Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Loreau

Publications and source records attributed to M Loreau.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

The ecological consequences of biodiversity loss have aroused considerable interest and controversy during the past decade. Major advances have been made in describing the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem processes, in identifying functionally important species, and in revealing underlying mechanisms. There is, however, uncertainty as to how results obtained in recent experiments scale up to landscape and regional levels and generalize across ecosystem types and processes. Larger numbers of species are probably needed to reduce temporal variability in ecosystem processes in changing environments. A major future challenge is to determine how biodiversity dynamics, ecosystem processes, and abiotic factors interact.

Animals↗

Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

The impact of biodiversity loss on the functioning of ecosystems and their ability to provide ecological services has become a central issue in ecology. Several experiments have provided evidence that reduced species diversity may impair ecosystem processes such as plant biomass production. The interpretation of these experiments, however, has been controversial because two types of mechanism may operate in combination. In the 'selection effect', dominance by species with particular traits affects ecosystem processes. In the 'complementarity effect', resource partitioning or positive interactions lead to increased total resource use. Here we present a new approach to separate the two effects on the basis of an additive partitioning analogous to the Price equation in evolutionary genetics. Applying this method to data from the pan-European BIODEPTH experiment reveals that the selection effect is zero on average and varies from negative to positive in different localities, depending on whether species with lower- or higher-than-average biomass dominate communities. In contrast, the complementarity effect is positive overall, supporting the hypothesis that plant diversity influences primary production in European grasslands through niche differentiation or facilitation.

Biomass↗

Microbial diversity, producer-decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model.

Interactions between the diversity of primary producers and that of decomposers--the two key functional groups that form the basis of all ecosystems--might have major consequences on the functioning of depauperate ecosystems. I present a simple ecosystem model in which primary producers (plants) and decomposers (microbes) are linked through material cycling. The model considers a diversity of plant organic compounds and a diversity of microbial species. Nutrient recycling efficiency from organic compounds to decomposers is then the key parameter that controls ecosystem processes (primary productivity, secondary productivity, producer biomass and decomposer biomass). The model predicts that microbial diversity has a positive effect on nutrient recycling efficiency and ecosystem processes through either greater intensity of microbial exploitation of organic compounds or functional niche complementarity, much like in plants. Microbial niche breadth and overlap should not affect ecosystem processes unless they increase the number of organic compounds that are decomposed. In contrast, the model predicts that plant organic compound diversity can only have a negative effect or, at best, no effect on ecosystem processes, at least in a constant environment. This creates a tension between the effects of plant diversity and microbial diversity on ecosystem functioning, which may explain some recent experimental results.

Bacteria↗

Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment.

The relationship between species diversity and ecosystem functioning is a central topic in ecology today. Classical approaches to studying ecosystem responses to nutrient enrichment have considered linear food chains. To what extent ecosystem structure, that is, the network of species interactions, affects such responses is currently unknown. This severely limits our ability to predict which species or functional groups will benefit or suffer from nutrient enrichment and to understand the underlying mechanisms. Here our approach takes ecosystem complexity into account by considering functional diversity at each trophic level. We conducted a mesocosm experiment to test the effects of nutrient enrichment in a lake ecosystem. We developed a model of intermediate complexity, which separates trophic levels into functional groups according to size and diet. This model successfully predicted the experimental results, whereas linear food-chain models did not. Our model shows the importance of functional diversity and indirect interactions in the response of ecosystems to perturbations, and indicates that new approaches are needed for the management of freshwater ecosystems subject to eutrophication.

Animals↗

Grazing optimization, nutrient cycling, and spatial heterogeneity of plant-herbivore interactions: should a palatable plant evolve?

Can the evolution of plant defense lead to an optimal primary production? In a general theoretical model, Loreau (1995) and de Mazancourt et al. (1998, 1999) have shown that herbivory could increase primary production up to a moderate rate of grazing intensity through recycling of a limiting nutrient, provided several conditions are fulfilled. In the present paper, we assume: (1) grazing intensity is controlled by plants through their level of palatability; and (2) plant fitness is determined by its productivity. We explore the conditions under which such an optimal production may be reached through natural selection. We model two competing plant types that differ only in palatability and are distributed in a patchy landscape determined by the plant-herbivore interaction. Patch size is determined by herbivore behavior: herbivores recycle nutrient homogeneously within patches, but recycle nutrient proportionally to consumption between patches. The model shows that a strategy of intermediate palatability can be adaptive in response to a small herbivore that lives on and recycles nutrient around one or a few individual plants. For moderately small herbivores, plant palatability may evolve towards one of two local convergent strategies, depending on the initial conditions. For medium- to large-sized herbivores, the nonpalatable strategy is always selected. We discuss the functional and evolutionary implications of these results, and suggest that the traditional dichotomy describing antagonistic and mutualistic interactions may be misleading.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands

At eight European field sites, the impact of loss of plant diversity on primary productivity was simulated by synthesizing grassland communities with different numbers of plant species. Results differed in detail at each location, but there was an overall log-linear reduction of average aboveground biomass with loss of species. For a given number of species, communities with fewer functional groups were less productive. These diversity effects occurred along with differences associated with species composition and geographic location. Niche complementarity and positive species interactions appear to play a role in generating diversity-productivity relationships within sites in addition to sampling from the species pool.

Journal Article↗

Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis.

Although the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning has become a major focus in ecology, its significance in a fluctuating environment is still poorly understood. According to the insurance hypothesis, biodiversity insures ecosystems against declines in their functioning because many species provide greater guarantees that some will maintain functioning even if others fail. Here we examine this hypothesis theoretically. We develop a general stochastic dynamic model to assess the effects of species richness on the expected temporal mean and variance of ecosystem processes such as productivity, based on individual species' productivity responses to environmental fluctuations. Our model shows two major insurance effects of species richness on ecosystem productivity: (i) a buffering effect, i.e., a reduction in the temporal variance of productivity, and (ii) a performance-enhancing effect, i.e., an increase in the temporal mean of productivity. The strength of these insurance effects is determined by three factors: (i) the way ecosystem productivity is determined by individual species responses to environmental fluctuations, (ii) the degree of asynchronicity of these responses, and (iii) the detailed form of these responses. In particular, the greater the variance of the species responses, the lower the species richness at which the temporal mean of the ecosystem process saturates and the ecosystem becomes redundant. These results provide a strong theoretical foundation for the insurance hypothesis, which proves to be a fundamental principle for understanding the long-term effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes.

Ecosystem↗

Phenotypic diversity and stability of ecosystem processes.

The resistance of an ecosystem to perturbations and the speed at which it recovers after the perturbations, which is called resilience, are two important components of ecosystem stability. It has been suggested that biodiversity increases the resilience and resistance of aggregated ecosystem processes. We test this hypothesis using a theoretical model of a nutrient-limited ecosystem in a heterogeneous environment. We investigate the stability properties of the model for its simplest possible configuration, i.e. , a system consisting of two plant species and their associated detritus and local resource depletion zones. Phenotypic diversity within the plant community is described by differences in the nutrient uptake and mortality rates of the two species. The usual measure of resilience characterizes the system as a whole and thus also applies to aggregated ecosystem processes. As a rule this decreases with increased diversity, though under certain conditions it is maximum for an intermediate value of diversity. Resistance is a property that characterizes each system component and process separately. The resistance of the inorganic nutrient pools, hence of nutrient retention in the ecosystem, decreases with increased diversity. The resistance of both total plant biomass and productivity either monotonically decreases or increases over part of the parameter range with increased diversity. Furthermore, it is very sensitive to parameter values. These results support the view that there is no simple relationship between diversity and stability in equilibrium deterministic systems, whether at the level of populations or aggregated ecosystem processes. We discuss these results in relation to recent experiments.

Ecosystem↗

Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model.

Recent experiments have provided some evidence that loss of biodiversity may impair the functioning and sustainability of ecosystems. However, we still lack adequate theories and models to provide robust generalizations, predictions, and interpretations for such results. Here I present a mechanistic model of a spatially structured ecosystem in which plants compete for a limiting soil nutrient. This model shows that plant species richness does not necessarily enhance ecosystem processes, but it identifies two types of factors that could generate such an effect: (i) complementarity among species in the space they occupy below ground and (ii) positive correlation between mean resource-use intensity and diversity. In both cases, the model predicts that plant biomass, primary productivity, and nutrient retention all increase with diversity, similar to results reported in recent field experiments. These two factors, however, have different implications for the understanding of the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. The model also shows that the effect of species richness on productivity or other ecosystem processes is masked by the effects of physical environmental parameters on these processes. Therefore, comparisons among sites cannot reveal it, unless abiotic conditions are very tightly controlled. Identifying and separating out the mechanisms behind ecosystem responses to biodiversity should become the focus of future experiments.

Ecosystem↗

Coexistence of multiple food chains in a heterogeneous environment: interactions among community structure, ecosystem functioning, and nutrient dynamics.

A model is developed and analyzed for a nutrient-limited ecosystem containing an arbitrary number of parallel plant-herbivore-detritus food chains in a heterogeneous environment, with a view to exploring interactions among community and ecosystem processes. Physical properties of the environment and functional properties of the entire ecosystem such as nutrient supply, transport, and recycling are shown to exert a profound influence on the composition, diversity, and assembly of the biological community. Community structure as well as the physical properties of the environment in turn affect ecosystem functions such as nutrient and energy flow. In particular, the rate of nutrient transport in the physical medium plays a critical role in competition and coexistence among food chains. The potential for coexistence decreases continuously as the nutrient transport rate increases in food chains with donor-controlled or no herbivory, while it increases continuously or is greatest at an intermediate value of the nutrient transport rate in herbivore-controlled food chains. On the other hand, energy flow generally increases with the rate of nutrient transport. Herbivory also exerts a significant, predictable influence on energy flow and coexistence among plants and food chains.

Animals↗

Competitive exclusion and coexistence of species with complex life cycles.

Complex life cycles are life histories in which abrupt ontogenetic transformations and niche shifts occur at the transition between stages. The effects of this niche differentiation between stages on coexistence between species are investigated using a simple discrete model of two-stage populations. The model incorporates exploitation competition for limiting resources within stages, between stages, and between species. While species with simple life cycles can never coexist at equilibrium, stable coexistence is shown to be possible between species with complex life cycles provided that (1) one species is more efficient in resource utilization at low resource abundance in the larval stage while the other is more efficient at low resource abundance in the adult stage; and (2) each species is mainly limited by that stage which is less efficient at low resource abundance. Stable coexistence is somewhat easier between a species with a simple life cycle and one with a complex life cycle. It requires that (1) the species with the simple life cycle should not be decidedly more efficient than that with the complex life cycle in utilizing the resource on which it lives; and (2) the main resource limitation for the species with a complex life cycle should occur in that stage which escapes competition with the species with a simple life cycle. Lastly, a complex life cycle can offer a decisive competitive superiority over a simple life cycle in interspecific competition, which suggests that competition can be a driving force of the evolution of complex life cycles.

Animals↗

Shade as a means of ecological control of Biomphalaria pfeifferi.

Species of Biomphalaria are attracted to light and negatively affected by darkness. Artificial shading of a breeding-site eliminated a population of B. pfeifferi within six weeks. The site was recolonized by eight weeks after the shade was removed. The time taken for recolonization suggests that shade acts not only by affecting snail behaviour but also indirectly by removing the diatoms which are food for the snails. The use of natural shade for ecological control of some snail vectors of schistosomiasis deserves, at least, careful consideration.

Animals↗