (10.0 +/- 1.7 pmol/L, 462.2 +/- 36.9 nmol/L, and 66.3 +/- 8.8 nmol/L), although statistical significance (P < 0.05) was obtained for cortisol and DHEA only. Also the ACTH, cortisol and DHEA responses to AVP were amplified by CAN (8.0 +/- 2.6 pmol/L, 324.0 +/- 34.8 nmol/L, and 77.8 +/- 4.0 nmol/L); again, statistical significance (P < 0.05) was obtained for cortisol and DHEA only. In conclusion, our study shows that the blockade of MR by CAN significantly enhances the activity of the HPA axis in humans, indicating a physiological role for MR in its control. These results also suggest that the stimulatory effect of CAN on HPA axis is mediated by concomitant modulation of CRH and AVP release.

Adrenal Glands↗
PubMed2001

Growth hormone-releasing hormone and growth hormone secretagogue-receptor ligands: focus on reproductive system.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin are the most important hypothalamic neurohormones controlling growth hormone (GH) secretion. Several neurotransmitters and neuropeptides also play an important role in the control of GH secretion, mainly acting via modulation of GHRH and somatostatin. In the past two decades, particular attention has been given to a new family of substances showing a strong GH-releasing effect: GH secretagogues (GHSs). GHSs increase GH secretion in a dose- and age-related manner after iv and even oral administration. The endocrine effects of GHSs, are not fully specific for GH; they show, in fact, prolactin- (PRL), adenocorticotropic hormone- and cortisol-releasing effects. Specific GHS receptors are present in both the central nervous system and peripheral tissues, where they mediate several extraendocrine effects of GHSs. The isolation of these "orphan" receptors suggested the existence of an endogenous GHS-like ligand that could be represented by a recently discovered gastric peptide, named ghrelin. The interaction between GHSs and GHRH at the central level and in the pituitary gland, but not at peripheral level, has clearly been shown. Because GHRH and GHS receptors share the same localization in some peripheral tissues, they may have some interactions even at this level.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2001

Biologic activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans.

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with strong, dose-dependent, and reproducible growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity even after oral administration. GHSs release GH via actions on specific receptors (GHS-R) at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic levels. GHSs likely act as functional somatostatin antagonists and meantime enhance the activity of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting neurons. The GH-releasing effect of GHSs is independent of gender but undergoes marked age-related variations. Estrogens play a major role in enhancing the GH response to GHSs at puberty, which GHRH hypoactivity, somatostatinergic hyperactivity and impaired activity of the putative GHS-like ligand and receptors probably explain the reduced GH-releasing effect of GHSs in aging. The activity of GHSs is not fully specific for GH. Their slight prolactin-releasing activity probably comes from direct pituitary action. In physiological conditions, the ACTH-releasing activity of GHSs is dependent on central actions; a direct action on GHS-R in pituitary ACTH-secreting tumors likely explains the peculiar ACTH and cortisol hyperresponsiveness to GHSs in Cushing disease. GHSs have specific receptor subtypes in other central and peripheral endocrine and nonendocrine tissues mediating GH-independent biologic activities. GHSs influence sleep pattern, stimulate food intake, and have cardiovascular activities. GHs have specific binding in normal and neoplastic follicular derived human thyroid tissue and inhibit the proliferation of follicular-derived neoplastic cell lines. The discovery of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide synthesized in the stomach but also in other tissues, has opened new fascinating perspectives of research in this field.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

Effects of short-term administration of low-dose rhGH on IGF-I levels in obesity and Cushing's syndrome: indirect evaluation of sensitivity to GH.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the hypothesis of an increased sensitivity to GH in obesity (OB) and Cushing's syndrome (CS). DESIGN: We studied the effects of short-term administration of low-dose rhGH on circulating IGF-I levels in patients with simple OB or CS and in normal subjects (NS). METHODS: Nineteen women with abdominal OB aged (mean +/- s.e.m.) 38.2+/-3.1 years, body mass index 40.7+/-2.5 kg/m(2), waist to hip ratio 0.86+/-0.02, ten with CS (50.4+/-4.2 years, 29.7 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) and 11 NS (35.0+/-3.6 years, 20.5+/-0.5 kg/m(2)) underwent s.c. administration of 5 microg/kg per day rhGH at 2200 h for four days. Serum IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), GH-binding protein (GHBP), insulin and glucose levels were determined at baseline and 12 h after the first and the last rhGH administration. RESULTS: Basal IGF-I levels in NS (239.3+/-22.9 microg/l) were similar to those in OB (181.5+/-13.7 microg/l) and CS (229.0+/-29.1 microg/l). Basal IGFBP-3, GHBP and glucose levels in NS, OB and CS were similar while insulin levels in NS were lower (P<0.01) than those in OB and CS. In NS, the low rhGH dose induced a sustained rise of IGF-I levels (279.0+/-19.5 microg/l, P<0.001), a non-significant IGFBP-3 increase and no change in GHBP, insulin and glucose levels. In OB and CS, the IGF-I response to rhGH showed progressive increase (246.2+/-17.2 and 311.0+/-30.4 microg/l respectively, P<0.01 vs baseline). Adjusting by ANCOVA for basal values, rhGH-induced IGF-I levels in CS (299.4 microg/l) were higher than in OB (279.1 microg/l, P<0.01), which, in turn, were higher (P<0.05) than in NS (257.7 microg/l). In OB, but not in CS, IGFBP-3 and insulin levels showed slight but significant (P<0.05) increases during rhGH treatment, which did not modify glucose levels in any group; thus, in the OB patient group a significant fall in glucose/insulin ratio was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with low-dose rhGH has enhanced stimulatory effect on IGF-I levels in OB and, particularly, in hypercortisolemic patients. These findings support the hypothesis that hyperinsulinism and hypercortisolism enhance the sensitivity to GH in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Enhancement of the peripheral sensitivity to growth hormone in adults with GH deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD) need recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement to restore body composition, structure functions and metabolic abnormalities. The optimal rhGH dose for replacement has been progressively reduced to avoid side effects. The aim of the present study was to define the minimal rhGH dose able to increase both IGF-I and IGF binding protein (BP)-3 levels in GHD and to verify the possible change in GH sensitivity. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: To this goal, we studied the effect of 4-day treatment with 3 rhGH doses (1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg/day) on IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in 25 panhypopituitary adults with severe GHD (12 males and 13 females, age: 44.5+/-3.0 years, body mass index (BMI): 27.0+/-0.9 kg/m(2)) and 21 normal young adult volunteers (NV, 12 males and 9 females, age: 30.5+/-2.0 years, BMI: 20.8+/-0.5 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD were lower (P<0.001) than in NV. In NV the 1.25 microg/kg dose of rhGH did not modify IGF-I levels. The dose of 2.5 microg/kg rhGH significantly increased IGF-I levels in men (P<0.001) but not in women, while the 5.0 microg/kg dose increased IGF-I levels in both sexes (P<0.001). IGFBP-3 levels were not modified by any of the administered rhGH doses. In GHD patients, all rhGH doses increased IGF-I levels 12 h after both the first (P<0.01) and the fourth rhGH dose (P<0.001). At the end of treatment percentage increases in IGF-I were higher (P<0.001) in GHD patients than in NV. In contrast with NV, in GHD patients the IGF-I response to short-term stimulation with rhGH was independent of gender. Moreover, GHD patients showed increases in IGFBP-3 after the fourth administration of both 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg rhGH. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrate that the minimal rhGH dose able to increase IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD patients is lower than in normal subjects, at least after a very short treatment. This evidence suggests an enhanced peripheral GH sensitivity in GH deprivation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

DHEA-S levels in hypopituitaric patients with severe GH deficiency are strongly reduced across lifespan. Comparison with IGF-I levels before and during rhGH replacement.

Both IGF-I and DHEA-S undergo an age-related decrease and their decrease could be involved in age-related changes in body composition, structure functions and metabolism. On the other hand, it is well known that mean IGF-I levels are clearly reduced in hypopituitaric patients with GH deficiency (GHD) while data about dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels in hypopituitarism are scanty. We evaluated DHEA-S and IGF-I levels and their relationship in 90 patients with panhypopituitarism (HYPOPIT) with severe GHD [49 women and 41 men; age, mean+/-SE: 47.9+/-1.49 yr, range: 20-80 yr, BMI: 26.4+/-0.6 kg/m2; 21 with childhood-onset (CO) and 69 with adult-onset (AO) HYPOPIT]. DHEA-S and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in 24 HYPOPIT with GHD after 3-month recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement. Data in HYPOPIT were compared with those in a large group of healthy controls (NS, 233 women and 103 men, aged 20-80 yr; all subjects were within +/-15% of their ideal body weight). In NS both DHEA-S levels and IGF-I were gender-independent while showed a strong, inverse correlation with age (r=-0.6; p<0.001 and r=-0.56; p<0.0001, respectively). Nevertheless, no relationship was found between DHEA-S and IGF-I levels in NS. In HYPOPIT, age-adjusted mean DHEA-S and IGF-I levels were clearly lower than those in NS (2.3+/-0.4 vs 16.0+/-0.7 microg/l, p<0.005; 71.1 +/- 4.5 vs 170+/-4.7 microg/l, p<0.005). IGF-I levels in CO-HYPOPIT were lower (p<0.01) than those in AO-HYPOPIT (49.6+/-4.8 vs 77.0+/-5.4 microg/l), while DHEA-S levels were similar in both subgroups (2.6+/-0.7 vs 2.3+/-0.4 microg/l). In HYPOPIT both DHEA-S and IGF-I were independent of age and gender while there was a trend toward a positive association between each other (r=0.45; p<0.003). Analyzing individual levels in HYPOPIT with respect to age-adjusted normal ranges, IGF-I levels were below normal in 84, 62 and 0% between 20-40, 40-60 and 60-80 yr, respectively. On the other hand, DHEA-S levels were below normal in 84, 86 and 67% between 20-40, 40-60 and 60-80, respectively. In HYPOPIT rhGH treatment strikingly increased IGF-I levels (150+/-3.2 vs 85.3+/-4.1 microg/l, p<0.005) while did not modify DHEA-S levels (1.7+/-0.2 vs 1.6+/-0.2 microg/l). In conclusion, our results demonstrate that DHEA-S and IGF-I are negatively and independently associated to age in physiological conditions but not in hypopituitaric patients in whom both are strikingly reduced. Both DHEA-S and IGF-I levels in HYPOPIT show some overlap with those in normal subjects; thus the assay of these parameters is not diagnostic for hypopituitarism. DHEA-S reduction in HYPOPIT does not depend on IGF-I as indicated also by evidence that GH replacement restores IGF-I but does not modify DHEA-S levels.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Double recurrence of FSGS after two renal transplants with complete regression after plasmapheresis and ACE inhibitors.

A patient who had undergone a first cadaveric donor kidney transplantation for idiopathic focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS), had an immediate recurrence of a biopsy-proven FSGS that eventually led to graft failure within 5 years from transplantation. The patient underwent a second cadaveric transplantation 10 months later. An immediate recurrence of a biopsy-proven FSGS occurred that was treated with two protracted cycles of plasmapheresis of seven months each, with the addition of an ACE inhibitor from the beginning. A complete and stable remission of FSGS was observed, which continues after more than 6 years from the end of plasmapheresis. The recurrence of FSGS after a second transplantation has a poor prognosis, but prolonged plasmapheresis treatment, by removing circulating factors altering glomerular permselectivity, and the addition of ACE inhibitors, through their potential interference with TGF-beta, might be synergistic in obtaining permanent remission.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Long-term results with cyclosporine monotherapy in renal transplant patients: a multivariate analysis of risk factors.

There is little information on the long-term outcome of patients initially assigned to cyclosporine (CsA) monotherapy and requiring the addition of steroid therapy during follow-up. The aim of this report is to describe our experience with 143 first renal transplant recipients (120 cadaver transplants, 23 living donor transplants) randomized to receive CsA monotherapy as a treatment arm of three consecutive controlled clinical trials. Median follow-up was 86 months. Thirty-four percent of the patients remained on the original CsA monotherapy, whereas the remaining 66% required the addition of steroid therapy. Cumulative patient and graft survivals at 11 years were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.95) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.72), respectively. The 11-year graft survival for converted patients was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.67). Cumulative graft half-life was 19.9 +/- 3.47 (SE) years. According to the Cox model, variables at transplantation that correlated with a lower 11-year graft survival were yearly increases in age (relative risk [RR], 1. 04; P = 0.039), monthly increases in hemodialysis duration (RR, 1.01; P = 0.029), no blood transfusion before transplantation (RR, 1.99; P = 0.043), CsA administration in a double daily dose (RR, 2.35; P = 0.008), and a cadaver donor transplant (RR, 4.76; P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis of time-dependent variables showed that delayed graft function recovery (RR, 2.20; P = 0.019) and the need to add steroid and/or azathioprine therapy (RR, 5.28; P = 0.000) were also correlated with a lower graft survival. Patients who added steroid therapy developed infections (P < 0.001), cataracts (P < 0.001), cardiovascular complications (P = 0.004), and arterial hypertension (P = 0.024) more frequently than patients remaining on CsA monotherapy. Patients administered CsA in a single daily dose received significantly less CsA over the years (P = 0.0042) than patients administered CsA in two divided doses. They also showed a trend toward greater creatinine clearance levels, although not statistically significant. In conclusion, this analysis showed that in patients assigned to CsA therapy alone, good long-term patient and graft survival probabilities can be obtained. In approximately one third of the patients, the use of steroids could be avoided for up to 11 years, and these patients had a better long-term outcome than those who required the addition of steroid therapy. Finally, in patients administered CsA in a single daily dose, the possibility of reducing CsA dosage probably led to better intrarenal hemodynamics with improving creatinine clearances.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Glucagon is an ACTH secretagogue as effective as hCRH after intramuscolar administration while it is ineffective when given intravenously in normal subjects.

It is widely accepted that glucagon stimulates GH, ACTH and cortisol release in humans, though the mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the stimulatory effect of intramuscolar (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) glucagon (GLU) administration on ACTH, cortisol (F) and GH release in normal adult subjects and to compare its effect on hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis with that of hCRH. To this goal, in 6 normal young women (26-32 yrs, 50-58 kg) we studied the ACTH and F responses to either i.m. or i.v. GLU (1 mg, approximately 0.017 mg/kg in subjects of 54.1 +/- 1.6 kg) administration as well as to i.v. hCRH (2.0 micrograms/kg) or placebo administration. The GH and glucose variations after GLU administration were also studied. I.v. GLU did not modify the spontaneous decrease of ACTH and cortisol levels observed after placebo. Conversely, i.m. GLU elicited clear-cut ACTH and F responses (peak vs baseline, mean +/- SEM: 53.0 +/- 15.2 vs 19.0 +/- 1.5 pg/ml, p < 0.05 and 222.3 +/- 23.8 vs 158.3 +/- 7.0 micrograms/l, p < 0.05) which were higher than those recorded after hCRH (28.1 +/- 4.6 vs 17.4 +/- 3.1 pg/ml, p < 0.02 and 182.7 +/- 22.8 vs 114.8 +/- 12.3 micrograms/l p < 0.02), though this difference did not attain statistical significance. Also GH rise was recorded after i.m. but not after i.v. GLU administration (11.6 +/- 3.4 vs 3.3 +/- 0.7 micrograms/l, p < 0.05). Thirty min after both i.v. and i.m. GLU administration glucose levels showed a similar increase followed by similar decrease. The intramuscular administration of GLU induced negligible side-effects in some subject (mild and transient nausea) which, on the contrary, were clear in all subjects after its intravenous administration (nausea, vomiting, tachycardia). In conclusion, glucagon "per se" is not an ACTH, cortisol and GH secretagogue. After intramuscular administration glucagon is a stimulus of HPA axis at least as effective as hCRH. The mechanisms underlying the ACTH, cortisol and GH responses to i.m. glucagon unlikely include glucose variations or stress.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2000

The GH/IGF-I axis in obesity: influence of neuro-endocrine and metabolic factors.

In this review we propose an integrated neuro-endocrine-metabolic point of view on the alterations (adaptations?) of GH/IGF-1 axis in obesity, summarizing the evidence from the literature, particularly focusing the data on humans and adding where possible results from our studies in this field. It is well-known that GH secretion is deeply impaired in overweight patients: we reviewed the multiple mechanisms underlying this issue, considering either central (CNS-related, such as impairment of GHRH tone or increased somatostatin release) or peripheral (ie metabolic: insulin, free fatty acids, glucose) factors. A central point of the debate about GH insufficiency in obesity is if it represents a simple adaptive phenomenon or reflects a true impairment of the axis activity. Evaluation of IGF-I levels and generation in obesity was the mean used to address this question: a bulk of evidence on IGF-I balance in human obesity has been provided, but the matter is still uncertain and unsolved.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2000

Alprazolam, a benzodiazepine, blunts but does not abolish the ACTH and cortisol response to hexarelin, a GHRP, in obese patients.

GH secretagogues (GHS) act on specific receptors at the pituitary and hypothalamic level and possess potent GH-releasing activity but also stimulate prolactin (PRL), ACTH and cortisol (F) secretion. However, hyperactivity of the HPA axis in obesity has been reported. The objective of this study was to clarify the endocrine activity of GHS in obesity. In nine obese patients (obese OB), 9 F, age, (34.8 +/- 3.7 y, body mass index (BMI), 35.0 +/- 2.2 kg/m2; WHR, 0.9 +/- 0.02), 14 controls (normal subjects, NS), 14 F, 30.4 +/- 0.9 y, 20.0 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), we studied the ACTH, F and GH responses to hexarelin (HEX, 2.0 microg/kg), a peptidyl GHS, alone and preceded by alprazolam (ALP, 0.02 mg/kg), and a benzodiazepine which has an inhibitory effect on corticotroph secretion. The HEX-induced ACTH response in OB was higher than that in n.s., but this difference did not attain statistical significance. In n.s. the HEX-induced ACTH response was abolished by ALP (P < 0.03) which, however, only blunted that in OB (P < 0.02). The GH response to HEX in OB was lower (P < 0.02) than that in n.s.. ALP blunted the GH response to HEX in n.s. (P < 0.03) while it did not modify that in OB. The GABAergic activation by alprazolam abolishes the ACTH response to hexarelin in normal subjects, while it only blunts that in obese subjects. Moreover, alprazolam blunts the GH response to hexarelin in normal but not in obese subjects. Thus, obese patients show partial refractoriness to the inhibitory effect of alprazolam on both corticotroph and somatotroph function.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed2000

Short-term fasting abolishes the sex-related difference in GH and leptin secretion in humans.

We studied growth hormone (GH) and leptin secretion in eight male (age 29.3 +/- 1.2 yr, body mass index 22.2 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)) and seven female normal subjects (28.0 +/- 0.8 yr, 20.1 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) before and after 36 h of fasting. In the fed state, 8-h mean GH and leptin concentrations were higher in females (P < 0.05 and P < 0. 0001, respectively). Fasting increased GH and decreased leptin in both sexes. There was significant interaction between gender and fasting (P < 0.05 for GH and P < 0.005 for leptin). Females showed a slighter increase in GH but a more marked decrease in leptin, so that there was no significant gender-related difference in GH and leptin after fasting. Fasting did not modify insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3, acid-labile subunit, or GH binding protein; increased IGFBP-1 and free fatty acids (P < 0.0001) but decreased glucose (P < 0.001) and insulin levels (P < 0.05). In males, insulin levels were higher (P < 0.05) in the fed state and underwent deeper reduction after fasting (interaction P < 0.03). In conclusion, GH and leptin secretions are higher in women than in men in the fed but not in the fasting condition, which abolishes these gender-related differences in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Arginine counteracts the inhibitory effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in humans.

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) exerts a negative feedback effect on GH secretion via either direct actions at the pituitary level or indirect ones at the hypothalamic level, through stimulation of somatostatin (SS) and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) in humans inhibits spontaneous GH secretion as well as the GH response to GHRH and even more to GH/GH-releasing peptides, whose main action is on the hypothalamus, antagonizing SS and enhancing GHRH activity. The aim of the present study was to further clarify in humans the mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced inhibition of somatotroph secretion. In six normal young volunteers (all women; mean +/- SEM: age, 28.3+/-1.2 yr; body mass index, 21.3+/-1.2 kg/m2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv, at 0 min), both alone and combined with arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg, iv, from 0-30 min), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic SS release, after pretreatment with rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg, sc, at -180 min) or placebo. rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels (peak at -60 vs. -180 min: 54.9+/-3.9 vs. 35.9+/-3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) to a reproducible extent, and these levels remained stable and within the normal range until 90 min. The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from -180 to 0 min) before ARG and/or GHRH was not modified by placebo or rhIGF-I. After placebo, the GH response to GHRH (peak, 23.6+/-2.9 microg/L) was strikingly enhanced (P < 0.05) by ARG coadministration (69.6+/-9.9 microg/L). rhIGF-I blunted the GH response to GHRH (13.1+/-4.5 microg/L; P < 0.05), whereas that to GHRH plus ARG was not modified (59.5+/-8.9 microg/L), although it occurred with some delay. Mean glucose and insulin concentrations were not modified by either placebo or rhIGF-I. In conclusion, ARG counteracts the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in humans. These findings suggest that the acute inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH takes place on the hypothalamus, possibly via enhancement of SS release, and that ARG overrides this action.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Stimulatory effect of adrenocorticotropin on cortisol, aldosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone secretion in normal humans: dose-response study.

The short ACTH test is widely used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. It is classically performed administering 250.0 microg ACTH(1-24) although 1.0 microg ACTH dose has been reported having maximal stimulatory effect on cortisol levels in normal subjects. We aimed to define the maximal and the minimal stimulatory ACTH dose on cortisol, aldosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in humans. To this goal, in 12 normal volunteers (6 males and 6 females; age, 22-34 yr; body mass index 20-25 kg/m2; body surface 1.6-1.9 m2), we studied the dose-response effect of eight ACTH doses (0.01, 0.03, 0.06, 0.125, 0.5, 1.0, 25.0, and 250.0 microg) on cortisol, aldosterone, and DHEA levels. Each ACTH dose administered at 0 min was followed by a second ACTH dose of 250.0 microg at +60 min. The cortisol delta areas under response curve (deltaAUCs) after all ACTH doses, apart from 0.01 microg, were significantly higher (P < 0.02) than that after placebo, showing a clear dose-response relationship (P < 0.001). The doses of 0.03 and 1.0 microg ACTH were the minimal and maximal effective doses, respectively. The cortisol response to 250.0 microg ACTH was not modified by pretreatment with 0.01, 0.03, and 0.06 microg ACTH doses, whereas it was progressively reduced by increasing the dose of ACTH pretreatment (P < 0.001). The aldosterone deltaAUCs to all but 0.01 microg ACTH doses were significantly higher (P < 0.02) than that after placebo, showing a clear dose-response relationship (P < 0.001). The dose of 0.03 microg was the minimal effective stimulating dose, whereas 25.0 microg showed the same aldosterone-releasing effect of 250.0 microg. The aldosterone response to 250.0 microg ACTH, preceeded by placebo, was not modified by pretreatment with 0.01 and 0.03 microg ACTH doses, whereas it was reduced by increasing the dose of ACTH pretreatment (P < 0.05-0.02). The DHEA deltaAUCs to all ACTH doses were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than that after placebo, showing a clear dose-response relationship (P < 0.001). The doses of 0.01 and 1.0 microg ACTH were the minimal and maximal effective dose, respectively. The DHEA response to 250.0 microg ACTH was not modified by pretreatment with 0.01, 0.03, 0.06, and 0.125 microg ACTH doses, whereas it was progressively reduced by pretreatment with 0.5, 1.0, and 25.0 microg ACTH doses (P < 0.01). In conclusion, these results show that an extremely low ACTH dose is needed to stimulate adrenal steroids and, among them, DHEA seems the most sensitive to corticotropin stimulation.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗