Diabetes education research.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M L Wheeler.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A survey was mailed to a probability sample of primary care physicians in Indiana to assess their use of and barriers to nutritional therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. Most (62%) primary care physicians reported referring their type 2 diabetes patients for nutrition counseling, while 38% reported providing counseling themselves. Patient-centered barriers were most frequently cited as reasons for poor effectiveness of nutrition therapy. This differs from previous research that cites system-level factors as barriers.
Diabetes is essentially a self-management disease in which patients must learn to integrate blood glucose monitoring with nutrition management and physical activity and, if needed, oral agents or insulin. This almost always requires behavior change. The American Diabetes Association diet is no longer a meaningful prescription, because recommendations are now based on individualized nutrition assessment and treatment goals. Physical activity recommendations, as an adjunct to nutrition management, should also be individualized. Using a team approach, focusing on individualization of nutrition management and physical activity, applying behavior change concepts, and providing frequent follow-up can improve self-management and result in improved metabolic control. Primary care practitioners are in a unique position to oversee this process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine metabolic responses to commercially sweetened flaked corn cereal, unsweetened flaked corn cereal, glucose, and sucrose in teenagers and young adults with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). DESIGN: A crossover design in which each subject consumed test meals in random order on 4 separate days at least 72 hours apart. SETTING: The inpatient setting of the General Clinical Research Center of the Indiana University Medical Center Hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixteen males and eight females, aged 14 to 25 years, with IDDM. INTERVENTIONS: After fasting overnight, each subject underwent challenge tests with 50 g carbohydrate per 1.73 m2 of body surface area from sweetened flaked corn cereal, unsweetened flaked corn cereal, sucrose, and glucose. All subjects were maintained on continuous intravenous infusion of insulin overnight (euglycemic goal = 3.9 to 6.7 mmol/L), with a constant basal insulin dose infused before and throughout a 3-hour postprandial period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma glucose, free insulin, triglycerides, and free fatty acid levels measured at baseline and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after meals. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Comparisons among the four meals were made using two-way repeated measures analyses of variance followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison procedure to identify specific differences among meals. The areas under the response curves were compared using one-way repeated measures analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline values. RESULTS: The response to glucose for the area under the 3-hour blood glucose response curve was significantly greater than the response to sucrose (P = .006 by repeated measures analysis of variance); the areas for the two cereals (not significantly different from one another) were between the glucose and sucrose areas. At 3 hours, glycemia differed significantly among three of the meals: unsweetened flaked corn cereal > sweetened flaked corn cereal > sucrose (P < .001). Glucose at 3 hours was greater than sucrose (P < .001). There were no significant differences for free insulin, triglycerides, or free fatty acids. APPLICATIONS: Equivalent gram amounts of carbohydrate as presweetened breakfast cereals are not detrimental to persons with IDDM compared with unsweetened cereals. Therefore, presweetened cereals can be used in the correct portion sizes and based on the number of carbohydrate or starch servings in a person's diabetic meal plan.
For more than 50 years the exchange lists have been one method of meal planning for persons with diabetes as well as for those on weight-loss regimens. Little research has been conducted, however, concerning the methodologic basis of the system or its clinical effectiveness. Justification for specific food inclusions and general food groupings for the 1995 revision of the Exchange Lists for Meal Planning is provided by a database of foods and associated energy and macronutrient values. The mean energy and macronutrient values for each of the lists and sublists (starch, fruit, milk, and vegetables from the carbohydrate group; the meat and meal substitutes group, and the fat group) closely match the mean exchange values; however, the standard deviation and range are large. Interpretation of the database provides a rationale and guidance for decision making in clinical practice when using exchanges for meal planning, recipe, and food label calculations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
If, as dietitians, we are to expand our role and influence on patient care and in clinical research (as described by the DCCT model), we need to examine our strengths, obtain expertise in our areas of interest, educate nondietitians and investigators about the benefits of using our skills in the clinical and research environments, and continue to develop our mentoring system. We need to identify our own personal challenges that will make us more effective leaders in health care. Also, we must acknowledge that the journey to reach these new goals will not always be easy, but is tremendously rewarding--personally and professionally.
To inform health-care providers and third-party carriers of the national quality assurance systems in place for diabetes education programs and the health professionals who provide education services and to indicate the need for consistent reimbursement of essential outpatient diabetes education services. The components of an independent quality assurance mechanism were examined and a survey was conducted to determine reimbursement coverage of ADA recognized programs. A national program to evaluate whether programs meet national standards is in place. Many ADA approved programs were reimbursed and official recognition helped in the process of attaining reimbursement. Insurance coverage decisions made by third-party carriers, however, were inconsistent and largely unpredictable. Outpatient education and follow-up for diabetes is an integral component of care. These services need to be more clearly defined to enable appropriate coding and coverage decisions to be made by third-party payors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Our objective was to determine whether 1) hydrogenated starch hydrolysates (HSHs), bulking/sweetening agents used in hard candies, produce a diminished postmeal glycemic response relative to glucose in individuals with and without diabetes and 2) any diminished glycemia is secondary to altered carbohydrate absorption. This study followed a randomized double-blind crossover design and was performed in 12 individuals with diabetes (6 non-insulin dependent, 6 insulin dependent) and 6 nondiabetic individuals. Each group consisted of 3 men and 3 women, none with known neuropathy. After an overnight fast, each subject was challenged with 50 g of glucose, HSH 5875 (7% sorbitol/60% maltitol), and HSH 6075 (14% sorbitol/78% hydrogenated maltooligosaccharides)/1.73 m2 of body surface area in random order on 3 successive days. Individuals with diabetes were maintained on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion throughout the study to achieve prechallenge glucose levels between 4.5 and 6.7 mM. For all groups, the order of plasma glucose responses over 5 h postchallenge was glucose greater than HSH 6075 greater than HSH 5875, P less than 0.001 (glucose vs. HSH). Pooled data for all groups for areas under the curve confirmed that HSH 6075 resulted in greater glycemia than HSH 5875 (P less than 0.05). This was reflected in the order of C-peptide responses seen in the nondiabetic and non-insulin-dependent groups (glucose greater than HSH 6075 greater than HSH 5875, P less than 0.001). Breath H2 after glucose was low, whereas HSH 5875 greater than HSH 6075 (P = 0.003). Gastric distress was noticed with all products.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is a major health problem, highly correlated with obesity and, therefore, overeating. Diet continues as the cornerstone of therapy, with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin added, if needed, to maintain normal blood glucose values. The diet prescription should be implemented in stages, with caloric restriction the first priority, as weight loss itself diminishes hyperglycemia to or toward normal. Combinations of foods and even different processing or cooking of the same food may produce different glucose responses. These factors minimize the role of the glycemic index in overall diabetes management. Foods with high soluble fiber content may diminish glucose elevations after meals; however, high-fiber foods appear to be less important for the obese diabetic person than adhering to a calorie-restricted diet and achieving weight loss. Attempts should be made to alter life-style within an acceptable degree for any given patient to encourage weight reduction. For example, although exercise may have a small but transient direct effect in lowering blood glucose and insulin resistance, it can be considered an adjunct to decreased calorie diets for weight reduction. Finally, it appears prudent to prevent or reverse obesity, especially in individuals with a family history of diabetes, in the hope that the onset of diabetes may be prevented or postponed.
A committee composed of members of The American Dietetic Association and the American Diabetes Association has revised Exchange List for Meal Planning. Changes were made, as deemed necessary, on the basis of nutritional recommendations for persons with diabetes as understood in 1986. Major changes include rewriting the text to make it more useful in the education of persons with diabetes; changing the order of the exchange lists to emphasize a high-carbohydrate, high-fiber diet, as well as to better reflect the order of foods in menu planning; adding symbols to foods high in fiber and sodium; changing nutritive values for the starch/bread and fruit lists; adding lists of combination foods, free foods, and foods recommended only for occasional use; developing a data base; and initiating a plan for field testing and evaluation. The committee also developed a simplified meal planning tool, Healthy Food Choices, to be used for initial or "survival" level education. In poster format, foods are grouped by calories into six food groups. Approximate portion sizes of commonly used foods are listed. Blank lines are provided for the nutrition counselor to write in a suggested menu or meal plan for the client. Because the booklet does not use the word "diabetes" specifically, it is appropriate as a general teaching tool.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.