Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M L Swartz

Publications and source records attributed to M L Swartz.

125 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.

This in vitro study evaluated the ability of three commercially available adhesive resins to reduce microleakage and provide retention between amalgam restorations and tooth structure. Results indicated that Amalgambond reduced leakage significantly more than Panavia EX, Prisma Universal Bond 2, and Copalite. In addition Amalgambond and Panavia EX exhibited the ability to bond amalgam to tooth structure. These results suggest that Amalgambond has the potential for serving successfully as a cavity liner with amalgam.

Analysis of Variance↗

The effect of surface treatment on the Knoop hardness of Dicor.

One advantage cited for the use of Dicor over other ceramic materials is a reported Knoop hardness comparable to human enamel. However, when fabricating dental restorations, a Dicor glass-ceramic casting generally is subjected to several different surface treatments because of processing, esthetic, and functional requirements. Therefore, this study compared the Knoop hardness of Dicor specimens under three conditions: (1) cerammed, (2) cerammed and shaded, and (3) sectioned to reveal internal material. Knoop hardness differences between groups were significant (P less than or equal to .05). The cerammed surface was the hardest; it was harder than human enamel. Shaded specimens had a surface hardness comparable to dental porcelain. However, the internal glass-ceramic material, located beneath the shading porcelain and cerammed surface, had a Knoop hardness slightly higher than that of human enamel.

Analysis of Variance↗

Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements.

Surface pH measurements were made over a 24-hour period for several luting cements and glass-ionomer lining and restorative materials. Of the luting cements, the water-mixed glass-ionomer cement, Ketac-Cem, had the lowest initial pH and the polycarboxylate, Durelon, had the highest. Three glass-ionomer lining materials showed differences in pH that increased over the entire test period. Two of the three visible-light-cured glass-ionomer liners evaluated showed similar pH values, while the third exhibited a considerably lower pH. The lower pH values found with the water-mixed glass-ionomer luting agent suggest that acidity may contribute to the posttreatment sensitivity associated with this material.

Dental Bonding↗

Comparison of microwave-polymerized denture base resins.

Three denture base resins, two designed for microwave polymerization and one for host-water-bath-processing, were compared. Results indicated that all four tested thicknesses (3, 6, 11.6, and 17.7 mm) of the water-bath-polymerized samples and one of the microwave-polymerized resins were porosity-free. When the water-bath-polymerized material was microwave processed, porosity was found when resin thickness exceeded 3 mm. When one resin designed for microwave polymerization was irradiated using the high-wattage (513 W), shorter cycle (4 minutes 52 seconds), porosity also occurred when the thickness exceeded 3 mm. Porosity did not occur until there was 9 mm of thickness when the lower-wattage (75.9 W), longer cycle (15 minutes 26 seconds) was used. No significant differences in transverse strength or hardness were noted between the materials.

Denture Bases↗

Comparative study: bond strength and microleakage with dentin bond systems.

Four commercial bond agent-composite systems were tested with respect to the strength of the bond to bovine dentin and their ability to seal class 5 erosion lesions without cavity preparation. At seven days there was no significant difference in the bond strengths of the four bonding agents, Scotchbond, Gluma, Tenure, and Scotchbond 2. Restorations placed with Gluma had significantly less leakage than those placed with other bond agents. At 90 days the bond strength of Tenure was reduced and was significantly less than that of the other systems, while Gluma and Scotchbond 2 restorations exhibited significantly less leakage than Scotchbond and Tenure. There was an inverse correlation (r2 = .5460) between bond strength and marginal leakage of class 5 restorations.

Animals↗

A comparison of resins for fabricating provisional fixed restorations.

Four acrylic resins and two composite resins for fabricating provisional fixed prosthodontic restorations were studied to determine temperature change during polymerization, surface hardness, marginal fit, wear resistance, transverse strength, transverse repair strength, surface roughness and polishability, color stability, and stain resistance. While certain materials exhibited advantageous properties in one or more of the tests, no one material was superior to the others in all tests.

Acrylic Resins↗

Efficacy testing of visible-light-curing units.

This study evaluated (1) the effect of known reductions in the output of curing lights on the depth of cure of various resins as determined by hardness measurements, and (2) the ability of the clinician to detect reduced light output by use of an explorer to compare the hardness of the top and bottom surfaces of resin specimens. Curing light output was reduced stepwise from 10 to 70% with neutral density filters. Hardness values indicated polymerization of the top surface to be generally unaffected by light blockage. Bottom surfaces were greatly affected: more with a 30-second than a 60-second cure time. Three clinicians utilized an explorer to compare the tops and bottoms of specimens of known hardness. Evaluators were unable to routinely detect differences of less than 20 to 30 Barcol numbers. The data indicate that a light meter is a more efficacious means of monitoring curing light performance than is a tactile test of resin surface hardness.

Composite Resins↗

Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ.

An in vitro study of 60 teeth examined the cervical microleakage of class 5 composite resin restorations in regard to preparation design and location from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Four groups of 15 teeth each were prepared for a class 5 composite resin restoration with the cervical margins finished as follows: a butt joint margin placed less than 1 mm from the CEJ, a beveled margin placed less than 1 mm from the CEJ, a butt joint placed greater than 1.5 mm from the CEJ, and a beveled margin placed greater than 1.5 mm from the CEJ. The teeth were acid etched, treated with an enamel bonding agent, and restored with a microfilled composite resin, and then sectioned for further analysis. The sectioned specimens were evaluated for cervical microleakage by Ca45 autoradiography. The butt joint margins placed less than 1 mm from the CEJ had significantly more microleakage than the other groups, indicating that all enamel margins of a class 5 composite resin restoration should be beveled to decrease microleakage regardless of their location relative to the cementoenamel junction.

Composite Resins↗

The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.

The marginal adaptation and microleakage of the glass-ionomer-lined composite resin restoration in simulated erosion and conventional class 5 preparations were evaluated. The most common site of leakage for all restorations was the gingival margin. In erosion lesion restorations, the etched thick liners were superior to the etched thin liners with respect to marginal leakage. Acid-etched and unetched liners in both the erosion lesion and the conventional class 5 restorations were comparable. Under the SEM a gap was often found in the liner rather than at the liner-resin interface in restorations with etched liners.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.

This study examined the linear dimensional stability of nonaqueous elastomeric impressions made from stock and custom trays by measuring casts derived from those impressions at 1 hour, 1 day, and 1 week. There was a small statistical difference among casts produced from stock versus custom trays compared to the master model. However, there was no significant difference in casts produced from impressions poured at 1 hour, 1 day, and 1 week. A custom tray with a 2.0 to 2.5 mm tray spacing had the least amount of variation, yet the differences between custom and stock trays may not be clinically significant.

Analysis of Variance↗

The effects of varied etching time and etching solution viscosity on bond strength and enamel morphology.

The effects of varied etching time and etching solution viscosity on bond strength were evaluated by measuring the tensile bond strength of a composite resin to bovine enamel. Also, six enamel surfaces were examined to evaluate the effect of acid treatment on the morphology of etched enamel using scanning electron microscopy. There was no significant difference in tensile bond strength between three etchants of differing viscosity or between etch times. Light microscopy revealed that most bond failures were cohesive in nature. When the three etchants of differing viscosity were compared under the scanning electron microscope, the liquid and the thin gel produced a more even etch pattern than the thick gel. In addition, the thin gel appeared to produce the most well-defined pattern of the three conditioners.

Acid Etching, Dental↗